The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Don’t even bother doing it yourself. Just use an artist/designer’s portfolio service like Squarespace or Behance that will let you tweak the colors and drop in your logo.
For the fixed pixel width and height thats pretty easy. You can just set the div width and height with CSS
height:900px;
width:399px;
etc.
The gallery page you might need to use a separate div ID cause then you could just leave out the height and it would automatically size to whatever content you put inside the div.
By default divs don't have borders so you're fine there
For setting it up I would use nested divs.
To lay it out this is how I'd do it (multiple divs)
body
header
content
bottom (for the part where its page title/description)
footer
Your website looks pretty okay to me. I'd probably still use the iframe as of current? Obviously you can get away from the table stuff into divs, that should be relatively easy though. You can get around iframes with scripting languages, and possibly, ajax. But you're an artist right? Not sure you want to dabble in that stuff. Overlord is giving you good information for the div stuff.
HTML5 still supports iframe for instance.
You might also try using validators for CSS and HTML in the future.
It'll show you stuff that might catch you up in other browsers or isn't compliant with normal web design. Just for my own knowledge, how much html/css are artists supposed to know?
not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
Which means you could keep your content separate from your design for the most part. You can get super fancy or not. I assume your webhost can handle php? But at this level you're going into programmer territory.
This option is far better than the javascript/div choice though.
not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
That should work. Obviously you'll need the CSS tied to the div. But it accomplishes the same thing while tricking the observer/validators that it's a single page.
Give it a shot, let me know and I can help rattle it down further if it gives errors or doesn't look quite right.
Also, to be 100% valid HTML, those included pages should only be partials, as you'll be popping it into a page that already has the <html> tags in it. I think.
not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
You can use min-height: for a div, which sets the minimum height for the div, but allows it to expand. Google it though, because you're going to need to put in some IE handling for it IIRC.
Whether they find a life there or not, I think Jupiter should be called an enemy planet.
Posts
height:900px;
width:399px;
etc.
The gallery page you might need to use a separate div ID cause then you could just leave out the height and it would automatically size to whatever content you put inside the div.
By default divs don't have borders so you're fine there
For setting it up I would use nested divs.
To lay it out this is how I'd do it (multiple divs)
body
header
content
bottom (for the part where its page title/description)
footer
Hopefully this helps/makes sense.
HTML5 still supports iframe for instance.
You might also try using validators for CSS and HTML in the future.
http://validator.w3.org/
It'll show you stuff that might catch you up in other browsers or isn't compliant with normal web design. Just for my own knowledge, how much html/css are artists supposed to know?
You could something like this in php:
Which means you could keep your content separate from your design for the most part. You can get super fancy or not. I assume your webhost can handle php? But at this level you're going into programmer territory.
This option is far better than the javascript/div choice though.
If that method doesn't require much beyond copy/pasting code like that, I think that'd be a great solution.
Give it a shot, let me know and I can help rattle it down further if it gives errors or doesn't look quite right.
Also, to be 100% valid HTML, those included pages should only be partials, as you'll be popping it into a page that already has the <html> tags in it. I think.