The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Need help finding a game like Earth & Beyond or Galaxy on Fire 2

SamotSamot Registered User regular
edited August 2011 in Games and Technology
I'm posting here because I think this community is the most likely to be able to help me. Quite a while ago, I played in the Earth and beyond beta and, although I didn't decide to continue playing at the time, I have fond memories of the game. Recently, I played Galaxy on Fire 2 for android and it brought all those memories flooding back. There is something about playing a game where you own a ship that is unique from a game where you play a character, and GoF2 really made me miss it.

This experience prompted me to search for a more robust, modern space combat / RPG / Trading simulator, but according to this list (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_space_flight_simulator_games) the pickings are pretty slim. None of the games listed Really struck me as a viable replacement for the games I remember, although Jumpgate Evolution looks promising.

My question is, can anyone with experience with these games recommend a modern equivalent? It doesn't have to be an MMO, but I would like it to support multiplayer, but, barring that, I'd really like a huge amount of gameplay or significant replayability (something GoF2 had only limited amounts of).

P.S. I have a lot of respect for the immensity and beauty of EVE (which I played as a trial) but I'm not interested in playing.

Samot on

Posts

  • Hahnsoo1Hahnsoo1 Make Ready. We Hunt.Registered User, Moderator, Administrator admin
    edited August 2011
    You've already played through all of the classics? Like:
    * Wing Commander Privateer
    * Freespace 2 (notable for continuing fan-made mod support and being Open Source now. Has mission-based limited multiplayer.)
    * Freelancer (notable for being impossible to find anywhere and having a robust server/client multiplayer that can support hundreds of players)
    * X3 (ignore the reviews, this is the quintessential space trading/simulation single player game)
    * Evochron (notable for being an indie game, mostly procedurally generated, and continually under development. Has limited multiplayer)

    Hahnsoo1 on
    8i1dt37buh2m.png
  • ButtcleftButtcleft Registered User regular
    Theres an Earth and Beyond free server up somewhere, I've not used it but I've seen several people talk about it.

  • SamotSamot Registered User regular
    edited August 2011
    I did play Wing commander briefly, and freespace 2 (I forgot to mention that one. It's another game that sparks this pursuit) and freelancer (I think) as well as some similar genre titles, like homeworld (great rts) but the my hope is to play a modern, polished, updated, hopefully multiplayer title that improves on the genre. It doesn't have to be a triple a produced behemoth, but I'm kinda surprised there isn't one offering from the major studios in the last few years. I'm searching for a continued experience that I can participate in over a long period (doesn't have to be mmo, fallout's dlc, for example, has provided similar effect), not a collection of (admittedly excellent) games to complete and put away. I wanna own a ship that I can be proud of.

    Looking more closely at some of the games listed "in development" in this genre, I'm stunned at how much potential this genre has. Most of the promising titles, however, are years away, or have been delayed so many times that they may never get off the ground.

    Look at this video for a game called "infinity universe." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7eREddMjt4 Amazing, but how long will we have to wait for it?

    Edit: Further investigation of a few of the titles you mentioned certainly provide a starting place. X3 looks really good, and evochron has a lot of potential, I'm downloading the demo right now. Still, it's disappointing that the best representations of this genre are obscure indie games or many years old. It's not the fact that they are indie (minecraft has taught us all that incredibly good games can come from independant developers) but that the genre's lack of popularity leaves it unexplored by the mainstream studios.

    Doesn't anyone else long to explore a universe like me?

    Samot on
  • Hahnsoo1Hahnsoo1 Make Ready. We Hunt.Registered User, Moderator, Administrator admin
    edited August 2011
    X3 is definitely not an obscure Indie title. It's actually one of the frontrunners of the genre, and it's often the FIRST game mentioned by space sim aficionados. It's been holding a torch for Elite-like gameplay for a very long time. Evochron, on the other hand, is the very definition of obscure.

    The X series is going to release a new game (X Rebirth) sometime later this year:
    http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/04/20/born-again-x-rebirth-announced/

    Hahnsoo1 on
    8i1dt37buh2m.png
  • SamotSamot Registered User regular
    The indie title I was referring to was Evochron. X3 does look good, but it's still a few years old (2008) and from reviews I've read, doesn't have the depth or multiplayer I'm looking for. I'll still probably play it, but at the moment I'm playing the demo of Evochron and I'm really happy with it. I'll probably buy the full version as soon as i get some money. My desire for a high end title remains, though, and I hope the rumors of Earth and Beyond 2 are true. If anyone hears of a good mmo like these games, let me know.

  • harvestharvest By birthright, a stupendous badass.Registered User regular
    As an alternative to buying Wing Commander Privateer from GOG you can get the free remake from http://privateer.sourceforge.net/ . It's not exactly the same, but it isn't a DOS app running in DOSbox. Supports real resolutions and more joystick buttons.

    B6yM5w2.gif
  • Hahnsoo1Hahnsoo1 Make Ready. We Hunt.Registered User, Moderator, Administrator admin
    Why in the heck do you need multiplayer? The only game out there that has significant multiplayer that isn't an MMO is Freelancer. You said you aren't necessarily looking for an MMO, but it sounds like that's exactly what you are looking for.

    X3 has all of the depth of Fallout and other open world games. You can sink hundreds of hours into it, and still have more to explore. I'm not sure where you are getting that "it doesn't have depth". It has more depth than a lot of MMOs. There's far more to do, with a lot less grinding than EVE (and certainly a lot less goosery).

    Space Pirates and Zombies (SPAZ) may actually scratch that spaceship itch. It's a top-down shooting game, but it's a lot of fun, and there are many weapon/upgrade options and lots of systems to explore.

    The big thing for space MMOs nowadays is browser games. They typically have 3D flight engines within a browser. If you are really looking for a space flight MMO, you might want to trawl your net a little wider to include browser games like Battlestar Galactica Online or Warpfire.

    8i1dt37buh2m.png
  • krylon666krylon666 Registered User regular
    prompted me to search for a more robust, modern space combat / RPG / Trading simulator

    Seriously, give X3: Terran Conflict a try. It looks amazing and has everything you're looking for (except multiplayer). I understand why you'd want some MP - space gets lonely - but don't let that keep you from enjoying one of the best space sandboxes available.

  • SamotSamot Registered User regular
    edited August 2011
    I "need" multiplayer because a portion of my fond memories are playing with my friends. I'd like that to be possible, even though most of them probably won't get into a new game with me unless it's on xbox. But at least with a multiplayer game, it's possible to make new friends. Or get my GF to play.

    I didn't mean to insult X3, but I have a (probably unfair) bias against single (only) player games. When I play them, I get a sense of "wasting time" guilt because there is no permanence or social aspect. This is a personal issue, but it's not going away. I only still play fallout because the expansions represent finite time commitments and small investments. Pouring hundreds of hours into a game (as I hope to do with a space game) which can't be shared with friends will always feel like a waste to me.

    It does seem like I'm looking for an MMO, but I can't devote the time to it that I used to be able to, so it either has to be an excellent regular multiplayer game or a very casual mmo. regular multiplayer seems like it's much easier to find.

    The browser based game suggestion is good. I'll definitly check out those options.

    Thanks for all the great help so far. Especially the mention of Evochron, the forerunner in my search so far.

    Also, I'd be much more open to x3 if I could find a demo. Can anyone point me towards one?

    Samot on
  • HyperAquaBlastHyperAquaBlast Registered User regular
    SpaceForce: Rogue Universe is pretty cool. I found it a bit hard after getting lost in the game though.

    steam_sig.png
  • Hahnsoo1Hahnsoo1 Make Ready. We Hunt.Registered User, Moderator, Administrator admin
    Trying to drag your friends kicking and screaming into a multiplayer game that only you want to play is a Sisyphean task at best. For example, it took 2 years for me to get my friends to even TRY Borderlands, and only because it was on sale for 5 dollars. The absolutely loved it, of course. But you can drop all sorts of hints that "Hey, let's play this game together", but unless they are actually interested in doing it on their own without your input, it's not going to happen.

    It sounds like you need to create new experiences with your friends with new games, rather than looking at "the old games we used to play". That sense of community and belonging from the past doesn't really exist anymore, so either you'll have to create a new community with new friends in a new multiplayer game, or find something that your current friends enjoy that you can do together. And maybe all they want to do is sit and play Call of Duty on their X-Box.

    It also sounds like you need to stop thinking of games as "time invested" and more as "well, I have this amount of time, I want to enjoy myself". You don't think of watching sports games on the TV as "time invested" or going to a bar or restaurant with friends as "time invested", do you? If you do, then you have some pretty serious issues.

    I was highly active in the Neverwinter Nights online community for several years. When Dragon Age first came out, I initially panned it because it lacked multiplayer. But when I sat down and played it, I realized that it was a magnificent and polished game that was a lot of fun to play, as much fun as any multiplayer session I had with Neverwinter Nights, minus the drama, the scheduling, the boring bits, and time investment for "online upkeep" (forums, chatting, etc.). I got more enjoyment with less cruft, all because I didn't have to deal with trying to wrangle other people into my fun.

    8i1dt37buh2m.png
  • SamotSamot Registered User regular
    SpaceForce: Rogue Universe is pretty cool. I found it a bit hard after getting lost in the game though.

    Looks nice, I'm downloading the demo now.

  • SamotSamot Registered User regular
    Hahnsoo1 wrote:
    Trying to drag your friends kicking and screaming into a multiplayer game that only you want to play is a Sisyphean task at best. For example, it took 2 years for me to get my friends to even TRY Borderlands, and only because it was on sale for 5 dollars. The absolutely loved it, of course. But you can drop all sorts of hints that "Hey, let's play this game together", but unless they are actually interested in doing it on their own without your input, it's not going to happen.

    It sounds like you need to create new experiences with your friends with new games, rather than looking at "the old games we used to play". That sense of community and belonging from the past doesn't really exist anymore, so either you'll have to create a new community with new friends in a new multiplayer game, or find something that your current friends enjoy that you can do together. And maybe all they want to do is sit and play Call of Duty on their X-Box.

    It also sounds like you need to stop thinking of games as "time invested" and more as "well, I have this amount of time, I want to enjoy myself". You don't think of watching sports games on the TV as "time invested" or going to a bar or restaurant with friends as "time invested", do you? If you do, then you have some pretty serious issues.

    I was highly active in the Neverwinter Nights online community for several years. When Dragon Age first came out, I initially panned it because it lacked multiplayer. But when I sat down and played it, I realized that it was a magnificent and polished game that was a lot of fun to play, as much fun as any multiplayer session I had with Neverwinter Nights, minus the drama, the scheduling, the boring bits, and time investment for "online upkeep" (forums, chatting, etc.). I got more enjoyment with less cruft, all because I didn't have to deal with trying to wrangle other people into my fun.

    All of that is true, and I know it well. I know how difficult it is to introduce a new game to a group, but If there is any possibility (as small as it may be) for my friends joining me, the game has to have multiplayer. I like keeping that possibility available. Also, I'm willing to make new friends within a game, but that also obviously requires multiplayer. My friends and I still play games together, including Halo Reach every friday, but with the changes 343 are making looming in the distance, and a nostalgic desire for a space sim bubbling in my gut, I'm making this search.

    As for how I think about games, I'm happy with my outlook. It's a conscious decision on top of a gut feeling which I decided on quite a while ago after the realization that my most important memories of game playing are all social/multiplayer, and if I played every single player game I was interested in (games I rarely play to completion) I'd quickly go broke. I have too many interests and hobbies to simply add games as another "pass time," as entertaining as many single player games are. I consciously decided I need to include games in "social pursuits" (or vice versa) in order to be happy with the considerable time I spend on them. And to answer your question, I do consider all of my time as "time invested" to some degree. I don't watch sports (don't watch a lot of tv in general, at least not without doing something else at the same time), but any time spent with my friends, I consider an excellent investment of time. Fortunatly, with my existing outlook, that includes video game playing.

Sign In or Register to comment.