How did this even get to Jennifer Love Hewitt? She wasn't even in Crank.
Which was a terrible movie. And Crank 2 was equally terrible. Worse even.
You saw what some horny 13 year olds made the first time and you gave them back a camera?
At least I still have Transporter 1 when I want to watch an enjoyable Statham movie.
The best Statham movie is called "Mean Machine" and its an Irish soccer (football) version of The Longest Yard. He plays the goalie. And he's brilliant.
Look at those mad men. Those are some crazy, crazy guys. Who knows what creative genius they'll bring to this project.
When you combine a solid movie franchise like Ghost Rider with a talented creative duo like that you're looking at gold. GOLD.
Or at least something that's yellow and sparkles in the sun.
The best Statham movie is called "Mean Machine" and its an Irish soccer (football) version of The Longest Yard. He plays the goalie. And he's brilliant.
Sure, that's not really an answer to what you enjoyed about Crankophenia. I'm beginning to think that "taste" to you means "Can you concievably high five a cyborg bear while yelling "Awesome" after reading/watching this thing? If so, it is good."
Transporter 2 had some fun car chases, slick fight coreography, and a plot that didn't get in the way of the first two. Crankapalooza was a mysoginistic 13 year old boys wet dream.
Sure, that's not really an answer to what you enjoyed about Crankophenia. I'm beginning to think that "taste" to you means "Can you concievably high five a cyborg bear while yelling "Awesome" after reading/watching this thing? If so, it is good."
Transporter 2 had some fun car chases, slick fight coreography, and a plot that didn't get in the way of the first two. Crankapalooza was a mysoginistic 13 year old boys wet dream.
Here, here. I don't know who could watch that first major action scene, where he busts into the dude's house and wrecks everyone's shit, and not come away enjoying that film. The second one was made less enjoyable by the less realistic action scenes, and by the third one I'd stopped caring.
I actually have a hard time thinking of Statham movies I don't enjoy. I just enjoy watching that dude beat the shit out of people.
Here, here. I don't know who could watch that first major action scene, where he busts into the dude's house and wrecks everyone's shit, and not come away enjoying that film. The second one was made less enjoyable by the less realistic action scenes, and by the third one I'd stopped caring.
I actually have a hard time thinking of Statham movies I don't enjoy. I just enjoy watching that dude beat the shit out of people.
The third one makes Transporter 1 look like it should win an Oscar for screenwriting. I almost feel like they just put Statham in a car with a girl and made everyone improv their lines. There is literally no coherent plot reasons for almost anything that happens in that movie.
NODe on
0
CorporateLogoThe toilet knowshow I feelRegistered Userregular
edited July 2010
The best part of the first Transporter is when he kicks the door in on the dude's face
CorporateLogo on
Do not have a cow, mortal.
0
AngryThe glory I had witnessedwas just a sleight of handRegistered Userregular
edited July 2010
crank is a 13 year old boy who hates women's wet dream.
angry and furu are the only dudes who have opinions almost as good as mine here
The Lovely Bastard on
0
TexiKenDammit!That fish really got me!Registered Userregular
edited July 2010
Transporter 1 was very good except the music was terrible. It wasn't even European dance good which would have worked for the movie, it was placeholder music where they must have just run out of time and money to get some good stuff. Give some 15 year old a beat box and 100 bucks and say "give me some music to go with this chase"
And Orangina is terrible, no wonder his car blew up. It didn't want that in the cupholder.
Posts
Admittedly it could've been any of them in all that tight armour.
How many DVDs of Time Of Your Life do you have?
How did this even get to Jennifer Love Hewitt? She wasn't even in Crank.
Which was a terrible movie. And Crank 2 was equally terrible. Worse even.
You saw what some horny 13 year olds made the first time and you gave them back a camera?
At least I still have Transporter 1 when I want to watch an enjoyable Statham movie.
Why?!?!?
It cost 110 million to make, and only made 220 million, yet Hulk cost 150 million and made 260 million and won't get a sequel?
When you combine a solid movie franchise like Ghost Rider with a talented creative duo like that you're looking at gold. GOLD.
Or at least something that's yellow and sparkles in the sun.
everyone who posted on this page who isn't me doesn't like crank
you are all terrible
and starting to make me regret posting in gv
Oh man that film is great.
this would be hilarious
http://lexiconmegatherium.tumblr.com/
in the first one, i thought gr looked pretty good himself, but literally everything else, every set and character just looked terrible.
See I can dig mindless action but that film was just terrible. I can't even articulate why I disliked it so much that's how bad it was.
But you enjoyed watching the Cranks? I am befuddled.
Shit pretending to be a post modern commentary is still shit.
hint: you are not one of them
and it was still terrible
DAMN YOU CASELEXIA!
Sure, that's not really an answer to what you enjoyed about Crankophenia. I'm beginning to think that "taste" to you means "Can you concievably high five a cyborg bear while yelling "Awesome" after reading/watching this thing? If so, it is good."
Transporter 2 had some fun car chases, slick fight coreography, and a plot that didn't get in the way of the first two. Crankapalooza was a mysoginistic 13 year old boys wet dream.
you just ain't gonna get it
you never gonna get it
Here, here. I don't know who could watch that first major action scene, where he busts into the dude's house and wrecks everyone's shit, and not come away enjoying that film. The second one was made less enjoyable by the less realistic action scenes, and by the third one I'd stopped caring.
I actually have a hard time thinking of Statham movies I don't enjoy. I just enjoy watching that dude beat the shit out of people.
Tumblr Twitter
and then give me credit for having the thoughts you done typed on the internet
The third one makes Transporter 1 look like it should win an Oscar for screenwriting. I almost feel like they just put Statham in a car with a girl and made everyone improv their lines. There is literally no coherent plot reasons for almost anything that happens in that movie.
you heard it here first folks.
I agree with angry (which happens pretty often)
And Orangina is terrible, no wonder his car blew up. It didn't want that in the cupholder.
http://pics.livejournal.com/mediocrechick/pic/005ktpc1
http://pics.livejournal.com/mediocrechick/pic/005kwt9t
http://pics.livejournal.com/mediocrechick/pic/005kxswq
http://pics.livejournal.com/mediocrechick/pic/005ky5w0
http://pics.livejournal.com/mediocrechick/pic/005kzys9
http://pics.livejournal.com/mediocrechick/pic/005p28b4
http://pics.livejournal.com/mediocrechick/pic/005p8ard
http://pics.livejournal.com/mediocrechick/pic/005p933b