The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
My ISP, Timewarner, appears to have sent me a message via my browser. I couldn't access the internet until I had accepted that I would take measures to address my actions, which are claimed to be using a P2P program to download media illegally.
While I may have done the occasional...questionable downloading via bittorent, I wonder if either
1) The message itself is bogus
2) My unsecured wireless is the cause
3) They actually noticed my downloads via bittorent
Anyone have an idea as to what is actually likely the cause?
2 is possible. It's also opening your computers up to stuff you really shouldn't be. Fix that. There is no legal or ethical or any kind of benefit from leaving it unsecured. WPA up in that bitch.
1 and 3 are both unlikely with some big caveats. 1 could be some nasty malware taking the theme of fake antivirus extortionware in a new direction, but it could be legit as well, Charter uses a similar interrupt page once to notify me my bill was past due.
As for 3, Timewarner may have noticed your torrents, it's possible to identify even encrypted torrent traffic (and very easy to identify unencrypted traffic), but they're unlikely to do anything except throttle the traffic, which they aren't dong for copyright reasons, though they might dress it up that way.
More likely, I think, your IP (or somebody accessing your network) was pulled by somebody at one of the copyright enforcement groups perusing torrents looking for potential targets. Your information is pretty much hanging out in the breeze there, it's not a private service by any stretch of the imagination. There are steps you can take to make it more private, but it'll never be completely private. The RIAA and MPAA themselves aren't in the big lawsuit business anymore, but a lot of other groups still are, I believe the ESA still has a firm sending violation notices to ISPs for individual users, and a lot of studios are doing it on their own even with the RIAA and MPAA backing down. You might remember the (some still ongoing) lawsuits about The Hurt Locker.
The browser message seems new (but certainly possible, it's a simple DNS hijack). They definitely track bit torrent traffic, it's possible that someone else is using your unsecured wireless to download tons of stuff.
I guess you should define "occasional". Time Warner cares less about copyright infringement and more about bandwidth usage- I've heard tales of people who swap copyright-free concerts getting hit with similar notices.
I don't think the RIAA/MPAA are suing individuals anymore but Time Warner can certainly throttle your service if they want.
I got one of these years ago when I was on... Cablevision I think? Same thing, except I had to call a number on the browser and say I wouldn't download anything any more. This is strictly from the ISP, they see large amounts of traffic from your IP and check to see what's going on, find out you're torrenting and fire off one of these warnings. It's honestly more of a cover-their-ass thing, so if the MPAA\RIAA every tries suing ISPs, they can say "Hey, look, we warned them."
Did it say "a p2p program" or a specific one? If it just said "p2p program" it's just a catch all - bit torrent is as much one as Limewire.
The wording on the page is probably meaningless as far as individual cases go - it's probably just a standard page everybody gets with nothing specific, just like 99% of communication you get from them on any subject. Rather than individually setting up these pages, they just flag your account and it pops up next time you try to fetch a web page.
Unless you engage in other high-bandwidth activities it's almost certainly the bit torrent traffic that triggered the warning. It's not hard to tell what it is, even if they can't read the contents. You should secure your router anyway (leaving it open is asking for all kinds of trouble), and knock off the torrenting unless you're willing to spend a bunch of time on the phone arguing with Time Warner when they throttle your bandwidth.
Typically what happens is the ISP gets a complaint from, say, the MPAA that says this IP downloaded this movie at this time. After a certain number of reports from your connection the ISP gives a page like that as a warning (the ISP I work for gives you one "freebie" before they start giving you the 'naughty boy' pages).
As for the cause, you might be able to contact them to find out exactly what triggered it. I don't know anything about Time Warner's policies in that regard.
Secure your wireless, force encryption in your bittorrent software (and do not allow legacy or unencrypted connections) and change the default ports it might be using.
IMO, stop doing the illegal stuff and secure your wireless.
I've seen these in the past so, you may also want to contact time warner and let them know they have a false positive in case it actually went on your record. For all you know you got someone's just released IP and you were never actually doing anything illegal. Your IP isn't static unless you paid for static so, lots of little things like that can happen.
bowen on
not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
I use Time Warner as well, and I've never had this issue. (Yes, I torrent alot. But it's actual legit torrents from a News Group. Granted, I have done some naughty things in the past, but well within reason.) I worked for AT&T for about two years, and one of the things we never worried about was what people were downloading. It's not even about bandwidth usage. Download streams are a dime a dozen. It's the upload that gets you. Not stopping that torrent after you download it leads to a couple gigs of upstream that your ISP WILL pick up on.
A quick story about my last ISP (A subsidiary of Time Warner here in Texas). I set up a torrent to download the original Assassin's Creed from a major torrent site. Is downloading the game illegal? Not entirely. I was downloading it due to a cracked DVD that I bought off impulse while browsing games at Best Buy. Everything was fine until I had to format and went to reinstall all my games. Kept giving off an I/O error at 44% through the install. Took it out, inspected it, sure enough...a small internal crack right in the plastic. So I downloaded it and was going to plug in my CD key from the back of the case. Bzzt. My ISP had other ideas. They shut the internet off as soon as the torrent was done. Received a call from my fiance at home while I was at work saying the internet didn't work. I walked her through power cycling everything and couldn't get it working. Called my ISP and asked what was up. They gave me the entire story from their end. Receiving information that my IP had downloaded, and I quote, "Ubisoft's Assassin's Creed from (not naming site).". I didn't deny it. Told them my story, and they had to flip my internet back on.
I mean, any other time I would've been in trouble, but that's about as "legit" as you can get. I would recommend Peer Guardian 2. It's free and works wonders in blocking folks from seeing what you're doing. It's not a 100% protection from your ISP, but it will at least stop other nasty things from seeing what you're doing. And you shouldn't have to worry about the WoW patches. That connection is secure and there's very little upload involved.
StrifeRaZoR on
0
TL DRNot at all confident in his reflexive opinions of thingsRegistered Userregular
edited December 2010
I'd guess that there was a copyright firm keeping tabs on something you downloaded. An ISP has no incentive to threaten or block its own users without coercion from the for-profit "C&D-> civil suit" operations that have sprung up.
Basically, law firms have realized that they can mass-subpoena people and the majority will settle out of court. It's lucrative and very little if any of the money actually makes it back to the people who created the copyrighted content to begin with.
how is anyone in this day and age using an unsecured wireless router?
it takes only minutes to set up the most basic of security, and most ISPs provide secure routers when they set you up. Secure your internet, and then your usage should make absolutely no waves - although it is still technically illegal so make your own judgement based on that.
My ISP e-mailed me a while ago because Nintendo sent them a threat saying they'd take action if I didn't stop sharing Super Mario Kart... Apparently I was sharing it on Bittorrent without realizing. But my ISP sends me messages through my browser all the time to say I'm at 75% or 100% of my bandwidth limit, so it is possible for your ISP to do that.
how is anyone in this day and age using an unsecured wireless router?
The argument is pretty prevalent on the internet, and I've seen it on this forum a LOT (hence why I mentioned it in my first post off the bat) that having your wireless network open constitutes some sort of legal protection. Which it doesn't, even less so in the US which has no federal and very few state laws on electronic trespassing or internet service theft.
how is anyone in this day and age using an unsecured wireless router?
The argument is pretty prevalent on the internet, and I've seen it on this forum a LOT (hence why I mentioned it in my first post off the bat) that having your wireless network open constitutes some sort of legal protection. Which it doesn't, even less so in the US which has no federal and very few state laws on electronic trespassing or internet service theft.
IANAL, and YMMV and all that, but I've had a bit of experience with this.
A few years ago a kid tried to steal the hood ornament off my dad's car, and damaged the hood up pretty bad but someone must have walked by during it and he ran off or something. Anyway, a couple days later we catch a kid in our garage going through the beer fridge, catch the kid, get his student card and call the police to deal with the break and enter issue (despite the cop claiming it was just trespassing, and us not really wanting to press charges, just to scare some sense into the kid.) Anyway, after the police left we looked the kid up on Facebook, and find someone posting on his wall along the lines of "I have no idea how much a Jag hood ornament would be worth, why?", and checking that kid's profile showed him posting "Cause there's one on Whisperwood (my street, its also the only Jaguar on the street) that I'm trying to jack". We printed this, showed the police the damage and what essentially amounted to an entirely non-coerced confession, to which the police responded "Well, we'd need to see if it was posted from his IP address, and even then he could have a wireless router and someone else could have stolen his internet and posted that under his account."
This is in Ontario, Canada, so again, YMMV, but even the police here are convinced that having an open network counts as protection.
I wish I kept the links that came up the last time I got involved in this argument, since Canadian in general (and Ontario in particular, in fact) has more precedent on the matter than the US, there were some child pornography cases a few years ago. The verdicts didn't all line up, but an open network isn't a defense - it actually takes away a strong defense, because it's impossible to prove a one time connection isn't an unauthorized intrusion.
Your situation is a pretty simple one, to be honest. Ever tried to get police to investigate a minor vandalism charge? A hood ornament, even on an expensive car, doesn't register on their radar. They'll give all kinds of excuses, but it's not because the case isn't there. It's not even because the open network matters - they know Facebook uses real names, and they know you connected that Facebook to the student ID procured from kid while he was actually on your property. They know that's enough to pick the kid up.
They gave you the runaround because some teenage punk for a petty crime for which he'll get a warning and community service on a bad day is about up there with arresting the coffee shop owner who illegally provides free food to on duty officers on the list of things they just aren't going to deal with. If you pushed matters with them, they might tell you, "You did the detective work, take him to civil court. You've got a case."
You may not be able to be convicted with an unsecured network (though that argument has failed plenty of times in US courts), but you can certainly still be sued, and that's the real pain in the ass. Going through the process of a jury trial ends up costing people a lot more than the proposed settlements- to the RIAA/MPAA, making you pay money is the goal. I doubt they care if you cut the check to them or to your lawyer. They make more money from ten minutes of Miley Cyrus' album sales than a year of lawsuits.
Also, those particular police officers in Ontario sound terribly lazy. While a Facebook confession isn't enough evidence to convict in a court of law, it's surely more than enough to convict in the court of the kid's parents' kitchen.
Posts
1 and 3 are both unlikely with some big caveats. 1 could be some nasty malware taking the theme of fake antivirus extortionware in a new direction, but it could be legit as well, Charter uses a similar interrupt page once to notify me my bill was past due.
As for 3, Timewarner may have noticed your torrents, it's possible to identify even encrypted torrent traffic (and very easy to identify unencrypted traffic), but they're unlikely to do anything except throttle the traffic, which they aren't dong for copyright reasons, though they might dress it up that way.
More likely, I think, your IP (or somebody accessing your network) was pulled by somebody at one of the copyright enforcement groups perusing torrents looking for potential targets. Your information is pretty much hanging out in the breeze there, it's not a private service by any stretch of the imagination. There are steps you can take to make it more private, but it'll never be completely private. The RIAA and MPAA themselves aren't in the big lawsuit business anymore, but a lot of other groups still are, I believe the ESA still has a firm sending violation notices to ISPs for individual users, and a lot of studios are doing it on their own even with the RIAA and MPAA backing down. You might remember the (some still ongoing) lawsuits about The Hurt Locker.
I guess you should define "occasional". Time Warner cares less about copyright infringement and more about bandwidth usage- I've heard tales of people who swap copyright-free concerts getting hit with similar notices.
I don't think the RIAA/MPAA are suing individuals anymore but Time Warner can certainly throttle your service if they want.
The message did specify a P2P program, maybe that indicates someone using my wi-fi, or it's just a catch all term?
The wording on the page is probably meaningless as far as individual cases go - it's probably just a standard page everybody gets with nothing specific, just like 99% of communication you get from them on any subject. Rather than individually setting up these pages, they just flag your account and it pops up next time you try to fetch a web page.
As for the cause, you might be able to contact them to find out exactly what triggered it. I don't know anything about Time Warner's policies in that regard.
NintendoID: Nailbunny 3DS: 3909-8796-4685
I've seen these in the past so, you may also want to contact time warner and let them know they have a false positive in case it actually went on your record. For all you know you got someone's just released IP and you were never actually doing anything illegal. Your IP isn't static unless you paid for static so, lots of little things like that can happen.
A quick story about my last ISP (A subsidiary of Time Warner here in Texas). I set up a torrent to download the original Assassin's Creed from a major torrent site. Is downloading the game illegal? Not entirely. I was downloading it due to a cracked DVD that I bought off impulse while browsing games at Best Buy. Everything was fine until I had to format and went to reinstall all my games. Kept giving off an I/O error at 44% through the install. Took it out, inspected it, sure enough...a small internal crack right in the plastic. So I downloaded it and was going to plug in my CD key from the back of the case. Bzzt. My ISP had other ideas. They shut the internet off as soon as the torrent was done. Received a call from my fiance at home while I was at work saying the internet didn't work. I walked her through power cycling everything and couldn't get it working. Called my ISP and asked what was up. They gave me the entire story from their end. Receiving information that my IP had downloaded, and I quote, "Ubisoft's Assassin's Creed from (not naming site).". I didn't deny it. Told them my story, and they had to flip my internet back on.
I mean, any other time I would've been in trouble, but that's about as "legit" as you can get. I would recommend Peer Guardian 2. It's free and works wonders in blocking folks from seeing what you're doing. It's not a 100% protection from your ISP, but it will at least stop other nasty things from seeing what you're doing. And you shouldn't have to worry about the WoW patches. That connection is secure and there's very little upload involved.
Basically, law firms have realized that they can mass-subpoena people and the majority will settle out of court. It's lucrative and very little if any of the money actually makes it back to the people who created the copyrighted content to begin with.
it takes only minutes to set up the most basic of security, and most ISPs provide secure routers when they set you up. Secure your internet, and then your usage should make absolutely no waves - although it is still technically illegal so make your own judgement based on that.
The argument is pretty prevalent on the internet, and I've seen it on this forum a LOT (hence why I mentioned it in my first post off the bat) that having your wireless network open constitutes some sort of legal protection. Which it doesn't, even less so in the US which has no federal and very few state laws on electronic trespassing or internet service theft.
IANAL, and YMMV and all that, but I've had a bit of experience with this.
A few years ago a kid tried to steal the hood ornament off my dad's car, and damaged the hood up pretty bad but someone must have walked by during it and he ran off or something. Anyway, a couple days later we catch a kid in our garage going through the beer fridge, catch the kid, get his student card and call the police to deal with the break and enter issue (despite the cop claiming it was just trespassing, and us not really wanting to press charges, just to scare some sense into the kid.) Anyway, after the police left we looked the kid up on Facebook, and find someone posting on his wall along the lines of "I have no idea how much a Jag hood ornament would be worth, why?", and checking that kid's profile showed him posting "Cause there's one on Whisperwood (my street, its also the only Jaguar on the street) that I'm trying to jack". We printed this, showed the police the damage and what essentially amounted to an entirely non-coerced confession, to which the police responded "Well, we'd need to see if it was posted from his IP address, and even then he could have a wireless router and someone else could have stolen his internet and posted that under his account."
This is in Ontario, Canada, so again, YMMV, but even the police here are convinced that having an open network counts as protection.
Your situation is a pretty simple one, to be honest. Ever tried to get police to investigate a minor vandalism charge? A hood ornament, even on an expensive car, doesn't register on their radar. They'll give all kinds of excuses, but it's not because the case isn't there. It's not even because the open network matters - they know Facebook uses real names, and they know you connected that Facebook to the student ID procured from kid while he was actually on your property. They know that's enough to pick the kid up.
They gave you the runaround because some teenage punk for a petty crime for which he'll get a warning and community service on a bad day is about up there with arresting the coffee shop owner who illegally provides free food to on duty officers on the list of things they just aren't going to deal with. If you pushed matters with them, they might tell you, "You did the detective work, take him to civil court. You've got a case."
Also, those particular police officers in Ontario sound terribly lazy. While a Facebook confession isn't enough evidence to convict in a court of law, it's surely more than enough to convict in the court of the kid's parents' kitchen.