The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

I need an RPG that will grab me and never let me go

12467

Posts

  • emnmnmeemnmnme Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Riokenn wrote: »
    Please, let me suggest the wonderful tales of Grandia and Grandia II. I LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVE those games to death and glad I spent so many lost hours into them.

    But not Grandia III. WHO WANTS TO RPG WITH THEIR MOMS!? >:/

    .....how hot is the Mom in Grandia 3?

    emnmnme on
  • Ah_PookAh_Pook Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    grandia 3 had really fun combat and some cool art here and there, but everything outside of that was actively painful. i think PA did a strip about it way back when, even.

    here it is
    20060222h.jpg

    Ah_Pook on
  • peterdevorepeterdevore Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Steam has Mass Effect for its weekend deal this weekend, 50% off, so it's dirt cheap now. I'm thinking of picking it up myself.

    peterdevore on
  • SyphyreSyphyre A Dangerous Pastime Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    A little handheld love thrown out...

    Star Ocean I, and II (preferably II) (PSP)
    Contact (DS)
    Dragon Quest IV/ V (DS) IV isn't near as "hardcore" as VIII in my opinion, (in counter argument to a statement the OP made)
    The World Ends With You (DS) (if you don't mind the atmosphere)

    Syphyre on
  • SF_DhalsimSF_Dhalsim Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Robman wrote: »
    Mass Effect
    Fallout 1/2/3
    Oblivion
    Baldurs Gate 2
    DA:O
    Diablow 2 (blow because it's addictive like cocaine)
    Borderlands
    etc

    These plus Kotor 1 and 2.

    SF_Dhalsim on
    sig-1355736.jpg
    sig-1355747.jpg
    SC2: XxKhrushchev.539
  • SageinaRageSageinaRage Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Somebody on these forums once told me that it would be impossible to play the BG games with 3rd edition rules. I didn't get much in the way of elaboration. Is that an accurate statement? Because that's the primary thing keeping me from replaying those; once you go 3rd you don't go backwards.

    Well, they don't use 3rd edition, they use second edition. It's 'impossible' in the same way that it is to play fallout with 3rd edition rules, so I'm not sure why you phrased it that way.

    But anyway, it's really not nearly as big a deal as it is when playing tabletop, and isn't the focus of the games at all, so if you let that dissuade you from playing, then you should basically just drop the pretense of caring about game stories at all.

    SageinaRage on
    sig.gif
  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Well, they don't use 3rd edition, they use second edition.

    No shit?! I hadn't noticed!
    It's 'impossible' in the same way that it is to play fallout with 3rd edition rules, so I'm not sure why you phrased it that way.

    Except that several campaigns written for 2nd edition have been updated to 3rd edition rules. Not to mention the fact that we're talking about an updated version of the same system, whereas your Fallout analogy would involve transplanting an unrelated rule set.
    But anyway, it's really not nearly as big a deal as it is when playing tabletop, and isn't the focus of the games at all, so if you let that dissuade you from playing, then you should basically just drop the pretense of caring about game stories at all.

    Sorry, I'll stop wishing I could have the best of both worlds...?

    Look, I was asking an honest question about why it would be technically infeasible to play a BG campaign with 3rd edition rules and I got a condescending reply. Plus, you didn't really answer my question.

    joshofalltrades on
  • MouschiMouschi Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Well, they don't use 3rd edition, they use second edition.

    No shit?! I hadn't noticed!
    It's 'impossible' in the same way that it is to play fallout with 3rd edition rules, so I'm not sure why you phrased it that way.

    Except that several campaigns written for 2nd edition have been updated to 3rd edition rules. Not to mention the fact that we're talking about an updated version of the same system, whereas your Fallout analogy would involve transplanting an unrelated rule set.
    But anyway, it's really not nearly as big a deal as it is when playing tabletop, and isn't the focus of the games at all, so if you let that dissuade you from playing, then you should basically just drop the pretense of caring about game stories at all.

    Sorry, I'll stop wishing I could have the best of both worlds...?

    Look, I was asking an honest question about why it would be technically infeasible to play a BG campaign with 3rd edition rules and I got a condescending reply. Plus, you didn't really answer my question.

    The entire game is coded with Thac0 and backstab instead of BAB and sneak attack. Updating the game from 2nd to 3rd would be a monumental task, on the level of making a whole new game. Which Bioware did. When they made KOTOR.

    Mouschi on
    1848717-1.png
    Gamertag: Cunning Hekate // League of Legends: FeroxPA
  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Mouschi wrote: »
    Well, they don't use 3rd edition, they use second edition.

    No shit?! I hadn't noticed!
    It's 'impossible' in the same way that it is to play fallout with 3rd edition rules, so I'm not sure why you phrased it that way.

    Except that several campaigns written for 2nd edition have been updated to 3rd edition rules. Not to mention the fact that we're talking about an updated version of the same system, whereas your Fallout analogy would involve transplanting an unrelated rule set.
    But anyway, it's really not nearly as big a deal as it is when playing tabletop, and isn't the focus of the games at all, so if you let that dissuade you from playing, then you should basically just drop the pretense of caring about game stories at all.

    Sorry, I'll stop wishing I could have the best of both worlds...?

    Look, I was asking an honest question about why it would be technically infeasible to play a BG campaign with 3rd edition rules and I got a condescending reply. Plus, you didn't really answer my question.

    The entire game is coded with Thac0 and backstab instead of BAB and sneak attack. Updating the game from 2nd to 3rd would be a monumental task, on the level of making a whole new game. Which Bioware did. When they made KOTOR.

    This is more what I was after, thanks.

    Now, Icewind Dale II is the same engine, and was coded with 3rd ed. BAB and sneak attack, IIRC. So it isn't as though some enterprising coder could tweak it a bit to make it work?

    joshofalltrades on
  • BigDesBigDes Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Also Thac0 can go suck so many dicks.

    BigDes on
    steam_sig.png
  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    edited November 2009
    BigDes wrote: »
    Also Thac0 can go suck so many dicks.

    This is also what I was after.

    It's up there in intuitiveness with "lower Armor Class = better".

    joshofalltrades on
  • StigmaStigma Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Mouschi wrote: »
    Well, they don't use 3rd edition, they use second edition.

    No shit?! I hadn't noticed!
    It's 'impossible' in the same way that it is to play fallout with 3rd edition rules, so I'm not sure why you phrased it that way.

    Except that several campaigns written for 2nd edition have been updated to 3rd edition rules. Not to mention the fact that we're talking about an updated version of the same system, whereas your Fallout analogy would involve transplanting an unrelated rule set.
    But anyway, it's really not nearly as big a deal as it is when playing tabletop, and isn't the focus of the games at all, so if you let that dissuade you from playing, then you should basically just drop the pretense of caring about game stories at all.

    Sorry, I'll stop wishing I could have the best of both worlds...?

    Look, I was asking an honest question about why it would be technically infeasible to play a BG campaign with 3rd edition rules and I got a condescending reply. Plus, you didn't really answer my question.

    The entire game is coded with Thac0 and backstab instead of BAB and sneak attack. Updating the game from 2nd to 3rd would be a monumental task, on the level of making a whole new game. Which Bioware did. When they made KOTOR.

    This is more what I was after, thanks.

    Now, Icewind Dale II is the same engine, and was coded with 3rd ed. BAB and sneak attack, IIRC. So it isn't as though some enterprising coder could tweak it a bit to make it work?

    It's *possible* that BG could be redesigned with third edition rules, but the fact remains, that is a monumental task. I would highly doubt a single mod maker could do this on his own.

    Stigma on
    YHWHYinYangblueblackblueborder.jpg
  • RamiRami Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    I prefer AD&D over 3rd.

    But then I played BG2 a lot so it makes perfect sense to me.

    Rami on
  • OrestusOrestus Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    I'll suggest Skies of Arcadia as well. Go with the Gamecube version if you have a choice, it adds 1 extra party member, a lot of extra discoveries (things to hunt for) and a few other features. Most importantly it decreases a bit the random encounter rate, which was the worst part of the original on DC.

    I think I know the feeling the OP is talking about and I haven't had it for two many games lately either, but I seem to remember Skies of Arcadia evoking that for me. Plus I loved the Airship battles!

    Orestus on
  • RamiRami Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    I am pretty positive Legends did not add a 7th character to the roster. Regardless it's still the best game ever made. Try and get the soundtrack though because they fucked up the compression in Legends.

    Rami on
  • 4rch3nemy4rch3nemy Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Torchlight if you want a fun ARPG romp. It's nothing else and doesn't pretend to be, though. But it WILL suck your time away.

    4rch3nemy on
  • DissociaterDissociater Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Khavall wrote: »
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Dragon Age.

    DRAGON. AGE.

    He hasn't played Baldur's Gate II yet.


    BGII

    then Dragon Age


    But BGII first. Always BGII


    Where are my BGII discs...

    I just found my BGII and Throne of Bhaal Disks yesterday.

    Here was my reaction:

    "no way! Awesome! Oh my crap, I can't wait!!!! ...NOOOOOOOOOOOO MAC VERSION!!!!!!"

    Dissociater on
  • MachismoMachismo Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    I am not sure why he should play BG2 first. I loved BG2, but I don't think it is the end all be all.
    Just because it is a classic doesn't mean it is the best. Fallout is a great example. I can't claim it is as good if I played it now compared to when I first played it. It is archaic in its architecture. Graphics show their age. The story telling has its weak parts.

    But then again, NMA forums would crucify my with electrons through the Internet.

    Just because it kicked ass back then, and even more so through nostalgia, doesn't mean that DAO should be tossed aside.

    Machismo on
    steam_sig.png
  • Raoulduke20Raoulduke20 Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Khavall wrote: »
    Aegeri wrote: »
    Dragon Age.

    DRAGON. AGE.

    He hasn't played Baldur's Gate II yet.


    BGII

    then Dragon Age


    But BGII first. Always BGII


    Where are my BGII discs...

    I just found my BGII and Throne of Bhaal Disks yesterday.

    Here was my reaction:

    "no way! Awesome! Oh my crap, I can't wait!!!! ...NOOOOOOOOOOOO MAC VERSION!!!!!!"

    I love BG2 as much as the next nerd, but there are some people who are turned off by 2d isometric rpgs. If that's the case here then by all means skip ahead to Dragon Age. It's a good game, it's pretty, it's fun, and it's challenging. The nostalgia it instills wouldn't have the same effect if he played BG2 then DA a week later, anyway.

    Raoulduke20 on
    signatureih.jpg
  • XagarathXagarath Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Machismo wrote: »
    I am not sure why he should play BG2 first. I loved BG2, but I don't think it is the end all be all.
    Just because it is a classic doesn't mean it is the best.

    Except for the convenient fact that it actually happens to be.

    So, yes.
    Play Baldur's Gate 2.
    Or Persona 4.
    Or both.

    Xagarath on
  • GilderGilder Aw snap Macaroni PartyRegistered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Rami wrote: »
    I am pretty positive Legends did not add a 7th character to the roster. Regardless it's still the best game ever made. Try and get the soundtrack though because they fucked up the compression in Legends.

    They did not add another character, but I can honestly say I was surprised that Piastol didn't join at the end of her sidequest. She seemed perfect. Anyway I would recommend SoA, but my opinion on it would be biased as hell. I have sort of an infatuation with one of the characters.

    Gilder on
  • MachismoMachismo Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Xagarath wrote: »
    Machismo wrote: »
    I am not sure why he should play BG2 first. I loved BG2, but I don't think it is the end all be all.
    Just because it is a classic doesn't mean it is the best.

    Except for the convenient fact that it actually happens to be.

    So, yes.
    Play Baldur's Gate 2.
    Or Persona 4.
    Or both.

    Wait, wait...
    BG2 i will grant is up there as one of the best games ever. Probably among the top 2 or 3 of all RPGs. But Persona 4? No. Sorry. It falls into all the cliches of JRPGs. A plodding story. Gameplay that excels and then falls on its face.

    And despite all of that, Baldur's Gate 2 is almost a decade old. He can pick it up for cheap off the net, certainly. I would encourage that, but DAO, just as good, is available at his nearest store. It is equal to BG2 (I know you're jaw is on the floor). It is stunningly good. If you don't believe me, play it (on the PC, not console). It really is. I haven't found a single thing that I don't like. Even when my group got wiped it was awesome. Why? Because a fucking Ogre picked up my main and beat it her to death with his bare fists. After that he swatted my mage 12 feet through the air. This is the shit we SAY in a table-top RPG, but it is literally happening on screen as well as my imagination can conjure.

    Machismo on
    steam_sig.png
  • Raoulduke20Raoulduke20 Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Xagarath wrote: »
    Machismo wrote: »
    I am not sure why he should play BG2 first. I loved BG2, but I don't think it is the end all be all.
    Just because it is a classic doesn't mean it is the best.

    Except for the convenient fact that it actually happens to be.

    So, yes.
    Play Baldur's Gate 2.
    Or Persona 4.
    Or both.

    I really do understand why people are fanatic about BG2, but it can be excessive sometimes. Lets be honest, the game isn't perfect and it's not for everyone. It's dated and, much like the original fallouts, some jaded modern gamers might find the action stale. It's a slow game and the combat isn't exactly intuitive. The story is amazing and anyone who can at least tolerate the gameplay should give it at least one run through for the writing and characters, but it seems like every time someone wants a suggestion for anything pc on this forum there will be dozens of people suggesting this game. I don't think it's what the op is looking for, but I could be wrong. DA, while very similar, is also very much a modern game and appeals to modern gamer sensibilities on several levels.

    Raoulduke20 on
    signatureih.jpg
  • TheStigTheStig Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    I have made a terrible mistake. I installed BG2 the day before a paper I have not started on is due. Why do I do these things to myself? I have already sunk about 4 hours into it today.

    TheStig on
    bnet: TheStig#1787 Steam: TheStig
  • Raoulduke20Raoulduke20 Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    TheStig wrote: »
    I have made a terrible mistake. I installed BG2 the day before a paper I have not started on is due. Why do I do these things to myself? I have already sunk about 4 hours into it today.

    I installed BG2 on my iBook when I bought it back in like 2006 and it has never left. I would really enjoy seeing how many hours I've sunk into it while sitting through lectures.

    Raoulduke20 on
    signatureih.jpg
  • HavelockHavelock Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Planescape: Torment



    Just throwing that out there, if it hasn't already.

    Havelock on
  • itchyeyesitchyeyes Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Xagarath wrote: »
    Machismo wrote: »
    I am not sure why he should play BG2 first. I loved BG2, but I don't think it is the end all be all.
    Just because it is a classic doesn't mean it is the best.

    Except for the convenient fact that it actually happens to be.

    So, yes.
    Play Baldur's Gate 2.
    Or Persona 4.
    Or both.

    I really do understand why people are fanatic about BG2, but it can be excessive sometimes. Lets be honest, the game isn't perfect and it's not for everyone. It's dated and, much like the original fallouts, some jaded modern gamers might find the action stale. It's a slow game and the combat isn't exactly intuitive. The story is amazing and anyone who can at least tolerate the gameplay should give it at least one run through for the writing and characters, but it seems like every time someone wants a suggestion for anything pc on this forum there will be dozens of people suggesting this game. I don't think it's what the op is looking for, but I could be wrong. DA, while very similar, is also very much a modern game and appeals to modern gamer sensibilities on several levels.
    Thank you.

    I just finished catching up on this thread there are several people in here who seem to take it almost as an affront to their religion that someone would recommend anything other than BG2. Looking back at the RPG's he says he's liked, almost all of them are JRPGs. The only western RPG he lists is Mass Effect, which although from the same developer, is very far from the type of game BG2 is.

    Personally, at least on the WRPG side, I'd say he should try out KotOR first, as a sort of "stepping stone" between the more action oriented Mass Effect and the more hardcore BG2 and DA:O.

    itchyeyes on
    Itchyeyes55.gif
  • MouschiMouschi Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    My main problem with all the BG2 recommendations is, it's not on steam or GOG, so I have no idea where people are finding it. I mean, I have an idea where people are finding it, but I don't know where people are purchasing it.

    Mouschi on
    1848717-1.png
    Gamertag: Cunning Hekate // League of Legends: FeroxPA
  • Ah_PookAh_Pook Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    you can get all the baldurs gate games/expansions off amazon right now for around $30

    Ah_Pook on
  • PotatoNinjaPotatoNinja Fake Gamer Goat Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    So I herd u liek JRPGs...

    WHAT: Persona 4.
    You're the newest transfer student in Inaba, and you'll need to balance time between studying, working, and relaxing to make it through the year sane and keep your friends close. Which would be alot easier if you weren't busy investigating a series of mysteries kidnappings-turned-murders and their relation to "The Midnight Channel."

    WHY?
    Combat is hard, deep, and satisfying--players looking for something more complicated than "ATTACK" "CAST HEAL" "ATTACK MORE!" should be happy here.

    Voice acting is excellent start to finish and the characters are well-written and (aside from a few obnoxious bad apples) generally likeable or interesting folk.

    The game manages to break away from the "Black and grey" motif that seems to have invaded all games made in the last decade. From character design to levels to small things like user interface and menus, Persona 4 makes good use of color and style for an overall excellent presentation.

    There's plenty to do in the game as well, you have the ability to manage and customize both your actual character (do you study to become smarter or work a boring job for more diligence and some spare cash) and the Personas you use to fight. The social aspects connect back to the game's combat when different friendships can change how strong your Persona is or what your allies can do in a fight.

    Its a JRPG that doesn't feature spiky hair, an amnesiac protagonist, or a civil war you must end to bring two cultures together to fight the BBEG.

    Unique and generally high-quality soundtrack.

    WHY NOT?
    The plot starts out interesting and then gets distracted and wanders around lost until coming to a conclusion. It isn't bad, but the characters move the game forward, the story exists only to give them an excuse to exist.

    The game is long. 70-80 hours for your first playthrough sounds about right.

    A handful of characters (luckily mostly optional ones) are really annoying as hell.

    ---

    WHAT: Tales of Vesperia.
    You're Yuri, generic (but surprisingly bearable) JRPG hero who rescues a weird princess-type girl. Hijinks ensue, world needs saving, you know the drill. Combat is real-time with a focus on combos and timing your attacks and defenses.

    WHY?
    ToV is RPG cheesecake, its a complete guilty pleasure. The plot is terrible and nonsensical, the characters are complete cliches and the enemy design is usually pretty generic. Despite all of that, the game is fun, the characters are endearing if you can stomach them, the voice acting is great and the main hero, despite being a predictable JRPG stereotype, is actually pretty badass.

    WHY NOT?
    Didn't you just read what I said above? Bad plot, cliche characters. Combat is fun but if you hate real-time RPGs this one won't change your mind.

    ---

    WHAT: Vagrant Story.
    You're a riskbreaker, basically the culmination of every Square-Enix hero ever, Cloud Strife without the motorcycle but you get to carry an entire armory on your back instead. You're pursuing a strange cult leader into some mysterious ancient ruins. So is a group of religious zealots. This will, of course, end well.

    WHY?
    Unique and engaging plot, great dialogue, and an incredible sense of style. The game has a very comic-book feel in pacing and presentation, the cutscenes are well-directed and, despite the PSOne-era graphics, fun to watch.

    Despite being a kind of generic "strong silent badass," both the main character and the villains and allies he encounters are interesting, with solid overall dialogue and great character design.

    The game's basically a real-time roguelike.

    WHY NOT?
    Vagrant Story hates you. The game is really complicated in some stupid ways. Ashley Riot may be a culmination of every Final Fantasy hero ever, but he's also burdened with an equipment and level-up system that's.... basically a culmination of every Final Fantasy ever. Build weapons with stats based on weapon types that level up based on use against particular types of enemies in a battle system where you need to perform combos at low life to deal max damage.

    You look at your inventory screen alot.

    The game's basically a real-time roguelike.

    ---

    WHAT: Shadow Hearts 3.
    You're a young 1930's-esque private detective aaaand well things get really weird really quick. You have out with a big, muscular Native American Gun-Fu master and a hedonistic gigantic talking cat who practices drunken Kung-Fu.

    WHY?
    You will not find a more unique cast of characters in an RPG. Each character is bizarre, creative, unique, and insane. The game is happy to mock itself, its genre, its characters, and its mechanics.

    The setting is a great change of pace, 1920-1930's Americana is a rarely touched time period for games in general and RPGs in particular.

    If you like weird JRPG humor, this game has you covered.

    WHY NOT?
    The combat system uses a timing-based "great wheel" which you might like or hate.

    The plot and dialogue can vary from "kinda weird" to "no, seriously, what the fuck?"

    The soundtrack gets old really, really fast. The voice acting is generally good, sometimes dropping down to terrible.


    So I herd u liek WRPGs....

    WHAT: Dragon Age: Origins.
    You're a member of an elite evil-demon-thing fighting organization that is trying to protect the world from an invasion of evil demon things. You and a small group of companions run around and try to do just that.

    WHY?
    The story, while somewhat cliche, is great. The characters are unique, creative, incredibly animated, voiced, and written. Lots of big dramatic "We want to make a LotR movie!" type moments.

    You have an incredible array of options and moralities available to you, and the game remembers them and the effect they have on the world. Rarely are you given a right-or-wrong choice, and your actions often have consequences down the road.

    Combat, while a little wonky at times, is generally a good mix of tactical and stupid fun. Some of the kill animations are particularly enjoyable, and the game's "WoW-meets-D&D" gameplay works pretty well most of the time.

    The game's overall pedigree is excellent. From the sound to the voices to the writing to the hidden details, every part of the game is carefully crafted and worth experiencing.

    WHY NOT?
    Its "A Song of Ice and Fire" meets "Lord of the Rings." If you're sick to death of dark European fantasy, well, you'll probably despise the setting.

    ---

    WHAT: The Witcher.
    You're a white-haired amnesiac badass who hunts horrific demonic creatures. You're also immune to diseases and can't have children and have the option of basically being the biggest manslut in all history if that's your thing.

    WHY?
    A great story, a fleshed-out look at a standard fantasy setting, and a hero who (usually) manages to be both badass and interesting without becoming too stoic or preachy.

    Interesting choices, with a game that often refuses to give you a "good / bad" option, usually just "complicated / complicated."

    WHY NOT?
    Dialogue and writing can be dodgy, sometimes excellent sometimes not (probably translation hiccups).

    The setting is alive and fleshed-out, but at the end of the day its a medieval setting with a bunch of peasants, elves, dwarves, and supernatural baddies and the expected civil wars / racial strife that accompanies that. Like Dragon Age, the setting is well-realized but nothing new.

    ---

    WHAT? Fallout 2.
    So the apocalypse came and went, everything looks like the shitty parts of Arizona, and well basically Road Warrior / Mad Max without Tina Turner. You're the chosen child of the VAULT DWELLER and are sent out on a quest to recover the sacred Garden of Eden Creation Kit (GECK) so your village doesn't starve to death horribly.

    WHY?
    The setting, both story and gameplay-wise, is great. You have to deal with roving bandits, mutants, crazy techno-cults, crimelords, mercenaries, and a handful of honest folk trying to get by (if "get by" means "not get turned into past by a gigantic sledgehammer.")

    Equipment and combat fits with the setting. You have your mundane gear (scavenged from the dead or the ruins of former cities) like pistols and rifles, knives, spears, and a wide assortment of 1950's-esque super science devices that shoot laser death or give you a sword which is also a chainsaw or whatnot.

    The game is hard, but unique and (mostly) fun. There is no "rest here to regain full HP" Inn, no save points before bosses, just a big, unfriendly world and you. Scavenging equipment, outwitting bandits, forming uncomfortable alliances or accidentally shoving armed grenades into the pants of people you don't like, the game doesn't play like a standard RPG.

    WHY NOT?
    The game can be brutally unfair, and its possible to build a character who is entirely useless.

    The game is ugly. No way around it.

    You spend about an hour or two wasting time on introduction bullshit where you kill far too many rats and scorpions.

    ---

    WHAT: Planescape: Torment.
    So you're a mostly-immortal amnesiac cadaver who wakes up in a city that exists as the crossroads to everything in existence and is fueled by the power of belief. Then things get a little complicated.

    WHY?
    Best writing in an RPG.

    Yes, that's a sentence with no wishy-washy language and a period at the end. The writing for this game is amazing, start to finish, and puts every other game in the field to shame.

    Amazing, unique characters and an incredibly unique setting. There's really no comparison to the Planescape setting, nothing to reference it against. You're in a fantasy setting where heaven and hell are real places and their denizens argue politics over lunch, where "does it exist?" is the wrong question and "where can I find it?" is the right one.

    Fantastic story that doesn't involve saving the world, preventing civil war, or killing an ancient God of Death who is just about to break out of his 1,000 year slumber.

    Gorgeous-but-dated painting-like graphics.

    WHY NOT?
    The game uses the D&D 2nd edition rule system, which (for those who aren't familiar with it) is pretty goddamn stupid. You might want to read a FAQ on how to best design your character or put some time into learning the nuances of the system, going in with no idea how to fight or play could end very, very badly.

    Hopefully that list gives you some ideas.

    PotatoNinja on
    Two goats enter, one car leaves
  • balerbowerbalerbower Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    I know exactly what you mean by the captivation of your FF7 experience. I've also been looking for a game to match that experience for me and I've only come across a few:

    Xenogears
    Star Ocean: Second Story
    Shadow Heart 1

    All PS1 RPG classics. Maybe it was the age I was at when I played all of those that amped up my immersion in those games, but still, I recommend you try to find these for an affordable price. All of them have great music, entertaining plotlines, perfect pacing, and great atmosphere.

    balerbower on
  • SorensonSorenson Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    I can't believe you fuckers have been circlejerking on and on and on about BGII while nobody (as far as search tells me) has so much as even breathed a mention of Arcanum, and that's just fucking criminal.

    Also: MOTHER 3 GODDAMMIT

    Sorenson on
  • TheStigTheStig Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Is mother 3 really that good? I thought people just liked it because they couldn't have it.

    Anyway, I'm surprised there isn't more talk about FFVI. I thought it was better than VII.

    TheStig on
    bnet: TheStig#1787 Steam: TheStig
  • Ah_PookAh_Pook Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    well mother 2/earthbound was really really good. i never played mother 3, but im guessing it was pretty boss too.

    Ah_Pook on
  • SorensonSorenson Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    YES IT IS THAT FUCKING GOOD. We're talking some serious god damn hard-hitting shit here.

    Sorenson on
  • RenzoRenzo Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Another WHY NOT? for Planescape: Torment

    If you want to play a game, don't play Planescape. If you want to read a game, play Planescape.

    Renzo on
  • thegloamingthegloaming Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    So on a related topic, Baldur's Gate I and II (and their expansions) are in my backlog. IIRC, there's a program that lets you play BGI using BGII's improved engine. Is that worth checking out? Is BGI worth checking out at all? What about the expansions? Should I install them before or after I finish the game?

    thegloaming on
  • HozHoz Cool Cat Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Before. Throne of Bhaal gives bonus side content to the main story and continues the story after the regular game is complete.

    The BG1 expansion just gives side content.

    Hoz on
  • thegloamingthegloaming Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Hoz wrote: »
    Before. Throne of Bhaal gives bonus side content to the main story and continues the story after the regular game is complete.

    The BG1 expansion just gives side content.

    Thanks for the tip.

    So what's the verdict on the Neverwinter Nights games? I haven't heard them uttered at all in this thread. Aren't they likened to a 3D Baldur's Gate?

    thegloaming on
  • SorensonSorenson Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Sorta, though it depends on who was writing the module. The core campaigns of each game are supposedly meh while the addons (Shadows of Undrentide, Horde of the Underdark, Mask of the Betrayer and Storm of Zehir) range from decent to fucking awesome.

    Sorenson on
Sign In or Register to comment.