The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Would a SSD change my life?

DiscoZombieDiscoZombie Registered User regular
So I've heard some hype about SSDs. They seem to be slowly but surely coming down in price, but I don't know if it's worth getting one yet. Would the performance boost be so earth-shattering that it's worth it? I do feel like load times are one of my biggest bottlenecks. I've got a WD2500KS hard drive, which I think is 7200 RPM, and I swear it still takes 3 to 5 minutes for my win xp computer to fully boot up. load times in some games can be heinous too.

If I had a SSD, it would probably be a small one, and I'd probably only be able to keep like 1 or 2 games installed on it at a time, along with the OS (which would probably be Win 7)... might be more trouble than it's worth... thoughts from anyone who's upgraded lately?

DiscoZombie on

Posts

  • Mr. ButtonsMr. Buttons Registered User regular
    edited December 2009
    What are the specs for the rest of your system. If it's taking 3 - 5 minutes to boot up your box, the bottleneck may not be the HDD

    Mr. Buttons on
  • corky842corky842 Registered User regular
    edited December 2009
    An SSD probably wouldn't help that much. When was the last time you defragmented your drive? That might be your problem.

    corky842 on
  • DiscoZombieDiscoZombie Registered User regular
    edited December 2009
    corky842 wrote: »
    An SSD probably wouldn't help that much. When was the last time you defragmented your drive? That might be your problem.

    you're probably right - I should start there =p it's been a loong time...

    as for my specs, let's see... core 2 duo 6600 @ 2.4GHz, 4 gigs of Corsair XMS2, Radeon HD 4800, 500W Enermax PSU, Asus P5B deluxe mobo... I think that's all the important stuff.

    DiscoZombie on
  • Mr. ButtonsMr. Buttons Registered User regular
    edited December 2009
    yeah, take a look at defrag and see how your HDD looks. You may also want to take a look at the programs that are starting up when windows loads, as 3 - 5 minutes seems a bit excessive for specs like that.

    Mr. Buttons on
  • Dark ShroudDark Shroud Registered User regular
    edited December 2009
    I would recommend My Defrag & CCleaner.

    You would be better off upgrading to Win7 before getting an SSD. A big part is that Win7 & Vista SP2 have built in modes for running off an SSD where XP doesn't. This can really mess you up if the SSD doesn't have trim support. Not to mention Win7 could make proper use of all of your memory & multi-core CPU.

    Dark Shroud on
  • krapst78krapst78 Registered User regular
    edited December 2009
    corky842 wrote: »
    An SSD probably wouldn't help that much. When was the last time you defragmented your drive? That might be your problem.

    you're probably right - I should start there =p it's been a loong time...

    as for my specs, let's see... core 2 duo 6600 @ 2.4GHz, 4 gigs of Corsair XMS2, Radeon HD 4800, 500W Enermax PSU, Asus P5B deluxe mobo... I think that's all the important stuff.

    My desktop has pretty much the same specs (except using a Gigabyte mobo and a Radeon 5850) as yours but I'm using a Supertalent Ultradrive SSD as my main boot disk. I can load into Windows 7 and have Chrome open and surfing the web in about 40-45 seconds after pushing the power button. This is even with my SSD at 90% capacity without TRIM support enabled.

    I have a secondary PC with similar specs (2.8ghz Pentium e6300 on an ASUS P5PQL mobo, 9800gt 1gb using a WD Caviar Blue WD3200) which takes over 2 minutes to boot into Windows 7 and have a web browser up and running.

    I've also run Modern Warfare 2 on both systems and the difference in loading times are pretty drastic. Loading the first level where you ride atop the HUMVEE my primary system will complete the level load before General Shepard starts talking in the loading video while the secondary system will complete loading as the bridgelayer is shown unfolding in the loading video. I think it's almost double the loading time per level.

    krapst78 on
    Hello! My name is Inigo Montoya! You killed my father prepare to die!
    Looking for a Hardcore Fantasy Extraction Shooter? - Dark and Darker
  • XantusXantus Registered User regular
    edited December 2009
    krapst78 wrote: »
    corky842 wrote: »
    An SSD probably wouldn't help that much. When was the last time you defragmented your drive? That might be your problem.

    you're probably right - I should start there =p it's been a loong time...

    as for my specs, let's see... core 2 duo 6600 @ 2.4GHz, 4 gigs of Corsair XMS2, Radeon HD 4800, 500W Enermax PSU, Asus P5B deluxe mobo... I think that's all the important stuff.



    I have a secondary PC with similar specs (2.8ghz Pentium e6300 on an ASUS P5PQL mobo, 9800gt 1gb using a WD Caviar Blue WD3200) which takes over 2 minutes to boot into Windows 7 and have a web browser up and running.

    my pc is almost exactly the same specs as your secondary. asus p5b-e mobo instead. and it only takes 1:15 to have opera open and running.

    food for thought.

    Xantus on
  • autono-wally, erotibot300autono-wally, erotibot300 love machine Registered User regular
    edited December 2009
    krapst78 wrote: »
    corky842 wrote: »
    An SSD probably wouldn't help that much. When was the last time you defragmented your drive? That might be your problem.

    you're probably right - I should start there =p it's been a loong time...

    as for my specs, let's see... core 2 duo 6600 @ 2.4GHz, 4 gigs of Corsair XMS2, Radeon HD 4800, 500W Enermax PSU, Asus P5B deluxe mobo... I think that's all the important stuff.

    My desktop has pretty much the same specs (except using a Gigabyte mobo and a Radeon 5850) as yours but I'm using a Supertalent Ultradrive SSD as my main boot disk. I can load into Windows 7 and have Chrome open and surfing the web in about 40-45 seconds after pushing the power button. This is even with my SSD at 90% capacity without TRIM support enabled.

    I have a secondary PC with similar specs (2.8ghz Pentium e6300 on an ASUS P5PQL mobo, 9800gt 1gb using a WD Caviar Blue WD3200) which takes over 2 minutes to boot into Windows 7 and have a web browser up and running.

    I've also run Modern Warfare 2 on both systems and the difference in loading times are pretty drastic. Loading the first level where you ride atop the HUMVEE my primary system will complete the level load before General Shepard starts talking in the loading video while the secondary system will complete loading as the bridgelayer is shown unfolding in the loading video. I think it's almost double the loading time per level.
    2 minutes is extremely excessive really
    my I have a t5550 core2duo laptop with 2gb ram and a wd hd and a fresh w7 install, and it takes about 40-50 seconds from pressing the power button to the desktop

    autono-wally, erotibot300 on
    kFJhXwE.jpgkFJhXwE.jpg
  • slash000slash000 Registered User regular
    edited December 2009
    If anyone's curious about comparative drive speeds and loading times, here are my results:

    Win7 x64
    4 gigs ddr2 800
    Core 2 Duo E7400 @ 2.8
    7200 RPM Sata 16 megs cache


    Total time from pushing power button to Windows Login Screen:
    36 seconds

    time to loaded windows desktop (including my typing in password):
    42 seconds

    time to get to this webforum on this webpage in Firefox (chrome or opera would be faster of course but i use firefox still):
    55 seconds


    It took my mobo a shocking 19 seconds to get to the Loading windows screen. it took less time to load windows from the drive than to pass the mobo stuff. I should disable some unnecessary tests its runs (like checking for raid and checking for bootable CD and what have you). I guess the point is, it takes about 1 minute to go from OFF to fully functional system with a standard 7200 RPM sata drive and Win7 x64.


    This breaks down to this:

    it took my mobo 19 seconds to POST
    it took my HDD exactly 17 seconds to load windows to the login screen after mobo posting was done

    Now, the system is still loading shit even though the login screen is still there. So:

    it took my hard drive and system 36 seconds to fully load windows and get to a fully functional computer with Firefox opened and this webforum up, after 19 seconds was mobo/posting time.

    And this isn't even a fresh install. I've been using Win7 x64 since March.

    slash000 on
  • ShensShens Portland, ORRegistered User regular
    edited December 2009
    Damn, slash. That is better than my WD Raptor with a fresh Win 7x64 install.

    E6600 at 3.0ghz + 4GB 800 DDR2

    Shens on
  • slash000slash000 Registered User regular
    edited December 2009
    Shens wrote: »
    Damn, slash. That is better than my WD Raptor with a fresh Win 7x64 install.

    E6600 at 3.0ghz + 4GB 800 DDR2

    Huh. I wonder why the discrepancy? I have an E7400 but it's not overclocked at all - it's running at 2.8 ghz, which is stock settings. I'm running 4 gigs DDR2 but it's 800mhz and running dual channel. My Win7 x64 Home Premium is not a fresh install (been running this since march). I don't have any junk loading at startup besides the ATI control panel and whatever else Win7 loads by itself by default.

    What could help shave significant time off my loading would be if my mobo POSTed faster. It takes 6 seconds from the power button push to showing the first on-screen post info, and it takes the full 19 seconds total go check drives and devices and verify PMI pool data, which is the last thing it does before displaying the "loading windows" screen.

    From the instant the Windows Loading screen shows up to the moment the login icon and password field shows up is 17 seconds. That's better than I expected. Makes me happy! :)

    I checked these times of mine with a stop watch and timed it three times in a row and the times were the same all three times.

    edit: I loaded FireFox. My time-to-this-webpage would be faster if I loaded Chrome instead. But only by maybe 1 second at most would be my guess.

    slash000 on
  • ShensShens Portland, ORRegistered User regular
    edited December 2009
    Ill have to give mine a timed test when I get home.

    I do know that my initial POST is much longer than reset.

    Shens on
  • DiscoZombieDiscoZombie Registered User regular
    edited December 2009
    Thanks for the stats - I probably won't splurge yet, but my next PC is booting off of one for sure.

    DiscoZombie on
Sign In or Register to comment.