The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Honduras- Privatizing government experiment.

azith28azith28 Registered User regular
edited September 2012 in Debate and/or Discourse
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/L/LT_HONDURAS_PRIVATE_CITIES?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-09-05-22-36-19
Honduras sets stage for 3 privately run cities

By ALBERTO ARCE
Associated Press
World Video
Buy AP Photo Reprints

TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras (AP) -- Investors can begin construction in six months on three privately run cities in Honduras that will have their own police, laws, government and tax systems now that the government has signed a memorandum of agreement approving the project.

An international group of investors and government representatives signed the memorandum Tuesday for the project that some say will bring badly needed economic growth to this small Central American country and that at least one detractor describes as "a catastrophe."

The project's aim is to strengthen Honduras' weak government and failing infrastructure, overwhelmed by corruption, drug-related crime and lingering political instability after a 2009 coup.

The project "has the potential to turn Honduras into an engine of wealth," said Carlos Pineda, president of the Commission for the Promotion of Public-Private Partnerships. It can be "a development instrument typical of first world countries."

The "model cities" will have their own judiciary, laws, governments and police forces. They also will be empowered to sign international agreements on trade and investment and set their own immigration policy.

Congress president Juan Hernandez said the investment group MGK will invest $15 million to begin building basic infrastructure for the first model city near Puerto Castilla on the Caribbean coast. That first city would create 5,000 jobs over the next six months and up to 200,000 jobs in the future, Hernandez said. South Korea has given Honduras $4 million to conduct a feasibility study, he said.

"The future will remember this day as that day that Honduras began developing," said Michael Strong, CEO of the MKG Group. "We believe this will be one of the most important transformations in the world, through which Honduras will end poverty by creating thousands of jobs."

Hernandez said another city will be built in the Sula Valley, in northern Honduras, and a third in southern Honduras. He gave no other details.

The project is opposed by civic groups as well as the indigenous Garifuna people, who say they don't want their land near Puerto Castilla on the Caribbean coast to be used for the project. Living along Central America's Caribbean coast, the Garifuna are descendants of the Amazon's Arawak Indians, the Caribbean's Caribes and escaped West African slaves.

"These territories are the Garifuna people's and can't be handed over to foreign capital in an action that is pure colonialism like that lived in Honduras during the time that our land became a banana enclave," said Miriam Miranda, president of the Fraternal Black Organization of Honduras.

Oscar Cruz, a former constitutional prosecutor, filed a motion with the Supreme Court last year characterizing the project as unconstitutional and "a catastrophe for Honduras."

"The cities involve the creation of a state within the state, a commercial entity with state powers outside the jurisdiction of the government," Cruz said.

The Supreme Court has not taken up his complaint.

In an interview Wednesday, Strong said that as soon as the Honduras government gives final approval to the boundaries of the sites, the developers will begin building infrastructure on the first half square mile of the first city, where they hope to have two or three businesses as tenants within 18 months.

He said the $15 million investment was contingent on Honduran government approval. He added that no tenants have made commitments to locating to the future private city yet, but the investors envision textile manufacturing, small-product assembly and outsourced businesses like call centers or data processing as possibilities.

"People are not going to put up big money for something that could fall through," Strong said. He did not name any of the investors in the project.

He said workers will be able to live in the cities, and the Honduran laws setting up the private areas guarantees that any citizen of the country can also live there.

"It can be a full-scale city," Strong said. "Once we have jobs then we will need affordable housing, schools, clinics, churches, stores, restaurants, all the businesses that create a real community."

The president of Honduras will appoint "globally respected international figures" without financial interests in the projects to nine-member independent boards that will oversee the running of the cities, whose daily operations will be administered by a board-appointed governor. Future appointments to the board will be decided by votes by standing board members, Strong said.

The governors will establish the rules by which the cities are initially run in conjunction with the developers, Strong said, but those rules can be changed in the future by popular votes among all residents of the cities.

Strong said Honduran law would not apply in the cities but they would have to adhere to international conventions on human rights and other basic principles.

He called the cities based on the best practices of free-trade zones around the world, like in Dubai, and he expected that they would successfully create jobs and help the development of Honduras.

"In general, free zones have been a spectacular success in terms of economic development," he said. "I'm very optimistic."

I find this amazingly interesting. Considering its location, conditions certainly could not get much worse off economically for the country so at the least, this could be viewed as a proof or failure of concept of the privatization of existing government duties.

We also get to see if all those movies about corporations running cities being police states is true!

Stercus, Stercus, Stercus, Morituri Sum
azith28 on
«13456

Posts

  • RMS OceanicRMS Oceanic Registered User regular
    Huh. When I read about how the UK Government was allowing companies like Tesco and Sainsburys fund local services like libraries and similar in return for planning permission for new stores, I felt that was the Government abandoning their responsibilities to save money. One could argue that this is a far more fitting definition of that accusation.

    So what if one of these cities decided to adopt a law that was controversial or outright illegal in Honduras proper? What could the Government do about it?

  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    edited September 2012
    too dependent on the will of the honduran government to defend it against charges of FOREIGNERS at a fundamental level, to meaningfully extract itself from regional corruption

    ronya on
    aRkpc.gif
  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    edited September 2012
    Huh. When I read about how the UK Government was allowing companies like Tesco and Sainsburys fund local services like libraries and similar in return for planning permission for new stores, I felt that was the Government abandoning their responsibilities to save money. One could argue that this is a far more fitting definition of that accusation.

    So what if one of these cities decided to adopt a law that was controversial or outright illegal in Honduras proper? What could the Government do about it?

    anything it wants, realistically speaking. it's a government, these are foreign investors, it can just seize the city.

    ronya on
    aRkpc.gif
  • SyphonBlueSyphonBlue The studying beaver That beaver sure loves studying!Registered User regular
    I can't wait to live in McDonaldspolis.

    LxX6eco.jpg
    PSN/Steam/NNID: SyphonBlue | BNet: SyphonBlue#1126
  • TomantaTomanta Registered User regular
    I want to make a Bentonville, AR joke but it's not quite coming to me.

  • King RiptorKing Riptor Registered User regular
    This is a bad bad idea.

    I have a podcast now. It's about video games and anime!Find it here.
  • Tiger BurningTiger Burning Dig if you will, the pictureRegistered User, SolidSaints Tube regular
    Be interesting to see what limitations are put on the police forces in regards to numbers and armament.

    Ain't no particular sign I'm more compatible with
  • This content has been removed.

  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    people who say they want to build Singapore never seem to remember the expensive statist bits

    aRkpc.gif
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    Well, this is horrifying.

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • DivideByZeroDivideByZero Social Justice Blackguard Registered User regular
    Be interesting to see what limitations are put on the police forces in regards to numbers and armament.

    One ED-209 per city block should be sufficient, no?

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKERS
  • rockrngerrockrnger Registered User regular
    This is going to ultimately suck for most of the people who are there, so I oppose it. But since I can do nothing to stop it, it will be fun to have yet another "even closer to the libertarian ideal" failed experiment to point to.

    Which of course will be rejected as "not libertarian enough" which I've come to interpret as "exactly like where I live now, but I don't have to pay taxes".

    I would be surprised if this didn't work out great for the people that live there.

    What usually happens is that you get a large number of rich people coming in to avoid taxes and the city doesn't allow low income housing so it turns into a huge gated community and the right calls it a huge success.

    Some Atlanta suburbs did the same thing on a smaller scale.

  • redxredx I(x)=2(x)+1 whole numbersRegistered User regular
    edited September 2012
    azith28 wrote:
    Investors can begin construction in six months on three privately run cities in Honduras that will have their own police, laws, government and tax systems now that the government has signed a memorandum of agreement approving the project.

    :shock:

    So, is anyone taking odds on which dystopia are going to be created? What's the over/under on shadowrun-ish corporate kleptocracy?

    redx on
    They moistly come out at night, moistly.
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    edited September 2012
    rockrnger wrote: »
    This is going to ultimately suck for most of the people who are there, so I oppose it. But since I can do nothing to stop it, it will be fun to have yet another "even closer to the libertarian ideal" failed experiment to point to.

    Which of course will be rejected as "not libertarian enough" which I've come to interpret as "exactly like where I live now, but I don't have to pay taxes".

    I would be surprised if this didn't work out great for the people that live there.

    What usually happens is that you get a large number of rich people coming in to avoid taxes and the city doesn't allow low income housing so it turns into a huge gated community and the right calls it a huge success.

    Some Atlanta suburbs did the same thing on a smaller scale.

    Meanwhile, the community has to have janitors and cooks and landscapers and repairmen, none of whom can afford to live in the gated community, and have to commute in to Oz from the real world.

    So the fancy gated community becomes a social parasite, letting everybody else get their hands dirty with all the icky poor people and their yucky poor people problems.

    Which is actually just fine as long as they're willing to pay taxes to help out the icky poor people.

    Feral on
    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    I mean, somebody's gotta TILL THE SOIL and it sure ain't gonna be Bob the Angry Flower.

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • AngelHedgieAngelHedgie Registered User regular
    redx wrote: »
    azith28 wrote:
    Investors can begin construction in six months on three privately run cities in Honduras that will have their own police, laws, government and tax systems now that the government has signed a memorandum of agreement approving the project.

    :shock:

    So, is anyone taking odds on which dystopia are going to be created? What's the over/under on shadowrun-ish corporate kleptocracy?

    Depends. Is Aztecnology involved?

    XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum / Steam: noxaeternum
  • JepheryJephery Registered User regular
    edited September 2012
    I don't see what is stopping the drug crime and corruption from infesting these cities.

    Edit: Hell, they should just legalize the drug trade in the cities, invite the drug lords, then they could rule Honduras through a shadow government. The drug lords already have most of the government in its pockets right?

    Jephery on
    }
    "Orkses never lose a battle. If we win we win, if we die we die fightin so it don't count. If we runs for it we don't die neither, cos we can come back for annuver go, see!".
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    Jephery wrote: »
    I don't see what is stopping the drug crime and corruption from infesting these cities.

    Edit: Hell, they should just legalize the drug trade in the cities, invite the drug lords, then they could rule Honduras through a shadow government. The drug lords already have most of the government in its pockets right?

    That's why they need a hermetically-sealed arcology.

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    Feral wrote: »
    rockrnger wrote: »
    This is going to ultimately suck for most of the people who are there, so I oppose it. But since I can do nothing to stop it, it will be fun to have yet another "even closer to the libertarian ideal" failed experiment to point to.

    Which of course will be rejected as "not libertarian enough" which I've come to interpret as "exactly like where I live now, but I don't have to pay taxes".

    I would be surprised if this didn't work out great for the people that live there.

    What usually happens is that you get a large number of rich people coming in to avoid taxes and the city doesn't allow low income housing so it turns into a huge gated community and the right calls it a huge success.

    Some Atlanta suburbs did the same thing on a smaller scale.

    Meanwhile, the community has to have janitors and cooks and landscapers and repairmen, none of whom can afford to live in the gated community, and have to commute in to Oz from the real world.

    So the fancy gated community becomes a social parasite, letting everybody else get their hands dirty with all the icky poor people and their yucky poor people problems.

    Which is actually just fine as long as they're willing to pay taxes to help out the icky poor people.

    the thing about a would-be Hong Kong is that, well, the benevolent neglect somehow included public housing, public education, and public healthcare for half the population

    sometimes "libertarian" really needs the appendage "compared to what?"

    aRkpc.gif
  • DiannaoChongDiannaoChong Registered User regular
    Man, how awesome would it be if a drug cartel bought one of the cities and set up. You want to see something/one turn around a profit and have a well oiled machine of government. Just wait till honduras goes "ok thats enough play time" and they just put up fortress walls around the city.

    steam_sig.png
  • TaramoorTaramoor Storyteller Registered User regular
    So, possible outcomes:

    -Shadowrun
    -Welcome to Drug World, be sure to visit Cocaine Land
    -Pullman
    -Rapture
    -Galt's Gulch

    ....

    I fail to see any of those as positive.

  • rockrngerrockrnger Registered User regular
    Feral wrote: »
    rockrnger wrote: »
    This is going to ultimately suck for most of the people who are there, so I oppose it. But since I can do nothing to stop it, it will be fun to have yet another "even closer to the libertarian ideal" failed experiment to point to.

    Which of course will be rejected as "not libertarian enough" which I've come to interpret as "exactly like where I live now, but I don't have to pay taxes".

    I would be surprised if this didn't work out great for the people that live there.

    What usually happens is that you get a large number of rich people coming in to avoid taxes and the city doesn't allow low income housing so it turns into a huge gated community and the right calls it a huge success.

    Some Atlanta suburbs did the same thing on a smaller scale.

    Meanwhile, the community has to have janitors and cooks and landscapers and repairmen, none of whom can afford to live in the gated community, and have to commute in to Oz from the real world.

    So the fancy gated community becomes a social parasite, letting everybody else get their hands dirty with all the icky poor people and their yucky poor people problems.

    Which is actually just fine as long as they're willing to pay taxes to help out the icky poor people.
    Exactly.

    Only here some libertarians are going to come along in a couple of years and say "look Oz has low taxes and no social safety net and a per capita income 10,000 percent higher than the rest of Honduras, your move statist".


  • lu tzelu tze Sweeping the monestary steps.Registered User regular
    edited September 2012
    Yeah, it's easy to build a successful community when you can boot all the wage slaves/poor people out every night and not have to worry about housing, schooling and healthcare for the idle parasites.

    lu tze on
    World's best janitor
  • TaramoorTaramoor Storyteller Registered User regular
    I assume they'll have to house their police force and the various civil services though.

    They won't want to pay them, most likely.

    Which, you know, go ahead, don't pay the large forced of armed and trained enforcers, see how that works out.

    Then again, maybe they'll institute a tax policy that is fiscally sound and understands the purpose and necessity of those taxes in maintaining general infrastructure that is used by everyone.

  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    I do reiterate that what I've read of the people pushing this idea is that they basically have "singapore-hongkong-singapore-hongkong-singapore-hongkong" running through their heads

    with a dash of spanish enclaves in morocco and such

    aRkpc.gif
  • JepheryJephery Registered User regular
    They don't realize that the Triads are major problems in Hong Kong and Singapore do they?

    }
    "Orkses never lose a battle. If we win we win, if we die we die fightin so it don't count. If we runs for it we don't die neither, cos we can come back for annuver go, see!".
  • SubhumanSubhuman Overlord BaltimoreRegistered User regular
    I suppose it's good to privatize where possible, as long as oversight isn't lost.

    "Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence"- Napoleon Bonaparte
  • AngelHedgieAngelHedgie Registered User regular
    Subhuman wrote: »
    I suppose it's good to privatize where possible, as long as oversight isn't lost.

    Why?

    XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum / Steam: noxaeternum
  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    edited September 2012
    Jephery wrote: »
    They don't realize that the Triads are major problems in Hong Kong and Singapore do they?

    Not really. They are still active in Hong Kong, although much diminished from their heyday in the 1960s, but essentially absent in Singapore. In part Singapore is no longer convenient to things that triads want to do (chiefly, drug trafficking). The most problematic crimes in Singapore and Hong Kong today are small-time scams on the gullible, not organized crime.

    Still, Hong Kong is far better than Honduras with regards to drug movement, triads or not.

    ronya on
    aRkpc.gif
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    Who's doing the overseeing and what's motivating them to do so?

    I mean, sure, privatization of essential government services is great, to the extent that it doesn't cause any problems.

    Sort of like glory holes are great, to the extent that you don't contract any communicable diseases.

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • rockrngerrockrnger Registered User regular
    ronya wrote: »
    I do reiterate that what I've read of the people pushing this idea is that they basically have "singapore-hongkong-singapore-hongkong-singapore-hongkong" running through their heads

    with a dash of spanish enclaves in morocco and such

    Could you elaborate on this a little?

  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Who's doing the overseeing and what's motivating them to do so?

    I mean, sure, privatization of essential government services is great, to the extent that it doesn't cause any problems.

    Sort of like glory holes are great, to the extent that you don't contract any communicable diseases.

    The ego and ethic of a would-be governor of Hong Kong, in practice, I suspect.

    In theory they probably have some technical mechanism of oversight but it doesn't really matter; the underlying "Honduras takes it back" possibility is going to lurk, even assuming it succeeds.

    aRkpc.gif
  • SubhumanSubhuman Overlord BaltimoreRegistered User regular
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Who's doing the overseeing and what's motivating them to do so?

    Reminds me of the rhetorical question, who will guard the guardians and who will police the police?. Some gray area, definitely. I imagine it would be the citizens who are the customers of the services much like we're paying for public services we all need and political leaders who accurately represent us and do what's in our best interest. At any rate, some public land or entities sold off to privately owned companies should have some benefits, at least get the wheels in motion to bring those entities back to life so they can do what they're supposed to in a functioning society.






    "Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence"- Napoleon Bonaparte
  • SubhumanSubhuman Overlord BaltimoreRegistered User regular
    Subhuman wrote: »
    I suppose it's good to privatize where possible, as long as oversight isn't lost.

    Why?

    Someone is willing to make the investment that we don't have to make. Why not?

    "Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence"- Napoleon Bonaparte
  • kildykildy Registered User regular
    Err, what does Honduras get out of this? Like, the country. If the cities are allowed to make their own laws and tax code, is there something forcing them to still obey the country's laws and tax codes? Or are they basically just giving away part of their country to be new countries?

    Overall, I fail to see any positives from this. Sure something may turn into a utopia of helping the poor and improving quality of life. But realistically it's far more likely to turn into a tax haven and gated community that leeches what little wealth the country has into it's confines.

  • AngelHedgieAngelHedgie Registered User regular
    edited September 2012
    Subhuman wrote: »
    Subhuman wrote: »
    I suppose it's good to privatize where possible, as long as oversight isn't lost.

    Why?

    Someone is willing to make the investment that we don't have to make. Why not?

    There's a reason George Pullman is buried under several tons of concrete.

    Or alternatively, TANSTAAFL.

    AngelHedgie on
    XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum / Steam: noxaeternum
  • kaidkaid Registered User regular
    It sounds like one of the start up premises of shadowrun. Corporations basically buying extra territorial cities where they can run as they want. I am sure that somebody is getting some govt kick backs and is making money but as for the country itself I don't see much upside for it long term.

  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    Subhuman wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Who's doing the overseeing and what's motivating them to do so?

    Reminds me of the rhetorical question, who will guard the guardians and who will police the police?. Some gray area, definitely. I imagine it would be the citizens who are the customers of the services much like we're paying for public services we all need and political leaders who accurately represent us and do what's in our best interest. At any rate, some public land or entities sold off to privately owned companies should have some benefits, at least get the wheels in motion to bring those entities back to life so they can do what they're supposed to in a functioning society.

    I know that my favorite part of Erin Brocovich was that bit where PG&E was forced to stop dumping crazy-high levels of chemicals into the water supply because of a letter-writing campaign by angry customers.

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • Tiger BurningTiger Burning Dig if you will, the pictureRegistered User, SolidSaints Tube regular
    edited September 2012
    kildy wrote: »
    Err, what does Honduras get out of this? Like, the country. If the cities are allowed to make their own laws and tax code, is there something forcing them to still obey the country's laws and tax codes? Or are they basically just giving away part of their country to be new countries?

    Overall, I fail to see any positives from this. Sure something may turn into a utopia of helping the poor and improving quality of life. But realistically it's far more likely to turn into a tax haven and gated community that leeches what little wealth the country has into it's confines.

    Foreign investment and jobs is the hope.

    In one sense, it's nothing more than a formalization of a process that happens a lot anyway. Maybe a small difference of degree. Hondouras is saying, "If you come and build your factory here, we will literally let you do anything you want."

    With "Unless we change our mind." unspoken but understood.

    Tiger Burning on
    Ain't no particular sign I'm more compatible with
  • caligynefobcaligynefob DKRegistered User regular
    So... it would be just like Dubai.

    PS4 - Mrfuzzyhat
Sign In or Register to comment.