The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
Please vote in the Forum Structure Poll. Polling will close at 2PM EST on January 21, 2025.
Critics of the case against the men argued that no direct evidence tied the three to the murders and that a knife recovered from a lake near the home of one of the men could not have caused the boys' wounds. More recent DNA testing also demonstrated no links, according the men's supporters.
Evidence in the case has been falling apart under scrutiny, and it looks like DNA evidence has essentially cleared them. However, they had to make a special plea arrangement to end the whole mess.
Damien Echols, Jessie Misskelley Jr. and Jason Baldwin pleaded guilty and were sentenced to 18 years in prison with credit for time served, a prosecutor said.
The three entered what is known as an Alford plea, which allows a defendant to maintain innocence while simultaneously acknowledging that the state has evidence to convict, Ellington said.
Three men were tried and convicted of the murders of three boys in West Memphis, Arkansas on May 5, 1993, subsequently referred to as the West Memphis Three. During the trial, the prosecution put forth the idea that the only purported motive in the case was that the slayings were part of a Satanic ritual. Damien Echols was sentenced to death, Jessie Misskelley, Jr. was sentenced to life imprisonment plus two 20-year sentences, and Jason Baldwin was sentenced to life imprisonment.
The case was super controversial, because of the association with Satanism and the questionable nature of the investigation and trial proceedings. This came to national attention with an HBO documentary called Paradise Lost.
It's an interesting movie. Even if you don't care about the case or the judicial system or young children or our dark lord Satan, you should track down a copy and give it a look.
Yeah, if the claimed motive for your suspects is "satanic killings" and you don't have any other compelling evidence, odds are you're just looking for a scapegoat to convict.
Yeah, if the claimed motive for your suspects is "satanic killings" and you don't have any other compelling evidence, odds are you're just looking for a scapegoat to convict.
Look, don't you go blaming the police just because satanic murderers are so good at hiding all evidence of their involvement in the crime, ok?
0
HunterChemist with a heart of AuRegistered Userregular
They could have done it, but the evidence the prosecution put forward was pathetic and proved nothing. So it's more not guilty due to lack of any evidence besides look at them and Teh DEVIL!
Yeah, if the claimed motive for your suspects is "satanic killings" and you don't have any other compelling evidence, odds are you're just looking for a scapegoat to convict.
0
UnbrokenEvaHIGH ON THE WIREBUT I WON'T TRIP ITRegistered Userregular
But one of them was named Damien! Clear devil-worshipper.
Yeah, if the claimed motive for your suspects is "satanic killings" and you don't have any other compelling evidence, odds are you're just looking for a scapegoat to convict.
You can't look at it in a vacuum. These people wore black, and listened to metal. And one of them was named Damien. If that's not enough evidence to convict, what is???
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence
0
Shortytouching the meatIntergalactic Cool CourtRegistered Userregular
awesome. this is awesome.
god I hope they get some kind of settlement from the state
0
HunterChemist with a heart of AuRegistered Userregular
edited August 2011
Yeah, it's about time.
These fuckers who think being tough on crime equals locking people up because they look guilty or are different/weird/eccentric/aren't grieving "the right way" completely miss the point of our legal system. Innocent until proven guilty is not that you did or didn't do the crime, it's that nobody can prove it.
Also, people who try to make the evidence just fit their theory piss me off. The evidence is the evidence. If it doesn't fit your theory, then most likely it's not the evidence that is wrong. Go back and work it again.
PiptheFairFrequently not in boats.Registered Userregular
one of the fathers of the murdered boys came forward and was all "Yeah these guys didn't do it and I kinda wanna know who did so stop hiding behind your faulty conviction"
Yeah, if the claimed motive for your suspects is "satanic killings" and you don't have any other compelling evidence, odds are you're just looking for a scapegoat to convict.
Yeah, if the claimed motive for your suspects is "satanic killings" and you don't have any other compelling evidence, odds are you're just looking for a scapegoat to convict.
also it was funny cause someone misused the phrase at work today and so it was tangentially relevant
0
Shortytouching the meatIntergalactic Cool CourtRegistered Userregular
wait what
what the fuck is this alford plea bullshit
TO THE WIKIMOBILE
0
Shortytouching the meatIntergalactic Cool CourtRegistered Userregular
edited August 2011
double post wee
So it looks like this kind of plea basically says that they claim they're innocent, but recognize that they could get convicted because the prosecutor has enough evidence, or the right kind of evidence, to convince a jury they're guilty.
And we already know the second half of that situation is true, because people are idiots.
So I can live with this as long as they walk.
Shorty on
0
Sir CarcassI have been shown the end of my worldRound Rock, TXRegistered Userregular
I bet they played D&D too.
Man, are they gonna flip and murder someone when they see 4th edition.
Yeah, if the claimed motive for your suspects is "satanic killings" and you don't have any other compelling evidence, odds are you're just looking for a scapegoat to convict.
you posted a screenshot of your own twitter?
why would you do that?
narcissism, mostly
It'll look good on your resume if you apply to be a producer at CNN.
0
FrankoSometimes I really wish I had four feet so I could dance with myself to the drumbeatRegistered Userregular
"In a nutshell, you are pleading guilty not because you admit that you did something wrong but because you are concerned the state has enough evidence to prove you guilty," attorney B.J. Bernstein said. "This is a common thing in tough cases, where a defendant is just adamant; I didn’t do it, I didn’t do it, I didn’t do it. They won't confess to it, but the evidence is so strong they are going to lose."
The highly technical legal maneuver also allows the three to be freed and be considered innocent. Although an Alford plea is treated as a guilty plea for sentencing, it cannot be held against the three men in any subsequent criminal prosecution or civil proceeding.
0
Shortytouching the meatIntergalactic Cool CourtRegistered Userregular
Okay, good. I'd be concerned that any kind of guilty plea could later be used against them.
Posts
is this a "oh good they're free because they didn't do it" thing?
or a "fuck i can't believe they set these murderers free" thing?
DAMN
Chupacabra
Look, don't you go blaming the police just because satanic murderers are so good at hiding all evidence of their involvement in the crime, ok?
They could have done it, but the evidence the prosecution put forward was pathetic and proved nothing. So it's more not guilty due to lack of any evidence besides look at them and Teh DEVIL!
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
is pretty metal
My cousin is named Damien, and he's a priest.
Surely that is a sign of the Apocalypse!
Oh wait, he's actually like a second cousin, so that's probably just like 7 years of bad luck or something.
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
You can't look at it in a vacuum. These people wore black, and listened to metal. And one of them was named Damien. If that's not enough evidence to convict, what is???
That step-father is insane.
god I hope they get some kind of settlement from the state
These fuckers who think being tough on crime equals locking people up because they look guilty or are different/weird/eccentric/aren't grieving "the right way" completely miss the point of our legal system. Innocent until proven guilty is not that you did or didn't do the crime, it's that nobody can prove it.
Also, people who try to make the evidence just fit their theory piss me off. The evidence is the evidence. If it doesn't fit your theory, then most likely it's not the evidence that is wrong. Go back and work it again.
Secret Satan 2013 Wishlist
I want to say the prosecutor should be fired
you posted a screenshot of your own twitter?
why would you do that?
narcissism, mostly
They entered an "alford plea". Which means they plead guilty, and sufficient evidence exists that they could be convicted.
and then they get to walk.
but, I'm not a lawyer and could totally wrong.
what the fuck is this alford plea bullshit
TO THE WIKIMOBILE
So it looks like this kind of plea basically says that they claim they're innocent, but recognize that they could get convicted because the prosecutor has enough evidence, or the right kind of evidence, to convince a jury they're guilty.
And we already know the second half of that situation is true, because people are idiots.
So I can live with this as long as they walk.
Man, are they gonna flip and murder someone when they see 4th edition.
CNN has a helpful article
How can West Memphis 3 walk free?