Paperman, besides having expertly animated emotions and interactions, also managed to make its technology demo aspect very subtle. I had no idea what was going on as far as animation techniques go until I read something about it.
I spotted the layers in the animation and how they interacted with one another before I read up about it. But I'm also an animation junkie with an eye for motion. That's probably why televisions with a higher refresh give me a slight headache.
I do have the excuse in watching initially it on a work computer.
i too have Opinions about weight loss but they're controversial :v
rilly
i generally disagree with the idea that anything more than a moderate diet is sabotaging your chances (not in terms of compliance, but physiologically). i think the claims about metabolic retarding from large calorie deficits are overstated, especially for people who are very heavy. i also think that it's really dumb how so many people are going to an almost anti-science reactionary mode in response to whatever new wave of fad diets.
You believe that a severe diet can get results over the long term, is what you're saying?
i'm saying that if a 350 lb dude eats 1,300 calories a day instead of 1,800, his body won't be convinced he's starving and shut down all weight loss.
legitimate diets
So one pound of weight loss comes from a 3500 calorie deficit, right?
What happens if that 350lb dude stays on the 1300 calorie a day diet for 350 weeks?
After 350 weeks, will he weigh zero pounds?
Yes.
Jesus Feral come on this is some grade school math here.
Next question: if you do a 360 flip on the swing do you turn inside out
i too have Opinions about weight loss but they're controversial :v
rilly
i generally disagree with the idea that anything more than a moderate diet is sabotaging your chances (not in terms of compliance, but physiologically). i think the claims about metabolic retarding from large calorie deficits are overstated, especially for people who are very heavy. i also think that it's really dumb how so many people are going to an almost anti-science reactionary mode in response to whatever new wave of fad diets.
You believe that a severe diet can get results over the long term, is what you're saying?
i'm saying that if a 350 lb dude eats 1,300 calories a day instead of 1,800, his body won't be convinced he's starving and shut down all weight loss.
So, the thing I'm reading now argues not that you get "all weight loss shut down" from cutting calories, but that you end up failing to maintain that caloric level over the long term because of your body's reaction to the change.
So [chat], me and my mum had an argument earlier. It was an important argument that needed to be had. Feelings were running high on both sides but we weren't able to settle it.
So I'm asking you [chat], what do you think is more likely; dying from a horse bite, or being kicked to death by a dog?
Huge swaths of Maryland feel completely uninhabited. Not in the Virginia, oh, huge tracts of mountains way, but in the Ohio, oh, miles of generic flatland way
Eddy on
"and the morning stars I have seen
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
So [chat], me and my mum had an argument earlier. It was an important argument that needed to be had. Feelings were running high on both sides but we weren't able to settle it.
So I'm asking you [chat], what do you think is more likely; dying from a horse bite, or being kicked to death by a dog?
100 duck-sized horses
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
So [chat], me and my mum had an argument earlier. It was an important argument that needed to be had. Feelings were running high on both sides but we weren't able to settle it.
So I'm asking you [chat], what do you think is more likely; dying from a horse bite, or being kicked to death by a dog?
are you saying, are you more likely to die from one of those causes than the other, in the wide world? likelihood of being bitten/kicked being part of the question?
or like, with the info already given that you've been horse-bitten or dog-kicked, which is more likely to be lethal?
Oh my god I want someone to do this to our intranet.
But it is a battleground of petty fiefdoms over which "content owners" hold sway and it is impossible to find, verify or update anything.
the majority of my job is owning our intranet
oh god why
I had a major bust up with someone that works in an office at the opposite end of the country about updating forms that are used many, many times a day.
Because, essentially, you do not get to be arsey about people not using the forms without amending them (you know, so that the required information is actually on them) while taking weeks over making changes to them.
If you want permissions for thee you must answer my riddles three.
It went something like this: We have a regulatory risk department who are frequently excessively paranoid about record keeping requirements. One of their more ill-thought out ideas was the idea that amending any controlled document (which is most of them) without clearing the changes be made an instant regulatory audit fail (which is a fairly serious thing, two or three of them is enough to get you fired).
Then create controlled documents that are not fit for purpose but are required extremely frequently, and require any amendment (any amendment) to be pushed through a process that takes, conservatively, a fortnight.
Then act surprised when people start finding some extremely creative ways to get stuff done without recording any of it, which is, from any sane perspective more of a risk to our record keeping obligations than minor amendments to standard forms.
Actually I think part of this is the data is a pain in the ass to collect especially when it comes to long term health effects of a diet.
Losing weight is good. Losing it by screwing up the system is bad. The best research on dietary health needs to take place over not months, not even a year but over 5 to 10 year periods. Get a sense of how much people lost. Did they keep it off? Where there long term health side effects? Were there other mitigating factors that lead to the weightloss being temporary or permanent? During the period of weight loss was their a confounding event that lead to more weight loss than was expected? What about other factors such as vitamins and blood pressure during the weight loss period, before the weight loss period and afterwards.
In general I think dietary science due to funding and the crazy amount of confounding variables that you cannot control unless you Truman Show the participants will always give murky results. Especially when you considered the best ways we have that are allowed by most oversight committees to monitor food intake are all dependent on the participant being honest, remembering what they ate, or actually eating everything they buy on a shopping trip and so on it leads to meh data.
Okay back to finishing CDC fellowship letter of interest thing.
So [chat], me and my mum had an argument earlier. It was an important argument that needed to be had. Feelings were running high on both sides but we weren't able to settle it.
So I'm asking you [chat], what do you think is more likely; dying from a horse bite, or being kicked to death by a dog?
horse bite dude, come on
i mean, it's not even close
Sir Landshark on
Please consider the environment before printing this post.
So [chat], me and my mum had an argument earlier. It was an important argument that needed to be had. Feelings were running high on both sides but we weren't able to settle it.
So I'm asking you [chat], what do you think is more likely; dying from a horse bite, or being kicked to death by a dog?
are you saying, are you more likely to die from one of those causes than the other, in the wide world? likelihood of being bitten/kicked being part of the question?
or like, with the info already given that you've been horse-bitten or dog-kicked, which is more likely to be lethal?
i guess i mean it in the sense of, across history have more people been killed by horse bites or by dog kicks?
0
Options
TehSlothHit Or MissI Guess They Never Miss, HuhRegistered Userregular
I had "Weight Training" in high school which was basically can you change clothes and then sit around and talk for an hour while holding dumbbells.
So [chat], me and my mum had an argument earlier. It was an important argument that needed to be had. Feelings were running high on both sides but we weren't able to settle it.
So I'm asking you [chat], what do you think is more likely; dying from a horse bite, or being kicked to death by a dog?
are you saying, are you more likely to die from one of those causes than the other, in the wide world? likelihood of being bitten/kicked being part of the question?
or like, with the info already given that you've been horse-bitten or dog-kicked, which is more likely to be lethal?
i guess i mean it in the sense of, across history have more people been killed by horse bites or by dog kicks?
Horse bites are actually kind of nasty.
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
So [chat], me and my mum had an argument earlier. It was an important argument that needed to be had. Feelings were running high on both sides but we weren't able to settle it.
So I'm asking you [chat], what do you think is more likely; dying from a horse bite, or being kicked to death by a dog?
are you saying, are you more likely to die from one of those causes than the other, in the wide world? likelihood of being bitten/kicked being part of the question?
or like, with the info already given that you've been horse-bitten or dog-kicked, which is more likely to be lethal?
i guess i mean it in the sense of, across history have more people been killed by horse bites or by dog kicks?
i think horse bites for sure. dogs are more diffuse and in greater numbers, but come on
So [chat], me and my mum had an argument earlier. It was an important argument that needed to be had. Feelings were running high on both sides but we weren't able to settle it.
So I'm asking you [chat], what do you think is more likely; dying from a horse bite, or being kicked to death by a dog?
are you saying, are you more likely to die from one of those causes than the other, in the wide world? likelihood of being bitten/kicked being part of the question?
or like, with the info already given that you've been horse-bitten or dog-kicked, which is more likely to be lethal?
i guess i mean it in the sense of, across history have more people been killed by horse bites or by dog kicks?
I feel like this is almost so obvious as to be a trick question, but I'll bite...
Horse bites, huge risk of infection, etc
"and the morning stars I have seen
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
0
Options
TTODewbackPuts the drawl in ya'llI think I'm in HellRegistered Userregular
So [chat], me and my mum had an argument earlier. It was an important argument that needed to be had. Feelings were running high on both sides but we weren't able to settle it.
So I'm asking you [chat], what do you think is more likely; dying from a horse bite, or being kicked to death by a dog?
are you saying, are you more likely to die from one of those causes than the other, in the wide world? likelihood of being bitten/kicked being part of the question?
or like, with the info already given that you've been horse-bitten or dog-kicked, which is more likely to be lethal?
i guess i mean it in the sense of, across history have more people been killed by horse bites or by dog kicks?
I would say that no one has ever been kicked to death by a dog.
So [chat], me and my mum had an argument earlier. It was an important argument that needed to be had. Feelings were running high on both sides but we weren't able to settle it.
So I'm asking you [chat], what do you think is more likely; dying from a horse bite, or being kicked to death by a dog?
are you saying, are you more likely to die from one of those causes than the other, in the wide world? likelihood of being bitten/kicked being part of the question?
or like, with the info already given that you've been horse-bitten or dog-kicked, which is more likely to be lethal?
i guess i mean it in the sense of, across history have more people been killed by horse bites or by dog kicks?
I would say that no one has ever been kicked to death by a dog.
plenty of people have had their nuts stomped by a bitch though
Posts
I do have the excuse in watching initially it on a work computer.
Now I get to go home and remedy that error.
Good day, gentlemen, ladies.
i love these videos they are the best
So, the thing I'm reading now argues not that you get "all weight loss shut down" from cutting calories, but that you end up failing to maintain that caloric level over the long term because of your body's reaction to the change.
I think I will pick up Dragon Warrior 4 again and see if I can stomach the "tactics" system.
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
I like it a lot! I mean, the weather part is lame. But dear God, the ale houses and pubs. Worth it.
So I'm asking you [chat], what do you think is more likely; dying from a horse bite, or being kicked to death by a dog?
1. Get a gym membership (and go, duh)
2. Start practicing a martial art.
3. Move to rural Japan
Easy-peasy people.
everyone was so fucking afraid of the two ogres in our class, one who was just freakishly big and one who had been held back once or twice
the second liked to torment kids -- one time his buddy knelt behind me and the ogre used him to trip me
there was a little wimpy kid who didn't like getting picked on who brought a screwdriver to PE one time and tried to stab him
all in all PE was pretty good though
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
100 duck-sized horses
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
no big deal, just some gang fights, whatevs
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
job make me fat and die
are you saying, are you more likely to die from one of those causes than the other, in the wide world? likelihood of being bitten/kicked being part of the question?
or like, with the info already given that you've been horse-bitten or dog-kicked, which is more likely to be lethal?
It went something like this: We have a regulatory risk department who are frequently excessively paranoid about record keeping requirements. One of their more ill-thought out ideas was the idea that amending any controlled document (which is most of them) without clearing the changes be made an instant regulatory audit fail (which is a fairly serious thing, two or three of them is enough to get you fired).
Then create controlled documents that are not fit for purpose but are required extremely frequently, and require any amendment (any amendment) to be pushed through a process that takes, conservatively, a fortnight.
Then act surprised when people start finding some extremely creative ways to get stuff done without recording any of it, which is, from any sane perspective more of a risk to our record keeping obligations than minor amendments to standard forms.
Losing weight is good. Losing it by screwing up the system is bad. The best research on dietary health needs to take place over not months, not even a year but over 5 to 10 year periods. Get a sense of how much people lost. Did they keep it off? Where there long term health side effects? Were there other mitigating factors that lead to the weightloss being temporary or permanent? During the period of weight loss was their a confounding event that lead to more weight loss than was expected? What about other factors such as vitamins and blood pressure during the weight loss period, before the weight loss period and afterwards.
In general I think dietary science due to funding and the crazy amount of confounding variables that you cannot control unless you Truman Show the participants will always give murky results. Especially when you considered the best ways we have that are allowed by most oversight committees to monitor food intake are all dependent on the participant being honest, remembering what they ate, or actually eating everything they buy on a shopping trip and so on it leads to meh data.
Okay back to finishing CDC fellowship letter of interest thing.
million dollar question
if he had Downs would you still call him an ogre
horse bite dude, come on
i mean, it's not even close
i guess i mean it in the sense of, across history have more people been killed by horse bites or by dog kicks?
twitch.tv/tehsloth
Skippy went to school with Crabb and Goyle.
Horse bites are actually kind of nasty.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
i think horse bites for sure. dogs are more diffuse and in greater numbers, but come on
I feel like this is almost so obvious as to be a trick question, but I'll bite...
Horse bites, huge risk of infection, etc
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
I had walk a couple of laps and then go take a nap. I had so many good naps in school.
I'd call him Spud since he can only count to potato
still here!
I would say that no one has ever been kicked to death by a dog.
i guess i did
sorry you were picked last?
Storms in Indiana caused a 40 car pileup with 20 tractor trailers
maybe i'm streaming terrible dj right now if i am its here
I dunno, I get the impression that some Greeks may have comingled with cave dwellers in the past.
Come Overwatch with meeeee
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jHNhFZhnMk
that's exactly what i said
i mean dogs legs don't even work that way, they can't kick you!
plenty of people have had their nuts stomped by a bitch though
am I right fellas
there were fights sometimes
no one got shot though
btw @bobcesca did u like how i did a bilingual pun to both say "i read this" and "this is legit"
because
any excuse to write legit................................... is legit