The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Google Images

ÆthelredÆthelred Registered User regular
edited February 2007 in Games and Technology
This is just a small topic I know, but Google appear to have modified their image search slightly. Now the results page has a mouseover effect that displays the image size and location - probably the most advanced html they've ever put on their search results layout. :wink: It's rather annoying though - I frequently look for large images through their search and now I have to hover over each one to find out the size. I know they have functions for this - searching by size - but frequently I want one that's, say, just a little below their 'large', but way above their 'small.' I wonder why they went for this now; people aren't struggling for screen real estate.

pokes: 1505 8032 8399
Æthelred on

Posts

  • AroducAroduc regular
    edited January 2007
    Wow, that really is irritating. My usability education bile is rising.

    Aroduc on
  • Marty81Marty81 Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    Do what I did and disable Javascript for google.com

    Marty81 on
  • bruinbruin Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    I like it. It's slick.

    bruin on
  • HandkorHandkor Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    I don't see the point, the space around the picture is still the same, why not show all the info.

    Handkor on
  • FreddyDFreddyD Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    Handkor wrote:
    I don't see the point, the space around the picture is still the same, why not show all the info.
    Exactly. It is utterly pointless and uniuntuitive.

    FreddyD on
  • Recoil42Recoil42 Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    It seems to me that they're working to try and clone Windows Live's much slicker image search...

    http://search.live.com/images/results.aspx?q=penny+arcade&mkt=en-us&FORM=LVSP&go.x=0&go.y=0&go=Search


    I don't like it either, and the worst part is, they totally missed the best part of Live's search -- the infinite page -- as you scroll down, more images just appear, there's no need to go to a "next page".

    Recoil42 on
  • Grizzly_AddamsGrizzly_Addams Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited January 2007
    I just checked it out now and that is pretty annoying. But that Windows Live infinite page thing is brilliant.

    Grizzly_Addams on
    Dr+Bongenstein.png
  • FunkyWaltDoggFunkyWaltDogg Columbia, SCRegistered User regular
    edited January 2007
    Does anyone know how to contact Google to provide feedback? I can't find anything.

    FunkyWaltDogg on
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    It is annoying but probably not worth complaining about.

    Couscous on
  • BigDesBigDes Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    never knew about the Windows Live thing, it's pretty awesome.

    BigDes on
    steam_sig.png
  • LewiePLewieP Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    I'm using mozilla atm, does it make sense that I see nothing new?

    LewieP on
  • DigDug2000DigDug2000 Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    LewieP wrote:
    I'm using mozilla atm, does it make sense that I see nothing new?
    It does some sort of browser sniffing. Works in FF2 but not in Minefield.

    DigDug2000 on
  • LewiePLewieP Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    DigDug2000 wrote:
    LewieP wrote:
    I'm using mozilla atm, does it make sense that I see nothing new?
    It does some sort of browser sniffing. Works in FF2 but not in Minefield.
    Mozilla, as in Mozilla 5.0. For some reason my university deems firefox unacceptable.

    LewieP on
  • QuintileQuintile Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    titmouse wrote:
    It is annoying but probably not worth complaining about.

    It's worth complaining about for me... I use google image search mainly to find album artwork, and I need images that are at least 200x200, so before the page would load and I'd easily be able to tell which I can use and which I can't, and now I have to mouse over each one to find the highest resolution image.

    They took away ease of use in exchange for trying to look cool.

    Very much not worth it, and quite the opposite of what google as always been about.

    Quintile on
  • VoroVoro Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    Man, this fucking blows. I hope someone's going to make an extension to disable this stupid shit. :|

    Voro on
    XBL GamerTag: Comrade Nexus
  • fragglefartfragglefart Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    Aroduc wrote:
    Wow, that really is irritating. My usability education bile is rising.
    Ditto.

    fragglefart on
    fragglefart.jpg
  • BigDesBigDes Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    Quintile wrote:
    titmouse wrote:
    It is annoying but probably not worth complaining about.

    It's worth complaining about for me... I use google image search mainly to find album artwork, and I need images that are at least 200x200, so before the page would load and I'd easily be able to tell which I can use and which I can't, and now I have to mouse over each one to find the highest resolution image.

    They took away ease of use in exchange for trying to look cool.

    Very much not worth it, and quite the opposite of what google as always been about.
    I always found that Amazon.co.uk helpful for album artwork.

    BigDes on
    steam_sig.png
  • LewiePLewieP Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    BigDes wrote:
    Quintile wrote:
    titmouse wrote:
    It is annoying but probably not worth complaining about.

    It's worth complaining about for me... I use google image search mainly to find album artwork, and I need images that are at least 200x200, so before the page would load and I'd easily be able to tell which I can use and which I can't, and now I have to mouse over each one to find the highest resolution image.

    They took away ease of use in exchange for trying to look cool.

    Very much not worth it, and quite the opposite of what google as always been about.
    I always found that Amazon.co.uk helpful for album artwork.
    wikipedia's quite good too.

    LewieP on
  • GoombaGoomba __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2007
    Voro wrote:
    Man, this fucking blows. I hope someone's going to make an extension to disable this stupid shit. :|
    ...it's that big of a deal. Also, NoScript or Adblock already let you disable it.

    Goomba on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ÆthelredÆthelred Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    Recoil42 wrote:
    It seems to me that they're working to try and clone Windows Live's much slicker image search...

    http://search.live.com/images/results.aspx?q=penny+arcade&mkt=en-us&FORM=LVSP&go.x=0&go.y=0&go=Search


    I don't like it either, and the worst part is, they totally missed the best part of Live's search -- the infinite page -- as you scroll down, more images just appear, there's no need to go to a "next page".
    Definitely very cool, but Live's search utterly fails in usability too - the rollover is even more obnoxious as the image pops bigger (for no apparent reason other than to jar) before you can see the image dimensions and location. Both sites appear to be trying to make their result page look like an awesome gallery. Users don't want a visually appealing gallery of images, they want to find what they want and get on with it. Quintile is very much right that it's surely a step away from Google's design philosophy.

    Æthelred on
    pokes: 1505 8032 8399
  • QuintileQuintile Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    LewieP wrote:
    BigDes wrote:
    Quintile wrote:
    titmouse wrote:
    It is annoying but probably not worth complaining about.

    It's worth complaining about for me... I use google image search mainly to find album artwork, and I need images that are at least 200x200, so before the page would load and I'd easily be able to tell which I can use and which I can't, and now I have to mouse over each one to find the highest resolution image.

    They took away ease of use in exchange for trying to look cool.

    Very much not worth it, and quite the opposite of what google as always been about.
    I always found that Amazon.co.uk helpful for album artwork.
    wikipedia's quite good too.

    Yeah, I use Wikipedia first, then Amazon.com if it's missing from Wikipedia, and then Google if it's not at Amazon.

    Quintile on
  • ÆthelredÆthelred Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    An almighty thread resurrection, but this 'feature' now appears to be utterly gone from GIS. How strange. Did they hear the cry of the internet?

    Æthelred on
    pokes: 1505 8032 8399
  • JJJJ DailyStormer Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    I'm not noticing anything different at all.

    It still says that size and dimensions under the thumbnail.

    My noscript is allowing google so I have no idea what anyone is talking about.

    Edit: oh, nevermind.

    JJ on
  • VariableVariable Mouth Congress Stroke Me Lady FameRegistered User regular
    edited February 2007
    yeah I see no difference and I haven't gone out of my way to change any settings.

    Variable on
    BNet-Vari#1998 | Switch-SW 6960 6688 8388 | Steam | Twitch
  • ÆthelredÆthelred Registered User regular
    edited February 2007
    That would be because I posted this a month ago and now it's gone, as I think JJ just twigged.

    Æthelred on
    pokes: 1505 8032 8399
Sign In or Register to comment.