The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Every time you fall asleep, another remake is made

KrentzKrentz Registered User regular
edited October 2009 in Social Entropy++
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wY53IlNKdqw

So Michael Bay is remaking Nightmare on Elm Street. I know I should be used to needless remakes by now, but this one bugs me in a special way. The promotion for the movie even brags:

"Platinum Dunes--the production company behind the remakes of FRIDAY THE 13TH, THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, and THE AMITYVILLE HORROR--tackles another classic horror franchise with this redo of the Wes Craven film."

as if it's a good thing. Yes, the company guilty of twisting fondly-remembered classics into over-glossed soulless CGI-fests is doing it again! And this time to the classic horror movie that probably needs a remake the least.

Robert Englund is still making movies. In fact, he just played Freddy Krueger in a movie like 4 years ago. Do we really need a new one? Johnny Depp was even in the original!

Also I hate how the first scene of the trailer is Freddy running into the boiler room and getting burned up. It completely discards the creepy ghost story vibe of his backstory. It's similar to how we all know the reason Heath Ledger's Joker was so chilling was because of his well documented and filmed history amirite?

But hey they have Rorschach playing the new Freddy. Maybe that's cool?

What are your thoughts on this crap, SE++?

tl;dr: BAWWWWWWWWWW

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Krentz on
«13

Posts

  • KhavallKhavall British ColumbiaRegistered User regular
    edited October 2009
    NIGHTMARE ON EXSPLOSIONS STREET!


    NIGHTMARE ON EXPLOSIONS SPLOSIONS

    NIGHTSPLOSIONS SPLODE EXPLOSIONS SPLOSIONS

    Khavall on
  • nateknatek unh unh Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Kelly Leak is Freddy Krueger

    natek on
  • JordynJordyn Really, Commander? Probing Uranus. Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    I thought Michael Bay said he was gonna quit making movies because people kept making fun of him.

    Jordyn on
    thumbsupguy-1.jpg
    JordynNolz.com <- All my blogs (Shepard, Wasted, J'onn, DCAU) are here now!
  • KrentzKrentz Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    No that was Uwe Boll.

    Easy mistake to make tbh.

    Krentz on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Bad-BeatBad-Beat Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    there was an explosion in the trailer

    Bad-Beat on
  • MorivethMoriveth BREAKDOWN BREAKDOWN BREAKDOWN BREAKDOWNRegistered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Is that Clancy Brown in the intro

    Moriveth on
  • KrentzKrentz Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Bad-Beat wrote: »
    there was an explosion in the trailer

    1/45th of the movie length.

    1/45th of the explosions.

    Krentz on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • StaleStale Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    God Dammit


    STOP RAPING EVERYTHING THAT WAS GOOD ABOUT THE 80s GOD DAMMIT

    Stale on
    easysig2.jpg
  • Airking850Airking850 Ottawa, ONRegistered User regular
    edited October 2009
    "Nightmare on Elm Street 2010" still feels like it should take place in a crazy space futureland.

    Airking850 on
  • RankenphileRankenphile Passersby were amazed by the unusually large amounts of blood.Registered User, Moderator Mod Emeritus
    edited October 2009
    what the fuck

    god damn it

    god damn it

    Rankenphile on
    8406wWN.png
  • Bad-BeatBad-Beat Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    I don't care if this is jackie Earl Haley in this role. It should not be.

    Bad-Beat on
  • StaleghotiStaleghoti Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Stale wrote: »
    God Dammit


    STOP RAPING EVERYTHING THAT WAS GOOD ABOUT THE 80s GOD DAMMIT

    Adrian Brody

    in Robert Rodriguez's Predators

    Staleghoti on
    tmmysta-sig.png2wT1Q.gifYAH!YAH!STEAMYoutubeMixesPSN: Clintown
    Dear satan I wish for this or maybe some of this....oh and I'm a medium or a large.
  • 101101 Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    So did they run out of movie ideas or what?

    101 on
  • FAQFAQ Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    the wave of remakes was a pain in the ass 3 years ago, now it's just goddamn I don't know

    FAQ on
  • MorivethMoriveth BREAKDOWN BREAKDOWN BREAKDOWN BREAKDOWNRegistered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Hey, I guess that is Clancy Brown in the intro to the trailer!

    Clancy Brown is rad.

    Moriveth on
  • Bad-BeatBad-Beat Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    101 wrote: »
    So did they run out of movie ideas or what?

    a while ago

    Bad-Beat on
  • Josiah_9Josiah_9 Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Hollywood why must you destroy everthing I onced loved?

    Josiah_9 on
    Saturate.jpg
  • KrentzKrentz Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    This begs a couple disturbing questions:

    1) When it comes time to make sequels to Friday the 13th and Nightmare on Elm Street, will they be remakes of the original sequels? Will we see the new Jason in Manhattan in 10 years?

    2) At the end of Freddy vs Jason, there was a cliffhanger that made it seem like there would be more (no surprise there). Will this storyline continue? Will it exist as a parallel dimension to the remake storyline? Or do the remakes usurp the originals and will we never have Englund cracking jokes while slaughtering people again?

    Krentz on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • KhavallKhavall British ColumbiaRegistered User regular
    edited October 2009
    101 wrote: »
    So did they run out of movie ideas or what?

    If people already know the plot, instead of filling the movie with exposition, development, or any of that boring shit, you can just fill the entire movie in with explosions.

    Duh

    Khavall on
  • MorivethMoriveth BREAKDOWN BREAKDOWN BREAKDOWN BREAKDOWNRegistered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Look, I'm just sayin'

    Clancy Brown was awesome in The Shawshank Redemption

    Moriveth on
  • AneurhythmiaAneurhythmia Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Krentz wrote: »
    Will we see the new Jason in Manhattan in 10 years?

    This could be the only decent outcome of these tepid remakes.


    I don't understand why film companies don't just save themselves a boatload of cash, pick out the niche classics that have held up decently well, reprint the reels, and ship those out for large screen showings.

    Aneurhythmia on
  • Bad-BeatBad-Beat Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Moriveth wrote: »
    Look, I'm just sayin'

    Clancy Brown was awesome in The Shawshank Redemption

    I'd imagine he has a very limited role in this though.

    Bad-Beat on
  • AneurhythmiaAneurhythmia Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Khavall wrote: »
    101 wrote: »
    So did they run out of movie ideas or what?

    If people already know the plot, instead of filling the movie with exposition, development, or any of that boring shit, you can just fill the entire movie in with explosions.

    Duh

    There should be a new artistic synthesis of these seemingly competing elements of fiction called explosition.

    Aneurhythmia on
  • ShoggothShoggoth Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    "Also I hate how the first scene of the trailer is Freddy running into the boiler room and getting burned up. It completely discards the creepy ghost story vibe of his backstory."

    wait what that is his backstory.

    Did I miss something? Do you mean it is revealed too early? I mean, that is what happens in the original.

    Shoggoth on
    11tu0w1.jpg
  • FAQFAQ Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Krentz wrote: »
    Will we see the new Jason in Manhattan in 10 years?

    This could be the only decent outcome of these tepid remakes.


    I don't understand why film companies don't just save themselves a boatload of cash, pick out the niche classics that have held up decently well, reprint the reels, and ship those out for large screen showings.

    I wouldn't think that that has half the potential for making cash

    FAQ on
  • Peter EbelPeter Ebel CopenhagenRegistered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Fuck it, another vapid movie.

    Does Michael Bay have a huge boner for the franchises of yesteryear or is this a cash only deal? Like, is Michael Bay selling the idea of these remakes or is someone selling them to him?

    Peter Ebel on
    Fuck off and die.
  • FAQFAQ Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    unless of course they re-release everything in 3D

    which they are doing anyway

    http://www.moviesonline.ca/movienews_17381.html

    FAQ on
  • HacksawHacksaw J. Duggan Esq. Wrestler at LawRegistered User regular
    edited October 2009
    I don't get all the hate for these remakes.

    Hacksaw on
  • ShoggothShoggoth Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    FAQ wrote: »
    Krentz wrote: »
    Will we see the new Jason in Manhattan in 10 years?

    This could be the only decent outcome of these tepid remakes.


    I don't understand why film companies don't just save themselves a boatload of cash, pick out the niche classics that have held up decently well, reprint the reels, and ship those out for large screen showings.

    I wouldn't think that that has half the potential for making cash

    I would imagine it has almost no potential for cash.
    Peter Ebel wrote: »
    Fuck it, another vapid movie.

    Does Michael Bay have a huge boner for the franchises of yesteryear or is this a cash only deal? Like, is Michael Bay selling the idea of these remakes or is someone selling them to him?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platinum_Dunes

    Judging by how much money they're making I'd say Bay's intentions are purely monetary.


    The original is a classic don't get me wrong but it's fucking A Nightmare on Elm Street. There really isn't much there for those involved to fuck up other than excessive CGI, which is totally endemic to hollywood now any way.

    I'm not really that put off by this and I'd say I enjoy the original. I think I'm more upset that the climate of infinite remakes is pushing out the potential for new material than I am about a remake of an already arguably not astounding film.

    Shoggoth on
    11tu0w1.jpg
  • FAQFAQ Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    because it's boring

    and they are usually the same story told worse

    I don't have a problem with remakes if something interesting is done, more often then not it's crap

    FAQ on
  • Peter EbelPeter Ebel CopenhagenRegistered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Hacksaw wrote: »
    I don't get all the hate for these remakes.

    I hate many many things and have done so for a long time. Hatred is the background radiation of my emotional spectrum.

    Peter Ebel on
    Fuck off and die.
  • FAQFAQ Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Shoggoth wrote: »
    FAQ wrote: »
    Krentz wrote: »
    Will we see the new Jason in Manhattan in 10 years?

    This could be the only decent outcome of these tepid remakes.


    I don't understand why film companies don't just save themselves a boatload of cash, pick out the niche classics that have held up decently well, reprint the reels, and ship those out for large screen showings.

    I wouldn't think that that has half the potential for making cash

    I would imagine it has almost no potential for cash.

    The original is a classic don't get me wrong but it's fucking A Nightmare on Elm Street. There really isn't much there for those involved to fuck up other than excessive CGI, which is totally endemic to hollywood now any way.

    I'm not really that put off by this and I'd say I enjoy the original. I think I'm more upset that the climate of infinite remakes is pushing out the potential for new material than I am about a remake of an already arguably not astounding film.

    it's incredibly lazy and motivated solely by making easy cash, of course the film industry has always been about making money, really there's too much of an audience ready to pay for any old nostalgic crap.

    FAQ on
  • ShoggothShoggoth Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    FAQ wrote: »
    because it's boring

    and they are usually the same story told worse

    I don't have a problem with remakes if something interesting is done, more often then not it's crap

    Did you see Rob Zombie's Halloween remake? I thought it was actually quite well done and was very pleasantly surprised. His other movies were complete shit, but he injected a lot of depth into Halloween.

    One of the better remakes, especially horror, that I can think of in the past couple years. I don't know why it didn't get good reviews I thought it was borderline masterfully done for a horror film.

    Shoggoth on
    11tu0w1.jpg
  • PiptheFairPiptheFair Frequently not in boats. Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Stale wrote: »
    God Dammit


    STOP RAPING EVERYTHING THAT WAS GOOD ABOUT THE 80s GOD DAMMIT

    nothing was good about the 80's except me

    PiptheFair on
  • KrentzKrentz Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    All the kids who go see this will complain so hard when they remake Saw in 10 years.

    Krentz on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • TheBlackWindTheBlackWind Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    PiptheFair wrote: »
    Stale wrote: »
    God Dammit


    STOP RAPING EVERYTHING THAT WAS GOOD ABOUT THE 80s GOD DAMMIT

    nothing was good about the 80's except me

    and we certainly aren't gonna stop raping Pip. Oh no.

    TheBlackWind on
    PAD ID - 328,762,218
  • FAQFAQ Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Shoggoth wrote: »
    FAQ wrote: »
    because it's boring

    and they are usually the same story told worse

    I don't have a problem with remakes if something interesting is done, more often then not it's crap

    Did you see Rob Zombie's Halloween remake? I thought it was actually quite well done and was very pleasantly surprised. His other movies were complete shit, but he injected a lot of depth into Halloween.

    One of the better remakes, especially horror, that I can think of in the past couple years. I don't know why it didn't get good reviews I thought it was borderline masterfully done for a horror film.

    I haven't and I'd be reluctant to see it, but I don't know it is the season

    FAQ on
  • HalfmexHalfmex I mock your value system You also appear foolish in the eyes of othersRegistered User regular
    edited October 2009
    I'm torn on the potential of the Nightmare on Elm Street remake. It could go either way.

    This remake, on the other hand, is pegging the needle at 'looks awesome':

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEMZwQulT1Q

    Halfmex on
  • ShoggothShoggoth Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    I think if we're lucky this trend of remakes will give way to prequels within the next couple years.

    There is a prequel to The Thing planned, which focuses on the norwegian camp. The Thing is one of my most cherished horror movies and I am on board with this prequel idea.

    EDIT: Thumbs up for The Crazies and also using Mad World in the trailer.

    Shoggoth on
    11tu0w1.jpg
  • Calamity JaneCalamity Jane That Wrong Love Registered User regular
    edited October 2009
    Staleghoti wrote: »
    Stale wrote: »
    God Dammit


    STOP RAPING EVERYTHING THAT WAS GOOD ABOUT THE 80s GOD DAMMIT

    Adrian Brody

    in Robert Rodriguez's Predators

    well, now just hold on there a second

    that just sounds fucking wacky

    oh wait, it'll be terrible. robert rodriguez will use his internal cgi studio

    Calamity Jane on
    twitter https://twitter.com/mperezwritesirl michelle patreon https://www.patreon.com/thatwronglove michelle's comic book from IMAGE COMICS you can order http://a.co/dn5YeUD
Sign In or Register to comment.