Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

EA hasn't changed everything - extends NFL exclusivity till 2012

cloudeaglecloudeagle Registered User regular
Yeah yeah, two EA topics in a row, but this is a big bit of news that may contradict the image of the newly modest EA. Peter Moore says EA has locked up the NFL license till 2012, continuing to effectively hobble the competition.

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/851/851316p1.html

In the interview Moore also says EA needs to make more casual football games, but that they aren't really going to change Madden.

I really can't decide if this is a good business decision that doesn't contradict company's new openness, or a good business decision that continues EA's tradition of being jerks.

Also, how has football gaming fared in the four years EA has had the exclusive rights? Has Madden suffered? Has anyone else managed to make a viable football game without the NFL? I don't know, I'm honestly asking.

cloudeagle on
Zangief wrote:
My low point came while I was crushing man's skull like sparrow's egg between my thighs. But then I thought to myself, "who else would crush man's skull like sparrow's egg between his thighs?"
3DS: 0344-9335-6762
«13

Posts

  • ÆthelredÆthelred Registered User
    Why the fuck wouldn't they sign this deal? Some other company needs to man up and create a rival football videogame franchise. It's not impossible without the license; Pro Evolution Soccer sells more than Fifa these days.

    pokes: 1505 8032 8399
  • Rorus RazRorus Raz C'est Waa Vie Registered User, Super Moderator, Moderator mod
    I'm glad they had the business savvy not to waste money on years after the Mayan apocalypse.

    But yeah, a lack of competition is bad news for the Madden series and the Football sub genre as a whole. I wish other companies would get creative and make a wholly new football game with a vivid, imaginary league, but the reality is that the target demographic is definitely buying this game for the NFL license.

    57SICde.png
  • ChewyWafflesChewyWaffles Registered User
    Why shouldn't EA work towards a guaranteed revenue stream from its sports licenses?

    It's great for EA. Bad for gamers and (I argue) the NFL. They just don't know it.

    mwf2sig.jpg
  • ChewyWafflesChewyWaffles Registered User
    Æthelred wrote: »
    Why the fuck wouldn't they sign this deal? Some other company needs to man up and create a rival football videogame franchise. It's not impossible without the license; Pro Evolution Soccer sells more than Fifa these days.

    Yes it is. You can't compete against a real license with real players in the NFL arena.

    mwf2sig.jpg
  • darleysamdarleysam Registered User regular
    They're still in the business of making money, and if they believe this will make them more money than losing exclusivity, then they'll keep doing it. Earth still spherical, sun still hot etc.

  • Grid SystemGrid System Registered User
    Why shouldn't EA work towards a guaranteed revenue stream from its sports licenses?

    It's great for EA. Bad for gamers.
    I guess I don't see a downside because I've never really liked sports games anyway, but I am interested in other EA games - Army of Two and Dead Space, for example - and anything that gives EA more money to make those kinds of games is good news for me.
    Smudge wrote: »
    Before we get in a tizzy about this, WHO is the one who went after exclusivity?

    The way I understand it, it was the NFL, not EA that wanted the exclusive deal.
    This too.

  • cloudeaglecloudeagle Registered User regular
    Why the fuck wouldn't they sign this deal? Some other company needs to man up and create a rival football videogame franchise. It's not impossible without the license; Pro Evolution Soccer sells more than Fifa these days.

    That's one of my questions. It's been four years... why hasn't anyone created a rival football franchise? Is it truly impossible? With the way the market demands their men conform to actual football players, it very well may be impossible to create a competing product that turns a profit.

    Zangief wrote:
    My low point came while I was crushing man's skull like sparrow's egg between my thighs. But then I thought to myself, "who else would crush man's skull like sparrow's egg between his thighs?"
    3DS: 0344-9335-6762
  • galenbladegalenblade Registered User regular
    Smudge wrote: »
    Before we get in a tizzy about this, WHO is the one who went after exclusivity?

    The way I understand it, it was the NFL, not EA that wanted the exclusive deal. The NFL for whatever weird reason LOVES exclusive deals. Gatoraide is the exclusive drink, reebok is the exclusive shoe, etc... They wanted to extend their exclusive branding into their games and only deal with one dev.

    NFL chose EA is the story I have heard, I even heard that ESPN and 2k had more money on the table. This could all be a load of bull, but there are a few different stories out there. Make sure you get the right one before starting a thread/rant.

    Edit: for the record I am 2k sports nut and own every 2k football game ever made. I still go back and play the one that had first person football a lot. I forget which year that it, but it is the one sitting on my shelf that gets played 10x more than Madden.

    You're half right.
    "We (EA) have proposed exclusivity several times in the past, but this year, in the spring the NFL had an off-site meeting, and they decided to consider bids for exclusivity," Brown told IGN in an exclusive interview. "Several bids were submitted but they accepted EA's. I cannot tell you how much this cost, but exclusivity is expensive, we are paying a premium. It wasn't cheap. I can tell you this, though, all parties all happy with this agreement, and Wall Street seems happy with it too."

    EA started putting the idea into the NFL's head, started lobbying for them to consider exclusivity deals. They then submitted the best proposal.

    So yeah. The NFL may have considered others, but it was EA that caused this exclusivity deal to come around in the first place.

    linksig.jpg
  • acidlacedpenguinacidlacedpenguin Registered User regular
    well maybe its because I'm not part of the unwashed masses, but I wouldn't not play a football game if it had completely made up teams if the game play was fun and interesting. . . but then again I'd probably play Madden if it was fun and interesting.


    does anyone remember mutant league football (and no I'm not talking about teams from San Fransisco)? That game was the shit and it didn't have real teams.

    GT: Acidboogie PSNid: AcidLacedPenguiN
  • korodullinkorodullin What. Registered User regular
    galenblade wrote: »
    So yeah. The NFL may have considered others, but it was EA that caused this exclusivity deal to come around in the first place.

    I see it as more like a genie that the old EA administration let out that can't really be put back into the bottle. Tying up NFL exclucivity for x number of years may not fit in line with the new ways of thinking, but if EA didn't sign an extention to the contract, then another company sure as hell would have.

  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Chareth Cutestory Lawyer of the SeaRegistered User regular
    Aw man. Now NFL-loving gamers will have to choose the option they would have chosen anyways were a rival series present. A series that, despite the cries of "lol EA makes the same game every year", actually does more than upgrade the roster.

    wRbeRNg.jpg
    Xbox: UnbreakableVows | PSN/Wii U: UnbreakableVow | 3DS: 1521-3241-9354
  • WingedWeaselWingedWeasel Registered User regular
    I can imagine it's close to impossible to create a competitor to madden since people really do only want to play as "real" NFL players. Mutant League Football was fun, although my memory may be fuzzy. Any game that tries to match-up with madden is probably going to have to have some gimmick to really sway non-sports gamers since the others I am willing to be will buy madden to play as their favorite team/players.

    Also can someone explain the hatred towards madden (the game not the person)? Personally I believe some competition would (hopefully) force more innovation/better games but sometimes it comes across as if madden is some kind of abomination that disfigures you just from thinking about it.


    XBL GT: Winged Weasel
  • BamaBama Registered User regular
    mutant league football
    This was going to be my response to the question of whether or not you could make a non-licensed football game and have it work. I'm pretty sure people will play what's fun.

    edit: To throw in my own $0.02 on the Madden hate: I think a lot of it stems from blatantly whoring the franchise. Now that console patching and DLC are becoming more and more prevalent, I think it's going to be even more grating for the driving force of a sequel to be a roster update. Instead of coming up with a feature that they thing warrants a new release, EA seems to scramble to find a new gimmick (hit stick, QB LoS) each year so they'll have a new bullet point in their marketing.

    "Despite all the bitching, if Diablo 3 sucks, I will eat my own cock. Counter-claim: If Diablo 3 does not suck, I will have a list of whiners who need to eat cocks." - Zen Vulgarity
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    cloudeagle wrote: »
    Also, how has football gaming fared in the four years EA has had the exclusive rights? Has Madden suffered? Has anyone else managed to make a viable football game without the NFL? I don't know, I'm honestly asking.


    There's been Midway's Blitz: The League, which was basically a parody of the NFL and is due for a next-gen sequel this year, and 2K's All Pro Football 2K8, which featured retired "football legends" who could be contracted without haivng to deal with the NFL. Neither game sold particularly well or was very well recieved by critics.

    vvvvvv-dithw.png
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    Aw man. Now NFL-loving gamers will have to choose the option they would have chosen anyways were a rival series present. A series that, despite the cries of "lol EA makes the same game every year", actually does more than upgrade the roster.

    There was a whole bunch of shit planned for Madden 06 that got cut from the development plan as soon as the exclusivity deal was signed and EA knew they could cheap out. Competition is always a good thing.

    vvvvvv-dithw.png
  • JohnHamJohnHam Registered User regular
    I found Madden 08 on 360 to be quite good. I've played the hell out of it, and I'll probably buy 09 too.

    EA would have to be stone cold retarded not to sign this deal, anyway.

    Twitter?
    LoL: j0hnh4m
  • cloudeaglecloudeagle Registered User regular
    Daedalus wrote: »
    cloudeagle wrote: »
    Also, how has football gaming fared in the four years EA has had the exclusive rights? Has Madden suffered? Has anyone else managed to make a viable football game without the NFL? I don't know, I'm honestly asking.


    There's been Midway's Blitz: The League, which was basically a parody of the NFL and is due for a next-gen sequel this year, and 2K's All Pro Football 2K8, which featured retired "football legends" who could be contracted without haivng to deal with the NFL. Neither game sold particularly well or was very well recieved by critics.

    So it's inconclusive as to whether non-Madden titles won't sell without real-world players, since the games were shitty. Hm.

    Zangief wrote:
    My low point came while I was crushing man's skull like sparrow's egg between my thighs. But then I thought to myself, "who else would crush man's skull like sparrow's egg between his thighs?"
    3DS: 0344-9335-6762
  • acidlacedpenguinacidlacedpenguin Registered User regular
    well considering that Madden is the very embodiment of any and every evil transgression EA has ever made fully realized into a single, yearly renewable doom machine. DOOM MACHINE.

    I'm not going to go further because EA has done some good things for the industry, but for that period of EA's existence Madden is the one and only shining token of their. . . well, for lack of a better term: Satanity.

    GT: Acidboogie PSNid: AcidLacedPenguiN
  • JohnHamJohnHam Registered User regular
    cloudeagle wrote: »
    Daedalus wrote: »
    cloudeagle wrote: »
    Also, how has football gaming fared in the four years EA has had the exclusive rights? Has Madden suffered? Has anyone else managed to make a viable football game without the NFL? I don't know, I'm honestly asking.


    There's been Midway's Blitz: The League, which was basically a parody of the NFL and is due for a next-gen sequel this year, and 2K's All Pro Football 2K8, which featured retired "football legends" who could be contracted without haivng to deal with the NFL. Neither game sold particularly well or was very well recieved by critics.

    So it's inconclusive as to whether non-Madden titles won't sell without real-world players, since the games were shitty. Hm.

    I thought Blitz the league was a pretty fun arcadey football game. In fact, my buddies at college only started playing Madden at all because our League disc broke.

    Twitter?
    LoL: j0hnh4m
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    cloudeagle wrote: »
    Daedalus wrote: »
    cloudeagle wrote: »
    Also, how has football gaming fared in the four years EA has had the exclusive rights? Has Madden suffered? Has anyone else managed to make a viable football game without the NFL? I don't know, I'm honestly asking.


    There's been Midway's Blitz: The League, which was basically a parody of the NFL and is due for a next-gen sequel this year, and 2K's All Pro Football 2K8, which featured retired "football legends" who could be contracted without haivng to deal with the NFL. Neither game sold particularly well or was very well recieved by critics.

    So it's inconclusive as to whether non-Madden titles won't sell without real-world players, since the games were shitty. Hm.

    Or perhaps the critics were a bit harder on them because they didn't have the actual rosters. Also, Madden doesn't usually get reviewed very well either, and that's never stopped it from selling. It's really hard to say.

    vvvvvv-dithw.png
  • galenbladegalenblade Registered User regular
    Aw man. Now NFL-loving gamers will have to choose the option they would have chosen anyways were a rival series present. A series that, despite the cries of "lol EA makes the same game every year", actually does more than upgrade the roster.

    A lot of NFL-lovers chose the NFL 2K series. At least enough to make EA worried and subsequently go after exclusivity.

    linksig.jpg
  • The_ScarabThe_Scarab Registered User regular
    Has there been another series which is as fun to play as Madden, from a purely gameplay perscpective. Especially Madden 08.

    From what I understand, many of the competition try to blame failings in their game design on not having the license. Which seems more than dickish.

    scarab you have mental problems
  • DirtyDirty Registered User regular
    Yeah, its not that evil that EA put in the highest bid to get the exclusive deal, its not that evil that they extended the deal. It IS evil that they gave the NFL the idea in the first place.

    Considering that Madden's only REAL competition was the NFL 2K series, EA should have bought the fucking studio (I mean, they do that all the time). Then incorporated that studio into their own to help make Madden better. Instead, they went with option B: Destroy the 2K series and NOT make Madden better. Its the classic lose-lose for gamers.

    I personally don't play the games, but have co-workers that do, and they all say Madden has just felt lazy the last few years.

  • acidlacedpenguinacidlacedpenguin Registered User regular
    cloudeagle wrote: »
    Daedalus wrote: »
    cloudeagle wrote: »
    Also, how has football gaming fared in the four years EA has had the exclusive rights? Has Madden suffered? Has anyone else managed to make a viable football game without the NFL? I don't know, I'm honestly asking.


    There's been Midway's Blitz: The League, which was basically a parody of the NFL and is due for a next-gen sequel this year, and 2K's All Pro Football 2K8, which featured retired "football legends" who could be contracted without haivng to deal with the NFL. Neither game sold particularly well or was very well recieved by critics.

    So it's inconclusive as to whether non-Madden titles won't sell without real-world players, since the games were shitty. Hm.


    EA should prove this once and for all - by developing a football game that doesn't have real players, then launch it aside the Madden flagship. See if it sells at all.

    GT: Acidboogie PSNid: AcidLacedPenguiN
  • FiarynFiaryn Omnicidal Madman Registered User regular
    Grass still green.

    Soul Silver FC: 1935 3141 6240
    White FC: 0819 3350 1787
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Chareth Cutestory Lawyer of the SeaRegistered User regular
    galenblade wrote: »
    Aw man. Now NFL-loving gamers will have to choose the option they would have chosen anyways were a rival series present. A series that, despite the cries of "lol EA makes the same game every year", actually does more than upgrade the roster.

    A lot of NFL-lovers chose the NFL 2K series. At least enough to make EA worried and subsequently go after exclusivity.

    I don't really believe that. I believe the bit about some people choosing the 2K series, but not the bit about it making them worry. Even when 2K was alive, didn't Madden still have the highest-selling game like pretty much every year?

    Compare them to Wal-Mart. A lot of people might choose other places to shop, even boycotting Wal-Mart outright, but I wouldn't say Wal-Mart was actually worried about this. And if they got a chance like EA did, they'd simply eliminate the competition so that the consumer had no choice. That I can see as being kind of dickish, but really, I'm sure that like eight out of ten football gamers chose Madden anyway.

    wRbeRNg.jpg
    Xbox: UnbreakableVows | PSN/Wii U: UnbreakableVow | 3DS: 1521-3241-9354
  • JohnHamJohnHam Registered User regular
    I've played Madden at least a few times every edition, and I would say the Next-Gen jump brought the most changes in recent memory (they changed the entire playbook layout, and the way you choose plays, etc.). 08 to me was probably the second biggest change. They added the idea of on-field weapons, which gives certain players the ability to make crazy catches or bomb the ball downfield or juke around a d-lineman. I found it legitimately satisfying using these roles - they didn't just do certain things better - being a "Weapon" actually allowed you to use moves with that player that others couldn't, etc.

    Twitter?
    LoL: j0hnh4m
  • galenbladegalenblade Registered User regular
    galenblade wrote: »
    Aw man. Now NFL-loving gamers will have to choose the option they would have chosen anyways were a rival series present. A series that, despite the cries of "lol EA makes the same game every year", actually does more than upgrade the roster.

    A lot of NFL-lovers chose the NFL 2K series. At least enough to make EA worried and subsequently go after exclusivity.

    I don't really believe that. I believe the bit about some people choosing the 2K series, but not the bit about it making them worry. Even when 2K was alive, didn't Madden still have the highest-selling game like pretty much every year?

    Compare them to Wal-Mart. A lot of people might choose other places to shop, even boycotting Wal-Mart outright, but I wouldn't say Wal-Mart was actually worried about this. And if they got a chance like EA did, they'd simply eliminate the competition so that the consumer had no choice. That I can see as being kind of dickish, but really, I'm sure that like eight out of ten football gamers chose Madden anyway.

    More like six out of ten, which is a good chunk of market share.

    # Madden NFL 2005 (PS2) - 3.2 million
    # ESPN NFL 2K5 (PS2) - 1.5 million

    2K5 actually outsold Madden on the Xbox, as well. If I was EA, I'd have been worried.

    linksig.jpg
  • UnbreakableVowUnbreakableVow Chareth Cutestory Lawyer of the SeaRegistered User regular
    galenblade wrote: »
    galenblade wrote: »
    Aw man. Now NFL-loving gamers will have to choose the option they would have chosen anyways were a rival series present. A series that, despite the cries of "lol EA makes the same game every year", actually does more than upgrade the roster.

    A lot of NFL-lovers chose the NFL 2K series. At least enough to make EA worried and subsequently go after exclusivity.

    I don't really believe that. I believe the bit about some people choosing the 2K series, but not the bit about it making them worry. Even when 2K was alive, didn't Madden still have the highest-selling game like pretty much every year?

    Compare them to Wal-Mart. A lot of people might choose other places to shop, even boycotting Wal-Mart outright, but I wouldn't say Wal-Mart was actually worried about this. And if they got a chance like EA did, they'd simply eliminate the competition so that the consumer had no choice. That I can see as being kind of dickish, but really, I'm sure that like eight out of ten football gamers chose Madden anyway.

    More like six out of ten, which is a good chunk of market share.

    # Madden NFL 2005 (PS2) - 3.2 million
    # ESPN NFL 2K5 (PS2) - 1.5 million

    2K5 actually outsold Madden on the Xbox, as well. If I was EA, I'd have been worried.

    Hmm, I stand corrected. But wasn't the 2K series much cheaper as well? Surely that's got to count for something in those figures.

    wRbeRNg.jpg
    Xbox: UnbreakableVows | PSN/Wii U: UnbreakableVow | 3DS: 1521-3241-9354
  • BamaBama Registered User regular
    Also they made the box shiny to attract simpletons.

    "Despite all the bitching, if Diablo 3 sucks, I will eat my own cock. Counter-claim: If Diablo 3 does not suck, I will have a list of whiners who need to eat cocks." - Zen Vulgarity
  • RedShellRedShell Registered User
    In the end, I think this is more the NFL's 'fault' than EA's. There's lots more interesting football software to be made than is made (I can imagine some fun interfaces with fantasy leagues, prizes, competitions, etc.) and the NFL would rather pocket the exclusivity money than let the market create cool stuff.

    Homing In Imperfectly?
    Pokemans D/P: 1289 4685 0522
  • galenbladegalenblade Registered User regular
    galenblade wrote: »
    galenblade wrote: »
    Aw man. Now NFL-loving gamers will have to choose the option they would have chosen anyways were a rival series present. A series that, despite the cries of "lol EA makes the same game every year", actually does more than upgrade the roster.

    A lot of NFL-lovers chose the NFL 2K series. At least enough to make EA worried and subsequently go after exclusivity.

    I don't really believe that. I believe the bit about some people choosing the 2K series, but not the bit about it making them worry. Even when 2K was alive, didn't Madden still have the highest-selling game like pretty much every year?

    Compare them to Wal-Mart. A lot of people might choose other places to shop, even boycotting Wal-Mart outright, but I wouldn't say Wal-Mart was actually worried about this. And if they got a chance like EA did, they'd simply eliminate the competition so that the consumer had no choice. That I can see as being kind of dickish, but really, I'm sure that like eight out of ten football gamers chose Madden anyway.

    More like six out of ten, which is a good chunk of market share.

    # Madden NFL 2005 (PS2) - 3.2 million
    # ESPN NFL 2K5 (PS2) - 1.5 million

    2K5 actually outsold Madden on the Xbox, as well. If I was EA, I'd have been worried.

    Hmm, I stand corrected. But wasn't the 2K series much cheaper as well? Surely that's got to count for something in those figures.

    That's true, the game was $20 to Madden's $50. The price difference probably had an effect, but it was still eating up marketshare like candy. If people kept moving to the 2K series, it would've been trouble for the Madden franchise.

    linksig.jpg
  • DirtyDirty Registered User regular
    IIRC, when 2K sports announced their $20 price model, EA mocked them saying that even if they gave their games away for free (with a free ham sandwich), people would still choose EA. When the games came out, and a lot of people didn't choose EA, they dropped many of their own games to $30. This was before Christmas shopping was over, and Madden and Live are always huge Christmas time sellers. They were very obviously worried about 2K. I don't think its a coincidence that the deal with the NFL came soon after that.

  • LotharsLothars Registered User
    Yes it was much cheaper than madden that year but it was also way better than madden.

    I still think that NFL 2k5 is still easily one of the best football games released and well madden 08 is really good but it's still not as good as NFL 2k5 but I have hopes for Madden 09, but I don't like this exclusivity contract, it's really bad though that Madden is still playing catch up on the 2k series after all this time.

  • DirtyDirty Registered User regular
    I heard All Pro Football wasn't all that great, but I bet they weren't as well funded by their publisher as they were prior to the NFL/EA deal. Why would their publisher risk such a loss knowing that the loss of both the NFL and ESPN would ruin any chances of the game being able to compete with Madden anymore.

  • Kuribo's ShoeKuribo's Shoe Masks, huh? Mine's superior.Registered User regular
    Why shouldn't EA work towards a guaranteed revenue stream from its sports licenses?

    because that means they're evil!

    let visual concepts work on their all-star franchise. it needs work, to be sure.

    Untitled_zpsc5dd016b.png
  • Kuribo's ShoeKuribo's Shoe Masks, huh? Mine's superior.Registered User regular
    also, I loved blitz the league. I hope they bring out a sequel. If that game's an example of what you can do with an unlicensed sports game, sign me up.

    Untitled_zpsc5dd016b.png
  • Lindsey LohanLindsey Lohan Registered User regular
    The NFL was not just pushing for an exclusive license because of EA hinting - they were trying to clean up the image of the league and weren't pleased with stuff like late hits and poor sportmanship in Blitz. By giving exclusivity to one company they can have an easier time managing their games for the content they feel is appropriate for their image.

    It's a shame it will continue as I preferred the 2k series as well, but at least the license is in competant hands - Madden is a very good game and as much as people bitch they've done a decent job keeping it fresh given they are required to do yearly updates.

    steam_sig.png
  • Kuribo's ShoeKuribo's Shoe Masks, huh? Mine's superior.Registered User regular
    RedShell wrote: »
    In the end, I think this is more the NFL's 'fault' than EA's. There's lots more interesting football software to be made than is made (I can imagine some fun interfaces with fantasy leagues, prizes, competitions, etc.) and the NFL would rather pocket the exclusivity money than let the market create cool stuff.

    another good point. the NFL wanted exclusivity. EA could afford it, why the hell wouldn't they ensure their most valuable franchise would stay alive?

    As long as the NFL demands exclusivity, Madden will be the only game in town.

    Untitled_zpsc5dd016b.png
  • mugginnsmugginns Registered User regular
    Bama wrote: »
    mutant league football
    This was going to be my response to the question of whether or not you could make a non-licensed football game and have it work. I'm pretty sure people will play what's fun.

    edit: To throw in my own $0.02 on the Madden hate: I think a lot of it stems from blatantly whoring the franchise. Now that console patching and DLC are becoming more and more prevalent, I think it's going to be even more grating for the driving force of a sequel to be a roster update. Instead of coming up with a feature that they thing warrants a new release, EA seems to scramble to find a new gimmick (hit stick, QB LoS) each year so they'll have a new bullet point in their marketing.

    Despite the fact that mutant league football comes up every time football games are mentioned, real football fans don't want to play mutant league football, and it would sell like shit.

    Re: why haven't people made an alternate game, they tried. APF is a great game but didn't sell.

    E26cO.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.