Hm... fair enough. Just seemed like overkill to me. *shrug*
Thanks.
Charging a crime based solely on confession or admission alone with no corroborating evidence isn't very good practice and it's not the best way to meet the burden of proof.
Does that mean Apple isn't going to cooperate with the investigation? Seeing as how they would have the emails with Gizmodo about the iPhone, plus probably server records of them remotely deactivating the lost iPhone the night it was lost.
At this point it's more or less too late - REACT fucked up the seizure, and fruit of the poisonous tree kicks in.
How does that apply to records Apple could provide from their own servers?
I just didn't see why they didn't go that route first, anyways. Didn't think about defendent's evidence vs non- though. *shrug*
Hm... fair enough. Just seemed like overkill to me. *shrug*
Thanks.
Charging a crime based solely on confession or admission alone with no corroborating evidence isn't very good practice and it's not the best way to meet the burden of proof.
Does that mean Apple isn't going to cooperate with the investigation? Seeing as how they would have the emails with Gizmodo about the iPhone, plus probably server records of them remotely deactivating the lost iPhone the night it was lost.
At this point it's more or less too late - REACT fucked up the seizure, and fruit of the poisonous tree kicks in.
How does that apply to records Apple could provide from their own servers?
I just didn't see why they didn't go that route first, anyways. Didn't think about defendent's evidence vs non- though. *shrug*
If it were my case, I'd want both records from Apple and from this guy's own computer or server or whatever.
1. More evidence always allows a better assessment of the case. 2. Sometimes you find exculpatory evidence too!
Hm... fair enough. Just seemed like overkill to me. *shrug*
Thanks.
Charging a crime based solely on confession or admission alone with no corroborating evidence isn't very good practice and it's not the best way to meet the burden of proof.
Does that mean Apple isn't going to cooperate with the investigation? Seeing as how they would have the emails with Gizmodo about the iPhone, plus probably server records of them remotely deactivating the lost iPhone the night it was lost.
At this point it's more or less too late - REACT fucked up the seizure, and fruit of the poisonous tree kicks in.
How does that apply to records Apple could provide from their own servers?
I just didn't see why they didn't go that route first, anyways. Didn't think about defendent's evidence vs non- though. *shrug*
I doubt it's enough to get the charges to stick. Which was probably the point of the seizure (well, beyond the intimidation factor.)
Finally playing Assassin's Creed after buying it a couple of months ago. It's pretty fun.
BOB
THIS IS IMPORTANT
In the Chat thread the other night, I corrected you that "Teetotaller" and "cadbury" are not synonyms. But then I think you went to bed.
A Cadbury is someone who is drunk after a glass and a half of beer. It is a perjorative, because holding your beer is a sign of manly maniness.
You are now equipped to instruct others on matters of our national heritage.
Yeah I saw your correction but was too tired to reply. It was a mistake born of said tiredness, poor reading comprehension, and jesus christ why can't I sleep when I need to.
evilbob on
0
Options
Irond WillWARNING: NO HURTFUL COMMENTS, PLEASE!!!!!Cambridge. MAModeratormod
Finally playing Assassin's Creed after buying it a couple of months ago. It's pretty fun.
BOB
THIS IS IMPORTANT
In the Chat thread the other night, I corrected you that "Teetotaller" and "cadbury" are not synonyms. But then I think you went to bed.
A Cadbury is someone who is drunk after a glass and a half of beer. It is a perjorative, because holding your beer is a sign of manly maniness.
You are now equipped to instruct others on matters of our national heritage.
cadbury is also chocolate
You're sharp Elldren, perhaps too sharp.
The Cadbury allusion is because the Cadbury slogan was "With a famous glass and a half of fresh full cream milk.", hence the glass and a half drunkeness.
Posts
Look out!
I just didn't see why they didn't go that route first, anyways. Didn't think about defendent's evidence vs non- though. *shrug*
I've given all I can
It's not enough
I've given all I can
But we're still on the payroll
Spiderman's gonna wrap up some guy in a cocoon and dissolve him from the inside out.
Yeeeeeaaaaahhhh.
I always feel bad killing spiders I find in my apartment. But then I remember that they're icky and stop feeling bad.
All of them.
Fuck em.
If it were my case, I'd want both records from Apple and from this guy's own computer or server or whatever.
1. More evidence always allows a better assessment of the case. 2. Sometimes you find exculpatory evidence too!
Fixed because spiders are the worst thing.
PSN: Corbius
For the most part.
Bahahahahahahahahah! That is fantastic.
BOB
THIS IS IMPORTANT
In the Chat thread the other night, I corrected you that "Teetotaller" and "cadbury" are not synonyms. But then I think you went to bed.
A Cadbury is someone who is drunk after a glass and a half of beer. It is a perjorative, because holding your beer is a sign of manly maniness.
You are now equipped to instruct others on matters of our national heritage.
I am eating peanut butter
I don't kill spiders unless I basically have to. Spiders are a "take outside and free" class of animal.
Mosquitos are a "kill on sight" class of animal.
Cats are somewhere in between.
High Five!
You seem like good peoples, we should hang out, talk about how much spiders suck.
PSN: Corbius
I doubt it's enough to get the charges to stick. Which was probably the point of the seizure (well, beyond the intimidation factor.)
That's pretty much what I thought as soon as I saw the trailers.
Shit, all I have is peanut butter too. I want to make PB&J but I'm out of jelly!
I guess I really don't like the idea of an independent task force that has corporations telling it what to do.
SKIPZ
what is this sort of tattoo called
http://snsimages.tribune.com/media/photo/2009-11/75588720-30120830.jpg
Please explain the bottom line. It does not understand me.
kimchi is handy to have around in case you get hungry
cottage cheese too
Yes, but you will not be capable of taking down Vecna singlehandedly, no matter how much you think you should be able to.
cadbury is also chocolate
With the right seasonings, cat should be pretty tasty.
... Now I just hope my gf doesn't read these forums.
which of the um
4
he is asking his wife how she wants to spend the money he is racking up.
Beast Companions are about as useful as your average attack squirrel.
I smoosh it
no questions asked
The bottom line is they are rich.
Cruel!
Yeah I saw your correction but was too tired to reply. It was a mistake born of said tiredness, poor reading comprehension, and jesus christ why can't I sleep when I need to.
because then you would have to share your roast cat?
But I can call him Mr. Butterspanks and he can hide nuts in his cheeks and then fly into a gnoll's face and rip its nose off.
You have a cold heart.
You're sharp Elldren, perhaps too sharp.
The Cadbury allusion is because the Cadbury slogan was "With a famous glass and a half of fresh full cream milk.", hence the glass and a half drunkeness.