The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Poor [Chat] Trash

1707172737476»

Posts

  • Caveman PawsCaveman Paws Registered User regular
    Feral wrote:
    Drez wrote:
    Chapter 1: Everyone Is Like Totally Dead

    "Everyone is dead."

    Pffft, you just copied that from Red Dwarf.

    I was so close to posting that clip.

  • DrezDrez Registered User regular
    Feral wrote:
    Drez wrote:
    Chapter 1: Everyone Is Like Totally Dead

    "Everyone is dead."

    Pffft, you just copied that from Red Dwarf.

    I was so close to posting that clip.

    Is that really something similar to something in Red Dwarf? Post a clip if you have it.

    I was just jerking off.

    I mean around.

    Nah, I mean off.

    Switch: SW-7690-2320-9238Steam/PSN/Xbox: Drezdar
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    edited October 2011
    ronya wrote:
    moniker wrote:
    ronya wrote:
    moniker what is your ideal national retirement fund system in a paragraph

    Right now SS gives you, on average, about ~40% of your lifetime earnings with the rest split between private pensions/investments and personal savings. I'd like to see that ratchet up to around ~70-80% of your lifetime earnings and just get rid of the private pensions/investments through your work. Or, at least, the tax benefits of such.

    huh.

    you and me, we goin' opposite directions here

    Well, defined benefit plans are basically dead and given the costs associated with them I can't really blame anybody for it. Defined contribution plans tend to fail miserably at getting people to actually save the amounts that they need to, but even disregarding that the limitations of plans offered by HR means that most of the benefits that you might possibly accrue get eated away by managed fund fees and the fact that there are legions of stockholders who do not in any way really actively manage their portfolio puts a lot of the benefits of public companies (activist shareholders and oversight) on autopilot even more than they were before.

    Plus, on top of all that stuff, having a good retirement is just sort of a universal desire by most people as evidenced by the almost universal availability of retirement benefits in every job that isn't part time/temporary. Given that, it seems to make more sense to truly universalize it and take the associated costs off of business' books/backs. Similar to how I feel towards health insurance. That way you have a more leveled playing field of competition between large incumbent firms and young turk upstarts in terms of attempting to attract talent since you're mostly just able to compete on issues of wages, time devotion, and some various amenities that aren't really transferable. (commute time, quality of your office's architecture, providing in house massage with happy endings, &c.) As it stands you can't really offer as good a retirement package or health insurance as a Fortune 100 company because you don't have the employee pool big enough to negotiate with Vanguard or Blue Cross and Blue Shield or whoever.

    moniker on
  • descdesc Goretexing to death Registered User regular
    Tav wrote:
    1317486636347554.jpg

    where does one buy this?

  • NerdgasmicNerdgasmic __BANNED USERS regular
    edited October 2011
    why feral

    Nerdgasmic on
This discussion has been closed.