The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Insurgent Dogs [chat]

Donkey KongDonkey Kong Putting Nintendo out of business with AI nipsRegistered User regular
edited May 2013 in Debate and/or Discourse
«134567100

Posts

  • TTODewbackTTODewback Puts the drawl in ya'll I think I'm in HellRegistered User regular
    Thank you for revealing this conspiracy.

    Bless your heart.
  • Ravenhpltc24Ravenhpltc24 So Raven Registered User regular
    I am pleased with the recent trend of puppy [chat]. :D

    (V) ( ;,,; ) (V)
  • RMS OceanicRMS Oceanic Registered User regular
    Will shooting fish in a barrel.

    If the universe hated him, Geth would have recycled the thread on page 1000.

  • CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    how dare you dewy

    i am the classiest whore

  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    oklahoman_1950_06_25_headline.jpg

    aRkpc.gif
  • emnmnmeemnmnme Registered User regular
    @cambiata gave me my 777th awesome.

    Lucky 7's!

  • EddyEddy Gengar the Bittersweet Registered User regular
    I wonder how resource-rich a hypothetical south vietnam would have been

    We could have let it rot under a local sphere of influence (Nasser then Saudi Arabia for North Yemen) or been the big dicks on campus and hoped they came to heel (South Korea)

    "and the morning stars I have seen
    and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
  • Ravenhpltc24Ravenhpltc24 So Raven Registered User regular
    An even more classless show than COPS is blaring in the waiting room of the car service center right now. I've tried turning it down or off but the remote doesn't work. This is officially a loose working definiton of hell.

    (V) ( ;,,; ) (V)
  • matt has a problemmatt has a problem Points to 'off' Points to 'on'Registered User regular
    edited May 2013
    Irond Will wrote:
    well

    this is like objecting to giving a guy food stamps because what we really need to do is improve social mobility and opportunity and create a solid basis for sustainable economic security across the broad socio-economic spectrum

    which is great

    but meanwhile

    that dude needs to eat

    That's what I mean though, that's why you don't pull out. We'll never "defeat terror", if we pull out we've left a weakened state with a huge power vacuum and enemies more than willing to come right back and fill it and return things to how bad they use to be. Same thing that happened in the 80's with the Soviets and Afghanistan basically. So you stay, and fight the "war on terror", but what you're really doing is giving people the chance to rebuild. You take the lumps and get called invaders, but the end result is a country that can finally protect itself, and then you can leave.

    matt has a problem on
    nibXTE7.png
  • EriktheVikingGamerEriktheVikingGamer Registered User regular
    edited May 2013
    Hermit Crab thoughts:

    "Gawd. No privacy. Hard to move. Worst. House. Ever."

    EriktheVikingGamer on
    Steam - DailyFatigueBar
    FFXIV - Milliardo Beoulve/Sargatanas
  • Irond WillIrond Will WARNING: NO HURTFUL COMMENTS, PLEASE!!!!! Cambridge. MAModerator Mod Emeritus
    Everyone knows the one true goal of US military action overseas is to turn the native stray dog population racist.

    soldier-feeds-stray-dogs-overseas--large-msg-135553446697.jpg

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JU8omT2TsE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okCQitzecuI

    man

    you never see anyone having that kind of life-affirming fun with cats

    Wqdwp8l.png
  • Ravenhpltc24Ravenhpltc24 So Raven Registered User regular
    Show has been identified as "Las Vegas Jailhouse." :l

    (V) ( ;,,; ) (V)
  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    edited May 2013
    a country that can protect itself is hideously expensive, and the degree of bloodshed needed for a central government to exert authority is no longer consistent with the degree of external support needed

    unless you do the Hong Kong thing and barricade yourself into a coastal area, abandoning the rest of the country. then your population gets over-represented by the Western-sympathetic minority

    ronya on
    aRkpc.gif
  • Irond WillIrond Will WARNING: NO HURTFUL COMMENTS, PLEASE!!!!! Cambridge. MAModerator Mod Emeritus
    Will shooting fish in a barrel.

    If the universe hated him, Geth would have recycled the thread on page 1000.

    yeah i took it safe this time

    Wqdwp8l.png
  • Donkey KongDonkey Kong Putting Nintendo out of business with AI nips Registered User regular
    edited May 2013
    Irond Will wrote: »
    Everyone knows the one true goal of US military action overseas is to turn the native stray dog population racist.

    soldier-feeds-stray-dogs-overseas--large-msg-135553446697.jpg

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JU8omT2TsE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okCQitzecuI

    man

    you never see anyone having that kind of life-affirming fun with cats

    It depends. How life-affirming and fun is it for you when an animal jumps on to your lap unbidden and shoves its asshole in your face.

    Donkey Kong on
    Thousands of hot, local singles are waiting to play at bubbulon.com.
  • EriktheVikingGamerEriktheVikingGamer Registered User regular
    edited May 2013
    Irond Will wrote:
    well

    this is like objecting to giving a guy food stamps because what we really need to do is improve social mobility and opportunity and create a solid basis for sustainable economic security across the broad socio-economic spectrum

    which is great

    but meanwhile

    that dude needs to eat

    That's what I mean though, that's why you don't pull out. We'll never "defeat terror", if we pull out we've left a weakened state with a huge power vacuum and enemies more than willing to come right back and fill it and return things to how bad they use to be. Same thing that happened in the 80's with the Soviets and Afghanistan basically. So you stay, and fight the "war on terror", but what you're really doing is giving people the chance to rebuild. You take the lumps and get called invaders, but the end result is a country that can finally protect itself, and then you can leave.
    Kind of like Iraq...

    What, you say there has been even more bombings recently? How odd.

    Granted, I'm not entirely disagreeing with you as far as potentially helping nations rebuild. But we've been doing way too much of that, in all the wrong ways, and for all the wrong reasons.

    EriktheVikingGamer on
    Steam - DailyFatigueBar
    FFXIV - Milliardo Beoulve/Sargatanas
  • Irond WillIrond Will WARNING: NO HURTFUL COMMENTS, PLEASE!!!!! Cambridge. MAModerator Mod Emeritus
    Geth recycle the thread on page 100

    Wqdwp8l.png
  • GethGeth Legion Perseus VeilRegistered User, Moderator, Penny Arcade Staff, Vanilla Staff vanilla
    Affirmative Irond Will. Thread will be recycled after 100 pages.

  • matt has a problemmatt has a problem Points to 'off' Points to 'on'Registered User regular
    If Israel actually attacks Russian shipments of weapons to Syria I'm taking a week off work just to watch the news.

    nibXTE7.png
  • Irond WillIrond Will WARNING: NO HURTFUL COMMENTS, PLEASE!!!!! Cambridge. MAModerator Mod Emeritus
    Irond Will wrote: »
    Everyone knows the one true goal of US military action overseas is to turn the native stray dog population racist.

    soldier-feeds-stray-dogs-overseas--large-msg-135553446697.jpg

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JU8omT2TsE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okCQitzecuI

    man

    you never see anyone having that kind of life-affirming fun with cats

    It depends. How life-affirming and fun is it to have an animal jump on to your lab unbidden and shove its asshole in your face.

    well there is that

    i guess it sort of depends on your stance on buttholes

    Wqdwp8l.png
  • Rear Admiral ChocoRear Admiral Choco I wanna be an owl, Jerry! Owl York CityRegistered User regular
    Man one drink that just makes me all warm and fuzzy inside is a Caesar

    Just made a couple with my late lunch and it's awesome

  • matt has a problemmatt has a problem Points to 'off' Points to 'on'Registered User regular
    Irond Will wrote:
    well

    this is like objecting to giving a guy food stamps because what we really need to do is improve social mobility and opportunity and create a solid basis for sustainable economic security across the broad socio-economic spectrum

    which is great

    but meanwhile

    that dude needs to eat

    That's what I mean though, that's why you don't pull out. We'll never "defeat terror", if we pull out we've left a weakened state with a huge power vacuum and enemies more than willing to come right back and fill it and return things to how bad they use to be. Same thing that happened in the 80's with the Soviets and Afghanistan basically. So you stay, and fight the "war on terror", but what you're really doing is giving people the chance to rebuild. You take the lumps and get called invaders, but the end result is a country that can finally protect itself, and then you can leave.
    Kind of like Iraq...

    What, you say there has been even more bombings recently? How odd.

    Granted, I'm not entirely disagreeing with you as far as potentially helping nations rebuild. But we've been doing way too much of that, in all the wrong ways, and for all the wrong reasons.

    We don't need to rebuild necessarily, we need to be the fence to keep the wolves away while the sheep figure things out. But "our troops are dying protecting the Iraqi population and we're getting nothing for it" doesn't make a good talking point.

    nibXTE7.png
  • Irond WillIrond Will WARNING: NO HURTFUL COMMENTS, PLEASE!!!!! Cambridge. MAModerator Mod Emeritus
    Irond Will wrote:
    well

    this is like objecting to giving a guy food stamps because what we really need to do is improve social mobility and opportunity and create a solid basis for sustainable economic security across the broad socio-economic spectrum

    which is great

    but meanwhile

    that dude needs to eat

    That's what I mean though, that's why you don't pull out. We'll never "defeat terror", if we pull out we've left a weakened state with a huge power vacuum and enemies more than willing to come right back and fill it and return things to how bad they use to be. Same thing that happened in the 80's with the Soviets and Afghanistan basically. So you stay, and fight the "war on terror", but what you're really doing is giving people the chance to rebuild. You take the lumps and get called invaders, but the end result is a country that can finally protect itself, and then you can leave.
    Kind of like Iraq...

    What, you say there has been even more bombings recently? How odd.

    Granted, I'm not entirely disagreeing with you as far as potentially helping nations rebuild. But we've been doing way too much of that, in all the wrong ways, and for all the wrong reasons.

    south korea worked out all right, and it's not a terrible terrible analog for long-term nationbuilding.

    of course, they were a very expensive dysfunctional shithole military dictatorship until the late 90s.

    and then suddenly they were japan jr, like overnight

    Wqdwp8l.png
  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    Irond Will wrote: »
    Irond Will wrote:
    well

    this is like objecting to giving a guy food stamps because what we really need to do is improve social mobility and opportunity and create a solid basis for sustainable economic security across the broad socio-economic spectrum

    which is great

    but meanwhile

    that dude needs to eat

    That's what I mean though, that's why you don't pull out. We'll never "defeat terror", if we pull out we've left a weakened state with a huge power vacuum and enemies more than willing to come right back and fill it and return things to how bad they use to be. Same thing that happened in the 80's with the Soviets and Afghanistan basically. So you stay, and fight the "war on terror", but what you're really doing is giving people the chance to rebuild. You take the lumps and get called invaders, but the end result is a country that can finally protect itself, and then you can leave.
    Kind of like Iraq...

    What, you say there has been even more bombings recently? How odd.

    Granted, I'm not entirely disagreeing with you as far as potentially helping nations rebuild. But we've been doing way too much of that, in all the wrong ways, and for all the wrong reasons.

    south korea worked out all right, and it's not a terrible terrible analog for long-term nationbuilding.

    of course, they were a very expensive dysfunctional shithole military dictatorship until the late 90s.

    and then suddenly they were japan jr, like overnight

    korean economic miracle predated liberalization

    aRkpc.gif
  • Irond WillIrond Will WARNING: NO HURTFUL COMMENTS, PLEASE!!!!! Cambridge. MAModerator Mod Emeritus
    Man one drink that just makes me all warm and fuzzy inside is a Caesar

    Just made a couple with my late lunch and it's awesome

    what is a caesar?

    is it what canadians call gravy & 7-up?

    Wqdwp8l.png
  • MazzyxMazzyx Comedy Gold Registered User regular
    Eddy wrote: »
    I wonder how resource-rich a hypothetical south vietnam would have been

    We could have let it rot under a local sphere of influence (Nasser then Saudi Arabia for North Yemen) or been the big dicks on campus and hoped they came to heel (South Korea)

    Majority of Vietnam's resource wealth is relatively new and mostly in the ocean.

    I would say there is a chance it could of gone the South Korea route but Park's government was much more in a position to hold ground than the South Vietnamese.

    Top of that North Vietnam at least till 1969 and the death of Ho Chi Minh were not a standard communist/maoist movement. Though I would say their legitimacy was more like the CCP's due to their success against the French.

    A more interesting version would of been backing Ho Chi Minh after WWII when he first came to the US asking for resources to build US style government. He only went to the Soviets after we rejected him for "communist" ties and wanting to appease the French who after WWII could of gone either way.

    u7stthr17eud.png
  • matt has a problemmatt has a problem Points to 'off' Points to 'on'Registered User regular
    Irond Will wrote: »
    Man one drink that just makes me all warm and fuzzy inside is a Caesar

    Just made a couple with my late lunch and it's awesome

    what is a caesar?

    is it what canadians call gravy & 7-up?

    Gravy and Moscato d'Asti.

    nibXTE7.png
  • MazzyxMazzyx Comedy Gold Registered User regular
    ronya wrote: »
    Irond Will wrote: »
    Irond Will wrote:
    well

    this is like objecting to giving a guy food stamps because what we really need to do is improve social mobility and opportunity and create a solid basis for sustainable economic security across the broad socio-economic spectrum

    which is great

    but meanwhile

    that dude needs to eat

    That's what I mean though, that's why you don't pull out. We'll never "defeat terror", if we pull out we've left a weakened state with a huge power vacuum and enemies more than willing to come right back and fill it and return things to how bad they use to be. Same thing that happened in the 80's with the Soviets and Afghanistan basically. So you stay, and fight the "war on terror", but what you're really doing is giving people the chance to rebuild. You take the lumps and get called invaders, but the end result is a country that can finally protect itself, and then you can leave.
    Kind of like Iraq...

    What, you say there has been even more bombings recently? How odd.

    Granted, I'm not entirely disagreeing with you as far as potentially helping nations rebuild. But we've been doing way too much of that, in all the wrong ways, and for all the wrong reasons.

    south korea worked out all right, and it's not a terrible terrible analog for long-term nationbuilding.

    of course, they were a very expensive dysfunctional shithole military dictatorship until the late 90s.

    and then suddenly they were japan jr, like overnight

    korean economic miracle predated liberalization

    Japan Jr. is a good description but we all forget Japan was a one party system most of the last 60 years and did most of its industrializing under an Prussian style monarchy.

    u7stthr17eud.png
  • matt has a problemmatt has a problem Points to 'off' Points to 'on'Registered User regular
    Mazzyx wrote: »
    Eddy wrote: »
    I wonder how resource-rich a hypothetical south vietnam would have been

    We could have let it rot under a local sphere of influence (Nasser then Saudi Arabia for North Yemen) or been the big dicks on campus and hoped they came to heel (South Korea)

    Majority of Vietnam's resource wealth is relatively new and mostly in the ocean.

    I would say there is a chance it could of gone the South Korea route but Park's government was much more in a position to hold ground than the South Vietnamese.

    Top of that North Vietnam at least till 1969 and the death of Ho Chi Minh were not a standard communist/maoist movement. Though I would say their legitimacy was more like the CCP's due to their success against the French.

    A more interesting version would of been backing Ho Chi Minh after WWII when he first came to the US asking for resources to build US style government. He only went to the Soviets after we rejected him for "communist" ties and wanting to appease the French who after WWII could of gone either way.

    Iran could've literally been our best friend if we hadn't overthrown their government and installed a murderous psychopath as the leader...

    nibXTE7.png
  • ThomamelasThomamelas Only one man can kill this many Russians. Bring his guitar to me! Registered User regular
    Mazzyx wrote: »
    Eddy wrote: »
    I wonder how resource-rich a hypothetical south vietnam would have been

    We could have let it rot under a local sphere of influence (Nasser then Saudi Arabia for North Yemen) or been the big dicks on campus and hoped they came to heel (South Korea)

    Majority of Vietnam's resource wealth is relatively new and mostly in the ocean.

    I would say there is a chance it could of gone the South Korea route but Park's government was much more in a position to hold ground than the South Vietnamese.

    Top of that North Vietnam at least till 1969 and the death of Ho Chi Minh were not a standard communist/maoist movement. Though I would say their legitimacy was more like the CCP's due to their success against the French.

    A more interesting version would of been backing Ho Chi Minh after WWII when he first came to the US asking for resources to build US style government. He only went to the Soviets after we rejected him for "communist" ties and wanting to appease the French who after WWII could of gone either way.

    Not one of our better diplomatic moves.

  • BeNarwhalBeNarwhal The Work Left Unfinished Registered User regular
    Man one drink that just makes me all warm and fuzzy inside is a Caesar

    Just made a couple with my late lunch and it's awesome

    Late lunch? It's 5pm!

    #AbolishTheMealSystem

  • Irond WillIrond Will WARNING: NO HURTFUL COMMENTS, PLEASE!!!!! Cambridge. MAModerator Mod Emeritus
    ronya wrote: »
    Irond Will wrote: »
    Irond Will wrote:
    well

    this is like objecting to giving a guy food stamps because what we really need to do is improve social mobility and opportunity and create a solid basis for sustainable economic security across the broad socio-economic spectrum

    which is great

    but meanwhile

    that dude needs to eat

    That's what I mean though, that's why you don't pull out. We'll never "defeat terror", if we pull out we've left a weakened state with a huge power vacuum and enemies more than willing to come right back and fill it and return things to how bad they use to be. Same thing that happened in the 80's with the Soviets and Afghanistan basically. So you stay, and fight the "war on terror", but what you're really doing is giving people the chance to rebuild. You take the lumps and get called invaders, but the end result is a country that can finally protect itself, and then you can leave.
    Kind of like Iraq...

    What, you say there has been even more bombings recently? How odd.

    Granted, I'm not entirely disagreeing with you as far as potentially helping nations rebuild. But we've been doing way too much of that, in all the wrong ways, and for all the wrong reasons.

    south korea worked out all right, and it's not a terrible terrible analog for long-term nationbuilding.

    of course, they were a very expensive dysfunctional shithole military dictatorship until the late 90s.

    and then suddenly they were japan jr, like overnight

    korean economic miracle predated liberalization

    yeah it must have. like, in college in the 90s i knew some kids who graduated from the ROK army to study abroad in the US and god did they have tough lives.

    and then a few years later i would meet korean immigrants that came from decidedly modern bourgeois backgrounds that were basically indistinguishable from upper-middle class kids anywhere.

    did korea basically follow the same economic development model as japan & taiwan?

    Wqdwp8l.png
  • CambiataCambiata Commander Shepard The likes of which even GAWD has never seenRegistered User regular
    emnmnme wrote: »
    @cambiata gave me my 777th awesome.

    Lucky 7's!

    That Ethiopian kids hacking tablets story was amazing.

    "excuse my French
    But fuck you — no, fuck y'all, that's as blunt as it gets"
    - Kendrick Lamar, "The Blacker the Berry"
  • Element BrianElement Brian Peanut Butter Shill Registered User regular
    my friend started an okCupid account and the first message she got was from some guy asking if he could pay her to let him go down on her

    so yeah that lasted about 9 minutes.

    and now she is skeptical about my intentions for using it

    Switch FC code:SW-2130-4285-0059

    Arch,
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_goGR39m2k
  • MazzyxMazzyx Comedy Gold Registered User regular
    Mazzyx wrote: »
    Eddy wrote: »
    I wonder how resource-rich a hypothetical south vietnam would have been

    We could have let it rot under a local sphere of influence (Nasser then Saudi Arabia for North Yemen) or been the big dicks on campus and hoped they came to heel (South Korea)

    Majority of Vietnam's resource wealth is relatively new and mostly in the ocean.

    I would say there is a chance it could of gone the South Korea route but Park's government was much more in a position to hold ground than the South Vietnamese.

    Top of that North Vietnam at least till 1969 and the death of Ho Chi Minh were not a standard communist/maoist movement. Though I would say their legitimacy was more like the CCP's due to their success against the French.

    A more interesting version would of been backing Ho Chi Minh after WWII when he first came to the US asking for resources to build US style government. He only went to the Soviets after we rejected him for "communist" ties and wanting to appease the French who after WWII could of gone either way.

    Iran could've literally been our best friend if we hadn't overthrown their government and installed a murderous psychopath as the leader...

    Probably would of been less best friend but more would talk to us and lean towards us over Russia.

    But really that is proof of nationalizing ones oil holdings from the British and the US is a bad idea.

    u7stthr17eud.png
  • matt has a problemmatt has a problem Points to 'off' Points to 'on'Registered User regular
    my friend started an okCupid account and the first message she got was from some guy asking if he could pay her to let him go down on her

    so yeah that lasted about 9 minutes.

    and now she is skeptical about my intentions for using it

    I'd say she knows exactly why you use it.

    nibXTE7.png
  • DeebaserDeebaser on my way to work in a suit and a tie Ahhhh...come on fucking guyRegistered User regular
    Oh no. My bosses boss stopped by and he saw that I was wearing gym socks.

    I want to die

  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    Mazzyx wrote: »
    Eddy wrote: »
    I wonder how resource-rich a hypothetical south vietnam would have been

    We could have let it rot under a local sphere of influence (Nasser then Saudi Arabia for North Yemen) or been the big dicks on campus and hoped they came to heel (South Korea)

    Majority of Vietnam's resource wealth is relatively new and mostly in the ocean.

    I would say there is a chance it could of gone the South Korea route but Park's government was much more in a position to hold ground than the South Vietnamese.

    Top of that North Vietnam at least till 1969 and the death of Ho Chi Minh were not a standard communist/maoist movement. Though I would say their legitimacy was more like the CCP's due to their success against the French.

    A more interesting version would of been backing Ho Chi Minh after WWII when he first came to the US asking for resources to build US style government. He only went to the Soviets after we rejected him for "communist" ties and wanting to appease the French who after WWII could of gone either way.

    Rhee was a basketcase on the level of Diem, so it's hard to tell what would've happened

    the US manhandling the transition from colonialism seems like a frequent occurrence, actually. the British had a willingness to pick promising winners and then back them with firepower.

    aRkpc.gif
  • AngelHedgieAngelHedgie Registered User regular
    my friend started an okCupid account and the first message she got was from some guy asking if he could pay her to let him go down on her

    so yeah that lasted about 9 minutes.

    and now she is skeptical about my intentions for using it

    And once again, the internet lives down to its reputation.

    XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum / Steam: noxaeternum
This discussion has been closed.