Ronald Reagan Appreciation Station

HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration ThreadCentrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
edited February 2010 in Debate and/or Discourse
250px-Official_Portrait_of_President_Reagan_1981.jpg
Former President Ronald Reagan
February 6, 1911– June 5, 2004

Ronald Reagan is a mythological creature. Though the modern popular image of the president is sometimes that of a donkey differing only in the horns on its forehead, the traditional president also has a billy-goat beard, a lion's tail, and cloven hooves—these distinguish it from a democrat. Marianna Mayer has observed (The Unicorn and the Lake), "Reagan is the only fabulous beast that does not seem to have been conceived out of human fears. In even the earliest references he is fierce yet good, selfless yet solitary, but always mysteriously beautiful. He could be captured only by unfair means, and his policies were said to neutralize poison."
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

So, it goes without saying that our current political climate has people yearning for the days of Reagan. Reagan is a figure I've observed that people either love or hate, it's generally hard to find a middleground. The thing is, when Reagan was in office I was but a babe and wasn't really aware of the world around me 'til Bush Sr. took over for a few years. I didn't grow up in the 1980's Cold War mindset. I've taken some time to read about Reagan, aside from learning about him in school, but I don't feel like I have any perspective. I can't necessarily trust the elderly folks (either on TV or coworkers or my folks) because they tend to be delusional and hyperbolic.

Aside from curbing the discussion going on in another thread, I'm curious about what people have to say about Reagan who were actually fairly grown up at the time of his term as president. All we can really do aside from that is talk about his policies and actions in hindsight.

Edit - Here's a list of criticism against Reagan and his terms as president. Big thanks to MGS2 Demo for it.
Reagan and The Fairness Doctrine:
In 1987 the Supreme Court ruled that the fairness doctrine was not mandated by congress and therefor unenforceable by the FCC. In 1987 both houses of Congress voted to make The Fairness Doctrine law and therefor enforceable. Reagan vetoed it and killed it.

Reagan and the metric system: A time line.
1975: The Metric Conversion Act of 1975 (Public Law 94-168) passed by Congress and the U.S. Metric Board is created.
1979: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) requires wine producers and importers to switch to metric.
1980: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) requires distilled spirits producers and importers to switch to metric.
1982: Reagan disbands U.S. Metric Board and fires everyone associated with it.

Reagan and Gun Control
*Reagan supported and signed a 15-day waiting period when he was governor of California. He then blamed it on the Democrats.
*Reagan supported and signed a law "prohibiting the carrying of loaded firearms on one's person or in a vehicle, in any public place or on any public street." The law was aimed at stopping the Black Panthers after their march on the California State Capitol, but affected all gun owners. He then blamed it on the Democrats.
*Reagan supported and signed a ban on the transfer of new manufacture fully automatic firearms while president and blamed it on the Democrats.
*Reagan vocally supported the Brady Bill and the Assault Weapons Ban after his presidency in the early 90s. Which were then blamed on the Democrats.

Criminal:
Iran-Contra treason.
Lied about it.
Likely encouraged Iran to keep US Embassy hostages until he was into office.

Fiscal:
Supply-side economics.
National debt tripled.
$12 billion trade surplus --> $100+ billion trade deficit.
Deregulated savings and loans, precipitated huge economic crisis.
Tax raiser.
Taxed the poor, cut taxes for the rich.
SDI "Star Wars" boondoggle.
Military spending increased to match imaginary spending in USSR.
Deregulation caused oil bust.
Broke air traffic control union.

Social:
Gutted social welfare.
Release of mental patients without recourse, homeless population up.
Ignored AIDS crisis.
Abstinence-only sex education.
Strengthened ATF, banned automatic weapons, blamed Democrats for it.
Increased spending for War on Drugs.
National drinking age of 21.
Underfunded NEA.
EPA Superfund grants manipulated to help Republicans in local elections.
Deregulated kids' tv, initiated 22 minute toy ads.
Killed energy programs.
Crack in the ghettos. (? Due to support for Contras and Noriega?)

Foreign:
Wars all over Central America, incl Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras.
Promoted Iran-Iraq war.
Sent Marines into Beirut, abandoned mission after terrorist bombing.
Broke detente with USSR until Gorbachev personally made things better.
Backed Contras in drug running schemes.
Supported right-wing dictators and movements everywhere, including:
Apartheid regime in SA.
Marcos regime in Phillipines.
Saddam Hussein and Baathist regime in Iraq, even after Kurds gassed.
Taliban in Afghanistan.
Manuel Noriega in Panama.
Augusto Pinochet in Chile.

Concepts:
Welfare queens.
Trees cause pollution.
Ketchup as a vegetable.

Appointments:
30+ convicted appointees.
Ed Meese at Justice, porn freak.
James Watt at Interior, idiot, corrupt.
William Casey at CIA, religious nut, strikes into Uzbekistan. (? Uzb part of USSR, maybe mean Afghanistan?)
HUD a corrupt mess in general.
Politicised CIA.
Robert Bork to SCOTUS (failed), segregationist and asshole.
Antonin Scalia, same but he got in.

Personal:
Unfit to serve due to Alzheimer's disease by term's end.
Horrible excuse for a human being in general.
McCarthyite.
Neo-Conservative. (? Isn't neo-conservatism post-Cold War?)
Backed Moral Majority.
Pardoned Robert Walker, who went on to kill his wife.
Started presidential campaign at racist murder crime scene in Philadelphia, MS.
Laid wreath and made speech at SS cemetery in Germany.
Vietnam War a "noble cause."
Helped start right-wing noise machine. (? By promoting myth of liberal media?)
Hated sex, made Ron Jr. feel like a sissy and quit ballet.
Dumb as a stump.
Believed in astrology and used it to run government.
Innovated "talking points" cue cards.
"I don't recall" to weasel out of press questions.
Confused movies with reality.
Outlawed Russia forever, started bombing in five minutes.

Henroid on
«13456789

Posts

  • emnmnmeemnmnme Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    I want to know more about the Iranian hostage deal going on before Reagan was elected over Carter. I know what happened - I want to know why people cared at the time. Were the Iranians taunting the States with the hostages? Was it hyped up as a matter of pride by the GOP?

    emnmnme on
  • Ethan SmithEthan Smith Origin name: Beart4to Arlington, VARegistered User regular
    edited February 2010
    "When I met him I began to wonder why anyone would think that this man should be the mayor of a town, none the less the governor of as important a state as California"--Kissinger, on Reagan.

    Ethan Smith on
  • RustRust __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2010
    if you want something that's waaaaay over on the hate end of the spectrum, john dolan did a pretty memorable writeup right after the man's funeral
    Here Lies the Worst of All

    In all of America, isn't there one person brave enough to dump wet cement on Reagan's Hollywood Boulevard star? Isn't there one bitter reject with nothing to lose, willing to pour lighter fluid over the "tributes" Reagan's fans have been laying outside the funeral home?

    Apparently not.

    Every fool in America is deep in mourning for this worthless man, who had no conscience, no intellect and no shame. He had all the faults and none of the virtues of the fascist: malice without frankness; cruelty without courage; pomp without dignity. And if all 285 million of you suckers are willing to sit there and let the jerks lie about him to your face, then you deserve him. He really was your kind of man.

    No one but a sucker would stand for the crap they're saying about Reagan. The claims they're making for Reagan aren't just false -- they're comic.

    "He was a brave leader." Reagan was the most cowardly president of the 20th century. His favorite weapons systems were those which could not possibly be used in anger, such as the B1 bomber or Star Wars. These weapons transferred money to military-industrial stockholders without risking actual wartime use, which made them ideal for corporate cowards like Reagan's staffers. It took his chickenhawk braintrust months to get up the nerve to invade Grenada, an island so tiny even the Army had a hard time finding maps for it. And when the American military finally triumphed, after some "tough combat" with a couple hundred Cuban construction workers, Reagan's men pissed themselves with relief. But they still wouldn't give effective anti-aircraft weapons to the Afghans -- not until Democratic congressmen forced Reagan the Peacenik's trembling hand.

    The Iran-Contra scandal revealed just how un-martial and indeed anti-American Reagan's military policies really were. While refusing to arm the Afghans, who were brave and effective anti-Soviet fighters, Reagan's circle was obsessed with funneling huge wads of cash to the "Contras," the Nicaraguan death squads whose military effectiveness consisted only of massacring unarmed villagers, and who never once stood up to Sandinista troops and provided the least semblance of battle. Since he was forbidden by law from slipping money to the Contras without Congressional authorization, Reagan sent fascist stooge Ollie "Nutcase" North to Iran -- to sell the Iranian Islamists US weaponry! Iran -- the country that hated us most in the world! Sending them US weapons and sending the money to sleazy coke-dealing throat-slitters who were no use in battle at all! How in the name of besieged sentience is that a patriotic act?

    "He was a compassionate conservative." What this means is that he was the only American rightwinger whose evil didn't show in every photograph--camouflage honed in dozens of films from an era when entertainment was bland and inoffensive. He was the quintessential American success, without memories or even a scrap of affect. His adopted son, Michael, wrote about meeting his dad at the boarding school to which the boy had been sent by his indifferent Hollywood parents. Reagan did a guest appearance at the school, which made Michael feel very proud. He stood in line to see his Dad. As each boy passed and shook his hand, Reagan said exactly the same line: "Hello, Sonny, what's your name?" Michael's turn finally came. He looked up at his father, who said, "Hello, Sonny, what's your name?"

    Compassionate? I know better. I grew up under Reagans rule. Many of his best techniques were refined in his terms as governor of California, long before he became president. Before Reagan, insane people were maintained at State expense. Under Reagan, the job was transferred to "community care" -- but as everybody knew, there was no such thing. So every crazy in California took the bus to Berkeley.

    "He won the Cold War." On the contrary, he came to power when the Cold War was already over, with the Soviet gerontocracy hanging on to power, trying not to make waves and hoping that their dying system would last their own lifetimes. Reagan and his CIA analysts confronted an opponent they knew to be dying or dead, and spent eight years propping up that moribund opponent in order to keep the suckers scared and the military-industrial complex running strong.

    If you read Philip K. Dick's novels, you know who Reagan was: he was Buster Friendly. Tireless, grinning, never taking himself too seriously -- and avidly working to destroy anything worth saving.

    Like Buster, Reagan hated Nature -- the animals, the forests -- most of all. You can explain his hatred as the result of buyout by timber and oil interests, and that's true to some extent. But other rightwing politicians in the habit of colluding with the energy biz go to some trouble to pretend they value all that environmental shit. Reagan never did. In fact, his record of anti-Nature invective is one of the few clear intellectual themes one can discern in his speeches. While still governor of California, he made the famous "If you've seen one Redwood tree, you've seen'em all" remark. He always made the extra effort to revile trees and the people who hugged them, to disseminate ridiculous claims about plants causing pollution, and to strip first California and then the whole country of every park, wilderness or environmental law. As far as I can see, this was his only principle: hatred of life. And the more beautiful and rare the life, the more intense his hatred.

    And now the amnesiac selfishness which characterized his whole undeservedly long, comfortable life has finally lapped over the top and stopped his heart. It was typical of him, though, to pick an exit that denied all thought, and all suffering. Those were for lesser breeds.

    all of that aside, if i had to point out reagan's biggest offense retrospectively it'd have to be that, looking back, he was one of, if not the first president that made ignorance a point of pride

    that folksy demeanor crushed the democrats so thoroughly that the whole country has been pandering to the lowest common denominator ever since, and when you groom leaders to appeal to the lowest common denominator, you get weak leaders

    the man was a plague, pure and simple, and his hobbling legacy poisons this country even today

    Rust on
  • enlightenedbumenlightenedbum Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    emnmnme wrote: »
    I want to know more about the Iranian hostage deal going on before Reagan was elected over Carter. I know what happened - I want to know why people cared at the time. Were the Iranians taunting the States with the hostages? Was it hyped up as a matter of pride by the GOP?

    Um, a foreign government was holding 100+ Americans as hostages. We tend to not like it when people do that.

    enlightenedbum on
    The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    His papers were sealed past their original expiry date thanks to W. but I believe that has since been reversed under Obama so that the length of time for something to become declassified will go back to normal and we'll see all the dirt in a handful of years. I'm looking forward to seeing a fairly comprehensive biography from some of the better historians using source documents when that is the case. Though I doubt even then we'll get a more full picture thanks to the constant and purposeful hagiography from 'conservatives' in the 90's and beyond.

    moniker on
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    moniker wrote: »
    His papers were sealed past their original expiry date thanks to W. but I believe that has since been reversed under Obama so that the length of time for something to become declassified will go back to normal and we'll see all the dirt in a handful of years. I'm looking forward to seeing a fairly comprehensive biography from some of the better historians using source documents when that is the case. Though I doubt even then we'll get a more full picture thanks to the constant and purposeful hagiography from 'conservatives' in the 90's and beyond.

    I did not know about that. People only do that shit when there's something to hide. :?

    Henroid on
  • Kipling217Kipling217 Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    The "he won the cold war" claim is the worst in my eyes. Guy won on a walkover.

    If the Soviet Leadership had massacred protesters like the Chinese did. Gave Gorbachev a one-way ticket to Siberia. Gave Boris Yeltsin a 9mm permanent hangover cure. Then said "nyerh, nyerh, nyerh".

    Do anyone really think that Regan would have Cowboyed up and done anything? Apart from speeches, pouting and boycotting the Olympics? With 3000 nukes pointed at the USA?

    Regan got handed the greatest victory in history by accident. Anybody in the White House would have gotten the samme.

    Kipling217 on
    The sky was full of stars, every star an exploding ship. One of ours.
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Kipling217 wrote: »
    The "he won the cold war" claim is the worst in my eyes. Guy won on a walkover.

    If the Soviet Leadership had massacred protesters like the Chinese did. Gave Gorbachev a one-way ticket to Siberia. Gave Boris Yeltsin a 9mm permanent hangover cure. Then said "nyerh, nyerh, nyerh".

    Do anyone really think that Regan would have Cowboyed up and done anything? Apart from speeches, pouting and boycotting the Olympics? With 3000 nukes pointed at the USA?

    Regan got handed the greatest victory in history by accident. Anybody in the White House would have gotten the samme.

    The only defense I see for it is Reagan starting the SDI project and how he managed military spending, which supposedly influenced the Soviet Union's decision making throughout the 80's. But how do you prove or disprove something like that?

    Henroid on
  • deadonthestreetdeadonthestreet Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Did you know he is the Greatest American?

    Yeah, no, he is one of the five worst presidents this country has ever had and is in part responsible for so much of today's problems.

    deadonthestreet on
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Kipling217 wrote: »
    The "he won the cold war" claim is the worst in my eyes. Guy won on a walkover.

    If the Soviet Leadership had massacred protesters like the Chinese did. Gave Gorbachev a one-way ticket to Siberia. Gave Boris Yeltsin a 9mm permanent hangover cure. Then said "nyerh, nyerh, nyerh".

    Do anyone really think that Regan would have Cowboyed up and done anything? Apart from speeches, pouting and boycotting the Olympics? With 3000 nukes pointed at the USA?

    Regan got handed the greatest victory in history by accident. Anybody in the White House would have gotten the samme.

    The Pope doesn't get enough credit for ending the Cold War either. If anything I'd say it goes John Paull II > Bush > Thatcher > Reagan, if we're going to ignore the Soviets who were in charge of winding things down responsibly.

    And I still say that Bush the Greater should have shared the Nobel with Gorbie.

    moniker on
  • enlightenedbumenlightenedbum Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Did you know he is the Greatest American?

    Yeah, no, he is one of the five worst presidents this country has ever had and is in part responsible for so much of today's problems.

    Buchanon, Grant, Harding, Hoover, and Bush the Lesser would like words with you.

    enlightenedbum on
    The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
  • tsmvengytsmvengy Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Did you know he is the Greatest American?

    Yeah, no, he is one of the five worst presidents this country has ever had and is in part responsible for so much of today's problems.

    Buchanon, Grant, Harding, Hoover, and Bush the Lesser would like words with you.

    Well considering W was like the Reaganites' wet dream we'll consider them tied for 5th-worst.

    tsmvengy on
    steam_sig.png
  • tsmvengytsmvengy Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Henroid wrote: »
    Kipling217 wrote: »
    The "he won the cold war" claim is the worst in my eyes. Guy won on a walkover.

    If the Soviet Leadership had massacred protesters like the Chinese did. Gave Gorbachev a one-way ticket to Siberia. Gave Boris Yeltsin a 9mm permanent hangover cure. Then said "nyerh, nyerh, nyerh".

    Do anyone really think that Regan would have Cowboyed up and done anything? Apart from speeches, pouting and boycotting the Olympics? With 3000 nukes pointed at the USA?

    Regan got handed the greatest victory in history by accident. Anybody in the White House would have gotten the samme.

    The only defense I see for it is Reagan starting the SDI project and how he managed military spending, which supposedly influenced the Soviet Union's decision making throughout the 80's. But how do you prove or disprove something like that?

    The USSR was basically in a bad place already in 1980, though I don't think people realized it at the time. US military spending might have accelerated the demise of the Soviet Union somewhat, but really it was Gorbachev who realized that the way they had been doing things for the last ~70 years wasn't going to work and instituted reforms that eventually led to its demise.

    Reagan lovers prefer to believe that bullshit like "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" inspired people to rise up in the name of "freedums!"

    tsmvengy on
    steam_sig.png
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Reagan gets his honors because he was pretty much the only Republican president since Eisenhower who wasn't:

    a. taken down by scandal(Nixon)
    b. forgettable(Bush senior)
    c. plagued by corruption and incompetence(GWB)

    nexuscrawler on
  • SynthesisSynthesis Honda Today! Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    tsmvengy wrote: »
    Henroid wrote: »
    Kipling217 wrote: »
    The "he won the cold war" claim is the worst in my eyes. Guy won on a walkover.

    If the Soviet Leadership had massacred protesters like the Chinese did. Gave Gorbachev a one-way ticket to Siberia. Gave Boris Yeltsin a 9mm permanent hangover cure. Then said "nyerh, nyerh, nyerh".

    Do anyone really think that Regan would have Cowboyed up and done anything? Apart from speeches, pouting and boycotting the Olympics? With 3000 nukes pointed at the USA?

    Regan got handed the greatest victory in history by accident. Anybody in the White House would have gotten the samme.

    The only defense I see for it is Reagan starting the SDI project and how he managed military spending, which supposedly influenced the Soviet Union's decision making throughout the 80's. But how do you prove or disprove something like that?

    The USSR was basically in a bad place already in 1980, though I don't think people realized it at the time. US military spending might have accelerated the demise of the Soviet Union somewhat, but really it was Gorbachev who realized that the way they had been doing things for the last ~70 years wasn't going to work and instituted reforms that eventually led to its demise.

    Reagan lovers prefer to believe that bullshit like "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" inspired people to rise up in the name of "freedums!"

    This isn't directed at anyone specifically, but it's important to distinguish two different things:

    The end of the Cold War, and the dissolution of the USSR into the CIS.

    They're not mutually inclusive. Besides the general hate-on a portion of the American population had for the USSR (which has transferred, in part, to the Russian Federation, and a few other countries in the CIS), I'd argue that the Cold War, as a state of affairs, was over by the time the Warsaw Pact was dissolved--at least for America (if not the USSR itself). To many people, a Cold War with the Russian Federation is not out of the question. In that case, I'd say it Gorbachev deserved the credit for not changing his positions leading up to the August Coup, and being more willing to eventually fall from his position than compromise with pro-Unionists. The New Union Treaty was really his effort not to "betray his conscious" so to speak, and not a very strong one (even if it was politically popular). The falling standard of living--compared to the "rise" during the late Khrushchev and into the Brezhnev years that many Soviet citizens perceived--is actually pretty hard to quantify and say just how much it contributed exactly. It certainly didn't kill the country by itself--if it did, the USSR wouldn't have been a country for 40 years after the catastrophe of the Second World War. The inability to solve problems "in all due time", and the notion that localities could do it better, was probably a bigger issue than "life is tough in the USSR". Especially given the horrific economic state the "Baltic Tigers" are in now.

    (Now, whether the outcome is a good or a bad thing widely varies depending on who you ask, though Gorbachev himself has expressed no shortage of regret over a course of action that, to his credit, he couldn't exactly predict everything to a T.)

    Reagan's willingness to keep the US on a risky, even dangerous path of spending more money than the rest of the world combined on military hardware, and just assuming that the military would know what to do with all of it, no doubt "helped", but I'd agree with others in saying it was just one driving factor. I'm tempted to say that it's on parity (perhaps somewhat greater) than the extremely fast falling price of oil (given that the USSR was widely considered by the west to be the most reliable oil exporting nation in the world, and was approaching OPEC's combined level of export in an attempt to make up for declining prices. This, that, and other things all come into play, but the unwillingness to go to war over the right to succeed in the 1977 Constitution was the death of the country in particular. As I've said, the economic situation in the USSR was dire--but not nation killing by itself--and it pales in comparison that the economic disaster that accompanied the transformation into the CIS and the remapping of the economy. A necessary disaster, perhaps, but one anyway.

    Of course, we're coming full circle now. Moscow has demonstrated that it's willing to go to war over the issue of autonomous oblasts (particularly if the autonomous oblasts are willing to do it too) with its neighbors. It's also demonstrated that little wars like this are, on the national level, cakewalks compared to the country's other problems and concerns(crime, alcoholism, infrastructure), much to NATO's surprise and horror (in the weeks leading up to the Russian-Georgian War, nobody in the west expected it to be the shooting gallery that it turned out to be--people actually thought Georgia might wrench a victory out of it, amazingly enough). The rising price of oil as afforded the country and its allies a "second wind", or something close to it. It's not entirely relevant, but people speculated China would eventually replace the USSR and the USA--I'm fairly confident that China will eventually take our place, and Russia's newfound willingness to talk to China (particularly through the SCO) suggests that a lot of Russians feel the same. And of course, the United States has its own problems.

    tl;dr--Reagan's role in ending the Cold War is widely exaggerated.

    Synthesis on
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Synthesis wrote: »
    moniker wrote: »
    Kipling217 wrote: »
    The "he won the cold war" claim is the worst in my eyes. Guy won on a walkover.

    If the Soviet Leadership had massacred protesters like the Chinese did. Gave Gorbachev a one-way ticket to Siberia. Gave Boris Yeltsin a 9mm permanent hangover cure. Then said "nyerh, nyerh, nyerh".

    Do anyone really think that Regan would have Cowboyed up and done anything? Apart from speeches, pouting and boycotting the Olympics? With 3000 nukes pointed at the USA?

    Regan got handed the greatest victory in history by accident. Anybody in the White House would have gotten the samme.

    The Pope doesn't get enough credit for ending the Cold War either. If anything I'd say it goes John Paull II > Bush > Thatcher > Reagan, if we're going to ignore the Soviets who were in charge of winding things down responsibly.

    And I still say that Bush the Greater should have shared the Nobel with Gorbie.

    This isn't directed at anyone specifically, but it's important to distinguish two different things:

    The end of the Cold War, and the dissolution of the USSR into the CIS.

    They're not mutually inclusive. Besides the general hate-on a portion of the American population had for the USSR (which has transferred, in part, to the Russian Federation, and a few other countries in the CIS), I'd argue that the Cold War, as a state of affairs, was over by the time the Warsaw Pact was dissolved--at least for America (if not the USSR itself). To many people, a Cold War with the Russian Federation is not out of the question. In that case, I'd say it Gorbachev deserved the credit for not changing his positions leading up to the August Coup, and being more willing to eventually fall from his position than compromise with pro-Unionists. The New Union Treaty was really his effort not to "betray his conscious" so to speak, and not a very strong one (even if it was politically popular).

    (Now, whether the outcome is a good or a bad thing widely varies depending on who you ask, though Gorbachev himself has expressed no shortage of regret over a course of action that, to his credit, he couldn't exactly predict everything to a T.)

    Reagan's willingness to keep the US on a risky, even dangerous path of spending more money than the rest of the world combined on military hardware, and just assuming that the military would know what to do with all of it, no doubt "helped", but I'd agree with others in saying it was just one driving factor. I'm tempted to say that it's on parity (perhaps somewhat greater) than the extremely fast falling price of oil (given that the USSR was widely considered by the west to be the most reliable oil exporting nation in the world, and was approaching OPEC's combined level of export in an attempt to make up for declining prices. This, that, and other things all come into play, but the unwillingness to go to war over the right to succeed in the 1977 Constitution was the death of the country in particular.

    Of course, we're coming full circle now. Moscow has demonstrated that it's willing to go to war over the issue of autonomous oblasts (particularly if the autonomous oblasts are willing to do it too) with its neighbors. The rising price of oil as afforded the country and its allies a "second wind", or something close to it. It's not entirely relevant, but people speculated China would eventually replace the USSR and the USA--I'm fairly confident that China will eventually take our place, and Russia's newfound willingness to talk to China (particularly through the SCO) suggests that a lot of Russians feel the same.

    tl;dr--Reagan's role in ending the Cold War is widely exaggerated.

    Well, yes, but that's not ignoring the Soviets in charge. If anything that's partly focusing on them.

    moniker on
  • SynthesisSynthesis Honda Today! Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    moniker wrote: »
    Synthesis wrote: »
    moniker wrote: »
    Kipling217 wrote: »
    The "he won the cold war" claim is the worst in my eyes. Guy won on a walkover.

    If the Soviet Leadership had massacred protesters like the Chinese did. Gave Gorbachev a one-way ticket to Siberia. Gave Boris Yeltsin a 9mm permanent hangover cure. Then said "nyerh, nyerh, nyerh".

    Do anyone really think that Regan would have Cowboyed up and done anything? Apart from speeches, pouting and boycotting the Olympics? With 3000 nukes pointed at the USA?

    Regan got handed the greatest victory in history by accident. Anybody in the White House would have gotten the samme.

    The Pope doesn't get enough credit for ending the Cold War either. If anything I'd say it goes John Paull II > Bush > Thatcher > Reagan, if we're going to ignore the Soviets who were in charge of winding things down responsibly.

    And I still say that Bush the Greater should have shared the Nobel with Gorbie.

    This isn't directed at anyone specifically, but it's important to distinguish two different things:

    The end of the Cold War, and the dissolution of the USSR into the CIS.

    They're not mutually inclusive. Besides the general hate-on a portion of the American population had for the USSR (which has transferred, in part, to the Russian Federation, and a few other countries in the CIS), I'd argue that the Cold War, as a state of affairs, was over by the time the Warsaw Pact was dissolved--at least for America (if not the USSR itself). To many people, a Cold War with the Russian Federation is not out of the question. In that case, I'd say it Gorbachev deserved the credit for not changing his positions leading up to the August Coup, and being more willing to eventually fall from his position than compromise with pro-Unionists. The New Union Treaty was really his effort not to "betray his conscious" so to speak, and not a very strong one (even if it was politically popular).

    (Now, whether the outcome is a good or a bad thing widely varies depending on who you ask, though Gorbachev himself has expressed no shortage of regret over a course of action that, to his credit, he couldn't exactly predict everything to a T.)

    Reagan's willingness to keep the US on a risky, even dangerous path of spending more money than the rest of the world combined on military hardware, and just assuming that the military would know what to do with all of it, no doubt "helped", but I'd agree with others in saying it was just one driving factor. I'm tempted to say that it's on parity (perhaps somewhat greater) than the extremely fast falling price of oil (given that the USSR was widely considered by the west to be the most reliable oil exporting nation in the world, and was approaching OPEC's combined level of export in an attempt to make up for declining prices. This, that, and other things all come into play, but the unwillingness to go to war over the right to succeed in the 1977 Constitution was the death of the country in particular.

    Of course, we're coming full circle now. Moscow has demonstrated that it's willing to go to war over the issue of autonomous oblasts (particularly if the autonomous oblasts are willing to do it too) with its neighbors. The rising price of oil as afforded the country and its allies a "second wind", or something close to it. It's not entirely relevant, but people speculated China would eventually replace the USSR and the USA--I'm fairly confident that China will eventually take our place, and Russia's newfound willingness to talk to China (particularly through the SCO) suggests that a lot of Russians feel the same.

    tl;dr--Reagan's role in ending the Cold War is widely exaggerated.

    Well, yes, but that's not ignoring the Soviets in charge. If anything that's partly focusing on them.

    No, I agree. There's just a lot of things to consider. It might be a bitter pill for a lot of Americans that we, the big men on campus, weren't in center stage nonstop.

    Similarly, it's a bitter pill for Republicans to think Reagan might have just be one contributing factor, if that makes any sense.

    Synthesis on
  • Metal Gear Solid 2 DemoMetal Gear Solid 2 Demo Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    1b50299692dbb6652ae5969.jpg

    Metal Gear Solid 2 Demo on
    SteamID- Enders || SC2 ID - BurningCrome.721 || Blogging - Laputan Machine
    1385396-1.png
    Orikae! |RS| : why is everyone yelling 'enders is dead go'
    When I say pop it that means pop it
    heavy.gif
  • SaigaSaiga Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    I went to Ronald Reagan high school. I appreciated him for four years.

    Saiga on
    28je138.png
  • Metal Gear Solid 2 DemoMetal Gear Solid 2 Demo Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    lets just close the thread
    Reagan and The Fairness Doctrine:
    In 1987 the Supreme Court ruled that the fairness doctrine was not mandated by congress and therefor unenforceable by the FCC. In 1987 both houses of Congress voted to make The Fairness Doctrine law and therefor enforceable. Reagan vetoed it and killed it.

    Reagan and the metric system: A time line.
    1975: The Metric Conversion Act of 1975 (Public Law 94-168) passed by Congress and the U.S. Metric Board is created.
    1979: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) requires wine producers and importers to switch to metric.
    1980: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) requires distilled spirits producers and importers to switch to metric.
    1982: Reagan disbands U.S. Metric Board and fires everyone associated with it.

    Reagan and Gun Control
    *Reagan supported and signed a 15-day waiting period when he was governor of California. He then blamed it on the Democrats.
    *Reagan supported and signed a law "prohibiting the carrying of loaded firearms on one's person or in a vehicle, in any public place or on any public street." The law was aimed at stopping the Black Panthers after their march on the California State Capitol, but affected all gun owners. He then blamed it on the Democrats.
    *Reagan supported and signed a ban on the transfer of new manufacture fully automatic firearms while president and blamed it on the Democrats.
    *Reagan vocally supported the Brady Bill and the Assault Weapons Ban after his presidency in the early 90s. Which were then blamed on the Democrats.

    Criminal:
    Iran-Contra treason.
    Lied about it.
    Likely encouraged Iran to keep US Embassy hostages until he was into office.

    Fiscal:
    Supply-side economics.
    National debt tripled.
    $12 billion trade surplus --> $100+ billion trade deficit.
    Deregulated savings and loans, precipitated huge economic crisis.
    Tax raiser.
    Taxed the poor, cut taxes for the rich.
    SDI "Star Wars" boondoggle.
    Military spending increased to match imaginary spending in USSR.
    Deregulation caused oil bust.
    Broke air traffic control union.

    Social:
    Gutted social welfare.
    Release of mental patients without recourse, homeless population up.
    Ignored AIDS crisis.
    Abstinence-only sex education.
    Strengthened ATF, banned automatic weapons, blamed Democrats for it.
    Increased spending for War on Drugs.
    National drinking age of 21.
    Underfunded NEA.
    EPA Superfund grants manipulated to help Republicans in local elections.
    Deregulated kids' tv, initiated 22 minute toy ads.
    Killed energy programs.
    Crack in the ghettos. (? Due to support for Contras and Noriega?)

    Foreign:
    Wars all over Central America, incl Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras.
    Promoted Iran-Iraq war.
    Sent Marines into Beirut, abandoned mission after terrorist bombing.
    Broke detente with USSR until Gorbachev personally made things better.
    Backed Contras in drug running schemes.
    Supported right-wing dictators and movements everywhere, including:
    Apartheid regime in SA.
    Marcos regime in Phillipines.
    Saddam Hussein and Baathist regime in Iraq, even after Kurds gassed.
    Taliban in Afghanistan.
    Manuel Noriega in Panama.
    Augusto Pinochet in Chile.

    Concepts:
    Welfare queens.
    Trees cause pollution.
    Ketchup as a vegetable.

    Appointments:
    30+ convicted appointees.
    Ed Meese at Justice, porn freak.
    James Watt at Interior, idiot, corrupt.
    William Casey at CIA, religious nut, strikes into Uzbekistan. (? Uzb part of USSR, maybe mean Afghanistan?)
    HUD a corrupt mess in general.
    Politicised CIA.
    Robert Bork to SCOTUS (failed), segregationist and asshole.
    Antonin Scalia, same but he got in.

    Personal:
    Unfit to serve due to Alzheimer's disease by term's end.
    Horrible excuse for a human being in general.
    McCarthyite.
    Neo-Conservative. (? Isn't neo-conservatism post-Cold War?)
    Backed Moral Majority.
    Pardoned Robert Walker, who went on to kill his wife.
    Started presidential campaign at racist murder crime scene in Philadelphia, MS.
    Laid wreath and made speech at SS cemetery in Germany.
    Vietnam War a "noble cause."
    Helped start right-wing noise machine. (? By promoting myth of liberal media?)
    Hated sex, made Ron Jr. feel like a sissy and quit ballet.
    Dumb as a stump.
    Believed in astrology and used it to run government.
    Innovated "talking points" cue cards.
    "I don't recall" to weasel out of press questions.
    Confused movies with reality.
    Outlawed Russia forever, started bombing in five minutes.

    Metal Gear Solid 2 Demo on
    SteamID- Enders || SC2 ID - BurningCrome.721 || Blogging - Laputan Machine
    1385396-1.png
    Orikae! |RS| : why is everyone yelling 'enders is dead go'
    When I say pop it that means pop it
    heavy.gif
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Wait, Reagan is the reason for the 21 drinking age in the country? What a silly goose.

    Henroid on
  • ScalfinScalfin __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2010
    Henroid wrote: »
    Wait, Reagan is the reason for the 21 drinking age in the country? What a silly goose.

    It's gone back and forth. Apperantly, the last time it was set back to 18 was only about a month after my mom turned 21. She was pissed.

    Scalfin on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The rest of you, I fucking hate you for the fact that I now have a blue dot on this god awful thread.
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Trees cause pollution what the fuck.

    Henroid on
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Henroid wrote: »
    Trees cause pollution what the fuck.
    Oxygen is terribly corrosive.

    Also, it supports terrorists.

    DevoutlyApathetic on
    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • Casual EddyCasual Eddy The Astral PlaneRegistered User regular
    edited February 2010
    ignoring the AIDS crisis betrays a staggering lack of empathy on his part

    Casual Eddy on
  • Andrew_JayAndrew_Jay Registered User regular
    edited October 2023
    -

    Andrew_Jay on
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Henroid wrote: »
    Trees cause pollution what the fuck.
    Oxygen is terribly corrosive.

    Also, it supports terrorists.

    Not that I don't appreciate the humor, but don't fuck with my head on this. D:

    How did he make the claim? It sounds so fucking... silly! Like a goose!

    Henroid on
  • ScalfinScalfin __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2010
    Andrew_Jay wrote: »
    Supported right-wing dictators and movements everywhere, including . . . Taliban in Afghanistan . . .
    To be fair, the Taliban didn't exist until the mid-1990's and the folks who did receive support, the Mujahadeen, were a different bunch altogether.

    Though he is to be blamed (along with H. W. Bush) for abandoning Afghanistan after the Soviet withdrawal, leading to the Taliban several years later.

    I think a random Afghani in a book I read put it best: "the soviets made our women not wear the veil and took our goats. The Taliban made our women wear burkas and took our goats."

    Scalfin on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The rest of you, I fucking hate you for the fact that I now have a blue dot on this god awful thread.
  • Spaten OptimatorSpaten Optimator Smooth Operator Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    A covert American program during the Reagan administration provided Iraq with critical battle planning assistance at a time when American intelligence agencies knew that Iraqi commanders would employ chemical weapons in waging the decisive battles of the Iran-Iraq war, according to senior military officers with direct knowledge of the program.

    ...

    Colonel Lang asserted that the Defense Intelligence Agency ''would have never accepted the use of chemical weapons against civilians, but the use against military objectives was seen as inevitable in the Iraqi struggle for survival.'' Senior Reagan administration officials did nothing to interfere with the continuation of the program, a former participant in the program said.

    ...

    The Pentagon ''wasn't so horrified by Iraq's use of gas,'' said one veteran of the program. ''It was just another way of killing people -- whether with a bullet or phosgene, it didn't make any difference,'' he said.



    http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/18/world/officers-say-us-aided-iraq-in-war-despite-use-of-gas.html?scp=4&sq=walter%20p.%20lang&st=nyt&pagewanted=1



    272628785228d5ea9bfe.jpg



    Sorry, Kurds! Hope you like Jelly Beans!

    Spaten Optimator on
  • Andrew_JayAndrew_Jay Registered User regular
    edited October 2023
    -

    Andrew_Jay on
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    ... just a bit off topic, that Jelly Belly mascot has something censoring his privates.

    Henroid on
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Andrew_Jay wrote: »
    Henroid wrote: »
    Henroid wrote: »
    Trees cause pollution what the fuck.
    Oxygen is terribly corrosive.

    Also, it supports terrorists.
    Not that I don't appreciate the humor, but don't fuck with my head on this. D:

    How did he make the claim? It sounds so fucking... silly! Like a goose!
    "Trees cause pollution" is a stupid concept foisted upon the public in 1981 by U.S. President Ronald W. Reagan. The full quote of his statement was, "Trees cause more pollution than automobiles do". It's a lie.

    Reagan was disingenuously referencing the photochemical reaction that causes ground level ozone pollution (GLOP), also known as photochemical smog. Smog is created when automobile and power plant emissions are broken down into ozone and other chemicals by strong sunlight. These reactions are amplified by the presence of various volatile organic compounds, or VOCs. During hot weather many tree species release volatile organic compounds into the atmosphere, notably terpenes and isoprenes (pine pitch is a terpene). Other VOCs that contribute to GLOP include gasoline, kerosene, paint, paint thinner and other industrial solvents.

    Reagan's statement was disingenuous because volatile organic compounds produced by trees do not cause pollution any more than the sun causes pollution. Reagan might as well have said, "the sun causes more pollution than automobiles do". Photochemical ozone pollution is created when automobile and power plant pollution is broken down by strong sunlight in the presence of any number of volatile organic compounds.

    GLOP or photochemical smog is only created in areas that receive large amounts of pollution from automobiles and power plants. Trees are not required to create it. Without the input of large amounts of man made nitrogen oxides by cars and power plants, the VOCs released by forests on a summer day have nothing to react with and they do not create any pollution. In reality, photochemical smog is very harmful to trees.

    Y'know what, I wasn't alive then but I know exactly what he did. He heard about this - briefly - from someone, and was like, "OH SHIT THAT SOUNDS COOL BETTER GO LOOK SMART" and wanted to tell as many people as possible. But he didn't bother with the fine print.

    Henroid on
  • HachfaceHachface Not the Minister Farrakhan you're thinking of Dammit, Shepard!Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    I'm open to the idea that Ronald Reagan was a worse president than George W. Bush. He might have been the Morgoth to Bush's Sauron.

    Hachface on
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Henroid wrote: »
    Henroid wrote: »
    Trees cause pollution what the fuck.
    Oxygen is terribly corrosive.

    Also, it supports terrorists.

    Not that I don't appreciate the humor, but don't fuck with my head on this. D:

    How did he make the claim? It sounds so fucking... silly! Like a goose!

    Somewhat seriously it reminded me of a Rush Limbaugh rant about how the first oxygen freeing lifeforms (pre-plants essentially) really fucked up the world because of how horribly reactive their free oxygen waste is. Of course, life adapted and lead to what we think of as normal now. It's a "The Earth is huge, we couldn't possibly fuck it up!" argument and is pretty stupid.

    I'm not positive it's level of stupid with regard to Reagan's comments though now that I see their source.

    DevoutlyApathetic on
    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • RustRust __BANNED USERS regular
    edited February 2010
    Henroid wrote: »
    Y'know what, I wasn't alive then but I know exactly what he did. He heard about this - briefly - from someone, and was like, "OH SHIT THAT SOUNDS COOL BETTER GO LOOK SMART" and wanted to tell as many people as possible. But he didn't bother with the fine print.

    given how horrible his environmental agenda was, it's more likely that this was deliberately spread misinformation than some kind of intellectual pratfall

    Rust on
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Yea, that sounds a lot like "I can work with that, I can sell this since only a couple hundred people understand what a load of bullshit it is."

    DevoutlyApathetic on
    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • ShivahnShivahn Unaware of her barrel shifter privilege Western coastal temptressRegistered User, Moderator mod
    edited February 2010
    Hachface wrote: »
    I'm open to the idea that Ronald Reagan was a worse president than George W. Bush. He might have been the Morgoth to Bush's Sauron.

    Well, think about if Reagan wasn't elected?

    Would supply-side be as big now? All this stuff deregulated?

    I think the alternate universe where Reagan wasn't elected is far different than one where only Bush wasn't. In a good way.

    Shivahn on
  • YougottawannaYougottawanna Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Not much to add here that hasn't already been said, except that all of that stuff is how he fucked up the nation as a whole. He also broke California's government before he even became President.

    And the more I learn about the Iran situation, the more depressing it gets. His handling of that whole thing was just unconscionable. I think it was Reagan who demonstrated just how thoroughly unethical you can get away with being if you talk a good game.

    Yougottawanna on
  • Ethan SmithEthan Smith Origin name: Beart4to Arlington, VARegistered User regular
    edited February 2010
    It's important to note that while Pinochet is the most memorable of the Southern Cone dictators, Reagan actually supported a far worse one in Uruguay.

    IIRC,

    In Uruguay, during the dictatorship, 20% of the population left the country, and 10% of those still there (that's 8% overall, or roughly 240,000 people) served prison time of more than three years, and a larger number than that were tortured.
    They had a caste system wherein the state(the largest employer at the time) wouldn't employ you for the slightest of political reasons. The 11 leaders of the revolutionary movement that the dictatorship formed in opposition to were kept in solitary confinement for 10 straight years.
    When Carter came in, he gave pressure to the Southern cone dictatorships to liberalize, and all of them did--they all created constitutions that contained clauses that would lead to democracy within the next decade. It's pretty amazing, because the more you study the area the more you realize that Carter was one of our only presidents who didn't delight in being a silly, silly, goose.

    Anyway, in '83, after 11 years of dictatorship, the constitution the military made to provide a path to democracy called for a vote. The liberal candidate who had run in the last election (early 70's) looked like he was going to win, and so the military started blatantly quashing dissent via a new group of arrests, torturing, and basically disallowing people to help him run.

    Reagan gave them military aid during this time.

    Ethan Smith on
  • sidhaethesidhaethe Registered User regular
    edited February 2010
    Ooh, am I late to the party with a mention of how Reagan supported Proposition 14, which enabled landlords to refuse to rent or sell homes to African Americans in California?

    sidhaethe on
Sign In or Register to comment.