The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent
vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums
here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules
document is now in effect.
All will [chat] me, and despair
Posts
exciting when a mets player is actually really good
Even worse than Shaz's "im tired and posting from bed" OP.
you should feel bad.
Let's play Mario Kart or something...
ALL OF YOU WITH YOUR BUTTS UP YOUR THUMBS
also thank you @gim and @casual eddy for linking those things
this is not an issue I have thought about much in relation to my own wishes
Last chat OP was just a youtube video. But I was slightly unprepared.
Top ten worst maybe. We've had some "Here is a chat" OPs.
and like how not only is it expensive but also the side effects are horrible, like lots of times you never have an erection again and maybe can't walk and some other stuff
and so maybe if you get prostate cancer, and most men will eventually (?), it is just better to go down with the ship rather than going the surgery route
am I right?
godddddddddddddddamnitttttttt.
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
Just think of it like a big death panel that saves tons of money. That seems to comfort portions of [chat].
No. It's more like astromech droid panels.
No, what I am proposing is a team of doctors deciding if a patient's care is really in their best interest. If a procedure is going to cost a million dollars and have virtually no chance of extending a patient's life, and WILL cause pain and suffering, to say the government will not pay for that procedure. A team of doctors, who have no profit motive, who have no budget, who suffer no retribution if they say "yeah go ahead and do everything".
That is my position. That is the position of most government run health institutions. In fact cost doesn't even have to factor in to it! It should be about outcomes and effects on the patient, that alone would substantially reduce costs by itself! I'm totally cool with them not even being told the price tag and making it totally about the welfare of the patient
Your position baffles the fuck out of me. Tomorrow if I came down with a chronic condition, you are perfectly honkey dorey with telling me to fuck off and die. My mother too. If she was one year older though? Everything must be done, regardless of any logical sense it must make. Hit by a bus with brain death? Keep her on life support forever, she's over 65 she MUST NOT DIEEEEEE
Fact is Spool, people need to let go eventually. I only have second hand experience as a child going to these places with my mom providing end of life care to people, and at some point you stopped being a caregiver and started being a torturer - all the while the government pays you piles of money to do it.
It's barbaric and I challenge you to find anyone who works with end of life patients who disagrees*
*anyone who doesn't have a direct profit motive behind their reasoning
geez that was way more wall of text than I thought it'd be
"It should be illegal to sell soda* to anyone under the age of 18". Discuss.
*soda defined however is sensible, by sugar content or whatever
I remember hearing something about starting to move away from recommending you get that checked at whatever age it is it's normal for it to get checked at becuase the cost + side effects is often worse than going untreated. Do not know if fact.
twitch.tv/tehsloth
I'll save it for the next time Im tapped.
what a shit day
had an absent partial seizure in the shower, fell on my ass
and because i have swollen discs in my back, this hurt a LOT
i laid down for a bit, took a T3 for the pain and an ativan for the seizing
now i am loopy as fuck
Ben and Jerry's Mighty Morphine Jolly Ranchers.
I know what your thinking: "Jolly Ranchers in my ice cream, that sounds disgusting!", but bro, there's a lot of fucking morphine in there. You don't mind the taste, dawg...
EDIT: I couldnt get this post in before the lock
i don't especially care about you and libruls sniping at each other i am talking about my ability to get healthcare? which seems like an academic discussion to everyone who has the power to change it
Yeah, pretty much; prostate is more "when" than "if". However, unless you're an outlier and get it early, the average onset/detection is about oh, 50-60, and it's generally slow enough that it'll kill you in about oh, 20 years.
So, let's see. "no erections anymore" or "this could kill me about when I'd probably be about to die anyhow".
Lemme think about that one.
(They've got some decent radiation-based treatments now though, and the surgery's getting WAY better. Eventually, I'd imagine it'll be routine.)
maybe you guys are misunderstanding each other
you mentioned being denied lifesaving care because of the cost or your value to society
and I don't think they're talking about that? I think they are talking about situations where it's not going to save your life anyway
like hey we can do this procedure but it has a 5% chance of getting the cancer and then you're going to be in bed for 6 months and die anyway
that kind of thing, where it's not life saving it's just kind of horribly prolonging?
Isn't prostate surgery more risky than the cancer itself?
I'm really foggy on the memory, I'm not even sure when I read it
man I wouldn't even get into it
that road leads only to the furrowing of brows and a long, dissatisfied sigh of exasperation
Can be, yep. Depends.
Edit: Hey, that's also a side effect!
this is in regards to that graph. so the question is specific, but I recall a group of non doctors were asked the same and the ratios of yes:no were essentially reversed
unfortunately I can't find the graph
50 if they vote republican or identify as a "patriot" / part of a "tea-party" group.
twitch.tv/tehsloth
Oh wow I didn't know the side effects were that bad.
I know it's really common and... yeah.
And I am on multiple medications that may increase the chance of nasty ones so ew.
nobody is suggesting we have a shady team of suits decide if someone is worth keeping alive
Only Republicans and Libertarians are in favor of that system, the system we currently have for 18-64 year olds, and that system is called "Private Insurance"
@Arch
Guy with early-onset Parkinson's has a wire in his brain, giving electric stimulation.
He shows what happens when he turns it off.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=uBh2LxTW0s0
we're presented with these heroic doctors reviving people with CPR on movies and in TV. and people also 'fight the disease' and so on. you usually don't have people deciding to die quiet, dignified deaths in american tv and movies.