The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
The Hobbit follows the journey of Bilbo Baggins, who is swept into an epic quest to reclaim the lost Dwarf Kingdom of Erebor, which was conquered by the dragon Smaug. Approached out of the blue by the wizard Gandalf the Grey, Bilbo finds himself joining a company of 13 dwarves led by the legendary warrior Thorin Oakenshield. Their journey will take them into the wild; through treacherous lands swarming with goblins and orcs, deadly wargs and giant spiders, shapeshifters and sorcerers and ultimately Baggins' meeting with Gollum, where he gains possession of Gollum's "precious" ring, the simple gold ring that is tied to the fate of all Middle-Earth.
Why is it going to be two movies?
Isn't The Hobbit shorter than either of the LotR parts?
It's obvious:
Two movies =
2x $$ at the theatre
2x $$ at DVD/BluRay release
2x $$ at Director's Cut release
edit: Also, skinny Peter Jackson is encouraging in that the dude has his health under control. However, I see him and still don't realize it's him for a minute. He looks so crazy different.
I paused at what looked like an image of a double-bitted medieval hatchet. “That’s Smaug,” del Toro said. It was an overhead view: “See, he’s like a flying axe.” Del Toro thinks that monsters should appear transformed when viewed from a fresh angle, lest the audience lose a sense of awe. Defining silhouettes is the first step in good monster design, he said. “Then you start playing with movement. The next element of design is colour. And then finally-finally-comes detail. A lot of people go the other way, and just pile up a lot of detail.”
I turned to a lateral image of the dragon. Smaug’s body, as del Toro had imagined it, was unusually long and thin. The bones of its wings were articulated on the dorsal side, giving the creature a slithery softness across its belly. “It’s a little bit more like a snake,” he said. I thought of his big Russian painting. Del Toro had written that the beast would alight “like a water bird.”
Smaug’s front legs looked disproportionately small, like those of a T. rex. This would allow the dragon to assume a different aspect in closeup: the camera could capture “hand” gestures and facial expressions in one tight frame, avoiding the quivery distractions of wings and tail. (Smaug is a voluble, manipulative dragon; Tolkien describes him as having “an overwhelming personality”.) Smaug’s eyes, del Toro added, were “going to be sculpturally very hidden”. This would create a sense of drama when the thieving Bilbo stirs the beast from slumber.
Del Toro wanted to be creative with the wing placement. “Dragon design can be broken into essentially two species,” he explained at one point. Most had wings attached to the forelimbs. “The only other variation is the anatomically incorrect variation of the six-appendage creature”-four legs, like a horse, with two additional winged arms. “But there’s no large creature on earth that has six appendages!” He had become frustrated while sketching dragons that followed these schemes. The journal had a discarded prototype. “Now, that’s a dragon you’ve seen before,” he said. “I just added these samurai legs. That doesn’t work for me.”
Gotta be honest, I think Peter Jackson is not a good director. The only reason the LotR movies turned out as well as they did is the quality of the source material, and possibly the fact that it was such a huge project that he couldn't ruin the whole thing by himself. And even then, I think the worst parts of those movies are the areas in which they depart substantially from the books - so the parts in which Jackson & co.'s creative vision is most prominent. (I'm not debating the need to adapt the material for the screen, I just think their execution was bad.)
Beyond that, I've seen two of his other movies, Heavenly Creatures and the King Kong remake. Both were bad, but King Kong especially was an abomination. Just terrible. So I'm not thrilled that he's back on board for the Hobbit; I'd much have preferred Guillermo del Toro's take on it (even if it would inevitably have given me nightmares). Hopefully it'll play out along the same lines as the LotR movies - good in spite of him.
Posts
Yes
Please don't suck
Please don't suck
Please don't suck
Please don't suck
Bollocks.
Isn't The Hobbit shorter than either of the LotR parts?
It's obvious:
Two movies =
2x $$ at the theatre
2x $$ at DVD/BluRay release
2x $$ at Director's Cut release
edit: Also, skinny Peter Jackson is encouraging in that the dude has his health under control. However, I see him and still don't realize it's him for a minute. He looks so crazy different.
As does the Battle of the Four Armies.
As might Bilbo's encounter with Gollum and finding the ring.
kingworkscreative.com
kingworkscreative.blogspot.com
most of the lotr trilogy I could do without
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
Also I dare you guys not to get emotional while watching that video
we seem to have an awful lot of movie threads right now
more like movie forum ++
yes
Will this be a musical? Because I really want to see 13 dwarves singing about wrecking up Bilbo's hobbit hole.
Now I can't get the Bilbo Baggins song out of my head. Thanks
Now I will accept nothing else.
I heard awhile ago that Guillermo Del Toro helped work on the design for Smaug as well.
Not sure how true it is, but if both of these facts are true I'm expecting perfection.
he helped work on a lot of the designs, the question is if PJ is gonna use any of them
John-Rhys Davies for Smaug. I will defend that pick until death!
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
oh my god
Eye brows to be added to the dragon!
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
The bravest little hobbit of them all!
http://www.youtuberepeater.com/watch?v=LR-MSZSLC5w
Also, David Warner would make a pretty great Smaug.
When I was little and read The Hobbit for the first time I would try to make up a tune for all the songs Tolkien included throughout the story.
I still do this.
Kind of hoping the big angry boasting session will still be there in some form.
what about those reports of them shoehorning in a bunch of LOTR cameos.
The ones that sound tasteful and don't intrude on the main narrative?
Legolas is the only other one you could consider being shoehorned but every report suggests it's brief.
Also goddamn, has it really been twelve years?
I find this terrifying
Beyond that, I've seen two of his other movies, Heavenly Creatures and the King Kong remake. Both were bad, but King Kong especially was an abomination. Just terrible. So I'm not thrilled that he's back on board for the Hobbit; I'd much have preferred Guillermo del Toro's take on it (even if it would inevitably have given me nightmares). Hopefully it'll play out along the same lines as the LotR movies - good in spite of him.
I... that remark is just
Not going there