The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Mojo_JojoWe are only now beginning to understand the full power and ramifications of sexual intercourseRegistered Userregular
Jesus fuck. I finally got the reviewer comments back from this paper.
Reviewer #1: This is good, it should be published
Reviewer #2: Here is a list of irrelevant side investigations that would each merit their own paper following this one.
Homogeneous distribution of your varieties of amuse-gueule
Jesus fuck. I finally got the reviewer comments back from this paper.
Reviewer #1: This is good, it should be published
Reviewer #2: Here is a list of irrelevant side investigations that would each merit their own paper following this one.
Remember, the Obama administration extracted such a cut as the price for its surrender on the Bush tax cuts — and it has been trying to get that cut extended, as the only economic stimulus it considers politically possible. And the GOP has turned it down flat.
How can that be, when Republicans love tax cuts? The answer is, they don’t. They love tax cuts for the rich. Tax cuts for ordinary workers, many of whom will be those hated lucky duckies whose incomes are too low to pay income tax, are if anything something Republicans dislike.
I do not think it is that simple; I think Republican strategists realize that it would help the economy and therefore Obama and therefore oppose it, whereas Republican rhetoricians oppose stimulus in principle and oppose it, and Republican legislators just go along with it; only a relatively low number of very rich Republicans actually think like this for self-interested reasons. But it is nonetheless quite straightforwardly bad policy.
American politics strikes me as looking an awful lot like the worst aspects of Northern Irish politics right now: It doesn't matter about making things better for everyone, all that matters is making sure "themmuns" don't get an edge of any kind.
0
Mojo_JojoWe are only now beginning to understand the full power and ramifications of sexual intercourseRegistered Userregular
Jesus fuck. I finally got the reviewer comments back from this paper.
Reviewer #1: This is good, it should be published
Reviewer #2: Here is a list of irrelevant side investigations that would each merit their own paper following this one.
Sooo, this is good?
No, because #2 demands those side investigations be completed and included in this paper before publication. He's wrong, but for obvious reasons it's hard to get an editor to change your reviewers just because he doesn't recommend instant publication.
Homogeneous distribution of your varieties of amuse-gueule
Jesus fuck. I finally got the reviewer comments back from this paper.
Reviewer #1: This is good, it should be published
Reviewer #2: Here is a list of irrelevant side investigations that would each merit their own paper following this one.
That's great! Congratulations
*e: or not. What does your supervisor say about the second reviewer?
American politics strikes me as looking an awful lot like the worst aspects of Northern Irish politics right now: It doesn't matter about making things better for everyone, all that matters is making sure "themmuns" don't get an edge of any kind.
Basically, it's about winning, not about the country or the people.
Jesus fuck. I finally got the reviewer comments back from this paper.
Reviewer #1: This is good, it should be published
Reviewer #2: Here is a list of irrelevant side investigations that would each merit their own paper following this one.
Sooo, this is good?
No, because #2 demands those side investigations be completed and included in this paper before publication. He's wrong, but for obvious reasons it's hard to get an editor to change your reviewers just because he doesn't recommend instant publication.
So what are your options? Are second opinions out of the question?
0
jakobaggerLO THY DREAD EMPIRE CHAOS IS RESTOREDRegistered Userregular
American politics strikes me as looking an awful lot like the worst aspects of Northern Irish politics right now: It doesn't matter about making things better for everyone, all that matters is making sure "themmuns" don't get an edge of any kind.
Basically, it's about winning, not about the country or the people.
This as well.
0
YamiNoSenshiA point called ZIn the complex planeRegistered Userregular
So what are your options? Are second opinions out of the question?
My supervisor should have more experience here, so I've forwarded him the email with my thoughts. Sadly, he's an idiot though, so he might just shrug, in which case I'd contact the editor myself asking for a third reviewer (pointing out that #2 makes some good points for the logical progression of this study and other irrelevant flattery). If it's a no, then I submit to a different journal.
Homogeneous distribution of your varieties of amuse-gueule
Posts
Except most of our users here at this office already had IE8 and now most of them say they've been rolled back to 6.
God damn it.
Also Cass that gif is slowing down my machine considerably. Just like how I slow down LoL teams.
Okay I edited the gif out, it was probably bigger than I thought (That's what SHE said)
dealwithit.gif
Edit: Arbuthnot dealt with it, apparently.
Don't make me say it!
That's a paddling.
It's not. It's only 480kb, which is 20kb below the cap. But for some reason, it was slowing down the whole IE window. So something local to my laptop.
@Absalon are you Danish and if not then what is up with your name?
Reviewer #1: This is good, it should be published
Reviewer #2: Here is a list of irrelevant side investigations that would each merit their own paper following this one.
Sooo, this is good?
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/05/anti-stimulus-politics/
I do not think it is that simple; I think Republican strategists realize that it would help the economy and therefore Obama and therefore oppose it, whereas Republican rhetoricians oppose stimulus in principle and oppose it, and Republican legislators just go along with it; only a relatively low number of very rich Republicans actually think like this for self-interested reasons. But it is nonetheless quite straightforwardly bad policy.
No, because #2 demands those side investigations be completed and included in this paper before publication. He's wrong, but for obvious reasons it's hard to get an editor to change your reviewers just because he doesn't recommend instant publication.
*e: or not. What does your supervisor say about the second reviewer?
Basically, it's about winning, not about the country or the people.
So what are your options? Are second opinions out of the question?
Man, I've been up for like two hours, you lazy bum. Protestant work ethic etc (insert obligatory xkcd).
This as well.
He was being considerate towards the American Posters in his greeting. For all you know he spent his morning revolutionising software programming.
Jokes on you, I never went to sleep!
Also it's 2:30 in the afternoon there.
Yeah, I'm up early today.
Please have a seat in my Punching Chair.
It was some random twitter derp.
Yes.
This is not a Discrete Maths class.