The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Thinking about a Mac Book....

YallYall Registered User regular
edited March 2007 in Games and Technology
So I'm a gamer, a musician, and a bit of a videographer.

I currently have an eMac 1.0 ghz, with 80 gig external disk (firewire), in addition to a gaming PC. I use the eMac exclusively for Music/Video editing. Lately the mac is just a pain in the ass. OS is way outdated, (I can't even use the iTunes store anymore without upgrading the OS. arrgghh!!!) and for the small area that it occupies, it takes up a decent amount of space.

I was considering replacing it with a laptop to do the video and editing, and then started thinking about a macbook pro as an alternative. The problem is, I just hate the human factors of mac/apple interfaces. Generally good hardware and 1st party apps, but I've been an apple and pc owner my whole life, and for some reason I just don't get it when it comes to macs (and I'm a developer/analyst!!!).

/rant

What I'm getting at is this: with my natural aversion to apples look and feel, should I just get a decent vista laptop and with the money I save on not buying a mac spent instead on software and external storage? Or is there a compelling reason to own a mac with regards to video/music editing.

I have a feeling there is, and maybe I'm just totally missing it.

Thanks in advance for your thoughts, gang.

Yall on

Posts

  • antifoodantifood Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    For you, I would think that Final Cut Pro is reason enough.

    antifood on
  • JohannenJohannen Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    My brothers got a mac book and it looks pretty fucking sweet, aswell as being reasonably sized and priced. (He carries it round in his back pack whilst he's been travelling the world and it fits out the way perfectly).
    It also has all the shit you could need to do what you want with, especially if you're already well versed in the software.

    Johannen on
  • grambogrambo Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    The editing software you use should determine what platform you pick.

    I'm assuming you are using MacOS 9 on that thing and not OSX? I think OSX is quite a bit nicer and I _HATE_ Apple :).

    grambo on
    grambo..png
  • sabyulsabyul Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    I am a student film/video editor and animator. I have a Macbook, and it's enough for what I use it for, which is assistant editing work (digitizing, organization) and as a Photoshop Automation machine to run color levels, resizing, etc on large numbers of animation frames.

    Currently, Adobe software doesn't really like the new Macs tooo much, but all that really means is a slightly longer start-up load time for the programs. Built-in programs such as iMovie and iDVD are very convenient to have around. Mostly I do all my work on school G5s (except for 3d, which is done on PCs) with Cintiqs and all that, so the Macbook plays the role of a supporting extra computer very well.

    sabyul on
    http://www.frame-advantage.com - Specializing in high quality fighting game video content
  • YallYall Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    grambo wrote: »
    The editing software you use should determine what platform you pick.

    I'm assuming you are using MacOS 9 on that thing and not OSX? I think OSX is quite a bit nicer and I _HATE_ Apple :).

    I'm using OS 10.2 (not entirely sure of the version.

    I do like final cut, but partculars of my copy make it such that I won't be installing it on a new one.

    They are pretty...

    Yall on
  • EggyToastEggyToast Jersey CityRegistered User regular
    edited March 2007
    There are pretty compelling arguments for music and video on a mac. I deal with audio, and CoreAudio as a driver model is pure bliss. Compared to ASIO or WDM drivers, it's amazing how you essentially do nothing to use low latency drivers 100% of the time.

    Can you do audio and video on a Windows machine, vista included? Sure. It's more headache if you've never really tried it before, and there are some very annoying quirks if you both play games (which use DirectX audio drivers) and do music (which do NOT use DirectX audio drivers).

    For video, OS X has CoreImage which is really handy if you're playing with video a lot. There's no iMovie or FCP on Windows, so you're usually stuck using Avid (very expensive and specialty) or Premier (which I personally dislike). There's a handful of other programs I ran across when I was still trying to do video on Windows, but as I'm relatively poor, I can't plink down a few hundred just to see if a video program does what I like as a hobby. Having iMovie free is amazing for that.

    What grambo said is essentially the crux of the argument, though. You need to go to where the software is. That's why so many gamers swear by Windows. For audio, there's options on both platforms that are often equivalent. There's less freeware audio apps for OS X but, personally, I've never found a free audio tool on Windows that actually sounded good. Utilities such as MidiOX are useful but rather convoluted, and there are equivalent (and easier to use) apps on OS X.

    I use a Windows laptop as a VST host, essentially using it to only run audio apps. It has a $100 PC Card audio card and is controlled via MIDI from the Mac and MPC1k. I've imported video to it via FireWire and Windows Movie Maker. It all works, but I won't say it just happened without some effort on my part. And it continues to work because I don't use it for any games (which love changing your audio driver settings :D ) nor internet stuff. For my every day work I use a G5 powermac, and I can say that most of your complaints about your emac being a pain in the ass would disappear with a newer computer (similar to someone's complaints about how Windows 98 on a 450mhz cpu doesn't work with any new stuff, for instance).

    As for the human factors stuff, do you have an apple store near you? If so, go play with the models in your price ranges to see how you feel about them. Talk to the apple guys there about complaints or concerns you have about using the machines, and they'll likely have good input you can see being used immediately. I can't blame you for not liking OS 10.2; we've got it on a computer here at work (the rest of us are 10.4) and it's really just the beginning of OS X getting "good." I didn't have any real interest in Macs until 10.3 started to appear and shortly after it came out I took the plunge. Before then I had no interest in them as computers.

    EggyToast on
    || Flickr — || PSN: EggyToast
  • DiscoPirateBunnyDiscoPirateBunny CaliforniaRegistered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Yall wrote: »
    I'm using OS 10.2 (not entirely sure of the version.

    Just so you know, I have an eMac 1.25ghz, and 10.4 Tiger runs *beautifully* on it.

    Given what I've heard about 10.2, if nothing else, I'd suggest upgrading the eMac (I'm assuming you have a decent amount of RAM given what you do). If you still are getting a newer machine, you can always use the Tiger disks that come with it to upgrade the eMac as well.

    BTW, as far as your original comment about possibly saving money by going with a Vista-based machine, I know it's an argument done to death around here, but lots of recent articles have pointed out how, at least on the high-end of things, Macs are actually pretty competitively priced, so I don't know if you'd actually save anything significant going that route (having just helped my work choose a new high-end laptop myself, I can personally verify this, but then one person's experience isn't much to go on).

    In the end, it *is* entirely about where the software is. Personally, for your areas of interest, IMHO the best software is on the Mac side. But if there's some software you just can't live without on the Windows side, then you should lean more towards that (or consider Parallels or VMWare...all hail virtualization!!)

    --mcn

    DiscoPirateBunny on
    "Let's take a look at the scores! The girls are at the square root of Pi, while the boys are still at a crudely drawn picture of a duck. Clearly, it's anybody's game!"
  • LewishamLewisham Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    To be honest, if you already have a Mac and you don't see any redeeming features over Windows, you should just get a Thinkpad.

    There's no point sticking with Mac just because everyone tells you it's better. If you can't see it, don't do it.

    Lewisham on
  • bashbash Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Fuck, closed the browser window.

    As I was trying to say, there's little reason to not go with the MacBook as long as it suits your needs. Your complaints about the eMac's "human factors" are a red herring. You're using an outdated version of the OS that is not actively supported on a machine that barely kept up with the status quo when it was brand new. I suspect your version of Final Cut is equally old considering it even runs on Jaguar. A new machine with up to date software is going to be a totally different experience. Not only will it come with very capable media apps like iMovie and GarageBand but offer a nice upgrade path to Final Cut and Logic.

    Head down to your local Apple Store and check out the damn MacBooks. Price wise they hold up very well to the competition, it's not like a PC notebook is going to save you umpteen hundreds of dollars. For a machine the size, weight, and power of the MacBook you'll spend about the same amount of money. The loss leader PC notebooks aren't worth the hassle, especially loaded with Vista.

    bash on
    comi-sig1.jpg
  • YallYall Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Thanks for all of the input.

    One thing I hadn't really considered was a G5. I'm probably going swing by the Apple store today and compare prices and specs. I'll let you guys know if this results in a purchase.

    Thanks again!

    Yall on
  • HAKdragonHAKdragon Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    If you still are getting a newer machine, you can always use the Tiger disks that come with it to upgrade the eMac as well.

    Any potential legal/license issues aside, that wouldn't work as all the new systems use Intel processors and the OS is compiled for that architecture. We probably won't see a universal binary OS until 10.5 (though they may include a PPC and an x86 version in the package as I'm not sure if you can boot a CD that uses different architectures and boot methods (Open Firmware vs EFI))

    HAKdragon on
    hakdragon.png
  • ObsObs __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2007
    OS9 is a piece of shit. That's your problem.

    Obs on
  • HAKdragonHAKdragon Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Obs wrote: »
    OS9 is a piece of shit. That's your problem.

    Protip: Read the thread, especially the part where he mentions he's running 10.2.

    HAKdragon on
    hakdragon.png
Sign In or Register to comment.