The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

[The Killing] on AMC. The owls are not what they seem.

SammyFSammyF Registered User regular
edited April 2012 in Debate and/or Discourse
22768.jpg

The Killing is a weekly serialized police procedural which runs Sunday nights on AMC. Based on an original Danish television program, Forbrydelsen ("The Crime"), the American remake is set in Seattle and focuses on the events surrounding the homicide of Rosie Larson, an 18 year old high school senior from a working class family, as well as the larger effect that the crime has had on her family, on the detectives investigating her case, and her community at large. Over the course of the first season, we met some of Rosie's extraordinarily questionable high school friends, explored questions of racial identity in the Pacific Northwest, saw one of the most anticipated land deals in the state of Washington unexpectedly sour, observed the complete emotional decompensation of the victim's parents, learned that an authority figure in the young woman's life may have encouraged her to make some questionable decisions in a casino just outside of local and state jurisdiction, and we still never learned who the fuck killed this girl. Basically, The Killing is this decade's Twin Peaks.

Except, you know, they're a little bit more discerning about what they consider a legitimate investigative technique.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9kejvxRokg

Some fans, who apparently never watched Twin Peaks, were outraged at the end of the show's first season when they discovered that the show didn't conclusively end Rosie Larson's homicide case. Part of me understand where they are coming from, but I also think it's still a pretty awesome show that we should totally be talking about. Unlike some of the better known, widely syndicated procedurals like Law and Order, this series focuses entirely on a single case. Because they don't have to wrap up a single case from beginning to end in the space of 42 minutes, the show can afford to spend a little bit more time exploring both the police work and the characters. I could honestly take or leave the dysfunctional detectives Holden and Linden at times, but every time the show spins back to a vignette about Rosie's parents struggling to cope with the grief of having a child violently taken from them, my heart breaks a little. Most of the time, a homicide victim on a police drama is little more than a self-contained source for forensic evidence and an abstract procedural motive generator. The Killing takes the time to make Rosie Larson so much more through her family members. I really like that. I also like that the show feels comfortable having a female protagonist who isn't meant to be a sex symbol but who also isn't meant to be boring.

Best of all, because the case is almost guaranteed to still be open after the end of any given episode, you can always look forward to coming back to this thread and positing your own theories of the crime as an amateur sleuth. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, CSI!

Season two of The Killing premiered last Sunday on AMC. The entirety of Season 1 is watchable instantly on Netflix.

SammyF on

Posts

  • Harry DresdenHarry Dresden Registered User regular
    Great show. At times it reaches a quality level I usually find on HBO. It's fascinating how it interweaves politics, the victim's family (which are usually given lesser roles in crime dramas), the investigation, Linden raising her son all clash together in a realistic fashion. The casting is constantly spot-on.

  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    Basically, The Killing is this decade's Twin Peaks.

    Does it have supernatural themes comparable to Twin Peaks?

    How about humor?

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • Harry DresdenHarry Dresden Registered User regular
    Feral wrote: »
    Basically, The Killing is this decade's Twin Peaks.

    Does it have supernatural themes comparable to Twin Peaks?

    How about humor?

    No, it's almost depressing to watch.

  • Martini_PhilosopherMartini_Philosopher Registered User regular
    It was a fair show that had a few good moments.

    I personally felt that it suffered from trying to do too much and lost a lot of time to events and conversations which didn't advance the plot or the characters.

    The whole mayor subplot was especially grating and underused.

    All opinions are my own and in no way reflect that of my employer.
  • SammyFSammyF Registered User regular
    edited April 2012
    Yeah I was being a little tongue in cheek there; the connection so far is exclusively limited to the parallel structure of the show (everything that happens in the show falls out of the investigation into a single homicide), the fact that both shows take place in the state of Washington (though in very different towns), and some strikingly similar facts about the victim.

    And of course, the fact that so many fans flew into a tizzy when they realized that they weren't going to have their curiosity satisfied by a neat little conclusion at the end of the first season. That bit was more or less identical.

    It was a fair show that had a few good moments.

    I personally felt that it suffered from trying to do too much and lost a lot of time to events and conversations which didn't advance the plot or the characters.

    The whole mayor subplot was especially grating and underused.

    One thing I've noticed watching the show is that if you want to make a wild guess at who the next prime suspect is going to be with 100% accuracy, always pick the character who has had the most dialogue or face time over the last two episodes for no apparently good reason. The events of the season premier lead me to believe that this pattern will continue to be born out, and the mayor or someone close to him is about to get a solid couple of days at the top of Sarah Linden's shit list.

    SammyF on
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    SammyF wrote: »
    Yeah I was being a little tongue in cheek there; the connection so far is exclusively limited to the parallel structure of the show (everything that happens in the show falls out of the investigation into a single homicide), the fact that both shows take place in the state of Washington (though in very different towns), and some strikingly similar facts about the victim.

    That makes sense. Sounds like a good premise for a show.

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • Captain TragedyCaptain Tragedy Registered User regular
    edited April 2012
    I dunno. I like a lot about the show (the concept, most of the actors, the atmosphere/style), but as I went through the first season, I just got tired of the "red herring of the week" format of it, where there was one and only one focus, and then the start of next week they go "Nope, not it" and they're just forgotten about, never really building to anything. It felt like a standard network procedural, except rather than the red herring suspect being a 6 minute segment between commercials in an hour long show, it was stretched into a full hour over 13 episodes.

    The season finale didn't bother me as much as others. It just seemed to be yet another red herring reveal.

    I'm giving it another chance this season, because of those things I like about it, and the premiere seems like they are building to something bigger.

    Captain Tragedy on
  • spacebearspacebear Registered User regular
    The atmosphere and style is what has me hooked. I don't believe there's too many crime dramas that take a really long look at the aftermath of a crime and how it changes a community. (If there are others feel free to give suggestions). I have to be honest and say the acting is quite nice (a well needed break from The Walking Dead) but the pace of the story could use some fine tuning.

  • SammyFSammyF Registered User regular
    edited April 2012
    I dunno. I like a lot about the show (the concept, most of the actors, the atmosphere/style), but as I went through the first season, I just got tired of the "red herring of the week" format of it, where there was one and only one focus, and then the start of next week they go "Nope, not it" and they're just forgotten about, never really building to anything. It felt like a standard network procedural, except rather than the red herring suspect being a 6 minute segment between commercials in an hour long show, it was stretched into a full hour over 13 episodes.

    I think that's generally fair, and if the characters were boring or the setting wasn't interesting, there were a few episodes where I would have been willing to pull the plug. However: there's also frequently a piece of legitimate evidence which turns up during each of the red herring hunts. Linden and Holder conveniently forget about these facts because the show wants us to forget about it, as well, until the point where they're ready to clue us into who did it. But it's still there if you're paying attention.

    For instance, in the case of one of our earlier red herrings:
    While investigating the teacher, Linden and Holder discovered that Mr. Ahmed was refinishing his floors using a number of chemicals, including ammonium hydroxide. Linden requests that the coroner check the body for the compound, and the lab discovered that there are substantial traces in her clothes and on her person. The lab technicians speculate that this compound could have been used to destroy any DNA or physical evidence beneath the victim's finger nails and further suggest that the use of the compound indicates a degree of sophistication on the part of the killer, who perhaps had become experienced at killing through other similar crimes.

    When Ahmed was later cleared as a suspect, the large bottles of ammonium hydroxide in his apartment were no longer consequential to the investigation -- but we still learned something important about both the crime and the killer.

    I could be totally wrong, of course. Perhaps these facts will never come up again because they haven't put nearly as much thought into the show as they've let on. But if there's enough interest in the thread, I'd enjoy it if some of us wanted to collaboratively put the objective elements of the crime together and then attempt to solve it before the show solves it for us.

    SammyF on
  • Anarchy Rules!Anarchy Rules! Registered User regular
    Here in the UK, Channel4 started showing season 1 of the American one last year. I began watching it, but BBC4 started showing the Danish original. I was watching them side-by-side, but only continued with the Danish one as it absolutely fantastic.

    In terms of the first 4 episodes I saw of both, Forbrydelsen is far superior to the remake. Interestingly, in the Danish one the murder is solved, which series 2 involving a separate murder altogether.

  • Mike DangerMike Danger "Diane..." a place both wonderful and strangeRegistered User regular
    edited April 2012
    Can we make a list of ways that the Rosie Larsen case relates to Laura Palmer's murder? Here are the ones I remember off of the top of my head, but I am sure there were a lot more.
    - Laura's mom finds out that Laura is dead when she hears (over the phone) the police arriving at the Great Northern where her husband is. Rosie's mom finds out Rosie is dead when she hears (over the phone) the police pushing her husband away from the barricade at Discovery Park.

    - Laura is revealed to have had connections to One-Eyed Jack's, a casino outside US jurisdiction in Canada. Rosie is revealed to have had connections to Wapi Eagle Casino, a casino outside US jurisdiction on Native American land.

    - Both investigations have characters named after presidents. (Sheriff Harry S Truman, Lyndon Johnson Rosales)

    I totally get why people don't like the show, and I totally understand that the red herring stuff is really implausible, but I still enjoy watching it (and I think it has the best theme sequence I've seen in a long time).

    Finally, calling it now, eat-my-wang, etc: Gwen is the killer. My friend that I watch the show with gave me a huge argument about why it has to be her, and I've drank the Kool-Aid.

    Mike Danger on
    Steam: Mike Danger | PSN/NNID: remadeking | 3DS: 2079-9204-4075
    oE0mva1.jpg
  • SammyFSammyF Registered User regular
    Gwen was my dark horse pick for a while there because I can certainly fit her for motive as well as plausible means and opportunity, but I can't square her on (season 2 spoiler):
    The backpack. The backpack showing up in the middle of the season premier like it did, while Richmond was in custody waiting to be arraigned, suggests to me that either the killer didn't like the idea of anyone else getting credit for his crime, or that the killer specifically didn't want Richmond to take the fall for it. Either way, the apparent purpose was to exonerate Richmond. Since Gwen had previously cooperated with the investigation by undermining Richmond's alibi and turning over the DVD showing that Richmond had undisclosed prior contact with Rosie, I can't see how she implicates him in the season one finale just so as she can exonerate him in the season two premier. That makes more sense for Jamie in my eyes: Jamie has always been trying to distance Richmond from the killing unequivocally. But while I have opportunity and means on Jamie, I can't fit him for motive yet.

    My initial theory of the crime was the mayor, which is finally coming around, but it's coming around so early in the season that it's undoubtedly wrong and also impossible to square with the same bit of evidence.

  • Martini_PhilosopherMartini_Philosopher Registered User regular
    Here in the UK, Channel4 started showing season 1 of the American one last year. I began watching it, but BBC4 started showing the Danish original. I was watching them side-by-side, but only continued with the Danish one as it absolutely fantastic.

    In terms of the first 4 episodes I saw of both, Forbrydelsen is far superior to the remake. Interestingly, in the Danish one the murder is solved, which series 2 involving a separate murder altogether.

    I would put that difference up to US television execs wanting their shows to go on forever and ever no matter how much the creators envision an end to their story. See zombie Simpsons.

    All opinions are my own and in no way reflect that of my employer.
  • Mike DangerMike Danger "Diane..." a place both wonderful and strangeRegistered User regular
    edited April 2012
    Hey, here's some more stuff The Killing and Twin Peaks share!
    - Laura is found by the lakeside, wrapped in plastic. Rosie is found in the lake, wrapped in plastic. Images of them being found in this way (figuratively in Laura's case, literally in Rosie's case) are important as the series goes on.

    - The pilot of Twin Peaks ends with a close-up on a photograph of Laura. The pilot of The Killing ends with a close-up on a photograph of Rosie.

    - Laura's best friend Donna spends most of her life being overshadowed by Laura, and later ends up with Laura's bad boy boyfriend James. Rosie's best friend Sterling spends most of her life being overshadowed by Rosie, and later ends up with Rosie's bad boy boyfriend Jasper.

    - A tape of Laura is an important piece of evidence, and a clue is found in a reflection in Laura's eye. A tape of Rosie is an important piece of evidence, and a clue is found in a reflection on Rosie's bicycle mirror.

    - Both girls are strangely childlike for high schoolers, and have strangely childlike rooms.

    - Laura's boyfriend Bobby is obnoxious and cheated on her. Rosie's boyfriend Jasper is obnoxious and cheated on her. (My Twin Peaks/The Killing-watching partner said that they were both rich as well, but I don't recall Bobby being rich.)

    - Community pillar Benjamin Horne is revealed to have connections to prostitution. Community pillar Darren Richmond is revealed to have connections to prostitution.

    - Important clues are found when someone thinks to investigate the after-school meals on wheels program Laura was involved in. Important clues are found when someone thinks to investigate the after-school anti-gang program Rosie was involved in.

    - Dale Cooper's deceased wife is revealed to be more important to the plot than thought as time goes on. Darren Richmond's deceased wife is revealed to be more important to the plot than thought as time goes on.

    Edit: Speaking of other shows, has anyone else noticed all the BSG alumni showing up? Leoben is Linden's fiance, Rosie's mom is Admiral Cain, Helo is Linden's ex-husband.

    Mike Danger on
    Steam: Mike Danger | PSN/NNID: remadeking | 3DS: 2079-9204-4075
    oE0mva1.jpg
  • JoshmviiJoshmvii Registered User regular
    I'm necroing this thread from the depths of hell because after being hugely disappointed in the fact that they drew out the Rosie Larsen case for 2 seasons, then them cancelling and later renewing this show for a 3rd season, this 3rd season which ends next Sunday is utterly killing it. No lie, it's some of the best TV in the past few years.

    Supposedly the 3rd season is going to hit Netflix very soon after it ends as part of their renewal deal, so if you liked the show at all and want to see by far its best work, check it out.

  • RocketSauceRocketSauce Registered User regular
    Joshmvii wrote: »
    I'm necroing this thread from the depths of hell because after being hugely disappointed in the fact that they drew out the Rosie Larsen case for 2 seasons, then them cancelling and later renewing this show for a 3rd season, this 3rd season which ends next Sunday is utterly killing it. No lie, it's some of the best TV in the past few years.

    Supposedly the 3rd season is going to hit Netflix very soon after it ends as part of their renewal deal, so if you liked the show at all and want to see by far its best work, check it out.

    I fear too many people gave up on the show based on AMC's crappy marketing "FIND OUT WHO KILLED ROSIE LARSEN!" every commercial break. It never bothered me, and The Killing has been a must watch every Sunday. The 3rd Season stands on its own, and is everything that is right about good TV. It is a show that is really running on all cylinders in terms of acting, writing, camera work, and pacing. It's just my jam.

    The previous weeks' episode "Reckoning" hit me like a ton of bricks and was probably the best hour of TV I've seen in a good while.

  • LawndartLawndart Registered User regular
    I avoided this show for the first two seasons after reading pretty much nothing but negative critical reviews.

    On a whim, I checked out the first episode of the new season and I've been hooked.

    They still have a final episode to fuck things up, but so far it's been one of my favorite recent shows.

  • JoshmviiJoshmvii Registered User regular
    The first season of The Killing was pretty good, and it was very atmospheric. The problem is myself and most viewers thought the Rosie Larsen case would be resolved at the end of season 1. When it wasn't, and the 2nd season was honestly pretty bad, it was like oh well, kinda glad you got cancelled.

    They learned from their mistakes for sure, because s3 is amazing. They hit gold with Bullet as a character, Holder is killing it, and Seward has been a great guest as well.

  • CommunistCowCommunistCow Abstract Metal ThingyRegistered User regular
    Joshmvii wrote: »
    The first season of The Killing was pretty good, and it was very atmospheric. The problem is myself and most viewers thought the Rosie Larsen case would be resolved at the end of season 1. When it wasn't, and the 2nd season was honestly pretty bad, it was like oh well, kinda glad you got cancelled.

    They learned from their mistakes for sure, because s3 is amazing. They hit gold with Bullet as a character, Holder is killing it, and Seward has been a great guest as well.

    This is how I felt. I got to the second to last episode of season 1 and one of my friends told me the arc continued to the end of season 2 and I just lost all heart and gave up on the show. It was pretty damn good up until I learned that.

    No, I am not really communist. Yes, it is weird that I use this name.
  • RocketSauceRocketSauce Registered User regular
    I liked how you got to follow characters through a couple of seasons and saw how this one thing bled into all aspects of their lives. That's what made the show for me, not the mystery. It's so cliché to wrap things up quickly, focus only on the criminal justice aspect and ignore the personal tragedies for those involved. If it was guilty of doing something poorly, I thought it wrapped up the central mystery too quickly at the end (most likely under threat of cancellation).

  • JoshmviiJoshmvii Registered User regular
    I disagree. I thought season 2 felt like they were like damn, we only needed 14 episodes to finish this arc not 28, we better put in here a big mayoral race and have wheelchair mayor candidate have a huge storyline, etc.

Sign In or Register to comment.