The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Is this your [chat]?
Elki
get busyModerator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
get busyModerator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
Elki on
0
This discussion has been closed.
Posts
there isn't a thing us nerds won't tear apart
hee hee
Kennedy seemed to be coming around on the mandate at the end of arguments.
C'mon, Microsoft, get me content!
He did. Actually was stating some of the main arguments from the government and sounded like he agreed. So I am not feeling real bad. He is the one vote I would be worried about going either way.
It turns out I'm terrible at LoL.
I dunno. I really don't know. But I am heartened that Kennedy did not find his limiting principle.
Like, really, how can you hate people that much?
Gorgeous everything else, though.
he didn't speak it out loud during arguments, no
doesn't mean he won't find one
Hey I already do like it, I told you I saw most of the first season, I was just lazy!
One of the characters in the film is named Katniss Everdeen. Katniss...Everdeen. That's all I need to know to have an opinion about it.
I think that is well into the class of dwellings that is priced in Lives rather than currency.
I think it probably costs at least fifty humans, ten goats and a few cats.
I read the transcripts of the arguments, as usual Scalia was mostly concerned with interjecting jokes than getting answers, since he's already made up his mind
also jesus the first day of argument about the anti injunction act was mind blowingly boring
if you have to ask
My big thing about the ACA is pre-existing conditions. As long as that stands I can live with the mandate going away because this thing going down makes single payer or cost reduction more likely in the nearer future.
Quickly moving toward scrub territory Sarks. SCRUB TERRITORY
are we counting the parts where you could see Scalia's lips moving?
really the only usefulness is to feel out where the justices already are at or what they are focusing down on
I really don't have anything to say about this that I haven't already said. You're dedicated to hatred regardless of the positions I've taken, so I really don't know where to go from here.
I don't remember him asking questions in the two transcripts I read
just sittin there like a troll on a log
but everyone will see you walking around naked with all those windows for walls and neighbors 50 feet away
the house my dad and his wife have built is nearly on that scale of gorgeous. No pool, but otherwise. But he was in construction his whole life and she was a dirt poor single mother who had to learn how to do every kind of house repair on her own so they did most of the work themselves. edit: and it's taken them like 10 years after moving in. Still working on the basement / attic.
The government didn't provide one for him either. The comment this NPR reporter attributed to Paul Clement, "whenever I argued Interstate commerce and I could provide a limiting principle, I won. When I could not, I lost" is telling. He knew what to go after to sway Kennedy. Maybe he was successful.
He rarely speaks or has questions about any case, let alone landmark ones. He is easily the "least scholarly" (this is code for "dumbest") justice the court has seen in almost 100 years.
My hatred for him alone could fill a beautiful valley situated beneath a stylish multi-million dollar home.