The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Robot Uprising [chat]
Donkey KongPutting Nintendo out of business with AI nipsRegistered Userregular
Brad DeLong? The guy that gave us NAFTA? My criticisms of him largely lie in my criticisms of NAFTA. I check his blog from time to time. It's linked to fairly often in the blogosphere I frequent.
2. gameplay is hella solid. Never gets frustrating.
3. the soundtrack, my god.
4. Story is great, but the greatest thing about it all is that it's told in a manner that can only be done by this medium. There are games that tell their story like a book does, and there are games that tell their story like it's a movie; I've never seen a game tell it like it's a game, not this well.
0
TL DRNot at all confident in his reflexive opinions of thingsRegistered Userregular
2. gameplay is hella solid. Never gets frustrating.
3. the soundtrack, my god.
4. Story is great, but the greatest thing about it all is that it's told in a manner that can only be done by this medium. There are games that tell their story like a book does, and there are games that tell their story like it's a movie; I've never seen a game tell it like it's a game, not this well.
I'd say Nier does number 4 too. Although it's a real flawed gem, so I wouldn't recommend it too highly.
Homogeneous distribution of your varieties of amuse-gueule
I know but it's still super frustrating. the anti-human caused climate change crowd is so fucking pigheaded. it is highly similar to arguing about evolution.
0
deadlyrhetoric"We could be two straight linesin a crooked world."__BANNED USERSregular
yo this office place construction going on in my direct vicinity is affecting my work pretty negatively
has anyone come up with a method better than a) moving the entire bed aside or b) getting a broom and knocking all the debris out from underneath the bed with big sweeping motions
I know but it's still super frustrating. the anti-human caused climate change crowd is so fucking pigheaded. it is highly similar to arguing about evolution.
the pro-human caused climate change crowd can be equally pigheaded
as someone who has argued with the same kind of person but politically mirrored
Brad DeLong? The guy that gave us NAFTA? My criticisms of him largely lie in my criticisms of NAFTA. I check his blog from time to time. It's linked to fairly often in the blogosphere I frequent.
Yes, the guy who maintained and continues to maintain that NAFTA was a net benefit. He is most representative of the American brand of Clintonian third-way (neo)liberalism in the academic blogs, mostly because he was actually part of it. Also because he vociferously insults everyone and anyone, so arguing with him always generates traffic.
Even then, in non Social Democratic theories, keeping with international proletarian unity there was a strict need for local representation and government. Russian SFSR, Communist China prior to unification, Mongolia, Eastern Europe prior to Stalinization. Huge huge emphasis on local governance with over arching governing bodies to handle international trade, exporting of the revolution, etc.
Of course, all of this was pretty much killed approximately 100 years ago.
I regard "local representation and government" as vulnerable to organized capital and other social institutions with non-egalitarian instincts - fundamentally one has organized capital at supernational scales and this is the efficient way to mobilize very large amounts of labour and capital, so it's not going to go away as long as we desire the material wealth they can produce. But crushing nascent localist nationhood at the heel of economic forces is not, I suppose, palatable, even if it done in the name of The People.
As a political-economy problem, bluntly people vote for leaders they identify with rather than their narrow class interest - unless they first identify with their class, which (let us acknowledge) they don't - so one has the permanent problem of local leaders extracting hilarious amounts of rent by continually waving the specter of Foreigners. Nationalism is a potent force - far more potent than unity of the working class, as World War I taught us.
has anyone come up with a method better than a) moving the entire bed aside or b) getting a broom and knocking all the debris out from underneath the bed with big sweeping motions
water and one of them big window-cleaning like tools which I don't know the name of in english
get on your stomach and use a rag for the corners
0
Donkey KongPutting Nintendo out of business with AI nipsRegistered Userregular
I imagine the first time people at Honda saw the PETMAN video, it went something like this:
I know but it's still super frustrating. the anti-human caused climate change crowd is so fucking pigheaded. it is highly similar to arguing about evolution.
the pro-human caused climate change crowd can be equally pigheaded
as someone who has argued with the same kind of person but politically mirrored
honestly political evangelism is a full-time career here - the field is too complex and any sources you, an amateur, can quote are easily countered by a slightly-better-trained opposition researcher who is easily available via Google
which will give your interlocutor the experience of watching you make an amateur statement, and then he finds some source that deconstructs your statement and shows precisely what is wrong with it, and then you have to revise what you said and hedge and qualify because climate change is Complicated, and then he finds a yet more sophisticated source that picks apart your current stance, etc. If you think anyone is going to walk away from an experience of You Being Continually Wrong with more uncertainty in their position (as a rational Bayesian might) rather than less, you have far more faith in human nature than I think is reasonable
Posts
which is a pipe dream so don't worry!
Brad DeLong? The guy that gave us NAFTA? My criticisms of him largely lie in my criticisms of NAFTA. I check his blog from time to time. It's linked to fairly often in the blogosphere I frequent.
1. it is the most gorgeous thing, ever
2. gameplay is hella solid. Never gets frustrating.
3. the soundtrack, my god.
4. Story is great, but the greatest thing about it all is that it's told in a manner that can only be done by this medium. There are games that tell their story like a book does, and there are games that tell their story like it's a movie; I've never seen a game tell it like it's a game, not this well.
Why do you say it's a pipe dream?
It really does have the greatest pimp strut.
I'd say Nier does number 4 too. Although it's a real flawed gem, so I wouldn't recommend it too highly.
they won't have SOULS GIVEN BY G-D!
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
Truly.
And it's well-timed.
http://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/comment/22027107#Comment_22027107
I know but it's still super frustrating. the anti-human caused climate change crowd is so fucking pigheaded. it is highly similar to arguing about evolution.
has anyone come up with a method better than a) moving the entire bed aside or b) getting a broom and knocking all the debris out from underneath the bed with big sweeping motions
the pro-human caused climate change crowd can be equally pigheaded
as someone who has argued with the same kind of person but politically mirrored
Yes, the guy who maintained and continues to maintain that NAFTA was a net benefit. He is most representative of the American brand of Clintonian third-way (neo)liberalism in the academic blogs, mostly because he was actually part of it. Also because he vociferously insults everyone and anyone, so arguing with him always generates traffic.
I regard "local representation and government" as vulnerable to organized capital and other social institutions with non-egalitarian instincts - fundamentally one has organized capital at supernational scales and this is the efficient way to mobilize very large amounts of labour and capital, so it's not going to go away as long as we desire the material wealth they can produce. But crushing nascent localist nationhood at the heel of economic forces is not, I suppose, palatable, even if it done in the name of The People.
As a political-economy problem, bluntly people vote for leaders they identify with rather than their narrow class interest - unless they first identify with their class, which (let us acknowledge) they don't - so one has the permanent problem of local leaders extracting hilarious amounts of rent by continually waving the specter of Foreigners. Nationalism is a potent force - far more potent than unity of the working class, as World War I taught us.
water and one of them big window-cleaning like tools which I don't know the name of in english
get on your stomach and use a rag for the corners
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtntTvuv8Aw
Someone isn't going to "accidentally" create conscious A.I. that's just not how the real world works.
I also don't believe in the singularity.
do you have an iphone?
if so, do you know of any good production apps?
i'm too tired to make music when i get home from work
so i want make beats on the crapper @ work.
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
so... it's a pipe dream because we can't do it now?
honestly political evangelism is a full-time career here - the field is too complex and any sources you, an amateur, can quote are easily countered by a slightly-better-trained opposition researcher who is easily available via Google
which will give your interlocutor the experience of watching you make an amateur statement, and then he finds some source that deconstructs your statement and shows precisely what is wrong with it, and then you have to revise what you said and hedge and qualify because climate change is Complicated, and then he finds a yet more sophisticated source that picks apart your current stance, etc. If you think anyone is going to walk away from an experience of You Being Continually Wrong with more uncertainty in their position (as a rational Bayesian might) rather than less, you have far more faith in human nature than I think is reasonable
Watch out for Cre. They'll snip your lox right out.
when both are awkward, you'd have stronger awkwardness
when they're in opposition you'd have destructive interference and get some sort mean-level awkwardness
We'll be dead so yeah. It is a pipe dream
It always looks like it's about to drop a load and it has gigantic feet for stability.
Petman has a pimp strut and wears people shoes.
Speak for yourself. I'm going to live to be 100, easy.
No, not when the awkward waves are in phase, in which case you get awkward amplification.
that's not what pipe dream means at all
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin