The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
I don't know if this is allowed, but I want to troll racists.
Well, I should say I want scientific studies that prove that racism or supremacist is retarded, and I want to throw it in their faces. Where can I find some?
Also if this thread isn't allowed tell me; I'll close it.
Personally, I think the extremes on both sides are just not true. Also people need to be very specific about what they are saying.
I think it's possible for all of the following to be true at the same time.
1. Giraffes are not smarter than Zebras
2. Being a Giraffe does not mean you a smart.
3. Being a Zebra does not mean you are stupid.
4. Giraffes have a higher deviation of intelligence than Zebras.
5. The average IQ of a Giraffe is equal to the average IQ of a Zebra.
6. Giraffes with 150+ IQ outnumber Zebras with 150+ IQ by a factor of 3 to 1.
Racist are people ... Just like librarians or people who use Zunes.
It's a choice they make.
If racists are 3% of the general population and 1% of the PHD population then it may be possible to draw a correlation with them being unsuccessful at college. However, people will usually take that example way further than it should go without more evidence.
2) Racists are usually never successful in any field that requires intelligence.
Hehe, yeah. Now that's just being prejudiced against racists. It will be pretty easy for them to poke holes in that argument, since there have been a bunch of successful racists. Generally clan members were also sherrifs or city council members, and Hitler is another example. I mean, successful people usually don't advertise that they are racist, but I think if you did a little reasearch on the matter you would find there are quite a few.
2) Racists are usually never successful in any field that requires intelligence.
There's actually a noted scientist (who's name escapes me, he's European) who maintains #1 but claims he's not a racist.
So you've got a double whammy there.
Anyway, #2 is retarded.
Stick to #1, which will be hard to scientifically prove because we don't know enough about genes and the human brain to make actual scientific conclusions. We can only study data and make inferences.
You know you're going to fail, right? I mean, you don't become a member of a white supremacy board because you're unsteady in your beliefs.
Well, I was sort of planning to make this a long term operation.
Sort of like that guy who made ridiculous fundamentalist videos to mock their beliefs on that Christian youtube site until the they caught on and banned him.
You know you're going to fail, right? I mean, you don't become a member of a white supremacy board because you're unsteady in your beliefs.
Well, I was sort of planning to make this a long term operation.
Sort of like that guy who made ridiculous fundamentalist videos to mock their beliefs on that Christian youtube site until the they caught on and banned him.
So you're going to spend a lot of time and effort for no result?
Look, if you want to make a difference, treat people how you know you should treat them, and shun the racists. They're like the marquee signs in that episode of the Simpsons, paying attention to them gives them power.
You know you're going to fail, right? I mean, you don't become a member of a white supremacy board because you're unsteady in your beliefs.
Well, I was sort of planning to make this a long term operation.
Sort of like that guy who made ridiculous fundamentalist videos to mock their beliefs on that Christian youtube site until the they caught on and banned him.
I know where you're going with this, and I think it could be somewhat entertaining.
However.
Take the guy who made the ridiculous videos. After they banned him, do you think that they sat down and discussed the finer points of what he was saying and decided that they should either mellow in their beliefs or just drop the whole God thing and become atheists? Probably not. They probably sat around and discussed how much of a dick that guy was and how he was going to burn in hell for eternity.
In your case, they'll ban you, probably even faster than the false fundamentalist was banned, and then sit down and discuss the finer points of racial inferiority. Or they'll keep you around and treat you like we treat Wiggin, or treated Ketchum_Ash before he finally set fire to the thin rope he was holding onto. And probably hurl racial epithets at you as they do it.
So you need to ask yourself, it this going to be worth the time and effort that you're going to put into this?
EDIT: You sons of bitches. "Oooh, look at me! I can make succinct posts faster than Descendant X can make long posts and say the exact same thing!"
Descendant X on
Garry: I know you gentlemen have been through a lot, but when you find the time I'd rather not spend the rest of the winter TIED TO THIS FUCKING COUCH!
0
EshTending bar. FFXIV. Motorcycles.Portland, ORRegistered Userregular
edited December 2009
Take a Social And Cultural Anthropology course. Race is a myth. :P
You don't need facts, or well supported opinions, or any of that shit. That's called debating.
When you troll you jump in with guns blazing and start making shit up as you go. Improvise. Your support is basically going to be anecdotal evidence and facts that don't actually exist or have no basis on reality. The amount of information you have available to support your "arguments" is limited only by the extent of your imagination.
EDIT: And don't try to prove those two points you posted because they are actually quite shitty and not true at all. You will be easily dispelled.
Posts
2) Racists are usually never successful in any field that requires intelligence.
Racist are people ... Just like librarians or people who use Zunes.
It's a choice they make.
Well, loud ones, I mean.
I think it's possible for all of the following to be true at the same time.
1. Giraffes are not smarter than Zebras
2. Being a Giraffe does not mean you a smart.
3. Being a Zebra does not mean you are stupid.
4. Giraffes have a higher deviation of intelligence than Zebras.
5. The average IQ of a Giraffe is equal to the average IQ of a Zebra.
6. Giraffes with 150+ IQ outnumber Zebras with 150+ IQ by a factor of 3 to 1.
If racists are 3% of the general population and 1% of the PHD population then it may be possible to draw a correlation with them being unsuccessful at college. However, people will usually take that example way further than it should go without more evidence.
Hehe, yeah. Now that's just being prejudiced against racists. It will be pretty easy for them to poke holes in that argument, since there have been a bunch of successful racists. Generally clan members were also sherrifs or city council members, and Hitler is another example. I mean, successful people usually don't advertise that they are racist, but I think if you did a little reasearch on the matter you would find there are quite a few.
There's actually a noted scientist (who's name escapes me, he's European) who maintains #1 but claims he's not a racist.
So you've got a double whammy there.
Anyway, #2 is retarded.
Stick to #1, which will be hard to scientifically prove because we don't know enough about genes and the human brain to make actual scientific conclusions. We can only study data and make inferences.
we also talk about other random shit and clown upon each other
Hitler?
You don't get much more successful than dictator of a country who ends up taking over a fair chunk of the world now do you?
Well, I was sort of planning to make this a long term operation.
Sort of like that guy who made ridiculous fundamentalist videos to mock their beliefs on that Christian youtube site until the they caught on and banned him.
Look, if you want to make a difference, treat people how you know you should treat them, and shun the racists. They're like the marquee signs in that episode of the Simpsons, paying attention to them gives them power.
Surely you realize that you'll never change anyone's opinion by attacking their beliefs, even if you're 100% correct?
I know where you're going with this, and I think it could be somewhat entertaining.
However.
Take the guy who made the ridiculous videos. After they banned him, do you think that they sat down and discussed the finer points of what he was saying and decided that they should either mellow in their beliefs or just drop the whole God thing and become atheists? Probably not. They probably sat around and discussed how much of a dick that guy was and how he was going to burn in hell for eternity.
In your case, they'll ban you, probably even faster than the false fundamentalist was banned, and then sit down and discuss the finer points of racial inferiority. Or they'll keep you around and treat you like we treat Wiggin, or treated Ketchum_Ash before he finally set fire to the thin rope he was holding onto. And probably hurl racial epithets at you as they do it.
So you need to ask yourself, it this going to be worth the time and effort that you're going to put into this?
EDIT: You sons of bitches. "Oooh, look at me! I can make succinct posts faster than Descendant X can make long posts and say the exact same thing!"
You don't need facts, or well supported opinions, or any of that shit. That's called debating.
When you troll you jump in with guns blazing and start making shit up as you go. Improvise. Your support is basically going to be anecdotal evidence and facts that don't actually exist or have no basis on reality. The amount of information you have available to support your "arguments" is limited only by the extent of your imagination.
EDIT: And don't try to prove those two points you posted because they are actually quite shitty and not true at all. You will be easily dispelled.