As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
We're funding a new Acquisitions Incorporated series on Kickstarter right now! Check it out at https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/pennyarcade/acquisitions-incorporated-the-series-2

[Mass Effect] Badass Transvestism

1101113151663

Posts

  • AstaleAstale Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Ad astra wrote: »
    Astale wrote: »
    Ad astra wrote: »
    In ME2 every mission dealing with the Collectors should have been a Suicide mission-lite, instead of what we got. It would have been a great way to build up to the main suicide mission.


    As for Mass Effect 3? They really need to up the stakes in terms of the possibility of losing squad mates permanently. It needs to be in the vain of the suicide mission where the decisions you make on certain missions will affect who lives and dies, but it needs to be around a hundred times harder than the Suicide Mission.

    And really, I think there should be a failure scenario where if you've screwed up enough then the Reapers win.

    Also, the game should randomly overheat your console.

    And starts shouting curse words at you.

    Really just go play a fire emblem game, I'm pretty sure they let you kill off all your own people, since that seems to be a fetish around here.



    Um, it's not really a fetish, it's just that the choices you make in the game should matter, the choices should have an effect... a, massive effect if you will.

    Bioware sold the entire Mass Effect series on the premise that your choices would matter, so far the choices really haven't mattered in any ways other than superficial ones, which means ME3 is the last chance they have to make them matter, in addition there should also be a lot of tough choices in ME3 itself and some of those tough choices should deal with how you go about carrying out important missions. They need to take the concept of the suicide mission and expand upon it.

    I'm not suggesting that every mission should all have the same possibility for squad members to die, but I do think that Bioware should raise the stakes, I mean, Shepard and company are facing the end of all life in the galaxy, it should be really hard to come out of that unscathed.

    See, you say all this, but your argument still boils down to "I want more ways to kill my own crew".

    You are a sick, sick person.

    Astale on
  • Renegade WolfRenegade Wolf Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Astale wrote: »
    Ad astra wrote: »
    Astale wrote: »
    Ad astra wrote: »
    In ME2 every mission dealing with the Collectors should have been a Suicide mission-lite, instead of what we got. It would have been a great way to build up to the main suicide mission.


    As for Mass Effect 3? They really need to up the stakes in terms of the possibility of losing squad mates permanently. It needs to be in the vain of the suicide mission where the decisions you make on certain missions will affect who lives and dies, but it needs to be around a hundred times harder than the Suicide Mission.

    And really, I think there should be a failure scenario where if you've screwed up enough then the Reapers win.

    Also, the game should randomly overheat your console.

    And starts shouting curse words at you.

    Really just go play a fire emblem game, I'm pretty sure they let you kill off all your own people, since that seems to be a fetish around here.



    Um, it's not really a fetish, it's just that the choices you make in the game should matter, the choices should have an effect... a, massive effect if you will.

    Bioware sold the entire Mass Effect series on the premise that your choices would matter, so far the choices really haven't mattered in any ways other than superficial ones, which means ME3 is the last chance they have to make them matter, in addition there should also be a lot of tough choices in ME3 itself and some of those tough choices should deal with how you go about carrying out important missions. They need to take the concept of the suicide mission and expand upon it.

    I'm not suggesting that every mission should all have the same possibility for squad members to die, but I do think that Bioware should raise the stakes, I mean, Shepard and company are facing the end of all life in the galaxy, it should be really hard to come out of that unscathed.

    See, you say all this, but your argument still boils down to "I want more ways to kill my own crew".

    You are a sick, sick person.

    Not really. He just wants the game to have consequences if you screw up. Mass Effect is a series based on your choices and some choices have bad results.

    Renegade Wolf on
  • -Tal-Tal Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Wyborn wrote: »
    These things you say are so awful

    -Tal, sometimes you say these things, and I don't know if it's because your father was a batarian but...

    WOAH calm down there buddy

    that's crossing the line

    -Tal on
    PNk1Ml4.png
  • DidgeridooDidgeridoo Flighty Dame Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    No he is sick and wrong, and that is the final word on the matter. :P

    Didgeridoo on
  • AstaleAstale Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Didgeridoo wrote: »
    No he is sick and wrong, and that is the final word on the matter. :P

    Astale on
  • curly haired boycurly haired boy Your Friendly Neighborhood Torgue Dealer Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Not really. He just wants the game to have consequences if you screw up. Mass Effect is a series based on your choices and some choices have bad results.

    yeah, and my position is when you take genre into account along with bioware's implementation of the renegade/paragon system, you'll never have "good" or "bad" consequences. if you play the game, you will end with success. the degree of that success will depend on your choices, and the "flavor" of that success will depend on your alignment, but never the outcome itself.

    curly haired boy on
    RxI0N.png
    Registered just for the Mass Effect threads | Steam: click ^^^ | Origin: curlyhairedboy
  • Ad astraAd astra Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    I just want choices to matter, that doesn't mean there has to be a dozen scenarios where you squad members can die, I was just putting that out there as an example of choices you could make in ME3 that would have an immediate result.


    Basically I really want Bioware to deliver on their choices will matter statements, I want ME3 to be wildly divergent depending on what you have done in ME1 and ME2.

    Ad astra on
  • CenoCeno pizza time Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Finally got around to snagging the last two achievements tonight. Re-S-ranked.

    Ceno on
  • curly haired boycurly haired boy Your Friendly Neighborhood Torgue Dealer Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    POLL TIME:

    if there was a way to nuke BOTH ashley and kaiden on virmire

    would you do it or not? i know what i'd do. :P

    curly haired boy on
    RxI0N.png
    Registered just for the Mass Effect threads | Steam: click ^^^ | Origin: curlyhairedboy
  • DidgeridooDidgeridoo Flighty Dame Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Aww, just ribbing ya Astra. I understand the impulse-- It's always nice (and exceptionally rare) when games let you have a serious influence on the outcome of the story. But at the same time, I've always felt that Character deaths were a somewhat cheap way to go about doing this. Offing a popular character is basically shorthand for "shit just got real," and I think the Bioware team has proved that such tactics are beneath them

    Didgeridoo on
  • Renegade WolfRenegade Wolf Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    POLL TIME:

    if there was a way to nuke BOTH ashley and kaiden on virmire

    would you do it or not? i know what i'd do. :P

    Definitly kill both. I really hope theres an option in ME3 to kill the survivor.

    Renegade Wolf on
  • EmporiumEmporium Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    POLL TIME:

    if there was a way to nuke BOTH ashley and kaiden on virmire

    would you do it or not? i know what i'd do. :P

    Going purely by how they act in ME1, I would spare one

    Going by how the survivor acts in ME2, they'd both be radioactive dust

    Well, at least for my canon run I would save one. Every other time I ran ME1 they'd be doomed.

    Emporium on
  • Ad astraAd astra Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Didgeridoo wrote: »
    Aww, just ribbing ya Astra. I understand the impulse-- It's always nice (and exceptionally rare) when games let you have a serious influence on the outcome of the story. But at the same time, I've always felt that Character deaths were a somewhat cheap way to go about doing this. Offing a popular character is basically shorthand for "shit just got real," and I think the Bioware team has proved that such tactics are beneath them

    Yeah, I don't want Bioware to go kill crazy and have characters dropping like flies, or railroad us into some sort of heroic sacrifice situation because I utterly hate those, but at the same time, it seems like if we are headed towards a final confrontation with the Reapers there should be some big life or death decisions we have to make in ME3.

    And I guess the reason I'm so obsessed with the choices mattering, is because I remember way back in 2005 when I read the very first thing about the Mass Effect series. Bioware was hyping it up and talking about how each game would be drastically different based on your choices. At the time it sounded like the game to end all games, now five years and two games later that drastically different thing really hasn't happened, so I'm just hoping that ME3 will fulfill all those things I heard them say about the Mass Effect trilogy 5 years ago.

    Ad astra on
  • curly haired boycurly haired boy Your Friendly Neighborhood Torgue Dealer Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    it should, really. you've got a ton of big decisions that you made in the first two games, and with ME3 bioware doesn't have to deal with infinite permutations because it's the end of shep's storyline.

    curly haired boy on
    RxI0N.png
    Registered just for the Mass Effect threads | Steam: click ^^^ | Origin: curlyhairedboy
  • OrcaOrca Also known as Espressosaurus WrexRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    POLL TIME:

    if there was a way to nuke BOTH ashley and kaiden on virmire

    would you do it or not? i know what i'd do. :P

    Why is this even a question? Seriously, Curly.

    edit: holy shit grammar brain fart.

    Orca on
  • Ad astraAd astra Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    POLL TIME:

    if there was a way to nuke BOTH ashley and kaiden on virmire

    would you do it or not? i know what i'd do. :P

    I'd save them both, Ashley is one of my favorite characters and Kaiden is an okay guy, so I'd save them both from the nuke.

    Ad astra on
  • OrcaOrca Also known as Espressosaurus WrexRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Ad astra wrote: »
    POLL TIME:

    if there was a way to nuke BOTH ashley and kaiden on virmire

    would you do it or not? i know what i'd do. :P

    I'd save them both, Ashley is one of my favorite characters and Kaiden is an okay guy, so I'd save them both from the nuke.

    You sir

    You sir are worse than -Tal.

    Orca on
  • Ad astraAd astra Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Orca wrote: »
    Ad astra wrote: »
    POLL TIME:

    if there was a way to nuke BOTH ashley and kaiden on virmire

    would you do it or not? i know what i'd do. :P

    I'd save them both, Ashley is one of my favorite characters and Kaiden is an okay guy, so I'd save them both from the nuke.

    You sir

    You sir are worse than -Tal.

    Yes, I know.

    Ad astra on
  • curly haired boycurly haired boy Your Friendly Neighborhood Torgue Dealer Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Ad astra wrote: »
    POLL TIME:

    if there was a way to nuke BOTH ashley and kaiden on virmire

    would you do it or not? i know what i'd do. :P

    I'd save them both, Ashley is one of my favorite characters and Kaiden is an okay guy, so I'd save them both from the nuke.

    this after all your talk about death and consequences? XD
    i kid, i kid

    curly haired boy on
    RxI0N.png
    Registered just for the Mass Effect threads | Steam: click ^^^ | Origin: curlyhairedboy
  • TurksonTurkson Near the mountains of ColoradoRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    I never got the hate some people have for Ashley. Sure, she's not as awesome as Garrus or Wrex, but she was a fairly deep character with good motivations for not liking alien races.

    It also annoys me when people call her a rascist. She's not, she's a xenophobe or "xenist."

    I made up that last word. I'm kinda liking it.

    Turkson on
    oh h*ck
  • Ad astraAd astra Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Turkson wrote: »
    I never got the hate some people have for Ashley. Sure, she's not as awesome as Garrus or Wrex, but she was a fairly deep character with good motivations for not liking alien races.

    It also annoys me when people call her a rascist. She's not, she's a xenophobe or "xenist."

    I made up that last word. I'm kinda liking it.

    Let us not start talking about Ashley and why some people don't like her, it can only end in the use of the words Hitler and or Nazi.

    There is no use trying to be reasonable about it.

    Ad astra on
  • manwiththemachinegunmanwiththemachinegun METAL GEAR?! Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    SPACE HILTER!

    NO OTHER ANSWER IS ACCEPTIBLE!

    manwiththemachinegun on
  • SoundsPlushSoundsPlush yup, back. Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Turkson wrote: »
    She's not, she's a xenophobe or "xenist."

    There's a Lucy Lawless joke here but I don't have the heart.
    -Tal wrote: »
    -Tal, sometimes you say these things, and I don't know if it's because your father was a batarian but...

    WOAH calm down there buddy

    that's crossing the line

    See? -Tal isn't always wrong. In the war against batarians, brother

    you have my sword.

    SoundsPlush on
    s7Imn5J.png
  • manwiththemachinegunmanwiththemachinegun METAL GEAR?! Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    And my rock...

    armageddon.jpg

    manwiththemachinegun on
  • Dox the PIDox the PI Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    And my stealth bomber
    sb.jpg

    Dox the PI on
  • TurksonTurkson Near the mountains of ColoradoRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    And my assault rifle

    hello-kitty-assault-rifle.jpg

    Turkson on
    oh h*ck
  • Renegade WolfRenegade Wolf Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    And my Reaper.

    270px-Reaper.jpg

    Renegade Wolf on
  • DidgeridooDidgeridoo Flighty Dame Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Okay but seriously though, the Batarians kinda got shafted in the intergalactic political sphere

    Doesn't make up for the fact that they're slave-owning assholes!

    But still

    Didgeridoo on
  • Dox the PIDox the PI Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Didgeridoo wrote: »
    Okay but seriously though, the Batarians kinda got shafted in the intergalactic political sphere

    Doesn't make up for the fact that they're slave-owning assholes!

    But still

    Batarians whole existence is for the player to hate them
    There is no argument when the writers WANTS you to hate them.

    Dox the PI on
  • DidgeridooDidgeridoo Flighty Dame Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    I get the feeling that they will throw a couple of sympathetic Batarians at us in ME3! I'm just trying to get adjusted to the concept

    And not ALL the Batarians we met were terrible. The... well. I mean the one guy on Garrus's mission was.. uh. Kind of tolerable?

    Didgeridoo on
  • eeSanGeeSanG I slice like a goddamn hammer. Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Didgeridoo wrote: »
    I get the feeling that they will throw a couple of sympathetic Batarians at us in ME3! I'm just trying to get adjusted to the concept

    And not ALL the Batarians we met were terrible. The... well. I mean the one guy on Garrus's mission was.. uh. Kind of tolerable?

    But he works too hard.

    eeSanG on
    LFMGb.jpg
    Slice like a god damn hammer. LoL: Rafflesia / BNet: Talonflame#11979
  • curly haired boycurly haired boy Your Friendly Neighborhood Torgue Dealer Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    their full name is the Vile Batarians

    it's part of their very IDENTITY

    i would consider it a very paragon thing indeed to hunt them all down and kill them. a good retirement for shep after saving the galaxy. spending my golden years killing batarians, my necklace made of their eyes growing heavier every day but never slowing me down

    curly haired boy on
    RxI0N.png
    Registered just for the Mass Effect threads | Steam: click ^^^ | Origin: curlyhairedboy
  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    eeSanG wrote: »
    I wish there are many more missions that involve assigning roles to the unused members of your squad. But instead of them dying when you choose badly, it should just spawn extra enemies for you during the mission.

    None of this "I have 12 people but we're only taking 2" crap.

    Back when ME2 was in development they were making a big deal out of how much of a key role the Normandy was going to be, how they wanted to make it basically another character in the game, and I floated the idea of having little space-combat interludes where you assigned crew members to various positions throughout the ship like in Skies of Arcadia. Everyone else scoffed but I still think it's an interesting idea.

    Also I really want some space combat.

    Salvation122 on
  • DarkPrimusDarkPrimus Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Shepard doesn't fly the Normandy, though. And I think another
    out-of-Shepard experience
    is enough for the series. Doing it again would just feel stale, even under different circumstances.

    DarkPrimus on
    usnTyq4.jpg
    Gamertag: PrimusD | Rock Band DLC | GW:OttW - arrcd | WLD - Thortar
  • LeitnerLeitner Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    SPACE HILTER!

    NO OTHER ANSWER IS ACCEPTIBLE!

    Your average Ashley fan.

    Against the geneva convention.

    Leitner on
  • Torso BoyTorso Boy Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    eeSanG wrote: »
    I wish there are many more missions that involve assigning roles to the unused members of your squad. But instead of them dying when you choose badly, it should just spawn extra enemies for you during the mission.

    None of this "I have 12 people but we're only taking 2" crap.

    Back when ME2 was in development they were making a big deal out of how much of a key role the Normandy was going to be, how they wanted to make it basically another character in the game, and I floated the idea of having little space-combat interludes where you assigned crew members to various positions throughout the ship like in Skies of Arcadia. Everyone else scoffed but I still think it's an interesting idea.

    Also I really want some space combat.

    I'm with you on this.

    Torso Boy on
  • AegeriAegeri Tiny wee bacteriums Plateau of LengRegistered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Given how poor their track record is with making vehicles fun, I would rather they didn't.

    Aegeri on
    The Roleplayer's Guild: My blog for roleplaying games, advice and adventuring.
  • SoundsPlushSoundsPlush yup, back. Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Didgeridoo wrote: »
    And not ALL the Batarians we met were terrible. The... well. I mean the one guy on Garrus's mission was.. uh. Kind of tolerable?

    Didge you're breaking my heart here with this batarian sympathy. The only reason that guy wasn't off a'slavin' or a'murderin' was because he was, at that moment, ill.

    The paragon option should have been to slip him some anthrax.

    SoundsPlush on
    s7Imn5J.png
  • Ad astraAd astra Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Didgeridoo wrote: »
    And not ALL the Batarians we met were terrible. The... well. I mean the one guy on Garrus's mission was.. uh. Kind of tolerable?

    Didge you're breaking my heart here with this batarian sympathy. The only reason that guy wasn't off a'slavin' or a'murderin' was because he was, at that moment, ill.

    The paragon option should have been to slip him some anthrax.

    Yeah, I mean, the Batarians are naturally dicks. It's intrinsic to their very nature, it's one of those constants, water is wet, the sky is blue and Batarians is dicks.

    Ad astra on
  • -Tal-Tal Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    the guy on Garrus' mission was a merc

    he would have shot you without hesitation as soon as you revealed yourself

    even Zaeed doesn't like working with batarians

    -Tal on
    PNk1Ml4.png
Sign In or Register to comment.