I love this one so much. "I don't rightly know..." so perfectly sums up how I feel when confronted with this.
I'm inclined to guess you want me to do something with this information, or you wouldn't have told me. But I have no idea what to do with it.
Most of the time people who talk to me about their identity issues are just looking for acceptance. Assuming you're already friends with them they're hoping that you, as their friend, will be able to help them feel more confident about asserting their identity in the world.
Well... yeah. I mean, I guess that's why these two comics seem so weirdly poignant. It's Frank reaching out to the other guy because he's got something in him that he can't keep in him anymore. Other Guy just has no frame of reference for this; it is, relative to everything he has experienced, unequivocally weird. But he wants to support his buddy, and he can tell this has been eating his buddy up. He's willing to be there, he just doesn't know what being there means.
In the end, all Frank wants is for someone to know.
These two comics are just masterfully crafted. It's just a couple goofy strips, but there's so much nuance packed in there.
you're = you are
your = belonging to you
their = belonging to them
there = not here
they're = they are
0
CambiataCommander ShepardThe likes of which even GAWD has never seenRegistered Userregular
edited October 2012
Otherkin just seems so firmly rooted in... self-delusion?
I mean it's not just someone saying they feel like they are a racoon. Otherkin is generally people believing they are an anthropromorphized (sp?) racoon, of a cartoony variety. Some otherkin believe they are in actuality a fictional character (ie, I'm not just a cartoony antropromorphic hedghog, I am actually Sonic and all the cartoon adventures and video games have been telling my memories).
It's similar to people who are certain they have lived in the past, but their other lives are never "I was a oft-beaten serf in medieval england", their other lives are always "I was Cleopatra, I was Julius Ceasar." Somehow people's "memories" of these things come from grand and well-told sources.
Maybe people should just come to terms with the fact that talented artists (and/or historians) have a way of touching us on very deep and personal levels. And if you want to dress up and pretend you are Sonic, or peter pan, or a Cleopatra, I don't begruge you that. I just find it a bit silly when you try to say you actually are that character instead of someone who really likes that character.
Cambiata on
"If you divide the whole world into just enemies and friends, you'll end up destroying everything" --Nausicaa of the Valley of Wind
Someone familiar with this aspect of the fandom tell me, though: What kind of cognitive dissonance makes anyone think they look good in a fursuit instead of like uncanny-valley aesthetic monstrosities? Is it just wishful thinking because that's the closest we can get with current technology, or what?
Why do people dress up as anime/video game characters at conventions?
They made the outfit, they want to show it off. You seem to be likening artistic pride with some kind of mental illness.
Except they seem to universally look terrible, and I'm not sure whether they're aware of that and don't care because it's as close as they can get, or they actually think it looks good. The equivalent for anime fans would be this type of thing I suppose, which I also don't get.
Look, I think the new My Little Pony is a fun cartoon. I would still run screaming in the other direction if I met this in a darkened hallway. I just want someone to tell me what goes on in these people's heads when they look in the mirror, out of curiosity.
Well, that kinda firms up the fursuit = cosplay thing rather nicely.
Let's just take your MLP reference since you brought it up.
Someone familiar with this aspect of the fandom tell me, though: What kind of cognitive dissonance makes anyone think they look good in a fursuit instead of like uncanny-valley aesthetic monstrosities? Is it just wishful thinking because that's the closest we can get with current technology, or what?
Why do people dress up as anime/video game characters at conventions?
They made the outfit, they want to show it off. You seem to be likening artistic pride with some kind of mental illness.
Except they seem to universally look terrible, and I'm not sure whether they're aware of that and don't care because it's as close as they can get, or they actually think it looks good. The equivalent for anime fans would be this type of thing I suppose, which I also don't get.
Look, I think the new My Little Pony is a fun cartoon. I would still run screaming in the other direction if I met this in a darkened hallway. I just want someone to tell me what goes on in these people's heads when they look in the mirror, out of curiosity.
Someone familiar with this aspect of the fandom tell me, though: What kind of cognitive dissonance makes anyone think they look good in a fursuit instead of like uncanny-valley aesthetic monstrosities? Is it just wishful thinking because that's the closest we can get with current technology, or what?
Why do people dress up as anime/video game characters at conventions?
They made the outfit, they want to show it off. You seem to be likening artistic pride with some kind of mental illness.
Except they seem to universally look terrible, and I'm not sure whether they're aware of that and don't care because it's as close as they can get, or they actually think it looks good. The equivalent for anime fans would be this type of thing I suppose, which I also don't get.
Look, I think the new My Little Pony is a fun cartoon. I would still run screaming in the other direction if I met this in a darkened hallway. I just want someone to tell me what goes on in these people's heads when they look in the mirror, out of curiosity.
Well, that kinda firms up the fursuit = cosplay thing rather nicely.
Let's just take your MLP reference since you brought it up.
Someone familiar with this aspect of the fandom tell me, though: What kind of cognitive dissonance makes anyone think they look good in a fursuit instead of like uncanny-valley aesthetic monstrosities? Is it just wishful thinking because that's the closest we can get with current technology, or what?
Why do people dress up as anime/video game characters at conventions?
They made the outfit, they want to show it off. You seem to be likening artistic pride with some kind of mental illness.
Except they seem to universally look terrible, and I'm not sure whether they're aware of that and don't care because it's as close as they can get, or they actually think it looks good. The equivalent for anime fans would be this type of thing I suppose, which I also don't get.
Look, I think the new My Little Pony is a fun cartoon. I would still run screaming in the other direction if I met this in a darkened hallway. I just want someone to tell me what goes on in these people's heads when they look in the mirror, out of curiosity.
Otherkin just seems so firmly rooted in... self-delusion?
I mean it's not just someone saying they feel like they are a racoon. Otherkin is generally people believing they are an anthropromorphized (sp?) racoon, of a cartoony variety. Some otherkin believe they are in actuality a fictional character (ie, I'm not just a cartoony antropromorphic hedghog, I am actually Sonic and all the cartoon adventures and video games have been telling my memories).
It's similar to people who are certain they have lived in the past, but their other lives are never "I was a oft-beaten serf in medieval england", their other lives are always "I was Cleopatra, I was Julius Ceasar." Somehow people's "memories" of these things come from grand and well-told sources.
Maybe people should just come to terms with the fact that talented artists (and/or historians) have a way of touching us on very deep and personal levels. And if you want to dress up and pretend you are Sonic, or peter pan, or a Cleopatra, I don't begruge you that. I just find it a bit silly when you try to say you actually are that character instead of someone who really likes that character.
Exactly this.
If you're a dude who's wants to kiss other dudes, that's one thing. That's a fact of existence that's rooted in measurable reality.
But if you tell me you're literally supposed to be a raccoon person. There's simply nothing I can do about that that's of any rational consequence. I mean, besides shuffling my feet awkwardly and changing the topic.
Otherkin just seems so firmly rooted in... self-delusion?
I mean it's not just someone saying they feel like they are a racoon. Otherkin is generally people believing they are an anthropromorphized (sp?) racoon, of a cartoony variety. Some otherkin believe they are in actuality a fictional character (ie, I'm not just a cartoony antropromorphic hedghog, I am actually Sonic and all the cartoon adventures and video games have been telling my memories).
It's similar to people who are certain they have lived in the past, but their other lives are never "I was a oft-beaten serf in medieval england", their other lives are always "I was Cleopatra, I was Julius Ceasar." Somehow people's "memories" of these things come from grand and well-told sources.
Maybe people should just come to terms with the fact that talented artists (and/or historians) have a way of touching us on very deep and personal levels. And if you want to dress up and pretend you are Sonic, or peter pan, or a Cleopatra, I don't begruge you that. I just find it a bit silly when you try to say you actually are that character instead of someone who really likes that character.
Exactly this.
If you're a dude who's wants to kiss other dudes, that's one thing.
But if you tell me you're literally supposed to be a raccoon person. There's simply nothing I can do about that that's of any rational consequence. I mean, besides shuffling my feet awkwardly and changing the topic.
I mean, you could just say "whatever makes you happy, bud". It's possible to have an empathic response in conversation when doing so costs you basically nothing.
Otherkin just seems so firmly rooted in... self-delusion?
I mean it's not just someone saying they feel like they are a racoon. Otherkin is generally people believing they are an anthropromorphized (sp?) racoon, of a cartoony variety. Some otherkin believe they are in actuality a fictional character (ie, I'm not just a cartoony antropromorphic hedghog, I am actually Sonic and all the cartoon adventures and video games have been telling my memories).
It's similar to people who are certain they have lived in the past, but their other lives are never "I was a oft-beaten serf in medieval england", their other lives are always "I was Cleopatra, I was Julius Ceasar." Somehow people's "memories" of these things come from grand and well-told sources.
Maybe people should just come to terms with the fact that talented artists (and/or historians) have a way of touching us on very deep and personal levels. And if you want to dress up and pretend you are Sonic, or peter pan, or a Cleopatra, I don't begruge you that. I just find it a bit silly when you try to say you actually are that character instead of someone who really likes that character.
Exactly this.
If you're a dude who's wants to kiss other dudes, that's one thing.
But if you tell me you're literally supposed to be a raccoon person. There's simply nothing I can do about that that's of any rational consequence. I mean, besides shuffling my feet awkwardly and changing the topic.
I'd like to ease your burden by letting you know I don't think I'm supposed to be a chocobo.
I am a chocobo who uses the internet as a smoke-screen cover to prevent PETA from sneaking into my house with chloroform and making me vanish into a dark warehouse somewhere.
With all the crazies that are out there, I'm safe cuz no one really knows.
Otherkin just seems so firmly rooted in... self-delusion?
I mean it's not just someone saying they feel like they are a racoon. Otherkin is generally people believing they are an anthropromorphized (sp?) racoon, of a cartoony variety. Some otherkin believe they are in actuality a fictional character (ie, I'm not just a cartoony antropromorphic hedghog, I am actually Sonic and all the cartoon adventures and video games have been telling my memories).
It's similar to people who are certain they have lived in the past, but their other lives are never "I was a oft-beaten serf in medieval england", their other lives are always "I was Cleopatra, I was Julius Ceasar." Somehow people's "memories" of these things come from grand and well-told sources.
Maybe people should just come to terms with the fact that talented artists (and/or historians) have a way of touching us on very deep and personal levels. And if you want to dress up and pretend you are Sonic, or peter pan, or a Cleopatra, I don't begruge you that. I just find it a bit silly when you try to say you actually are that character instead of someone who really likes that character.
Exactly this.
If you're a dude who's wants to kiss other dudes, that's one thing.
But if you tell me you're literally supposed to be a raccoon person. There's simply nothing I can do about that that's of any rational consequence. I mean, besides shuffling my feet awkwardly and changing the topic.
I mean, you could just say "whatever makes you happy, bud". It's possible to have an empathic response in conversation when doing so costs you basically nothing.
Well naturally that'd be my response if you told me you were an alien from another world and that the guv'ment is out to get you.
Otherkin just seems so firmly rooted in... self-delusion?
I mean it's not just someone saying they feel like they are a racoon. Otherkin is generally people believing they are an anthropromorphized (sp?) racoon, of a cartoony variety. Some otherkin believe they are in actuality a fictional character (ie, I'm not just a cartoony antropromorphic hedghog, I am actually Sonic and all the cartoon adventures and video games have been telling my memories).
It's similar to people who are certain they have lived in the past, but their other lives are never "I was a oft-beaten serf in medieval england", their other lives are always "I was Cleopatra, I was Julius Ceasar." Somehow people's "memories" of these things come from grand and well-told sources.
Maybe people should just come to terms with the fact that talented artists (and/or historians) have a way of touching us on very deep and personal levels. And if you want to dress up and pretend you are Sonic, or peter pan, or a Cleopatra, I don't begruge you that. I just find it a bit silly when you try to say you actually are that character instead of someone who really likes that character.
Exactly this.
If you're a dude who's wants to kiss other dudes, that's one thing.
But if you tell me you're literally supposed to be a raccoon person. There's simply nothing I can do about that that's of any rational consequence. I mean, besides shuffling my feet awkwardly and changing the topic.
I'd like to ease your burden by letting you know I don't think I'm supposed to be a chocobo.
I am a chocobo who uses the internet as a smoke-screen cover to prevent PETA from sneaking into my house with chloroform and making me vanish into a dark warehouse somewhere.
With all the crazies that are out there, I'm safe cuz no one really knows.
Do you object to the way Chocobos are portrayed in the Final Fantasy games? Is it demeaning that players inbreed Chocobos or otherwise use them as beasts of burden in games?
Anyone who's religious literally believes in all sorts of crazy shit, but religious intolerance is bad, everyone! So even if someone thinks they're a chocobo or a churro or whatever the fuck, maybe prejudice is a bad idea!
0
CambiataCommander ShepardThe likes of which even GAWD has never seenRegistered Userregular
Anyone who's religious literally believes in all sorts of crazy shit, but religious intolerance is bad, everyone! So even if someone thinks they're a chocobo or a churro or whatever the fuck, maybe prejudice is a bad idea!
Well I personally am not saying round up all the otherkin and burn them in a furnace. I'm not even saying shun them, humilate them, or laugh at them on the internet.
I am saying that if you actually believe that you are, I dunno, Lighthing McQueen and are angry that Pixar "got your story wrong.", then it might not hurt to get some therapy.
"If you divide the whole world into just enemies and friends, you'll end up destroying everything" --Nausicaa of the Valley of Wind
Otherkin just seems so firmly rooted in... self-delusion?
I mean it's not just someone saying they feel like they are a racoon. Otherkin is generally people believing they are an anthropromorphized (sp?) racoon, of a cartoony variety. Some otherkin believe they are in actuality a fictional character (ie, I'm not just a cartoony antropromorphic hedghog, I am actually Sonic and all the cartoon adventures and video games have been telling my memories).
It's similar to people who are certain they have lived in the past, but their other lives are never "I was a oft-beaten serf in medieval england", their other lives are always "I was Cleopatra, I was Julius Ceasar." Somehow people's "memories" of these things come from grand and well-told sources.
Maybe people should just come to terms with the fact that talented artists (and/or historians) have a way of touching us on very deep and personal levels. And if you want to dress up and pretend you are Sonic, or peter pan, or a Cleopatra, I don't begruge you that. I just find it a bit silly when you try to say you actually are that character instead of someone who really likes that character.
Exactly this.
If you're a dude who's wants to kiss other dudes, that's one thing.
But if you tell me you're literally supposed to be a raccoon person. There's simply nothing I can do about that that's of any rational consequence. I mean, besides shuffling my feet awkwardly and changing the topic.
I'd like to ease your burden by letting you know I don't think I'm supposed to be a chocobo.
I am a chocobo who uses the internet as a smoke-screen cover to prevent PETA from sneaking into my house with chloroform and making me vanish into a dark warehouse somewhere.
With all the crazies that are out there, I'm safe cuz no one really knows.
Do you object to the way Chocobos are portrayed in the Final Fantasy games? Is it demeaning that players inbreed Chocobos or otherwise use them as beasts of burden in games?
YES.
Square totally needs to make a game where a chocobo's being badass, and not just that lame Chocobo's Dungeon crap where it's 24/7 cuteness.
I wanna see a 'bo curb-stomp someone. They owe us that much.
Otherkin just seems so firmly rooted in... self-delusion?
I mean it's not just someone saying they feel like they are a racoon. Otherkin is generally people believing they are an anthropromorphized (sp?) racoon, of a cartoony variety. Some otherkin believe they are in actuality a fictional character (ie, I'm not just a cartoony antropromorphic hedghog, I am actually Sonic and all the cartoon adventures and video games have been telling my memories).
It's similar to people who are certain they have lived in the past, but their other lives are never "I was a oft-beaten serf in medieval england", their other lives are always "I was Cleopatra, I was Julius Ceasar." Somehow people's "memories" of these things come from grand and well-told sources.
Maybe people should just come to terms with the fact that talented artists (and/or historians) have a way of touching us on very deep and personal levels. And if you want to dress up and pretend you are Sonic, or peter pan, or a Cleopatra, I don't begruge you that. I just find it a bit silly when you try to say you actually are that character instead of someone who really likes that character.
Exactly this.
If you're a dude who's wants to kiss other dudes, that's one thing.
But if you tell me you're literally supposed to be a raccoon person. There's simply nothing I can do about that that's of any rational consequence. I mean, besides shuffling my feet awkwardly and changing the topic.
I mean, you could just say "whatever makes you happy, bud". It's possible to have an empathic response in conversation when doing so costs you basically nothing.
Well naturally that'd be my response if you told me you were an alien from another world and that the guv'ment is out to get you.
Because that's entirely analogous to what we're talking abou- oh wait, no, it's actually a bullshit straw man.
Otherkin just seems so firmly rooted in... self-delusion?
I mean it's not just someone saying they feel like they are a racoon. Otherkin is generally people believing they are an anthropromorphized (sp?) racoon, of a cartoony variety. Some otherkin believe they are in actuality a fictional character (ie, I'm not just a cartoony antropromorphic hedghog, I am actually Sonic and all the cartoon adventures and video games have been telling my memories).
It's similar to people who are certain they have lived in the past, but their other lives are never "I was a oft-beaten serf in medieval england", their other lives are always "I was Cleopatra, I was Julius Ceasar." Somehow people's "memories" of these things come from grand and well-told sources.
Maybe people should just come to terms with the fact that talented artists (and/or historians) have a way of touching us on very deep and personal levels. And if you want to dress up and pretend you are Sonic, or peter pan, or a Cleopatra, I don't begruge you that. I just find it a bit silly when you try to say you actually are that character instead of someone who really likes that character.
Exactly this.
If you're a dude who's wants to kiss other dudes, that's one thing.
But if you tell me you're literally supposed to be a raccoon person. There's simply nothing I can do about that that's of any rational consequence. I mean, besides shuffling my feet awkwardly and changing the topic.
I mean, you could just say "whatever makes you happy, bud". It's possible to have an empathic response in conversation when doing so costs you basically nothing.
Well naturally that'd be my response if you told me you were an alien from another world and that the guv'ment is out to get you.
Because that's entirely analogous to what we're talking abou- oh wait, no, it's actually a bullshit straw man.
That's possible.
The point I'm getting across here is that it's not likely to change the judgment that I think such a person is delusional. Whether I'm rude about it or polite about it doesn't change that assessment in the least. That Otherkin guy is hypothetically less crazy than tinfoil-hat guy is just a matter of degree. Their beliefs are false and non-functional.
Normally I would also respond to TychoCelchuuu by pointing out that you can be tolerant while still believing somebody to be delusional, but I'm not certain if he's just being sarcastic or not.
Otherkin just seems so firmly rooted in... self-delusion?
I mean it's not just someone saying they feel like they are a racoon. Otherkin is generally people believing they are an anthropromorphized (sp?) racoon, of a cartoony variety. Some otherkin believe they are in actuality a fictional character (ie, I'm not just a cartoony antropromorphic hedghog, I am actually Sonic and all the cartoon adventures and video games have been telling my memories).
It's similar to people who are certain they have lived in the past, but their other lives are never "I was a oft-beaten serf in medieval england", their other lives are always "I was Cleopatra, I was Julius Ceasar." Somehow people's "memories" of these things come from grand and well-told sources.
Maybe people should just come to terms with the fact that talented artists (and/or historians) have a way of touching us on very deep and personal levels. And if you want to dress up and pretend you are Sonic, or peter pan, or a Cleopatra, I don't begruge you that. I just find it a bit silly when you try to say you actually are that character instead of someone who really likes that character.
Exactly this.
If you're a dude who's wants to kiss other dudes, that's one thing.
But if you tell me you're literally supposed to be a raccoon person. There's simply nothing I can do about that that's of any rational consequence. I mean, besides shuffling my feet awkwardly and changing the topic.
I mean, you could just say "whatever makes you happy, bud". It's possible to have an empathic response in conversation when doing so costs you basically nothing.
Well naturally that'd be my response if you told me you were an alien from another world and that the guv'ment is out to get you.
Because that's entirely analogous to what we're talking abou- oh wait, no, it's actually a bullshit straw man.
That's possible.
The point I'm getting across here is that it's not likely to change the judgment that I think such a person is delusional. Whether I'm rude about it or polite about it doesn't change that assessment in the least. That Otherkin guy is hypothetically less crazy than tinfoil-hat man is just a matter of degree. Their beliefs are false and non-functional.
Normally I would also respond to TychoCelchuuu by pointing out that you can be tolerant while still believing somebody to be delusional, but I'm not certain if he's just being sarcastic or not.
Fair enough, but the tone of your arguments is more than a little patronizing toward the individuals in question. I would hope, at the very least, that you would take that into account if and when you're confronted with this elsewhere.
Otherkin just seems so firmly rooted in... self-delusion?
I mean it's not just someone saying they feel like they are a racoon. Otherkin is generally people believing they are an anthropromorphized (sp?) racoon, of a cartoony variety. Some otherkin believe they are in actuality a fictional character (ie, I'm not just a cartoony antropromorphic hedghog, I am actually Sonic and all the cartoon adventures and video games have been telling my memories).
It's similar to people who are certain they have lived in the past, but their other lives are never "I was a oft-beaten serf in medieval england", their other lives are always "I was Cleopatra, I was Julius Ceasar." Somehow people's "memories" of these things come from grand and well-told sources.
Maybe people should just come to terms with the fact that talented artists (and/or historians) have a way of touching us on very deep and personal levels. And if you want to dress up and pretend you are Sonic, or peter pan, or a Cleopatra, I don't begruge you that. I just find it a bit silly when you try to say you actually are that character instead of someone who really likes that character.
Exactly this.
If you're a dude who's wants to kiss other dudes, that's one thing.
But if you tell me you're literally supposed to be a raccoon person. There's simply nothing I can do about that that's of any rational consequence. I mean, besides shuffling my feet awkwardly and changing the topic.
I mean, you could just say "whatever makes you happy, bud". It's possible to have an empathic response in conversation when doing so costs you basically nothing.
Well naturally that'd be my response if you told me you were an alien from another world and that the guv'ment is out to get you.
Because that's entirely analogous to what we're talking abou- oh wait, no, it's actually a bullshit straw man.
That's possible.
The point I'm getting across here is that it's not likely to change the judgment that I think such a person is delusional. Whether I'm rude about it or polite about it doesn't change that assessment in the least. That Otherkin guy is hypothetically less crazy than tinfoil-hat man is just a matter of degree. Their beliefs are false and non-functional.
Normally I would also respond to TychoCelchuuu by pointing out that you can be tolerant while still believing somebody to be delusional, but I'm not certain if he's just being sarcastic or not.
Fair enough, but the tone of your arguments is more than a little patronizing toward the individuals in question. I would hope, at the very least, that you would take that into account if and when you're confronted with this elsewhere.
Some people who are in the mainstream of society romanticize the lives of those living in the margins. Desperately yearning to be among those mental and cultural pioneers, they invent their own minority in which to live out their fantasy. This tends to be a tad undermining but innocuous (I'm really a cat!), somewhat insulting (Walt Disney didn't create Mickey Mouse! I AM MICKEY MOUSE), or patently racist (I'm a black man trapped in a white man's body). In some case these are legitimate mental illnesses that are spun into some kind of special class. Because they are the white bread of the world and want to be special. What they really need is to get off Tumblr and see a doctor.
I like to think about someday decades after this comic, when not-Frank's grandkids will ask him to tell them stories about his Army buddies and what he did in the war.
I like to think about someday decades after this comic, when not-Frank's grandkids ask will him to tell them stories about his Army buddies and what he did in the war.
Five long years, he wore this watch up his raccoon ass. Then he died of dysentery, he gave me the watch. I hid this uncomfortable hunk of metal up my ass two years. Then, after seven years, I was sent home to my family. And now, little man, I give the watch to you.
Being a furry myself, let me add my two cents. I'm not really a fursuiter, I don't think I'm an animal trapped in a human body. My experience with the fandom has been basically a matter of making peace with our differences. For instance, my boyfriend is of a more specific furry-fetish-type I myself do not identify with. And since meeting other furries in my community, I've found myself quite surrounded with those who are of that persuasion while I myself remain uninterested in such things. But over time I've found that learning to coexist has been quite painless. Having initially been alienated and weirded out by it, I probably would have remained that way had I not had exposure to these people and realized that most of them are otherwise pretty normal people. Of course, even furries within the fandom will hate on the more specific fetishes and interests within their fandom. I can't really blame people for going WTF at something that is new to them, Things society have not told us is ok. Over time I have abandoned the need for society's reaffirmation of my or anyone else's interests and have learned to use my own moral compass (there are some more fundamental taboos I've avoided for obvious reasons and will likely continue to avoid).
The rabbit hole of weirdness does just keep going further, but as an artist I've kind of learned to embrace it. I do think meeting people in person rather than surfing the internet and gawking at all the crazy shit you find changes one's perspective.
I also think the need for individuals to express themselves is vital...even to the extent of one's own survival. It's better to be ridiculed for what you are than praised for what you aren't.
I like to think about someday decades after this comic, when not-Frank's grandkids ask will him to tell them stories about his Army buddies and what he did in the war.
Five long years, he wore this watch up his raccoon ass. Then he died of dysentery, he gave me the watch. I hid this uncomfortable hunk of metal up my ass two years. Then, after seven years, I was sent home to my family. And now, little man, I give the watch to you.
What a touching story. It really moves the heart and anus...
Someone familiar with this aspect of the fandom tell me, though: What kind of cognitive dissonance makes anyone think they look good in a fursuit instead of like uncanny-valley aesthetic monstrosities? Is it just wishful thinking because that's the closest we can get with current technology, or what?
Why do people dress up as anime/video game characters at conventions?
They made the outfit, they want to show it off. You seem to be likening artistic pride with some kind of mental illness.
Except they seem to universally look terrible, and I'm not sure whether they're aware of that and don't care because it's as close as they can get, or they actually think it looks good. The equivalent for anime fans would be this type of thing I suppose, which I also don't get.
Look, I think the new My Little Pony is a fun cartoon. I would still run screaming in the other direction if I met this in a darkened hallway. I just want someone to tell me what goes on in these people's heads when they look in the mirror, out of curiosity.
Well, that kinda firms up the fursuit = cosplay thing rather nicely.
Let's just take your MLP reference since you brought it up.
P.S: I had to dig into google to find a suitable rainbow dash fursuit. I hope you acknowlege my efforts.
Yeahhhh... So every image posted in both quotes has elicited from me a panicked whimpering cry of "Kill it!" in frantic repetition. I think that sets the base on my opinion.
Someone familiar with this aspect of the fandom tell me, though: What kind of cognitive dissonance makes anyone think they look good in a fursuit instead of like uncanny-valley aesthetic monstrosities? Is it just wishful thinking because that's the closest we can get with current technology, or what?
Why do people dress up as anime/video game characters at conventions?
They made the outfit, they want to show it off. You seem to be likening artistic pride with some kind of mental illness.
Except they seem to universally look terrible, and I'm not sure whether they're aware of that and don't care because it's as close as they can get, or they actually think it looks good. The equivalent for anime fans would be this type of thing I suppose, which I also don't get.
Look, I think the new My Little Pony is a fun cartoon. I would still run screaming in the other direction if I met this in a darkened hallway. I just want someone to tell me what goes on in these people's heads when they look in the mirror, out of curiosity.
Well, that kinda firms up the fursuit = cosplay thing rather nicely.
Let's just take your MLP reference since you brought it up.
P.S: I had to dig into google to find a suitable rainbow dash fursuit. I hope you acknowlege my efforts.
Yeahhhh... So every image posted in both quotes has elicited from me a panicked whimpering cry of "Kill it!" in frantic repetition. I think that sets the base on my opinion.
Someone familiar with this aspect of the fandom tell me, though: What kind of cognitive dissonance makes anyone think they look good in a fursuit instead of like uncanny-valley aesthetic monstrosities? Is it just wishful thinking because that's the closest we can get with current technology, or what?
Why do people dress up as anime/video game characters at conventions?
They made the outfit, they want to show it off. You seem to be likening artistic pride with some kind of mental illness.
Except they seem to universally look terrible, and I'm not sure whether they're aware of that and don't care because it's as close as they can get, or they actually think it looks good. The equivalent for anime fans would be this type of thing I suppose, which I also don't get.
Look, I think the new My Little Pony is a fun cartoon. I would still run screaming in the other direction if I met this in a darkened hallway. I just want someone to tell me what goes on in these people's heads when they look in the mirror, out of curiosity.
Well, that kinda firms up the fursuit = cosplay thing rather nicely.
Let's just take your MLP reference since you brought it up.
P.S: I had to dig into google to find a suitable rainbow dash fursuit. I hope you acknowlege my efforts.
Nope, the second is still more "burn-it-with-fire" than "'dawww", just to a lesser extent. Some things just don't look good in the real world, with human proportions.
EDIT: I swear I posted this earlier, before Blackie62's response, but maybe I too am going to be blessed by a double-post showing up later.
Someone familiar with this aspect of the fandom tell me, though: What kind of cognitive dissonance makes anyone think they look good in a fursuit instead of like uncanny-valley aesthetic monstrosities? Is it just wishful thinking because that's the closest we can get with current technology, or what?
Why do people dress up as anime/video game characters at conventions?
They made the outfit, they want to show it off. You seem to be likening artistic pride with some kind of mental illness.
Except they seem to universally look terrible, and I'm not sure whether they're aware of that and don't care because it's as close as they can get, or they actually think it looks good. The equivalent for anime fans would be this type of thing I suppose, which I also don't get.
Look, I think the new My Little Pony is a fun cartoon. I would still run screaming in the other direction if I met this in a darkened hallway. I just want someone to tell me what goes on in these people's heads when they look in the mirror, out of curiosity.
Well, that kinda firms up the fursuit = cosplay thing rather nicely.
Let's just take your MLP reference since you brought it up.
P.S: I had to dig into google to find a suitable rainbow dash fursuit. I hope you acknowlege my efforts.
Nope, the second is still more "burn-it-with-fire" than "'dawww", just to a lesser extent. Some things just don't look good in the real world, with human proportions.
EDIT: I swear I posted this earlier, before Blackie62's response, but maybe I too am going to be blessed by a double-post showing up later.
that's a rather weak position to take on the whole thing just on the fact that "its not good with human proportions".
No crap, what did you expect them to do, to make a 4-legged suit that's anatomically correct with real horses? Not even good cosplayers are absolutely perfect.
The fact is you can really tell that the 2nd picture had a lot more effort and skill put into it than the first, and they want to show off that handiwork.
Someone familiar with this aspect of the fandom tell me, though: What kind of cognitive dissonance makes anyone think they look good in a fursuit instead of like uncanny-valley aesthetic monstrosities? Is it just wishful thinking because that's the closest we can get with current technology, or what?
Why do people dress up as anime/video game characters at conventions?
They made the outfit, they want to show it off. You seem to be likening artistic pride with some kind of mental illness.
Except they seem to universally look terrible, and I'm not sure whether they're aware of that and don't care because it's as close as they can get, or they actually think it looks good. The equivalent for anime fans would be this type of thing I suppose, which I also don't get.
Look, I think the new My Little Pony is a fun cartoon. I would still run screaming in the other direction if I met this in a darkened hallway. I just want someone to tell me what goes on in these people's heads when they look in the mirror, out of curiosity.
Well, that kinda firms up the fursuit = cosplay thing rather nicely.
Let's just take your MLP reference since you brought it up.
P.S: I had to dig into google to find a suitable rainbow dash fursuit. I hope you acknowlege my efforts.
Nope, the second is still more "burn-it-with-fire" than "'dawww", just to a lesser extent. Some things just don't look good in the real world, with human proportions.
EDIT: I swear I posted this earlier, before Blackie62's response, but maybe I too am going to be blessed by a double-post showing up later.
that's a rather weak position to take on the whole thing just on the fact that "its not good with human proportions".
No crap, what did you expect them to do, to make a 4-legged suit that's anatomically correct with real horses? Not even good cosplayers are absolutely perfect.
The fact is you can really tell that the 2nd picture had a lot more effort and skill put into it than the first, and they want to show off that handiwork.
And again, hard work or no, it still looks terrible. You pretty much answered my question inadvertently by thinking the second one isn't also a creepy aesthetic nightmare.
Some kind of Stockholm Syndrome from being exposed to such things over a long period of time, I guess?
That second one looks like a costume . . .
I've seen Easter Bunny costumes, football mascots and costumes at Disney Land that look approximately like that.
I understand that you're determined to remind us of MLP's bandwagony creepiness. But come on, there are reasonable limits.
And again, hard work or no, it still looks terrible. You pretty much answered my question inadvertently by thinking the second one isn't also a creepy aesthetic nightmare.
Some kind of Stockholm Syndrome from being exposed to such things over a long period of time, I guess?
Or that ugly thing called "opinions" popping up where it's not wanted.
Just cuz you don't like it doesn't mean it's not good.
Posts
Well... yeah. I mean, I guess that's why these two comics seem so weirdly poignant. It's Frank reaching out to the other guy because he's got something in him that he can't keep in him anymore. Other Guy just has no frame of reference for this; it is, relative to everything he has experienced, unequivocally weird. But he wants to support his buddy, and he can tell this has been eating his buddy up. He's willing to be there, he just doesn't know what being there means.
In the end, all Frank wants is for someone to know.
These two comics are just masterfully crafted. It's just a couple goofy strips, but there's so much nuance packed in there.
your = belonging to you
their = belonging to them
there = not here
they're = they are
I mean it's not just someone saying they feel like they are a racoon. Otherkin is generally people believing they are an anthropromorphized (sp?) racoon, of a cartoony variety. Some otherkin believe they are in actuality a fictional character (ie, I'm not just a cartoony antropromorphic hedghog, I am actually Sonic and all the cartoon adventures and video games have been telling my memories).
It's similar to people who are certain they have lived in the past, but their other lives are never "I was a oft-beaten serf in medieval england", their other lives are always "I was Cleopatra, I was Julius Ceasar." Somehow people's "memories" of these things come from grand and well-told sources.
Maybe people should just come to terms with the fact that talented artists (and/or historians) have a way of touching us on very deep and personal levels. And if you want to dress up and pretend you are Sonic, or peter pan, or a Cleopatra, I don't begruge you that. I just find it a bit silly when you try to say you actually are that character instead of someone who really likes that character.
Looks like no one remembers this disturbing little incident from a while back...
My eyes have not stopped bleeding since...
http://www.zeldawiki.org/Groose
Well, that kinda firms up the fursuit = cosplay thing rather nicely.
Let's just take your MLP reference since you brought it up.
Its been done absolutely terrible.
It's also been done relatively well.
P.S: I had to dig into google to find a suitable rainbow dash fursuit. I hope you acknowlege my efforts.
Well that kinda affirms the analogy more.
Let's take your MLP example:
There's those that done it terribly awful.
There's also those that did it relatively well.
Well, that kinda firms up the fursuit = cosplay thing rather nicely.
Let's just take your MLP reference since you brought it up.
Its been done absolutely terrible.
It's also been done relatively well.
P.S: I had to dig into google to find a suitable rainbow dash fursuit. I hope you acknowlege my efforts.
Well that kinda affirms the analogy more.
Let's take your MLP example:
There's those that done it terribly awful.
There's also those that did it relatively well.
Don't worry about it, it happens, I was just having a little fun at your expense.
Exactly this.
If you're a dude who's wants to kiss other dudes, that's one thing. That's a fact of existence that's rooted in measurable reality.
But if you tell me you're literally supposed to be a raccoon person. There's simply nothing I can do about that that's of any rational consequence. I mean, besides shuffling my feet awkwardly and changing the topic.
I mean, you could just say "whatever makes you happy, bud". It's possible to have an empathic response in conversation when doing so costs you basically nothing.
I'd like to ease your burden by letting you know I don't think I'm supposed to be a chocobo.
I am a chocobo who uses the internet as a smoke-screen cover to prevent PETA from sneaking into my house with chloroform and making me vanish into a dark warehouse somewhere.
With all the crazies that are out there, I'm safe cuz no one really knows.
Do you object to the way Chocobos are portrayed in the Final Fantasy games? Is it demeaning that players inbreed Chocobos or otherwise use them as beasts of burden in games?
Well I personally am not saying round up all the otherkin and burn them in a furnace. I'm not even saying shun them, humilate them, or laugh at them on the internet.
I am saying that if you actually believe that you are, I dunno, Lighthing McQueen and are angry that Pixar "got your story wrong.", then it might not hurt to get some therapy.
YES.
Square totally needs to make a game where a chocobo's being badass, and not just that lame Chocobo's Dungeon crap where it's 24/7 cuteness.
I wanna see a 'bo curb-stomp someone. They owe us that much.
Because that's entirely analogous to what we're talking abou- oh wait, no, it's actually a bullshit straw man.
The point I'm getting across here is that it's not likely to change the judgment that I think such a person is delusional. Whether I'm rude about it or polite about it doesn't change that assessment in the least. That Otherkin guy is hypothetically less crazy than tinfoil-hat guy is just a matter of degree. Their beliefs are false and non-functional.
Normally I would also respond to TychoCelchuuu by pointing out that you can be tolerant while still believing somebody to be delusional, but I'm not certain if he's just being sarcastic or not.
Fair enough, but the tone of your arguments is more than a little patronizing toward the individuals in question. I would hope, at the very least, that you would take that into account if and when you're confronted with this elsewhere.
I've been told that I'm abrasive.
http://www.zeldawiki.org/Groose
Five long years, he wore this watch up his raccoon ass. Then he died of dysentery, he gave me the watch. I hid this uncomfortable hunk of metal up my ass two years. Then, after seven years, I was sent home to my family. And now, little man, I give the watch to you.
The rabbit hole of weirdness does just keep going further, but as an artist I've kind of learned to embrace it. I do think meeting people in person rather than surfing the internet and gawking at all the crazy shit you find changes one's perspective.
I also think the need for individuals to express themselves is vital...even to the extent of one's own survival. It's better to be ridiculed for what you are than praised for what you aren't.
What a touching story. It really moves the heart and anus...
http://www.zeldawiki.org/Groose
Yeahhhh... So every image posted in both quotes has elicited from me a panicked whimpering cry of "Kill it!" in frantic repetition. I think that sets the base on my opinion.
Yeahhhh... So every image posted in both quotes has elicited from me a panicked whimpering cry of "Kill it!" in frantic repetition. I think that sets the base on my opinion.
Nope, the second is still more "burn-it-with-fire" than "'dawww", just to a lesser extent. Some things just don't look good in the real world, with human proportions.
EDIT: I swear I posted this earlier, before Blackie62's response, but maybe I too am going to be blessed by a double-post showing up later.
I wonder if there's a market for a furry-themed bar called The Rabbit Hole.
that's a rather weak position to take on the whole thing just on the fact that "its not good with human proportions".
No crap, what did you expect them to do, to make a 4-legged suit that's anatomically correct with real horses? Not even good cosplayers are absolutely perfect.
The fact is you can really tell that the 2nd picture had a lot more effort and skill put into it than the first, and they want to show off that handiwork.
And again, hard work or no, it still looks terrible. You pretty much answered my question inadvertently by thinking the second one isn't also a creepy aesthetic nightmare.
Some kind of Stockholm Syndrome from being exposed to such things over a long period of time, I guess?
I've seen Easter Bunny costumes, football mascots and costumes at Disney Land that look approximately like that.
I understand that you're determined to remind us of MLP's bandwagony creepiness. But come on, there are reasonable limits.
Or that ugly thing called "opinions" popping up where it's not wanted.
Just cuz you don't like it doesn't mean it's not good.