The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

The (very fortunate) Death of American Football?

1356712

Posts

  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    a5ehren wrote: »
    a5ehren wrote: »
    I would like to see some data on the assertion that "most schools" don't have LATs at practice and games. We definitely did in my high school, and we were far from being well-heeled.

    Likewise, football creates a lot of revenue for schools, especially for colleges (though much of that goes right back to the football program). If you're looking for sports that cost schools, look to the sports that no one shows up to watch, like baseball and track and every girls' sports ever.


    None of that has any pertinence on the issue of Is Football Safe?, mind you, but hey.

    I don't have data, but it is pretty much a matter of math, isn't it? In large parts of the country there simply aren't enough trainers to be at every practice for every school.

    I have no idea. I would think that it's probably a state-mandated thing to have at least one licensed trainer on staff.

    I think many states mandate a trainer be present at games, but I'm not sure about practice.

    Like I said, I'd like to see some data. Your assertion was fairly authoritative, but my experience tells me otherwise.

  • Sir LandsharkSir Landshark resting shark face Registered User regular
    tyrannus wrote: »
    a5ehren wrote: »
    The fact that taxpayer money gets spent to build sports stadiums is the biggest fucking racket.

    Something more like the Green Bay Packers' model would be better than holding a town hostage for a new stadium every 10 years.

    This. There is zero scientific evidence that new stadiums increase tax revenue (or increase tourism by a significant amount) or create jobs that wouldn't otherwise be there.

    I mean, except the construction of said stadiums, which give loads of people temporary work, which means that any revenue recognized from the construction of said stadium is taxed in the state in which the stadium was built. So there's some evidence, there.

    I get what you're saying, but that's an argument that supports having people dig ditches and fill them up again as much as building sports stadiums. So maybe it's something to consider if we need a Keynesian stimulus but if we're going to go that route it'd probably be better to just fix some roads.

    Please consider the environment before printing this post.
  • redxredx I(x)=2(x)+1 whole numbersRegistered User regular
    tyrannus wrote: »
    a5ehren wrote: »
    The fact that taxpayer money gets spent to build sports stadiums is the biggest fucking racket.

    Something more like the Green Bay Packers' model would be better than holding a town hostage for a new stadium every 10 years.

    This. There is zero scientific evidence that new stadiums increase tax revenue (or increase tourism by a significant amount) or create jobs that wouldn't otherwise be there.

    I mean, except the construction of said stadiums, which give loads of people temporary work, which means that any revenue recognized from the construction of said stadium is taxed in the state in which the stadium was built. So there's some evidence, there.

    I get what you're saying, but that's an argument that supports having people dig ditches and fill them up again as much as building sports stadiums. So maybe it's something to consider if we need a Keynesian stimulus but if we're going to go that route it'd probably be better to just fix some roads.

    And, unless I'm mistaken, most of the tax money for stadiums comes from the state level. I'm all for economic stimulus, but the states have shit credit so it is expensive to go that route, and most of them are so broke it would be criminal to take money away from the projects they actually need to do to finance a stadium.

    They moistly come out at night, moistly.
  • tyrannustyrannus i am not fat Registered User regular
    edited July 2012
    Well I also mean that when you look at any sporting event, those stadiums like, sell tickets and sell overpriced beer and shit. most of those transactions are taxable transactions, so there's some evidence as well that those stadiums increase tax revenue.

    my point is is saying that there's zero scientific evidence that revenue generates tax is a little silly.

    tyrannus on
  • YarYar Registered User regular
    Sports culture in general has a lot of problems, and I don't pretend to know of any solution.

    Most of the guys I work with played various sports in high school. Not even talking about football here. They retell horror stories (with pride and glee) about torturous and highly illegal stuff their coaches put them through. Sports players are treated like medieval farm animals. Pretty much anyone I know who went on to play college sports of any kind have chronic injuries. Again, not even talking about football. And these same guys, spending weeks in surgery and pain, are pushing their elementary school sons hard to be the best little leaguers, with multiple practices and games every week, exhausting them until late at night. There are some good lessons to be learned from team sports, and my sons play a lot of sports, too, and I frequently coach. But I do my best to squash the psycho culture that permeates so much of it. It's this weird jingoistic warrior-spirit and pride thing that makes people insane about excelling at sports far beyond the point of fun and exercise.

  • a5ehrena5ehren AtlantaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2012
    tyrannus wrote: »
    Well I also mean that when you look at any sporting event, those stadiums like, sell tickets and sell overpriced beer and shit. most of those transactions are taxable transactions, so there's some evidence as well that those stadiums increase tax revenue.

    my point is is saying that there's zero scientific evidence that revenue generates tax is a little silly.

    Gross revenue is generated, but it usually isn't enough to cover the interest on the bonds used to build the stadium, so it's a net negative. Many stadium deals also include provisions that let the team keep some of the sales tax revenue, along with breaks on the property tax on the stadium land.

    Some of the more recent stadium deals aren't quite as terrible, so it seems that legislatures are catching on a little bit.

    a5ehren on
  • a5ehrena5ehren AtlantaRegistered User regular
    a5ehren wrote: »
    a5ehren wrote: »
    I would like to see some data on the assertion that "most schools" don't have LATs at practice and games. We definitely did in my high school, and we were far from being well-heeled.

    Likewise, football creates a lot of revenue for schools, especially for colleges (though much of that goes right back to the football program). If you're looking for sports that cost schools, look to the sports that no one shows up to watch, like baseball and track and every girls' sports ever.


    None of that has any pertinence on the issue of Is Football Safe?, mind you, but hey.

    I don't have data, but it is pretty much a matter of math, isn't it? In large parts of the country there simply aren't enough trainers to be at every practice for every school.

    I have no idea. I would think that it's probably a state-mandated thing to have at least one licensed trainer on staff.

    I think many states mandate a trainer be present at games, but I'm not sure about practice.

    Like I said, I'd like to see some data. Your assertion was fairly authoritative, but my experience tells me otherwise.

    Yeah I guess I'd like some, too. It's something I've seen in the media a few times (Nightline, the Atlantic, etc), but they don't usually give a source for it either.

  • tyrannustyrannus i am not fat Registered User regular
    edited July 2012
    oh I agree with you on the bonds. NJ is still paying for the old New York Giants stadium, even after its been demolished.
    The old Giants Stadium, demolished to make way for New Meadowlands Stadium, still carries about $110 million in debt, or nearly $13 for every New Jersey resident, even though it is now a parking lot.

    -http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/08/sports/08stadium.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

    it's just really really hard for me to believe that it's net negative.

    tyrannus on
  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    Yar wrote: »
    Sports culture in general has a lot of problems, and I don't pretend to know of any solution.

    Most of the guys I work with played various sports in high school. Not even talking about football here. They retell horror stories (with pride and glee) about torturous and highly illegal stuff their coaches put them through. Sports players are treated like medieval farm animals. Pretty much anyone I know who went on to play college sports of any kind have chronic injuries. Again, not even talking about football. And these same guys, spending weeks in surgery and pain, are pushing their elementary school sons hard to be the best little leaguers, with multiple practices and games every week, exhausting them until late at night. There are some good lessons to be learned from team sports, and my sons play a lot of sports, too, and I frequently coach. But I do my best to squash the psycho culture that permeates so much of it. It's this weird jingoistic warrior-spirit and pride thing that makes people insane about excelling at sports far beyond the point of fun and exercise.

    One thing I've decided from my own experience in playing football for 16+ years is that any kids of mine won't play sports until junior high at the earliest, and never more than one sport at a time.

    Youth sports is a nightmare of obsessive parents living vicariously through their toddlers and freak kids with pituitary problems crippling normal-sized children.

  • tyrannustyrannus i am not fat Registered User regular
    actually the more I read that article, the more I am beginning to rescind my prior opinion about stadiums not being net-negative on tax revenue.

    dis shit is makin me mad

  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    tyrannus wrote: »
    actually the more I read that article, the more I am beginning to rescind my prior opinion about stadiums not being net-negative on tax revenue.

    dis shit is makin me mad
    I really don't understand how someone can learn about this shit (especially the bowl games) and turn around and say "you know how I should spend my money? Going to an NCAA football game!"

  • Alistair HuttonAlistair Hutton Dr EdinburghRegistered User regular

    Also the players don't end up with mush brain. The lack of helmets and pads actually makes the game less rough, although it is still very rough. But the pads and helmets double as weapons, which is a huge part of football's problem I guess.

    Unfortunately, as a massive fan of rugby, this just isn't true. Whilst it doesn't have the extremes of American Football, Rugby is starting to show a body of evidence towards long term brain damage for pro players from multiple concussive and non-concussive blows. players.

    However, rugby has a chance of getting better as , by the laws of the game, the types of concussive blows should not happen except by freak accident. It is the pernicious ignoring of the laws at the breakdown at the pro-level which results in players charging headfirst into each other or performing shoulder-charge clearouts of head first players. The IRB is a couple of lawsuits away from being forced to make their top refs ref the game as actually stated in the law book rather than trying to create a TV spectacle.

    I have a thoughtful and infrequently updated blog about games http://whatithinkaboutwhenithinkaboutgames.wordpress.com/

    I made a game, it has penguins in it. It's pay what you like on Gumroad.

    Currently Ebaying Nothing at all but I might do in the future.
  • tyrannustyrannus i am not fat Registered User regular
    edited July 2012
    Like, government making bad decisions regarding stadiums doesn't seem to be focused just on football.
    The “full faith and taxing power” of communities, a solemn pledge, was being used to guarantee revenue bonds for nonessentials like solar-power projects, apartment buildings and a soccer stadium — things bailout-weary taxpayers might walk away from if the guarantees were called.

    Moody’s cut several communities’ own credit ratings to junk, briefly making New Jersey the nation’s leader in junk-rated municipalities. (Now Michigan has that distinction.) The gritty town of Harrison, just across the Passaic River from Newark, had its rating cut a rare eight notches in a single year, when it couldn’t honor a promise to pay debts connected with construction of the Red Bull soccer stadium.

    Harrison had to borrow from Hudson County to get through the crisis, but that in turn raised doubts about whether the county’s taxpayers would honor their guarantee of yet another project’s debts — $85 million for a faltering waste-disposal system.

    “We are seeing more of these than we had seen previously,” said Matt Fabian, managing director of Municipal Market Advisors, a research and advisory firm for municipal bonds. “The weak economy is making weak projects worse. It is undermining cities’ abilities and willingness to backstop these projects when they do fail.”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/26/business/surprised-taxpayers-are-paying-for-bonds-they-did-not-vote-on.html?pagewanted=all

    So basically, counties have been guaranteeing bonds of enterprise, or otherwise independent authorities, and they're able to do so and not disclose the specifics of the enterprise loan in their own financial statements. Any kind of pre-approval for these bonds don't seem to happen because of the nature of these guarantees.

    If anyone wants to look through this, here's a GASB statement on this issue:
    Some governments extend financial guarantees for the obligations of another
    government, a not-for-profit entity, or a private entity without directly receiving
    consideration of equal value in exchange (a nonexchange transaction). As a part of this
    nonexchange financial guarantee, a government commits to indemnify the holder of the
    obligation if the entity that issued the obligation does not fulfill its payment requirement.
    Also, some governments issue obligations that are guaranteed by other entities in a
    nonexchange transaction. The objective of this proposed Statement is to improve
    accounting and financial reporting by state and local governments that extend and receive
    nonexchange financial guarantees.

    This Statement would require a government that extends a nonexchange financial
    guarantee to recognize a liability when qualitative factors or historical data indicate that it
    is more likely than not that the government will make a payment on the guarantee. The
    amount of the liability would be the best estimate of the future outflows expected to be
    incurred. When there is no best estimate but a range of the estimated future outflows can
    be established, the amount of the liability would be the minimum amount within the
    range.

    http://gasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobkey=id&blobwhere=1175824109417&blobheader=application/pdf

    what the fuck. That's right from the horses mouth that as of right now they don't have to show these potential liabilities until the shit already hits the fan.

    tyrannus on
  • a5ehrena5ehren AtlantaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2012
    tyrannus wrote: »
    actually the more I read that article, the more I am beginning to rescind my prior opinion about stadiums not being net-negative on tax revenue.

    dis shit is makin me mad

    Yup! If you want to see true stupidity, look at minor league stadiums. A county near here decided (through magic I guess) that they would be able to pay for a new stadium by increasing their hotel and car rental taxes and for some reason the increased tourism from a minor league baseball team would be enough to cover it.

    The county is now having to use property tax revenue to cover the shortfall.

    There was an economist at one of the local universities that led a "WTF is wrong with you people" campaign, but it failed.

    a5ehren on
  • tyrannustyrannus i am not fat Registered User regular
    edited July 2012
    a5ehren wrote: »
    tyrannus wrote: »
    actually the more I read that article, the more I am beginning to rescind my prior opinion about stadiums not being net-negative on tax revenue.

    dis shit is makin me mad

    Yup! If you want to see true stupidity, look at minor league stadiums. A county near here decided (through magic I guess) that they would be able to pay for a new stadium by increasing their hotel and car rental taxes and for some reason the increased tourism from a minor league baseball team would be enough to cover it.

    The county is now having to use property tax revenue to cover the shortfall.

    There was an economist at one of the local universities that led a "WTF is wrong with you people" campaign, but it failed.

    and they don't even have to accrue for the liability until the debt they are guaranteeing falls through. that way, they bypass any voter approval and get around any kind of debt limits imposed on them by the state.

    i'm angry

    angry about stadiums

    tyrannus on
  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    a5ehren wrote: »
    tyrannus wrote: »
    actually the more I read that article, the more I am beginning to rescind my prior opinion about stadiums not being net-negative on tax revenue.

    dis shit is makin me mad

    Yup! If you want to see true stupidity, look at minor league stadiums. A county near here decided (through magic I guess) that they would be able to pay for a new stadium by increasing their hotel and car rental taxes and for some reason the increased tourism from a minor league baseball team would be enough to cover it.

    There was an economist at one of the local universities that led a "WTF is wrong with you people" campaign, but it failed.

    Yeah, having been in Round Rock recently, I had to park next to The Dell Diamond, the stadium for their AAA(!) team . . . . that has seating for 12,000 people.

    Most MLB games don't sell that many tickets.

  • a5ehrena5ehren AtlantaRegistered User regular
    a5ehren wrote: »
    tyrannus wrote: »
    actually the more I read that article, the more I am beginning to rescind my prior opinion about stadiums not being net-negative on tax revenue.

    dis shit is makin me mad

    Yup! If you want to see true stupidity, look at minor league stadiums. A county near here decided (through magic I guess) that they would be able to pay for a new stadium by increasing their hotel and car rental taxes and for some reason the increased tourism from a minor league baseball team would be enough to cover it.

    There was an economist at one of the local universities that led a "WTF is wrong with you people" campaign, but it failed.

    Yeah, having been in Round Rock recently, I had to park next to The Dell Diamond, the stadium for their AAA(!) team . . . . that has seating for 12,000 people.

    Most MLB games don't sell that many tickets.

    Well I think they sell that many tickets, but getting them all to show up is another matter entirely (a quick glance at Stubhub shows 1,300-3,500 tickets for sale for all the remaining Braves home games, for example).

    The Gwinnett Braves stadium is similar to what you're describing for Round Rock. It's a nice stadium, but I don't think AAA teams need a 2-deck stadium...

  • devCharlesdevCharles Gainesville, FLRegistered User regular
    There seems to be some confusion on this point, so I think I should clarify. The majority of division 1 football programs for college are profitable for the school, while the majority of athletic programs (of which football falls under the umbrella of) are not profitable at the division 1 level. Usually, football is the only program that actually brings in money while pretty much all the other sports (basketball commonly being the exception) drain money. This is why most of your athletic departments are in the red. This is why some football programs beneath the D1 level shut down their football programs from time to time.

    Also, the reason that Ball State and WKU weren't picked for bowl games last year is pretty simple. They ran out of bowls. This happens occasionally. Is it kind of shitty that not all bowl eligible teams get to play in a bowl every year, but it used to be that there were only like 4 or 5 bowls and everyone else could fuck off.

    Xbox Live: Hero Protag
    SteamID: devCharles
    twitter: https://twitter.com/charlesewise
  • y2jake215y2jake215 certified Flat Birther theorist the Last Good Boy onlineRegistered User regular
    a5ehren wrote: »
    tyrannus wrote: »
    actually the more I read that article, the more I am beginning to rescind my prior opinion about stadiums not being net-negative on tax revenue.

    dis shit is makin me mad

    Yup! If you want to see true stupidity, look at minor league stadiums. A county near here decided (through magic I guess) that they would be able to pay for a new stadium by increasing their hotel and car rental taxes and for some reason the increased tourism from a minor league baseball team would be enough to cover it.

    There was an economist at one of the local universities that led a "WTF is wrong with you people" campaign, but it failed.

    Yeah, having been in Round Rock recently, I had to park next to The Dell Diamond, the stadium for their AAA(!) team . . . . that has seating for 12,000 people.

    Most MLB games don't sell that many tickets.

    I'm just kind of shitting on your point but on average all MLB teams sell at least 19k tickets

    http://espn.go.com/mlb/attendance

    C8Ft8GE.jpg
    maybe i'm streaming terrible dj right now if i am its here
  • y2jake215y2jake215 certified Flat Birther theorist the Last Good Boy onlineRegistered User regular
    Still don't understand why people would consistently watch minor league baseball though

    C8Ft8GE.jpg
    maybe i'm streaming terrible dj right now if i am its here
  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    y2jake215 wrote: »
    Still don't understand why people would consistently watch minor league baseball though

    Even in those biggest markets, you're only at 60-80% capacity, though. Some are at 50% or lower.

    Now, extrapolate that to a AAA club 20 miles outside of Austin, TX.

  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    y2jake215 wrote: »
    a5ehren wrote: »
    tyrannus wrote: »
    actually the more I read that article, the more I am beginning to rescind my prior opinion about stadiums not being net-negative on tax revenue.

    dis shit is makin me mad

    Yup! If you want to see true stupidity, look at minor league stadiums. A county near here decided (through magic I guess) that they would be able to pay for a new stadium by increasing their hotel and car rental taxes and for some reason the increased tourism from a minor league baseball team would be enough to cover it.

    There was an economist at one of the local universities that led a "WTF is wrong with you people" campaign, but it failed.

    Yeah, having been in Round Rock recently, I had to park next to The Dell Diamond, the stadium for their AAA(!) team . . . . that has seating for 12,000 people.

    Most MLB games don't sell that many tickets.

    I'm just kind of shitting on your point but on average all MLB teams sell at least 19k tickets

    http://espn.go.com/mlb/attendance

    There is no fucking way the Pirates have averaged 19k tickets over the past decade

    No fucking way in hell

  • a5ehrena5ehren AtlantaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2012
    devCharles wrote: »
    There seems to be some confusion on this point, so I think I should clarify. The majority of division 1 football programs for college are profitable for the school, while the majority of athletic programs (of which football falls under the umbrella of) are not profitable at the division 1 level. Usually, football is the only program that actually brings in money while pretty much all the other sports (basketball commonly being the exception) drain money. This is why most of your athletic departments are in the red. This is why some football programs beneath the D1 level shut down their football programs from time to time.

    Also, the reason that Ball State and WKU weren't picked for bowl games last year is pretty simple. They ran out of bowls. This happens occasionally. Is it kind of shitty that not all bowl eligible teams get to play in a bowl every year, but it used to be that there were only like 4 or 5 bowls and everyone else could fuck off.

    Not that going to some random-ass bowl game on Dec 18 is a great privilege anyway - the only people that make money on the non-major bowls are the bowl committees and ESPN.

    Also, it should be pointed out that most of the non-BCS FBS and FCS programs keep their entire athletic budget afloat by taking payoff games against the major powers. For those not familiar, a program like Florida will pay someone like Coastal Carolina a large sum of money ($750K-$1.5M seems to be where the high-end ones fall now) to come into their home stadium and get their ass beat. In turn, CC will sometimes pay some D2 team a much smaller sum to come get beat up, which I find hilarious for some reason.

    a5ehren on
  • MvrckMvrck Dwarven MountainhomeRegistered User regular
    a5ehren wrote: »
    devCharles wrote: »
    There seems to be some confusion on this point, so I think I should clarify. The majority of division 1 football programs for college are profitable for the school, while the majority of athletic programs (of which football falls under the umbrella of) are not profitable at the division 1 level. Usually, football is the only program that actually brings in money while pretty much all the other sports (basketball commonly being the exception) drain money. This is why most of your athletic departments are in the red. This is why some football programs beneath the D1 level shut down their football programs from time to time.

    Also, the reason that Ball State and WKU weren't picked for bowl games last year is pretty simple. They ran out of bowls. This happens occasionally. Is it kind of shitty that not all bowl eligible teams get to play in a bowl every year, but it used to be that there were only like 4 or 5 bowls and everyone else could fuck off.

    Not that going to some random-ass bowl game on Dec 18 is a great privilege anyway - the only people that make money on the non-major bowls are the bowl committees and ESPN.

    Also, it should be pointed out that most of the non-BCS FBS and FCS programs keep their entire athletic budget afloat by taking payoff games against the major powers. For those not familiar, a program like Florida will pay someone like Coastal Carolina a large sum of money ($750K-$1.5M seems to be where the high-end ones fall now) to come into their home stadium and get their ass beat. In turn, CC will sometimes pay some D2 team a much smaller sum to come get beat up, which I find hilarious for some reason.

    Hey! They have a fair shot at winning. Just ask Michigan.

  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    devCharles wrote: »
    There seems to be some confusion on this point, so I think I should clarify. The majority of division 1 football programs for college are profitable for the school, while the majority of athletic programs (of which football falls under the umbrella of) are not profitable at the division 1 level. Usually, football is the only program that actually brings in money while pretty much all the other sports (basketball commonly being the exception) drain money. This is why most of your athletic departments are in the red. This is why some football programs beneath the D1 level shut down their football programs from time to time.

    Also, the reason that Ball State and WKU weren't picked for bowl games last year is pretty simple. They ran out of bowls. This happens occasionally. Is it kind of shitty that not all bowl eligible teams get to play in a bowl every year, but it used to be that there were only like 4 or 5 bowls and everyone else could fuck off.

    Also, bowl games just don't mean much anymore since the only real hurdle is going one game over .500. There are all kinds of bowls that are just shit, like the Independence Bowl and Armed Forces Bowl and the Texas Bowl.


    But back to your other point, Div-1 football basically funds the entire school's athletics program (outside of possibly basketball). For a lot of those schools, killing football would mean killing a bunch of other sports, too. Now, granted, I'm not the world's biggest supporter of school sports for the sake of it, especially women's sports. I don't think schools should be made obliged to offer sports programs to anyone.

  • a5ehrena5ehren AtlantaRegistered User regular
    y2jake215 wrote: »
    a5ehren wrote: »
    tyrannus wrote: »
    actually the more I read that article, the more I am beginning to rescind my prior opinion about stadiums not being net-negative on tax revenue.

    dis shit is makin me mad

    Yup! If you want to see true stupidity, look at minor league stadiums. A county near here decided (through magic I guess) that they would be able to pay for a new stadium by increasing their hotel and car rental taxes and for some reason the increased tourism from a minor league baseball team would be enough to cover it.

    There was an economist at one of the local universities that led a "WTF is wrong with you people" campaign, but it failed.

    Yeah, having been in Round Rock recently, I had to park next to The Dell Diamond, the stadium for their AAA(!) team . . . . that has seating for 12,000 people.

    Most MLB games don't sell that many tickets.

    I'm just kind of shitting on your point but on average all MLB teams sell at least 19k tickets

    http://espn.go.com/mlb/attendance

    There is no fucking way the Pirates have averaged 19k tickets over the past decade

    No fucking way in hell

    It's pretty easy to manipulate the "tickets sold" number. Before they moved, the Marlins would announce attendances of 15K at games when there were clearly about 3,000 people in the stadium.

  • y2jake215y2jake215 certified Flat Birther theorist the Last Good Boy onlineRegistered User regular
    edited July 2012
    y2jake215 wrote: »
    a5ehren wrote: »
    tyrannus wrote: »
    actually the more I read that article, the more I am beginning to rescind my prior opinion about stadiums not being net-negative on tax revenue.

    dis shit is makin me mad

    Yup! If you want to see true stupidity, look at minor league stadiums. A county near here decided (through magic I guess) that they would be able to pay for a new stadium by increasing their hotel and car rental taxes and for some reason the increased tourism from a minor league baseball team would be enough to cover it.

    There was an economist at one of the local universities that led a "WTF is wrong with you people" campaign, but it failed.

    Yeah, having been in Round Rock recently, I had to park next to The Dell Diamond, the stadium for their AAA(!) team . . . . that has seating for 12,000 people.

    Most MLB games don't sell that many tickets.

    I'm just kind of shitting on your point but on average all MLB teams sell at least 19k tickets

    http://espn.go.com/mlb/attendance

    There is no fucking way the Pirates have averaged 19k tickets over the past decade

    No fucking way in hell

    Flipping through random years, they're better than you think. Only abysmal sub 10k city I could see was Montreal. This is getting off topic though

    y2jake215 on
    C8Ft8GE.jpg
    maybe i'm streaming terrible dj right now if i am its here
  • a5ehrena5ehren AtlantaRegistered User regular
    edited July 2012
    Mvrck wrote: »
    a5ehren wrote: »
    devCharles wrote: »
    There seems to be some confusion on this point, so I think I should clarify. The majority of division 1 football programs for college are profitable for the school, while the majority of athletic programs (of which football falls under the umbrella of) are not profitable at the division 1 level. Usually, football is the only program that actually brings in money while pretty much all the other sports (basketball commonly being the exception) drain money. This is why most of your athletic departments are in the red. This is why some football programs beneath the D1 level shut down their football programs from time to time.

    Also, the reason that Ball State and WKU weren't picked for bowl games last year is pretty simple. They ran out of bowls. This happens occasionally. Is it kind of shitty that not all bowl eligible teams get to play in a bowl every year, but it used to be that there were only like 4 or 5 bowls and everyone else could fuck off.

    Not that going to some random-ass bowl game on Dec 18 is a great privilege anyway - the only people that make money on the non-major bowls are the bowl committees and ESPN.

    Also, it should be pointed out that most of the non-BCS FBS and FCS programs keep their entire athletic budget afloat by taking payoff games against the major powers. For those not familiar, a program like Florida will pay someone like Coastal Carolina a large sum of money ($750K-$1.5M seems to be where the high-end ones fall now) to come into their home stadium and get their ass beat. In turn, CC will sometimes pay some D2 team a much smaller sum to come get beat up, which I find hilarious for some reason.

    Hey! They have a fair shot at winning. Just ask Michigan.

    Notice App State hasn't played many of those games since then :P. There are certainly some FCS teams that are capable of being competitive in these games (Richmond beating Duke 2 years in a row doesn't count :P), but the vast majority aren't.

    a5ehren on
  • enlightenedbumenlightenedbum Registered User regular
    For reasons that defy explanation, we've scheduled them again, actually. Next year, I think.

    The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    y2jake215 wrote: »
    Still don't understand why people would consistently watch minor league baseball though

    Its fun, relatively cheap, and a nice way to spend an afternoon with friends/family. You do it the same reason you go to any sporting event.

    wbBv3fj.png
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Goumindong wrote: »
    y2jake215 wrote: »
    Still don't understand why people would consistently watch minor league baseball though

    Its fun, relatively cheap, and a nice way to spend an afternoon with friends/family. You do it the same reason you go to any sporting event.

    Except for the "relatively cheap" part.

  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    AAA baseball was cheap where i lived.

    wbBv3fj.png
  • tuxkamentuxkamen really took this picture. Registered User regular
    Just a minor thing to note: I'm pretty sure the results from examination of Seau's brain have not come back yet. The article and quote in the OP are the pathologist's remarks about the brain of Andre Waters, who also took his own life at age 44.


    Games: Ad Astra Per Phalla | Choose Your Own Phalla
    Thus, the others all die before tuxkamen dies to the vote. Hence, tuxkamen survives, village victory.
    3DS: 2406-5451-5770
  • MvrckMvrck Dwarven MountainhomeRegistered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    Goumindong wrote: »
    y2jake215 wrote: »
    Still don't understand why people would consistently watch minor league baseball though

    Its fun, relatively cheap, and a nice way to spend an afternoon with friends/family. You do it the same reason you go to any sporting event.

    Except for the "relatively cheap" part.

    http://www.rogerdeanstadium.com/florida/season/

    Season tickets for lower level play are very cheap. Way cheaper than going to a movie each one of those nights.

  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    I'm pretty sure Shryke was referring to how Goum's assertion of "any sporting event" would fail the criterion of "relatively cheap."


    The cheapest seats for an NFL game these days are about $50 per. Twice that if you want to see what's actually happening.

  • tbloxhamtbloxham Registered User regular
    Goumindong wrote: »
    AAA baseball was cheap where i lived.

    I once went to see a St Paul Saints game for like $3 and there were $1 hot dogs and beer. The new balls were brought out to the pitcher by a trained pig, there was a guy who came around and entertained the crowds by having us pretend we were in a roller coaster, they raked the sand in the 5th inning by having a father son race towing the big rakes behind them, and the outfield seats were Jacuzzis. That sir is entertainment!

    "That is cool" - Abraham Lincoln
  • Xenogears of BoreXenogears of Bore Registered User regular
    Umm, AAA baseball has been a deal every time I've seen it and I've seen it in most of the northern parks.

    3DS CODE: 3093-7068-3576
  • Eat it You Nasty Pig.Eat it You Nasty Pig. tell homeland security 'we are the bomb'Registered User regular
    I was really proud that Portland recently chose not to build another dumbass minor league stadium, even if it was a closer decision than it should've been

    going to minor league games is fun and all, but the cost (of the stadium) is ridiculous and I can drink cheap beer at home

    Anyway, I don't really have a moral issue with pro football because the dudes are adults and well compensated and their safety/practice/etc procedures are collectively bargained. But at lower levels, yeesh.

    I think at the college level could relatively easily get to a point at which economically, it at least seems equitable (better insurance for players against injury, revenue held in trust for lifetime medical expenses, larger stipends possibly also held in trust, etc.)

    I don't really think the game is going to 'die,' just because it's far from clear that the safety issues are considered a big deal in the parts of the country that are truly its heartbed. I wouldn't be surprised if some schools quit playing football (or possibly transitioned to flag or 7 on 7 or something), but I don't think it'll go away as long as there's as much money as there is in the college/pro game.

    I mean hell boxing hasn't 'died,' and that's a sport in which the literal competitive goal is to give the other guy a concussion.

    hold your head high soldier, it ain't over yet
    that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
  • Eat it You Nasty Pig.Eat it You Nasty Pig. tell homeland security 'we are the bomb'Registered User regular
    a5ehren wrote: »
    Mvrck wrote: »
    a5ehren wrote: »
    devCharles wrote: »
    There seems to be some confusion on this point, so I think I should clarify. The majority of division 1 football programs for college are profitable for the school, while the majority of athletic programs (of which football falls under the umbrella of) are not profitable at the division 1 level. Usually, football is the only program that actually brings in money while pretty much all the other sports (basketball commonly being the exception) drain money. This is why most of your athletic departments are in the red. This is why some football programs beneath the D1 level shut down their football programs from time to time.

    Also, the reason that Ball State and WKU weren't picked for bowl games last year is pretty simple. They ran out of bowls. This happens occasionally. Is it kind of shitty that not all bowl eligible teams get to play in a bowl every year, but it used to be that there were only like 4 or 5 bowls and everyone else could fuck off.

    Not that going to some random-ass bowl game on Dec 18 is a great privilege anyway - the only people that make money on the non-major bowls are the bowl committees and ESPN.

    Also, it should be pointed out that most of the non-BCS FBS and FCS programs keep their entire athletic budget afloat by taking payoff games against the major powers. For those not familiar, a program like Florida will pay someone like Coastal Carolina a large sum of money ($750K-$1.5M seems to be where the high-end ones fall now) to come into their home stadium and get their ass beat. In turn, CC will sometimes pay some D2 team a much smaller sum to come get beat up, which I find hilarious for some reason.

    Hey! They have a fair shot at winning. Just ask Michigan.

    Notice App State hasn't played many of those games since then :P. There are certainly some FCS teams that are capable of being competitive in these games (Richmond beating Duke 2 years in a row doesn't count :P), but the vast majority aren't.

    App State was the FCS national champ the year before they beat michigan, right? They're a perennial power at that level, not chopped liver. Plus, michigan was terrible that year.

    hold your head high soldier, it ain't over yet
    that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
  • GodfatherGodfather Registered User regular
    Boxing's current relative oblivion has a lot to do with a bunch of similarly corrupt boards a lot like the NCAA and the lack of a major American superstar.

    Your point still stands that a similar bloodsport used to be the biggest thing in American sports.

    It also has to do with the fact that the top 'champions' basically have free reign to pick who they fight against; a bunch of b-stringers that promise easy wins in the sport.

    The fights that you'd actually want to see never happen, because those fighters are too worried about losing their coveted 'undefeated' status.

Sign In or Register to comment.