The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Basically, you simply take the coefficient and multiply it by the variable term its in front of. ex. 15x^2, basically 15 times the basic x^2 function. So if x=5, then the value becomes 15 * (5)^2 = 15*25 = 375.
Basically, you simply take the coefficient and multiply it by the variable term its in front of. ex. 15x^2, basically 15 times the basic x^2 function. So if x=5, then the value becomes 15 * (5)^2 = 15*25 = 375.
So in the above, what is the coefficient?
Rhino on
0
MetalbourneInside a cluster b personalityRegistered Userregular
Basically, you simply take the coefficient and multiply it by the variable term its in front of. ex. 15x^2, basically 15 times the basic x^2 function. So if x=5, then the value becomes 15 * (5)^2 = 15*25 = 375.
For basic algebra, a coefficient is the constant multiplier of a collection of variables and powers of variables multiplied together, with one for each separate term. So for the function 5x^2 - 8x + 3, the coefficients are 5, -8, and 3, corresponding to the terms 5x^2, -8x, and 3 respectively. If a question asked what the coefficient of x^2 was in that equation you'd answer 5, and if it asked what the coefficient of x was you'd answer -8.
Coefficient can mean other things in other contexts, but this is the most basic math meaning of the word.
The answer in back of book (for pratice set) says that 8 is the numeral coefficient, x is the variable coefficent and has a 'strike' though 9 or z (meaning they aren't coefficients). Why aren't 9 or z a coefficient?
So coefficient can be defined as "something you multiply against"?
What about this?
(A + 4
4 would be the numerial coefficient, right? What type of coefficients are A & B?
The answer in back of book (for pratice set) says that 8 is the numeral coefficient, x is the variable coefficent and has a 'strike' though 9 or z (meaning they aren't coefficients). Why aren't 9 or z a coefficient?
So coefficient can be defined as "something you multiply against"?
What about this?
(A + 4
4 would be the numerial coefficient, right? What type of coefficients are A & B?
That doesn't seem to make any sense. Does your book give a definition of the "variable, numerical, true, and real coefficients" that you asked about in the original post?
In mathematics, a coefficient is a constant multiplicative factor of a specific object. For example, in the expression 9x2, the coefficient of x2 is 9.
That doesn't seem to make any sense. Does your book give a definition of the "variable, numerical, true, and real coefficients" that you asked about in the original post?
no, it's a "review" chapater before the real stuff starts. It says we should of already taken and know this stuff.
Well hold up, 8x + 9z makes no sense. It's just a bunch of numbers and symbols.
That is the example from the book.
But F(x) = 8x + 9z makes sense. 8 would be a coefficient and 9z are constants.
Why isn't 9 a coefficient?
Because the variable in question is "x", not z.
If it were F(z) = 8x + 9z then 9 would be the coefficient.
Math books are always pulling this kind of shit.
But yeah, in terms of x, 9z isn't a coefficient.
Actually, wikipedia spells it out pretty good: a coefficient is a constant multiplicative factor of a specific object.
Thanks guys, I guess I understand.
In math terminology, what is a "specific object" defined as?
It's not really a math term, it's just anything that the focus is on. Like the focus being on x in your math book, even though it wasn't stated. As in "What is the coefficient of x in the equation 3x + 2y"
x is the specific object that we're talking about here.
Well hold up, 8x + 9z makes no sense. It's just a bunch of numbers and symbols.
That is the example from the book.
But F(x) = 8x + 9z makes sense. 8 would be a coefficient and 9z are constants.
Why isn't 9 a coefficient?
Because the variable in question is "x", not z.
If it were F(z) = 8x + 9z then 9 would be the coefficient.
Math books are always pulling this kind of shit.
But yeah, in terms of x, 9z isn't a coefficient.
Actually, wikipedia spells it out pretty good: a coefficient is a constant multiplicative factor of a specific object.
Thanks guys, I guess I understand.
In math terminology, what is a "specific object" defined as?
It's not really a math term, it's just anything that the focus is on. Like the focus being on x in your math book, even though it wasn't stated. As in "What is the coefficient of x in the equation 3x + 2y"
x is the specific object that we're talking about here.
ok.
So coefficient just means "number" or variable that we're "concerned" with. got it. Thanks.
Well hold up, 8x + 9z makes no sense. It's just a bunch of numbers and symbols.
That is the example from the book.
But F(x) = 8x + 9z makes sense. 8 would be a coefficient and 9z are constants.
Why isn't 9 a coefficient?
Because the variable in question is "x", not z.
If it were F(z) = 8x + 9z then 9 would be the coefficient.
Math books are always pulling this kind of shit.
But yeah, in terms of x, 9z isn't a coefficient.
Actually, wikipedia spells it out pretty good: a coefficient is a constant multiplicative factor of a specific object.
Thanks guys, I guess I understand.
In math terminology, what is a "specific object" defined as?
It's not really a math term, it's just anything that the focus is on. Like the focus being on x in your math book, even though it wasn't stated. As in "What is the coefficient of x in the equation 3x + 2y"
x is the specific object that we're talking about here.
ok.
So coefficient just means "number" or variable that we're "concerned" with. got it. Thanks.
This is probably going to confuse you, but no.
While a coefficient can be any real number, it's not a variable.
x is a variable. In other words, letters.
Metalbourne on
0
Inquisitor772 x Penny Arcade Fight Club ChampionA fixed point in space and timeRegistered Userregular
edited September 2009
OK guys, human cognition 101 - people learn concepts through examples. Stop using terminology.
1) The coefficient of x is 3.
2) The coefficient of y is 7.
3) The coefficient of z is 15. The coefficient of n is 2.
4) The coefficient of a is 6. The coefficient of x is 2. The coefficient of y is 9.
5) The coefficient of b is 48. The coefficient of g is 6. The coefficient of v is 1/12.
Sensing a pattern here? Later on you can worry about trick questions and specific objects. The basic concept is the same everywhere. These guys are just making you think too hard about something basic.
1) The coefficient of x is 3.
2) The coefficient of y is 7.
3) The coefficient of z is 15. The coefficient of n is 2. 4) The coefficient of a is 6. The coefficient of x is 2. The coefficient of y is 9.
5) The coefficient of b is 48. The coefficient of g is 6. The coefficient of v is 1/12.
Sensing a pattern here? Later on you can worry about trick questions and specific objects. The basic concept is the same everywhere. These guys are just making you think too hard about something basic.
Er, I'm pretty sure that number 4 is a bit off. Maybe you meant something else, because typically you want to expand out terms to get coefficients. So 6a(2x - 9y) = 12a*x - 54a*y, which has the coefficient 12 for a*x and -54 for a*y.
The question should be specific on what coefficient(s) in particular they are asking for if there is potential for ambiguity.
Savant on
0
MetalbourneInside a cluster b personalityRegistered Userregular
1) The coefficient of x is 3.
2) The coefficient of y is 7.
3) The coefficient of z is 15. The coefficient of n is 2. 4) The coefficient of a is 6. The coefficient of x is 2. The coefficient of y is 9.
5) The coefficient of b is 48. The coefficient of g is 6. The coefficient of v is 1/12.
Sensing a pattern here? Later on you can worry about trick questions and specific objects. The basic concept is the same everywhere. These guys are just making you think too hard about something basic.
Er, I'm pretty sure that number 4 is a bit off. Maybe you meant something else, because typically you want to expand out terms to get coefficients. So 6a(2x - 9y) = 12a*x - 54a*y, which has the coefficient 12 for a*x and -54 for a*y.
The question should be specific on what coefficient(s) in particular they are asking for if there is potential for ambiguity.
Technically you're right. (which is the best kind of right)
1) The coefficient of x is 3.
2) The coefficient of y is 7.
3) The coefficient of z is 15. The coefficient of n is 2. 4) The coefficient of a is 6. The coefficient of x is 2. The coefficient of y is 9.
5) The coefficient of b is 48. The coefficient of g is 6. The coefficient of v is 1/12.
Sensing a pattern here? Later on you can worry about trick questions and specific objects. The basic concept is the same everywhere. These guys are just making you think too hard about something basic.
Er, I'm pretty sure that number 4 is a bit off. Maybe you meant something else, because typically you want to expand out terms to get coefficients. So 6a(2x - 9y) = 12a*x - 54a*y, which has the coefficient 12 for a*x and -54 for a*y.
The question should be specific on what coefficient(s) in particular they are asking for if there is potential for ambiguity.
I might be wrong and this is kind of nitpicky, but couldn't you say that for: 6a(2x-9y), 6 is the coefficient of a(2x-9y) (ie: treating a(2x-9y) as one term affected by 6).
...like i said kinda really nitpicky....
Al_wat on
0
Casually HardcoreOnce an Asshole. Trying to be better.Registered Userregular
edited September 2009
6a(2x-9y), 6 is the coefficient of a(2x-9y) (ie: treating a(2x-9y) as one term affected by 6)
No, a(2x-9y) is two terms; 2xa - 2ya.
Casually Hardcore on
0
MetalbourneInside a cluster b personalityRegistered Userregular
I cant imagine why they would be teaching you this for more than 5 minutes.
It's almost trivial.
It seems like it is, but learning the vocabulary of math is pretty important.
You learn by actually doing math, not nitpicking about the definition of a coefficient.
No. There's a huge difference between (4x+9)dx and 4x+9dx. Getting your math definitions and nomenclature correct now will help you immensely when you continue your math education.
Posts
"Find the numerical coefficients in the below problems"
So in the above, what is the coefficient?
15. 15 is the number in front of the variable. 15 is the coefficient.
Coefficient can mean other things in other contexts, but this is the most basic math meaning of the word.
What about 8x + 9z?
The answer in back of book (for pratice set) says that 8 is the numeral coefficient, x is the variable coefficent and has a 'strike' though 9 or z (meaning they aren't coefficients). Why aren't 9 or z a coefficient?
So coefficient can be defined as "something you multiply against"?
What about this?
(A + 4
4 would be the numerial coefficient, right? What type of coefficients are A & B?
That doesn't seem to make any sense. Does your book give a definition of the "variable, numerical, true, and real coefficients" that you asked about in the original post?
from Wikipedia
If A and B are variables, then in 4(A+B), 4 is the coefficient. In 8x + 9z, 8 and 9 are the coefficients.
But F(x) = 8x + 9z makes sense. 8 would be a coefficient and 9z are constants.
That is the example from the book.
Why isn't 9 a coefficient?
Because the variable in question is "x", not z.
If it were F(z) = 8x + 9z then 9 would be the coefficient.
Math books are always pulling this kind of shit.
But yeah, in terms of x, 9z isn't a coefficient.
Actually, wikipedia spells it out pretty good: a coefficient is a constant multiplicative factor of a specific object.
Thanks guys, I guess I understand.
In math terminology, what is a "specific object" defined as?
It's not really a math term, it's just anything that the focus is on. Like the focus being on x in your math book, even though it wasn't stated. As in "What is the coefficient of x in the equation 3x + 2y"
x is the specific object that we're talking about here.
ok.
So coefficient just means "number" or variable that we're "concerned" with. got it. Thanks.
?
It's a refresher course.
This is probably going to confuse you, but no.
While a coefficient can be any real number, it's not a variable.
x is a variable. In other words, letters.
1) 3x
2) 7y
3) 15z + 2n
4) 6a(2x-9y)
5) 3 + 48b - v/12 + 6g
1) The coefficient of x is 3.
2) The coefficient of y is 7.
3) The coefficient of z is 15. The coefficient of n is 2.
4) The coefficient of a is 6. The coefficient of x is 2. The coefficient of y is 9.
5) The coefficient of b is 48. The coefficient of g is 6. The coefficient of v is 1/12.
Sensing a pattern here? Later on you can worry about trick questions and specific objects. The basic concept is the same everywhere. These guys are just making you think too hard about something basic.
Er, I'm pretty sure that number 4 is a bit off. Maybe you meant something else, because typically you want to expand out terms to get coefficients. So 6a(2x - 9y) = 12a*x - 54a*y, which has the coefficient 12 for a*x and -54 for a*y.
The question should be specific on what coefficient(s) in particular they are asking for if there is potential for ambiguity.
Technically you're right. (which is the best kind of right)
I might be wrong and this is kind of nitpicky, but couldn't you say that for: 6a(2x-9y), 6 is the coefficient of a(2x-9y) (ie: treating a(2x-9y) as one term affected by 6).
...like i said kinda really nitpicky....
No, a(2x-9y) is two terms; 2xa - 2ya.
I'm sure he meant factor in that.
It's almost trivial.
It seems like it is, but learning the vocabulary of math is pretty important.
You learn by actually doing math, not nitpicking about the definition of a coefficient.
No. There's a huge difference between (4x+9)dx and 4x+9dx. Getting your math definitions and nomenclature correct now will help you immensely when you continue your math education.