The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

According to this week's Entertainment Weekly, The top Science Fiction TV series is..

Ronin356Ronin356 Nowhere MORegistered User regular
Buffy the Vampire Slayer?

And they didn't even put Babylon 5 in the list. I just don't know what to say to these people.

EW, don't you know what Science Fiction is and is not?
I'm just a little pissed at them. Okay, maybe more than that.
Where are the pitchforks and torches?

Nobody sees a flower really; it is so small. We haven't time, and to see takes time - like to have a friend takes time.
Georgia O'Keeffe
Be sure to like my Comic Book "Last Words" on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Last-Words-The-Comic-Book/458405034287767
and Magenta the Witchgirl!: http://www.drunkduck.com/Magenta_the_Witchgirl/



«1

Posts

  • DurkhanusDurkhanus Commander Registered User regular
    I like Buffy.

    Couldn't get through the second episode of Babylon 5 before walking away. But, it wasn't as bad as Dune. Dune puts me to sleep exactly 20 minutes in. Every time.

  • ZxerolZxerol for the smaller pieces, my shovel wouldn't do so i took off my boot and used my shoeRegistered User regular
    There's no pitchforks and torches because anyone reasonable doesn't give a damn what EW thinks is or is not the best sci-fi whatever.

  • Ronin356Ronin356 Nowhere MORegistered User regular
    edited June 2013
    Zxerol wrote: »
    There's no pitchforks and torches because anyone reasonable doesn't give a damn what EW thinks is or is not the best sci-fi whatever.

    It still bothers me. It seems to me like a bad typo. I want it to be fix, regardless if I care about their opinions or not.

    Ronin356 on
    Nobody sees a flower really; it is so small. We haven't time, and to see takes time - like to have a friend takes time.
    Georgia O'Keeffe
    Be sure to like my Comic Book "Last Words" on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Last-Words-The-Comic-Book/458405034287767
    and Magenta the Witchgirl!: http://www.drunkduck.com/Magenta_the_Witchgirl/



  • Golden YakGolden Yak Burnished Bovine The sunny beaches of CanadaRegistered User regular
    Is it science fiction? It's all magic and demons and stuff. Modern fantasy, maybe?

    H9f4bVe.png
  • NobodyNobody Registered User regular
    Golden Yak wrote: »
    Is it science fiction? It's all magic and demons and stuff. Modern fantasy, maybe?

    It kinda dips in on occasion, like with the robotic duplicates, but that'd be a weak justification.

  • InvisibleInvisible Registered User regular
    edited June 2013
    EW is well terrible. They could say the sky is blue and I would question their judgement.

    That said, Buffy is good. I don't consider it sci-fi, but whatever. I mean it has elements of it, but they're minor and it would be like saying Law and Order is the best medical drama because parts of some episodes happen in hospitals.

    Invisible on
  • Harry DresdenHarry Dresden Registered User regular
    Does EW know what the difference between fantasy and sci-fi? I love Buffy but it's fantasy.
    Golden Yak wrote: »
    Is it science fiction? It's all magic and demons and stuff. Modern fantasy, maybe?

    Urban fantasy.

  • Regina FongRegina Fong Allons-y, Alonso Registered User regular
    Seconding urban fantasy. It's a sub-genre of fantasy, and pretty popular actually.

  • Harry DresdenHarry Dresden Registered User regular
    Seconding urban fantasy. It's a sub-genre of fantasy, and pretty popular actually.

    Buffy was my introduction to that genre. It wasn't until I started reading novels that I noticed that was it was urban fantasy. :)

  • FrankiedarlingFrankiedarling Registered User regular
    Technically speaking, Buffy is the best everything. I'd nod if someone told me it was the best Batman movie.

  • IncenjucarIncenjucar VChatter Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    Are those more-correct categories actually options? Book stores used to mostly cram sci-fi and fantasy together...

  • [Tycho?][Tycho?] As elusive as doubt Registered User regular
    Entertainment Weekly? The fuck is that?

    mvaYcgc.jpg
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    Every top ten list or claim that a particular piece of culture is the best in its genre is lame.

  • Wraith260Wraith260 Happiest Goomba! Registered User regular
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    Are those more-correct categories actually options? Book stores used to mostly cram sci-fi and fantasy together...

    yeah, sci-fi and fantasy are generally lumped together in most cases so its hardly surprising when one is used as a catch all term. also you could argue that season 4 of Buffy had a leaning towards sci-fi, though i'd hardly use that in the shows favor.

  • Ronin356Ronin356 Nowhere MORegistered User regular
    edited June 2013
    [Tycho?] wrote: »
    Entertainment Weekly? The fuck is that?

    This magazine right here:
    http://www.ew.com/ew/

    Ronin356 on
    Nobody sees a flower really; it is so small. We haven't time, and to see takes time - like to have a friend takes time.
    Georgia O'Keeffe
    Be sure to like my Comic Book "Last Words" on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Last-Words-The-Comic-Book/458405034287767
    and Magenta the Witchgirl!: http://www.drunkduck.com/Magenta_the_Witchgirl/



  • Kane Red RobeKane Red Robe Master of Magic ArcanusRegistered User regular
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    Are those more-correct categories actually options? Book stores used to mostly cram sci-fi and fantasy together...

    Sure the main section is called "Science Fiction & Fantasy," but that's because the people that read one of those are pretty likely to want to read the other. Despite that though there are definitely sub-genres of the books placed there and urban fantasy is definitely one of them.

  • Ronin356Ronin356 Nowhere MORegistered User regular
    edited June 2013
    "Lost" is also on the list as well.
    I'm not sure that Firefly even made the list. Same thing with Eureka.

    Some of the stuff on the SyFi channel is really a mixed bag. I do enjoy watching Warehouse 13, and one could make the case that the show is Urban Fantasy (To be honest Warehouse 13 is in a barren place in South Dakota, far far away from any well known city.)

    Ronin356 on
    Nobody sees a flower really; it is so small. We haven't time, and to see takes time - like to have a friend takes time.
    Georgia O'Keeffe
    Be sure to like my Comic Book "Last Words" on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Last-Words-The-Comic-Book/458405034287767
    and Magenta the Witchgirl!: http://www.drunkduck.com/Magenta_the_Witchgirl/



  • Harry DresdenHarry Dresden Registered User regular
    Ronin356 wrote: »
    "Lost" is also on the list as well.
    I'm not sure that Firefly even made the list. Same thing with Eureka.

    Some of the stuff on the SyFi channel is really a mixed bag. I do enjoy watching Warehouse 13, and one could make the case that the show is Urban Fantasy (To be honest Warehouse 13 is in a barren place in South Dakota, far far away from any well known city.)

    Lost is science fiction so that deserves to be on the list. Warehouse 13 is both science fiction and science fantasy.

  • ShivahnShivahn Unaware of her barrel shifter privilege Western coastal temptressRegistered User, Moderator mod
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    Are those more-correct categories actually options? Book stores used to mostly cram sci-fi and fantasy together...

    Sure the main section is called "Science Fiction & Fantasy," but that's because the people that read one of those are pretty likely to want to read the other. Despite that though there are definitely sub-genres of the books placed there and urban fantasy is definitely one of them.

    Sci-fi and fantasy tend to be very similar in theme, too. And have similar tropes and stuff.

    Sometimes they're practically indistinguishable. Look at Star Wars. It has elements of both and nothing seems particularly out of place.

  • Harry DresdenHarry Dresden Registered User regular
    Shivahn wrote: »
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    Incenjucar wrote: »
    Are those more-correct categories actually options? Book stores used to mostly cram sci-fi and fantasy together...

    Sure the main section is called "Science Fiction & Fantasy," but that's because the people that read one of those are pretty likely to want to read the other. Despite that though there are definitely sub-genres of the books placed there and urban fantasy is definitely one of them.

    Sci-fi and fantasy tend to be very similar in theme, too. And have similar tropes and stuff.

    Sometimes they're practically indistinguishable. Look at Star Wars. It has elements of both and nothing seems particularly out of place.

    Space fantasy. :)

  • Wraith260Wraith260 Happiest Goomba! Registered User regular
    ok if we really want to mix and match or break apart the genres all we need to do is look at Star Wars. its already been mentioned but people tend to tread lightly around it.

    at its most basic its fantasy. it even start with the classic fairy tale opening, 'once upon a time, in a far away land'*. however, its setting gives it veneer of sci-fi, despite there being nothing scientific about it.

    at no point is Star Wars actually sci-fi, but its never called fantasy.

    *'Along time ago, in a galaxy far far away'

  • SchrodingerSchrodinger Registered User regular
    Technically, isn't all fiction a fantasy of some form?

    And Buffy is SciFi because of robots.

  • Harry DresdenHarry Dresden Registered User regular
    Technically, isn't all fiction a fantasy of some form?

    And Buffy is SciFi because of robots.

    The sci-fi aspects aren't the primary genre the show is about. I guess it also could be called science fantasy if we include them in the show's genre.

  • Solomaxwell6Solomaxwell6 Registered User regular
    edited June 2013
    Edit: Wrong thread.

    Solomaxwell6 on
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    Durkhanus wrote: »
    I like Buffy.

    Couldn't get through the second episode of Babylon 5 before walking away. But, it wasn't as bad as Dune. Dune puts me to sleep exactly 20 minutes in. Every time.

    I accept, on the testimony of others whose opinions I trust, that B5's story was excellent.

    The TV show was awful - as in, all the things that turn a screenplay into a TV show. The actors, the set and costume design, the special effects.

    Hollywood seems reboot-crazy. If there's any IP aching for a reboot, B5 is it.

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    Ronin356 wrote: »
    [Tycho?] wrote: »
    Entertainment Weekly? The fuck is that?

    This magazine right here:
    http://www.ew.com/ew/

    ew ew

    Ew ew ew ew ewewewewewewewew

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • FrankiedarlingFrankiedarling Registered User regular
    I protest, B5 was fantastic. It took a little getting used to, but it certain ranks in the top 20 TV shows for me.

  • NoughtNought Registered User regular
    Feral wrote: »
    Durkhanus wrote: »
    I like Buffy.

    Couldn't get through the second episode of Babylon 5 before walking away. But, it wasn't as bad as Dune. Dune puts me to sleep exactly 20 minutes in. Every time.

    I accept, on the testimony of others whose opinions I trust, that B5's story was excellent.

    The TV show was awful - as in, all the things that turn a screenplay into a TV show. The actors, the set and costume design, the special effects.

    Hollywood seems reboot-crazy. If there's any IP aching for a reboot, B5 is it.

    Rebooting B5 would be a terrible idea. Try reading any part of the B5 thread to find out why.
    Most if the actors were great, sets and costumes were better then could be expected from the budget. And the cgi is better than the shit in Defiance.

    The only modern show element that B5 would benifit from is the fact that season long story arcs are accepted now, but B5 already got away with a story that spanned the whole show.

    But if you remade it now it would be forced to include 20 somethings in skintight t-shirts and angsty teenagers. It would loose alle the charm and suffer if it was not allowed to complete it's storyline before cancellation.

    On fire
    .
    Island. Being on fire.
  • EchoEcho ski-bap ba-dapModerator, Administrator admin
    I recall reading somewhere that LotR was called "science fiction" because the "fantasy" term wasn't coined yet. Don't take my word for that though.

  • AbsalonAbsalon Lands of Always WinterRegistered User regular
    EW? Ew.

  • jungleroomxjungleroomx It's never too many graves, it's always not enough shovels Registered User regular
    Phineas and Ferb is more sci-fi than Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

  • GreeperGreeper Registered User regular
    Phineas and Ferb is more sci-fi than Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

    I would argue that Phineas and Ferb is actually pretty sci-fi, in a Fringe-for-kids kind of way

  • RichyRichy Registered User regular
    [Tycho?] wrote: »
    Entertainment Weekly? The fuck is that?

    According to itself, it's #1 on its own list of best weekly entertainment magazines.

    sig.gif
  • LanzLanz ...Za?Registered User regular
    This is a very odd way of spelling "Orphan Black," EW

    waNkm4k.jpg?1
  • Ronin356Ronin356 Nowhere MORegistered User regular
    Lanz wrote: »
    This is a very odd way of spelling "Orphan Black," EW

    If it was Orphan Black, I would be a little bit understanding.
    The writers on that show really have a good grasp of what makes a compelling story.

    Nobody sees a flower really; it is so small. We haven't time, and to see takes time - like to have a friend takes time.
    Georgia O'Keeffe
    Be sure to like my Comic Book "Last Words" on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Last-Words-The-Comic-Book/458405034287767
    and Magenta the Witchgirl!: http://www.drunkduck.com/Magenta_the_Witchgirl/



  • JibbaJibba Registered User regular
    edited July 2013
    Roman is so pissed right now.

    EDIT: Can't believe Starz made YT take down the clip with Roman and the hooker. :/

    Jibba on
  • Harry DresdenHarry Dresden Registered User regular
    edited July 2013
    Wraith260 wrote: »
    ok if we really want to mix and match or break apart the genres all we need to do is look at Star Wars. its already been mentioned but people tend to tread lightly around it.

    Not all people tread lightly around its genre.
    at its most basic its fantasy. it even start with the classic fairy tale opening, 'once upon a time, in a far away land'*. however, its setting gives it veneer of sci-fi, despite there being nothing scientific about it.

    Fantasy isn't all Star Wars is. Having a fairy tale opening doesn't mean its advanced technology ceases to be sci-fi by definition. The movies having plots similar to fantasy epics isn't all that is required to categorize an IP by genre. Setting is an enormous factor in that and the Star Wars universe setting is literally crawling with science fiction concepts with its technology. Space ships, faster than light space travel, laser guns, force-fields, technological death machines (Sun Crusher, Death Star etc), tractor beams, mechanical vehicles that don't exist (AT-AT walkers, speeders), artificial limbs, cyborgs, highly advanced robots - the list is never ending. All qualify as sci-fi inventions. This isn't a veneer the IP is drowning in sci-fi tropes. The fact the universe also has a sophisticated fantasy component with The Force doesn't mean those inventions cease to be relevant in the IP's genre. There is a genre that fits all of the above in one setting, which is space fantasy. WarHammer 40k fits, as well, and Buffy to a lesser degree.
    at no point is Star Wars actually sci-fi, but its never called fantasy.

    *'Along time ago, in a galaxy far far away'

    Except for Empire Strikes Back which is listed under sci-fi all the Star Wars movies on IMDB are listed under both the sci-fi and fantasy genres. I don't know why you think it's never been called fantasy or sci-fi before. If that was the case genre categories mean nothing and I disagree that's what's going on with Star Wars.

    Harry Dresden on
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    The genre argument is kind of lame. I mean, categorizations are useful to a point, but that point typically doesn't make it as far as arguing about it.

    It all falls into the realm of speculative fiction. It involves asking "what if...?" and then exploring that question. Imagine some fundamental aspect of the world was different - there's dragons! there's magic! there's time-travel! there's ghosts! - and then tell a story around that.

    So getting away from the genre argument, how good is Buffy? I'd say it was pretty fantastic. While I may not stick it at the top of a list of spec-fic series, it's good enough that I wouldn't think the list's author was smoking something.

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • KingofMadCowsKingofMadCows Registered User regular
    Well, here's what Arthur C. Clarke had to say about such matters:
    There are purists who say that Star Trek isn't science fiction, but science fantasy -- and they have a point. Genuine science fiction should describe things that could happen according to present knowledge, and today we are fairly certain that we won't be able to dash from one star system to another in time for the next week's episode. We can also be sure that the inhabitants of other worlds won't look anything like human beings -- or speak fluent American.

    But we have to remember that much that once seemed fantasy has now become fact. Seventy years ago, if anyone had written a story in which a whole city was destroyed by banging two small pieces of metal together, virtually all physicists would have said: "Utter nonsense!" Yet this is how the greatest of wars was ended in 1945. Today there are many other examples of my Third Law: ‘Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic’ (I’m amused to hear from a friend that the villain Lex Luthor utters these very words in the latest Superman movie, which I haven’t yet seen. My agents will be following this up.)

    http://startrek40.blogspot.com/2006/09/forty-years-of-star-trek-by-arthur-c_07.html

    Also, Star Trek should be on the top of that list. Yes, it has a lot of flaws but people always forget just how influential it was.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D20VGaQBLV8

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLOZxOo5Czo

  • DiannaoChongDiannaoChong Registered User regular
    Ronin356 wrote: »
    [Tycho?] wrote: »
    Entertainment Weekly? The fuck is that?

    This magazine right here:
    http://www.ew.com/ew/

    Maga-what? who-zine?

    steam_sig.png
Sign In or Register to comment.