The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

NATO, Terrorism, and the CPD

Boring7Boring7 Registered User regular
edited May 2012 in Debate and/or Discourse
...dot tumblr dot com

Sorry, so it seems that Chicago is hosting a big ol' NATO summit that's important to me the same way hey what was I talking about?

Anyway, the media narrative has been that CHICAGO WILL BURN because all the stinky stupid filthy retarded over-educated muslim atheist commienazi hippiefascists are going to riot like it's Angels 8. CPD has dropped 1 million on shiny new riot gear and things are already simmering.

For example; Traffic stops where 4+ officers spend some quality time loudly threatening individuals for being filthy stinking protesters and salivating at the prospect of doling out beatings.
"See these guys know, '68, these guys know all about '68," one voice allegedly belonging to a police officer says to the protesters. "What did they say back in '68?" one officer asks. "Billy club to the f***ing skull," the voice of another man, allegedly a police officer, says. At the mention of race issues being a factor in the '68 riots, one alleged officer says "okay, now we'll beat your white ass." Before the protesters seem to be dismissed, one of the car's passengers tells police they'll see them at NATO next weekend. "We'll come look for you, each and every one of you," says one man, who is allegedly a police officer.

The police response has been mostly denial and that the video was clearly edited so those statements didn't mean anything. (I haven't watched the full unedited 30 minutes because I have what the doctors call a short attention sp-Hey what's that over there?)

But what makes me bring this story up now is that apparently those same protesters have just been arrested and charged with terrorism.
According the the NLG, the three men were surrounded by several police squad cars outside of a CVS last week, not far for the Occupy Chicago headquarters on 500 West Cermak. The group posted a video that shows police questioning their activities and possible plans for the NATO Summit...He also told the Sun-Times an officer wrote “ID 1968” on his hand, a reference to the Democratic National Convention that year that remains infamous for violent clashes between protesters and police.
Police say they had a improvised exposive or incendiary devices, a mortar, swords, a hunting bow, throwing stars, and knives with brass-knuckle handles, gas masks, extensive plans to attack multiple locations including the Mayor's office, police headquarters, the Obama Campaign headquarters, and STAG bases in Steelport as part of Black Bloc and Occupy Chicago and I'm not even sure what all else. But apparently they had no guns for all of this, so...yeah. Their lawyers say all they had a microbrewery for making homemade beer. The 3 (of 9) being charged have bail of 1.5 million each and were apparently being investigated since the begninning of the month despite having gotten to Chicago in typical hippie-caravan style.

I am reminded of that parable about hammers and nails, to be honest.

Anyway, I find this interesting, I figured I should bring it up.

Boring7 on
«1345678

Posts

  • ShadowfireShadowfire Vermont, in the middle of nowhereRegistered User regular
    So, the police are assholes, but they also arrested some folks who were making plans to cause damage, create havoc, and hurt people.

    I'm not quite sure what to think aside from "you guys are fucking dicks but uh... good job I guess." Am I missing something?

  • HacksawHacksaw J. Duggan Esq. Wrestler at LawRegistered User regular
    If it fucks over the Black Bloc people, I'm okay with it. Those guys tore up part of Seattle during the May Day demonstrations. They can go fuck themselves all the way off a cliff.

  • Boring7Boring7 Registered User regular
    Well, there's also a question as to whether or not they were even planning anything. Certain things are very questionable, like the fact that these supposed anarchists planning to blow up the entire city (seriously?) don't appear to have had any GUNS. And the police, who went after the same group of guys twice, kept making references to the '68 riots (allegedly both times).

    There's a rolling argument on Fark as to what lies are being told and how far CPD might go to justify their million dollar militarization project.

  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    Boring7 wrote: »
    Well, there's also a question as to whether or not they were even planning anything. Certain things are very questionable, like the fact that these supposed anarchists planning to blow up the entire city (seriously?) don't appear to have had any GUNS. And the police, who went after the same group of guys twice, kept making references to the '68 riots (allegedly both times).

    There's a rolling argument on Fark as to what lies are being told and how far CPD might go to justify their million dollar militarization project.

    Yeah, I'm going to call bullshit on this conspiracy plan until I see a lot more evidence. That's a bit crazy.

    Lh96QHG.png
  • ScooterScooter Registered User regular
    It's kind of reverse of normal though. I might expect cops to plant a gun. I wouldn't expect them to plant a mortar.

    Unless they were just cleaning out all the old junk in their evidence lockers?

  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    I honestly don't think the Chicago cops need any more justification than the fact that this is a period of economic instability and NATO is in town. I mean, I was only 11 or so, but I remember Seattle and the WTO protests.

    These people are nuts and tempers are high out there.

    I bet the same people decrying overprep would be the first ones in line to complain about underprep if shit went down. Same kind of people who complain when the govt issues evac orders for hurricanes.

    Lh96QHG.png
  • Brian KrakowBrian Krakow Registered User regular
    The references to the police riot of 1968 are disturbing.

  • KlashKlash Lost... ... in the rainRegistered User regular
    edited May 2012
    Everybody cross your fingers, we can have another Toronto G20! It's gonna so exciting!

    Klash on
    We don't even care... whether we care or not...
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    Hacksaw wrote: »
    If it fucks over the Black Bloc people, I'm okay with it. Those guys tore up part of Seattle during the May Day demonstrations. They can go fuck themselves all the way off a cliff.
    They broke some fucking windows, and the fact that people are capable of getting upset with them while completely ignoring the behavior of the banks whose windows they broke is really a special kind of appalling.

  • ShadowfireShadowfire Vermont, in the middle of nowhereRegistered User regular
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Hacksaw wrote: »
    If it fucks over the Black Bloc people, I'm okay with it. Those guys tore up part of Seattle during the May Day demonstrations. They can go fuck themselves all the way off a cliff.
    They broke some fucking windows, and the fact that people are capable of getting upset with them while completely ignoring the behavior of the banks whose windows they broke is really a special kind of appalling.

    I can hate banks and think what they do is appalling while believing that a bunch of assholes smashing windows is also appalling.

  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    There's no excuse of busting shit up, banks or no banks. It's fucking ridiculous.

    Lh96QHG.png
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    It fucking calls attention to the problem, and it's a problem that people are ignoring the shit out of. It's a form of civil disobedience.

  • Captain CarrotCaptain Carrot Alexandria, VARegistered User regular
    No, it's not. Civil disobedience is about going to jail for breaking an unjust law so that people see the discrepancy between the action and the punishment. Breaking the windows on a building belonging to a heartless corporation doesn't qualify in the slightest.

  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    It's a stupid form and I'm not going to lose any sleep when a little shit that takes to rioting gets whats coming to them. There are better outlets, and more effective outlets, than rioting.

    Lh96QHG.png
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    It's a stupid form and I'm not going to lose any sleep when a little shit that takes to rioting gets whats coming to them. There are better outlets, and more effective outlets, than rioting.
    You don't have a problem with some guys who break some windows for some big banks who they're protesting being sent to Guantanamo?

  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    Thanatos wrote: »
    It's a stupid form and I'm not going to lose any sleep when a little shit that takes to rioting gets whats coming to them. There are better outlets, and more effective outlets, than rioting.
    You don't have a problem with some guys who break some windows for some big banks who they're protesting being sent to Guantanamo?

    Has that actually happened? Get off the goose caboose.

    Lh96QHG.png
  • Johnny ChopsockyJohnny Chopsocky Scootaloo! We have to cook! Grillin' HaysenburgersRegistered User regular
    Thanatos wrote: »
    It fucking calls attention to the problem, and it's a problem that people are ignoring the shit out of.

    No, it doesn't. It takes the problem they're attempting to highlight and puts it firmly behind the "fucking rioting assholes, breaking shit because they're assholes" problem.

    ygPIJ.gif
    Steam ID XBL: JohnnyChopsocky PSN:Stud_Beefpile WiiU:JohnnyChopsocky
  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    Thanatos wrote: »
    It fucking calls attention to the problem, and it's a problem that people are ignoring the shit out of.

    No, it doesn't. It takes the problem they're attempting to highlight and puts it firmly behind the "fucking rioting assholes, breaking shit because they're assholes" problem.

    Exactly.

    Lh96QHG.png
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    Thanatos wrote: »
    It's a stupid form and I'm not going to lose any sleep when a little shit that takes to rioting gets whats coming to them. There are better outlets, and more effective outlets, than rioting.
    You don't have a problem with some guys who break some windows for some big banks who they're protesting being sent to Guantanamo?
    Has that actually happened? Get off the goose caboose.
    o_O

    Did you not read the OP?

  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    Case in point, we're in here talking about rioting and response, not income inequality and dickbag banks.

    Lh96QHG.png
  • Caveman PawsCaveman Paws Registered User regular
    These guys don't look/sound like misunderstood protesters being dicked over by the cops because they want to shine a light on corruption, currently they look like thugs who will use any excuse to fuck some shit up and the cops saw them coming a mile away and did their job.

    I am leery when I see charges of terrorism being used, but in a situation like this (assuming they did have plans to cause damage and were carrying/had access to weapons required to do the deed) the charge would be fitting.

  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    It's a stupid form and I'm not going to lose any sleep when a little shit that takes to rioting gets whats coming to them. There are better outlets, and more effective outlets, than rioting.
    You don't have a problem with some guys who break some windows for some big banks who they're protesting being sent to Guantanamo?
    Has that actually happened? Get off the goose caboose.
    o_O

    Did you not read the OP?

    Yeah, and I don't see anything about Gitmo. Plenty of American terrorists in federal prisons.

    Lh96QHG.png
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    It's a stupid form and I'm not going to lose any sleep when a little shit that takes to rioting gets whats coming to them. There are better outlets, and more effective outlets, than rioting.
    You don't have a problem with some guys who break some windows for some big banks who they're protesting being sent to Guantanamo?
    Has that actually happened? Get off the goose caboose.
    o_O

    Did you not read the OP?
    Yeah, and I don't see anything about Gitmo. Plenty of American terrorists in federal prisons.
    So, banks are entitled to have someone breaking their windows sent to prison for decades, but they should be able to get away with whatever the fuck they want scott-free?

    These guys don't look/sound like misunderstood protesters being dicked over by the cops because they want to shine a light on corruption, currently they look like thugs who will use any excuse to fuck some shit up and the cops saw them coming a mile away and did their job.

    I am leery when I see charges of terrorism being used, but in a situation like this (assuming they did have plans to cause damage and were carrying/had access to weapons required to do the deed) the charge would be fitting.
    Do you have a lug wrench in your trunk? Oh, well, then, you're a terrorist!

  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    Yes, that's clearly what I think. You caught me. Fucking get over yourself.

    Lh96QHG.png
  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    As a note: when someone breaks a window, it's not prosecuted by the bank, it's prosecuted by the state. "The bank" is not sending people to prison.

    aRkpc.gif
  • SheepSheep Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2012
    Thanatos wrote: »
    Hacksaw wrote: »
    If it fucks over the Black Bloc people, I'm okay with it. Those guys tore up part of Seattle during the May Day demonstrations. They can go fuck themselves all the way off a cliff.
    They broke some fucking windows, and the fact that people are capable of getting upset with them while completely ignoring the behavior of the banks whose windows they broke is really a special kind of appalling.


    This.

    A million times.

    It's equally atrocious to hear people consider something like that to be "violence". Smashing a window is not violence. It's vandalism.

    Anything else is tacit approval.

    "The banks suck, but we sure don't want to inconvenience them in anyway while they rob us blind".
    No, it doesn't. It takes the problem they're attempting to highlight and puts it firmly behind the "fucking rioting assholes, breaking shit because they're assholes" problem.

    Then how about you stop considering them "fucking rioters breaking shit because they're assholes"? It's only a problem because people place such high esteem on window panes.



    As a note: when someone breaks a window, it's not prosecuted by the bank, it's prosecuted by the state. "The bank" is not sending people to prison.

    You know good and well that the Bank and the State are firmly intertwined.


    Sheep on
  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    Oh sweet jesus, no. Fucking, I can be mad at banks and rioters at the same time. This isn't a zero sum game folks.

    Lh96QHG.png
  • SheepSheep Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    You're mad, but not enough to actually do anything about the problem, however you'll demonize and backstab those that manifest their disgust.

  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    No, it turns out that resorting to violence and vandalism isn't the best course of action. In fact it confuses the issue and turns off the regular people whose support would make change an actual thing.

    Lh96QHG.png
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    @AManFromEarth Vandalism is not terrorism. Vandalism is also not violent.

    I'm not objecting to them being prosecuted, or arrested, or anything like that. I'm objecting to the problem that the banks can commit a terrorist attack on our economy, and our only reaction to it is to throw the fucking book at the only people doing anything about it.

    I would be much happier with us as a society if everyone were out there breaking some windows.

  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    @Thanatos I can sympathize, I just think that there are much better reactions. I'm not wanting to call internet batman on this particular case, but if it turns out there WERE going to go after the DNC or whatever, I'm fine with what they get, you know?

    Lh96QHG.png
  • SheepSheep Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    No, it turns out that resorting to violence and vandalism isn't the best course of action. In fact it confuses the issue and turns off the regular people whose support would make change an actual thing.


    I'm not confused. I recognize the need to have a multifaceted approach to protesting and am not interested in weakening the action of the masses by turning on someone who has the audacity to break a window.

    A "regular" person who puts the financial and superficial well being of a bank above the actions of the people whose lives the bank has ruined is not a regular person. They are part of the problem.

  • This content has been removed.

  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    Thanatos wrote: »
    I'm objecting to the problem that the banks can commit a terrorist attack on our economy
    Sheep wrote: »
    You know good and well that the Bank and the State are firmly intertwined.

    8->

    Overwrought rhetoric aside, you do realize that breaking windows doesn't actually deter, punish, or illegitimize banking as an industry, yes?

    aRkpc.gif
  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    Sheep wrote: »
    No, it turns out that resorting to violence and vandalism isn't the best course of action. In fact it confuses the issue and turns off the regular people whose support would make change an actual thing.


    I'm not confused. I recognize the need to have a multifaceted approach to protesting and am not interested in weakening the action of the masses by turning on someone who has the audacity to break a window.

    A "regular" person who puts the financial and superficial well being of a bank above the actions of the people whose lives the bank has ruined is not a regular person. They are part of the problem.

    Not wanting people to resort to violence and vandalism does not mean someone is putting the needs of a bank over the needs of people. That's just stupid.

    Lh96QHG.png
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited May 2012
    No, it turns out that resorting to violence and vandalism isn't the best course of action. In fact it confuses the issue and turns off the regular people whose support would make change an actual thing.
    I have yet to see anyone here advocate violence, or say that violence is a good thing. Breaking windows is not violence.

    ronya wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    I'm objecting to the problem that the banks can commit a terrorist attack on our economy
    Sheep wrote: »
    You know good and well that the Bank and the State are firmly intertwined.
    8->

    Overwrought rhetoric aside, you do realize that breaking windows doesn't actually deter, punish, or illegitimize banking as an industry, yes?
    Only because there's not enough of it going on.
    Vanguard wrote: »
    I wouldn't exactly call breaking windows doing anything about the economy. Breaking a window doesn't close tax loopholes. It doesn't bring the people who steered us wrong to trial. It doesn't prevent it from happening again.

    It does, however, give the media a pretty easy way to discredit the legitimate parts of the protest.
    And not breaking windows has certainly had the effect of curtailing their influence on government, right?

    Thanatos on
  • SheepSheep Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    edited May 2012
    ronya wrote: »
    Thanatos wrote: »
    I'm objecting to the problem that the banks can commit a terrorist attack on our economy
    Sheep wrote: »
    You know good and well that the Bank and the State are firmly intertwined.

    8->

    Overwrought rhetoric aside, you do realize that breaking windows doesn't actually deter, punish, or illegitimize banking as an industry, yes?

    And playing hackey sack in the street does?

    Clever words on a poster board?

    Drum circles?

    I would say that vandalism may be more effective on the principle that at least it doesn't curb it's behavior to appease the abusive establishment.

    They abuse, use, and steal. They can't think any worse of us as is.

    Sheep on
  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    Lh96QHG.png
  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    It's not true violence. Only this application of destructive force is violence.

    Look, I get why this linguistic tango goes on at all, you want to shield property destruction from delegitimization by association. It's pointless. It just taints 'vandalism' too, people have personal property that they care about, and lots of it, because you live in the fucking first world.

    aRkpc.gif
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Protests barely generate public sympathy or attention as is. The bullshit rioting and breaking windows and looting only exacerbates this problem even more.

    I live in Montreal, this shit is going on here right now. Nobody cares about anything but you going away once you start destroying property. The public turns on you very quickly once you pull this shit.

    There's a reason MLKjr had his people show up in a suit and tie and march peacefully.

Sign In or Register to comment.