|
 02-04-2009, 04:22 AM
 |
LibrarianThorne wrote:

|
Though I will say, the only thing that bugged me abou the Dominion War was the complete absence of the Enterprise-D or Enterprise-E.
|
Well, I think that speaks to the feeling that DS9 "isn't really Trek." If the Next Generation crew were around, it would be hard to overlook that the Dominion is the sort of problem they usually faced down and disposed of in the course of a single episode: Picard would shout at someone, Riker would bang a Founder, and it would end when Geordi and Data whip up a multiphasic protoion wave and boost it through the main deflector dish to turn the shapeshifters back into goo.
I'm being a bit glib, but that does highlight the distinction between DS9 and the other Treks - it is drama and tragedy, and they are melodrama. I hasten to add, however, that when it was coined the Greek word "melodrama" did not carry the negative connotations it does today.
DS9 experimented with character arcs and stories that explored the fallout and consequences of previous choices. By contrast, the original series and Next Generation featured characters who were archetypal and basically superheroes in all but name. That's not a bad thing; creating a set of iconic characters with easily-recognizable attributes and putting them into different situations without actually changing them very much is a completely valid approach to storytelling that has worked for centuries.
Sticking the TNG characters into DS9 would have made those differences really uncomfortably apparent, however, and it would do neither set of characters any favors - either you make Picard and company less heroic and competent, or the DS9 group looks frazzled, neurotic, and morally suspect by contrast. I think the best thing for all concerned is to assume that the Enterprise was off at the edge of the galaxy dealing with even bigger threats than the Dominion. |
__________________
|
| #1234
|
|
|