The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Help Talon Build A New PC! So He Can Run STALKER! *now with quasi-final build*

TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
edited April 2007 in Games and Technology
Yes it's another "build a pc" thread. I love you guys that much

So as anyone who hangs out in the G&T IRC channel knows, my current PC is terrible and shitty. RAM sucks, harddrives need to be reformatted, wiped and Windows reinstalled, motherboard is outdated. I bought STALKER the other day and it couldn't run it. I have a 3d Animation class I need to do projects for and my machine can't render files. So I finally said "fuck it" and dipped into my emergency reserve of cash supplied by the generous oil companies since I have the good fortune of living in Alaska.

I have a pretty good idea of what I want to build but you guys are great at pointing huge gaping flaws in rig builds. I've been flipping through all the build threads and looking at Tom's Hardware guide so I have a rough idea of what I want. My main priority is 3d Animating (not MAYA, more basic stuff) and video editing (lots of Adobe Premiere and Adobe AfterEffects, so rendering is a big issue). A side aspect is sweet, sweet gaming. I want to be able to run Company of Heroes, Oblivion, Dawn of War, STALKER and Supreme Commander at the highest settings without a single flicker.

Price: $1500. I'm looking at building at the end of this month.

I already have harddrives, CD drive, DVD+RW drive, soundcard and twin monitors from the old rig. I'm currently thinking about the following:

CPU - Either twin Opterons or a Core 2 Duo E6600. Someone told me twin opterons won't make for good gaming but the golden grail of any video editing rig is twin CPUs. Should I do a Dual-Core instead? How will this affect renders?

Memory - I was planning on 2gb of high quality stuff but G&T IRC is telling me 4gb will make my dick bigger. What kind of RAM you think is really bitchin'?

Video Card - I am really not sure about this one. I know some of you have the 8800GT and like it. How are Radeon cards nowadays? Should I wait for the DX10 cards to hit the scene? Should I just pickup a DX9 for a good deal?

Mobo - Not sure here either. Might be a server board if I go with twin Opterons.

Case - Weretac0 linked to a really good case, real quiet. I'll probably go with that one.

What do you guys recommend and like?

CURRENT BUILD DRAFT:

CPU Fan: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16835118004
$50 ZALMAN CNPS 9500 AM2 2 Ball CPU Cooling Fan/Heatsink

Power Source: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817139002
$170 CORSAIR CMPSU-620HX ATX12V v2.2 and EPS12V 2.91 620W

Case: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16811129021
$120 Antec Nine Hundred Black Steel ATX Mid Tower Computer Case

Video Card: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150172
$310 XFX PVT80GGHE9 GeForce 8800GTS 320MB 320-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 GRAW Bundle HDCP

Motherboard: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131070
$150 ASUS P5B-E LGA 775 Intel P965 Express ATX Intel Motherboard

Memory: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820145590
$130x2 CORSAIR XMS2 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400)
$260

CPU: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115003
$310 Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 Conroe 2.4GHz 4M shared L2 Cache LGA 775

Monitor: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824014139
$280 BenQ FP222WH Black 22" 5ms DVI Widescreen HDMI LCD

Rig: $1500
Rig + Shipping: $1650
Total + Monitor: $1930

sig4.jpg
Talonrazor on
«1

Posts

  • JJJJ DailyStormer Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    You'll never find you son, he's dead!

    Anyway I hear those dual core cpus will be getting a price cut soon.

    JJ on
  • JragghenJragghen Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    JJ wrote: »
    You'll never find you son, he's dead!

    Anyway I hear those dual core cpus will be getting a price cut soon.

    Theoretically April 9th for AMD, April 22nd for Intel. Both rumored, not confirmed.

    Jragghen on
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Jragghen wrote: »

    Been there, done that.

    I am calling in the SWAT team of computer knowledge.

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    "I want to be able to run Company of Heroes, Oblivion, Dawn of War, STALKER and Supreme Commander at the highest settings without a single flicker.

    Price: $1500. "


    These two qualifiers don't mesh. Even dual cores have issues with SupCom... and the cheapest Quad cores are approx half your "budget".


    With a budget like that, think moreso "decent settings with decent frames"

    Deusfaux on
  • JJJJ DailyStormer Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Deusfaux wrote: »
    "I want to be able to run Company of Heroes, Oblivion, Dawn of War, STALKER and Supreme Commander at the highest settings without a single flicker.

    Price: $1500. "


    These two qualifiers don't mesh. Even dual cores have issues with SupCom... and the cheapest Quad cores are approx half your "budget".


    With a budget like that, think moreso "decent settings with decent frames"

    Well, decent settings with high frames or high settings with ehhhh frames.

    JJ on
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    point is, apart from DoW and sometimes CoH, all of those games mentioned are part of a handful of the hardest pushing games around

    to run them at the "highest settings" at smooth levels (north of 60) you're look at like quad cores and dual 8800 rigs, very expensive


    of course that largely depends on how many pixels are being pushed (resolution of the monitor)

    Deusfaux on
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Deusfaux wrote: »
    point is, apart from DoW and sometimes CoH, all of those games mentioned are part of a handful of the hardest pushing games around

    to run them at the "highest settings" at smooth levels (north of 60) you're look at like quad cores and dual 8800 rigs, very expensive


    of course that largely depends on how many pixels are being pushed (resolution of the monitor)

    I was being slightly factious when I said that. I would settle for "running them without a slideshow".

    Thinking about this RAM http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820145590

    Or this RAM http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820145168

    The big question I have now is what is the advantage of a Dual Core vs. something like twin high-capacity Opterons. I know in theory that dual core is suppose to be like twin CPUs but how much is it really? I've been seriously out of the market for awhile.

    Or hell, should I go with a Quad Core for major awesome?

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    dual core if you're building now, quad core if you'll wait for all the pricedrops comign up. or one now and the other later


    ram is one of the least important factors on your performance

    Deusfaux on
  • Xenocide GeekXenocide Geek Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Deusfaux wrote: »
    dual core if you're building now, quad core if you'll wait for all the pricedrops comign up. or one now and the other later


    ram is one of the least important factors on your performance

    Because I'm sure that having shitty RAM will in no way bottleneck your setup. :roll:

    C'mon, now.

    Xenocide Geek on
    i wanted love, i needed love
    most of all, most of all
    someone said true love was dead
    but i'm bound to fall
    bound to fall for you
    oh what can i do
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Deusfaux wrote: »
    dual core if you're building now, quad core if you'll wait for all the pricedrops comign up. or one now and the other later


    ram is one of the least important factors on your performance

    What time do you expect these prices to drop at? Like, in a month? I'm kinda needing a rig around this month or so.

    I probably wouldn't be able to upgrade again until at least winter.

    EDIT: Wait what? RAM is least important factor? I don't think so, for good rendering I need a bunch of high quality.

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • His CorkinessHis Corkiness Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Deusfaux wrote: »
    point is, apart from DoW and sometimes CoH, all of those games mentioned are part of a handful of the hardest pushing games around

    to run them at the "highest settings" at smooth levels (north of 60) you're look at like quad cores and dual 8800 rigs, very expensive


    of course that largely depends on how many pixels are being pushed (resolution of the monitor)

    I have no idea of what you're talking about. Both of my housemates have an E6600, 2GBs of RAM and an 8800GTS, and NOTHING makes their computers chug. Unless you're running some insane 4-megapixel resolution on two monitors at once and use 16x MSAA (not CSAA) even though it makes no difference at that resolution, quad-cores and dual 8800s are extreme overkill for any game out today.

    His Corkiness on
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Deusfaux wrote: »
    dual core if you're building now, quad core if you'll wait for all the pricedrops comign up. or one now and the other later


    ram is one of the least important factors on your performance

    Because I'm sure that having shitty RAM will in no way bottleneck your setup. :roll:

    C'mon, now.

    Not before having a shitty CPU, shitty GPU, shitty MOBO and shitty PSU to power the above will do the same

    READ : there are more important components than ram

    I have no idea of what you're talking about.

    Then why respond like you do?
    NOTHING makes their computers chug.

    Who said chug? Why is it always black or white with people like you? I said "cant do north of 60" and you equate this with "below 25". NOTHING you've seen perhaps.
    quad-cores and dual 8800s are extreme overkill for any game out today.

    I said it was dependant on resolution, and you dont have to be necessarily talking about 2560x 1600. And you're still wrong.

    1174066643Rrrbl528Ru_3_10.gif


    Yeahhhh. 30 FPS average is HARDCORE OVERKILLZ OMFG WHO NEEDZ MOR THAN THAT



    Talon, there are numerous threads on the subject, Orikae's was within the last week and comes to mind, might as well just go through that, every thread of these are basicalyl the same

    Deusfaux on
  • His CorkinessHis Corkiness Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Deusfaux wrote: »
    NOTHING makes their computers chug.

    Who said chug? Why is it always black or white with people like you? I said "cant do north of 60" and you equate this with "below 25". NOTHING you've seen perhaps.
    Who said below 25? The quoted computers can handle SupCom at +10 speed, 1280x960 on two monitors, all settings on max (4xCSAA), and still stay above 40 FPS. But maybe I'm living in some sort of fantasy land, and their computers run on pixie dust or something.
    quad-cores and dual 8800s are extreme overkill for any game out today.

    I said it was dependant on resolution
    Having a quad-core or dual-core won't matter shit in terms of resolution.
    Yeahhhh. 30 FPS average is HARDCORE OVERKILLZ OMFG WHO NEEDZ MOR THAN THAT
    I don't give a fuck about benchmarks. Unless someone's been slipping me acid, I've actually experienced what you're saying is impossible. TALK IN RETARDED SARCASTIC CAPS ALL YOU WANT, you're still a dipshit.

    Edit: Your own fucking benchmark shows a 0.2 FPS increase going from dual->quad core. Fantastic.

    His Corkiness on
  • GiganticusGiganticus Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    I run Supcom at max details, 1600x1200, 2xAA, full AF on a C2D E6400 & 8800GTS 640mb..

    Played an 8 way 81x81km the other day, I did not notice slowdown. At all, in fact.

    Giganticus on
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Ok, the guys on the IRC channel have been awesome. What are some opinions on these?

    Looking at these two PSUs - The Enermax Liberty http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817194004

    and the Antec Phantom http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817194004

    Looking at this case - Antec 900 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?It

    And of course this CPU Fan - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835118004

    I'm thinking about a 8800GTX card with an ASUS P5B board, if I go with a dual core that is. Still not really sure what CPU to take.

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    do yourself a huge favor and find my two or more posts in orik's thread, you'll save yourself a lot of worrying about what parts to get


    http://forums.penny-arcade.com/showpost.php?p=1043400&postcount=29

    read through the thread beyond that, i have more posts near the end with orik

    Deusfaux on
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Pretty similar to what I'm thinking. I've got two 17'' CRT monitors I'm going to be using so I can afford nice stuff like the 8800GTX and what looks like the E6600. I've always been an AMD fan, I'm surprised Intel's the CPU of choice now.

    Still need a good idea for a PSU.

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Talonrazor wrote: »
    Pretty similar to what I'm thinking. I've got two 17'' CRT monitors I'm going to be using so I can afford nice stuff like the 8800GTX and what looks like the E6600. I've always been an AMD fan, I'm surprised Intel's the CPU of choice now.

    Still need a good idea for a PSU.
    Deusfaux wrote:
    The Corsair 520 or 620 PSU

    from the post. if the GTX, get the latter

    Deusfaux on
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Ok, here's the current build I have.

    CPU Fan: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835118004
    $50 ZALMAN CNPS 9500 AM2 2 Ball CPU Cooling Fan/Heatsink

    Power Source: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139002
    $170 CORSAIR CMPSU-620HX ATX12V v2.2 and EPS12V 2.91 620W

    Case: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811129021
    $120 Antec Nine Hundred Black Steel ATX Mid Tower Computer Case

    Video Card: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150214R
    $540 XFX PVT80FSHD9 GeForce 8800GTX 768MB 384-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 XXX Version HDCP

    Motherboard: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131070
    $150 ASUS P5B-E LGA 775 Intel P965 Express ATX Intel Motherboard

    Memory: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820134041
    $230 Kingston HyperX 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 675 (PC2 5400)

    CPU: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115003
    $310 Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 Conroe 2.4GHz 4M shared L2 Cache LGA 775

    All it needs is some super quality thermal paste. Entire build: $1570

    EDIT: Had to refigure for a second

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    I'll sell you MY 9500 if thats what you'd like

    I'd be pulling it out this week. Its a 9500 LED (copper fins and clear LED lighted fan to match intel scheme)

    it'd come with everything fully boxed in mint-y condition

    pair it with some arctic silver 5

    Deusfaux on
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Deusfaux wrote: »
    I'll sell you MY 9500 if thats what you'd like

    I'd be pulling it out this week. Its a 9500 LED (copper fins and clear LED lighted fan to match intel scheme)

    it'd come with everything fully boxed in mint-y condition

    pair it with some arctic silver 5

    Hey I might be interested in that. It's in good shape? Hit me up with a PM, I like to see money go to forumers then some website.

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • RookRook Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    I'd think about getting a better monitor first. Seriously everything is going to look like crap on a 17" monitor regardless of what you've got under the bonnet.

    Rook on
  • AridholAridhol Daddliest Catch Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    everything looks fine with that build, however like rook said, 17" crt's? really?

    I would skimp on either the fan (my intel stock fan is great, cools to 22C after 14hrs of prime95)
    Maybe go for the 8800GTS and invest in a nice 19" LCD.

    Putting all that into driving 2 CRT's (the video card will need 2xDVI to VGA adapters) is rediculous

    Aridhol on
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Well I was looking at this http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009100. I could do it probably if I got slightly cheaper memory and withdrew another $200. With shipping the current build is $1640 and the most I can possibly do is $2,000 although I'd like to keep it cheaper then that. I could even do three screens with that thing, using my two current monitors. That's a nice 19-inch LCD widescreen for not that much more then what I already have into this thing.

    EDIT: Also, this Corsair XMS2 RAM is much cheaper then Kingston and appears to be just as good. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820145590

    Is that reliable RAM? It looks like a better deal then the Kingston and would allow me to afford the LCD monitor as well.

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • RookRook Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Talonrazor wrote: »
    Well I was looking at this http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009100. I could do it probably if I got slightly cheaper memory and withdrew another $200. With shipping the current build is $1640 and the most I can possibly do is $2,000 although I'd like to keep it cheaper then that. I could even do three screens with that thing, using my two current monitors. That's a nice 19-inch LCD widescreen for not that much more then what I already have into this thing.

    EDIT: Also, this Corsair XMS2 RAM is much cheaper then Kingston and appears to be just as good. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820145590

    Is that reliable RAM? It looks like a better deal then the Kingston and would allow me to afford the LCD monitor as well.

    Yeah, that's good ram. To be honest though, with the Core2s the speed of the ram makes very little difference to gaming benchmarks unless you're going to start overclocking. I'd be more tempted to try and eek out a 20" widescreen monitor for the increased screen res, especially if you do any sort of art with it. Maybe by dropping the GTX to a GTS or going for an E6300 and overclocking it.

    Rook on
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Rook wrote: »
    Talonrazor wrote: »
    Well I was looking at this http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009100. I could do it probably if I got slightly cheaper memory and withdrew another $200. With shipping the current build is $1640 and the most I can possibly do is $2,000 although I'd like to keep it cheaper then that. I could even do three screens with that thing, using my two current monitors. That's a nice 19-inch LCD widescreen for not that much more then what I already have into this thing.

    EDIT: Also, this Corsair XMS2 RAM is much cheaper then Kingston and appears to be just as good. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820145590

    Is that reliable RAM? It looks like a better deal then the Kingston and would allow me to afford the LCD monitor as well.

    Yeah, that's good ram. To be honest though, with the Core2s the speed of the ram makes very little difference to gaming benchmarks unless you're going to start overclocking. I'd be more tempted to try and eek out a 20" widescreen monitor for the increased screen res, especially if you do any sort of art with it. Maybe by dropping the GTX to a GTS or going for an E6300 and overclocking it.

    How much of a performance difference will I see in an GTS? Appears I'd save about a $100 then and Acer's got a 20'' monitor I could probably swing. From benchmark stuff, there is a bit of a performance difference between the two cards but I wonder if it'd even matter that much.

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • RookRook Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Talonrazor wrote: »
    Rook wrote: »
    Talonrazor wrote: »
    Well I was looking at this http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009100. I could do it probably if I got slightly cheaper memory and withdrew another $200. With shipping the current build is $1640 and the most I can possibly do is $2,000 although I'd like to keep it cheaper then that. I could even do three screens with that thing, using my two current monitors. That's a nice 19-inch LCD widescreen for not that much more then what I already have into this thing.

    EDIT: Also, this Corsair XMS2 RAM is much cheaper then Kingston and appears to be just as good. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820145590

    Is that reliable RAM? It looks like a better deal then the Kingston and would allow me to afford the LCD monitor as well.

    Yeah, that's good ram. To be honest though, with the Core2s the speed of the ram makes very little difference to gaming benchmarks unless you're going to start overclocking. I'd be more tempted to try and eek out a 20" widescreen monitor for the increased screen res, especially if you do any sort of art with it. Maybe by dropping the GTX to a GTS or going for an E6300 and overclocking it.

    How much of a performance difference will I see in an GTS? Appears I'd save about a $100 then and Acer's got a 20'' monitor I could probably swing. From benchmark stuff, there is a bit of a performance difference between the two cards but I wonder if it'd even matter that much.

    I think you'd see a less of a performance difference dropping to an E6300 than you will dropping to the GTS. Check this article out from firing squad and make a note of the resolutions being played at.

    edit: fixxed link

    Rook on
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    That.... that links me to the Wii on Amazon.

    Also, I'm looking at the $250 cheaper 320mb GTS and wondering if a GTX would really serve me all that well. When it comes to rendering and editing videos, do you think a GTX would make a major difference? For me, CPU is important since that's what really drives me video software.

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • RookRook Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Talonrazor wrote: »
    That.... that links me to the Wii on Amazon.

    Also, I'm looking at the $250 cheaper 320mb GTS and wondering if a GTX would really serve me all that well. When it comes to rendering and editing videos, do you think a GTX would make a major difference? For me, CPU is important since that's what really drives me video software.

    Sorry, I've fixed the link now.

    edit: as for 3d rendering, I believe the video card only makes a difference on bits like preview and that'd likely be not a lot anyways.

    Rook on
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Now I'm torn. I could do a 320mb GTS and save $250 coupled with an E6400 and save about ~$100. That money could buffer getting a nicer monitor and a nicer harddrive. I'd suffer some drops in performance but I think I should still be able to run top-of-the-line games for a long time. Looking here, [H]ardocp shows very little difference between the GTS and GTX on the Oblivion front.

    Mm... decisions, decisions.

    EDIT: Well, current build is $1600. I actually should be able to swing that and still get a $200 LCD monitor, 'specially if I sell my old rig to someone for that much. I might even be able to get 4gb of RAM....

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • AridholAridhol Daddliest Catch Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    I would go with a slower processor like a 6300 (super cheap good overclocker) and stick with the GTX if you can, there is a noticeable performance difference at much higher resolutions (24" 30" monitors would make use of this)

    If however you are going to go no larger than 20 I would say the GTS is going to be just fine and it's a pretty reasonable price right now.

    Aridhol on
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    I will probably not being going over 22" at all. I'm mostly worried about having a powerful CPU/RAM for rendering right now. It might be worth it to drop to a GTS and spend the savings on 4gb of RAM.

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • ArdentArdent Down UpsideRegistered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Running essentially the same build you're looking to buy, TR, Supreme Commander chugs on highest settings; too many units being individually rendered and managed.

    CoH runs perfectly, though.

    I'd strongly recommend you match producers on your mobo and graphics card -- I recommend EVGA -- even though the price will likely be a bit steeper. The advantage is that each is tested with the other in-house to generate performance reports, so your results should be identical to the factory specs if you have the right drivers.

    As far as monitors go...you can pick up a 19-20" LCD for $200 or so (check Tigerdirect, their monitor prices tend to be lower in my experience). I have a 21" BenQ that has served me faithfully for 3 years with no(!) pixel burnout, and a secondary 19" widescreen Hitachi that cost me almost nothing to pick up. The 8800GTX provides two DVI-D outs to simplify the typical gamer's dual-monitor lifestyle.

    Ardent on
    Steam ID | Origin ID: ArdentX | Uplay ID: theardent | Battle.net: Ardent#11476
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    You have a BenQ eh? I'm looking at this http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824014139 so it's good to hear they are a bit more reliable. I'm thinkin' I'll probably get the GTS and push that savings onto the monitor/shipping/RAM.

    Is it possible to use the two other CRTs without having to get a secondary video card? Three screen setup would be bitchin'.

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • AridholAridhol Daddliest Catch Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    for reference I have a 6300
    2GB OCZ platinum (got a good deal)
    Geforce 8800GTS 320MB by xfx
    Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 (good board GREAT price)
    seagate 320GB sata2 drive


    Fear, stalker, COH, Dawn of war, wow all run well (40+ FPS) on max res and settings. Supreme commander runs great until there are thousands of units, at that point I get chunk, the graphics settings don't seem to have an impact at all, I think it is probably cpu/ram bottlenecking with that many units.


    TLDR: the GTS is fine for Supreme Commander.

    Aridhol on
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Yea, I think I'm going with the 8800GTS 320mb. I can afford 4gb of RAM and get a 22" monitor for under $2000 which is very attractive. Plus I'm sure the GTX will fall in price over the summer and I could even think about upgrading next winter. Updating OP with the new build idea.

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • RookRook Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Just one slightly huge question. Why are you buying that heatsink which isn't compatible with Socket 775 procs?

    Honestly, if you're not overclocking the stock heatsink that comes with the E6600 is pretty good too.

    Rook on
  • TalonrazorTalonrazor Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Rook wrote: »
    Just one slightly huge question. Why are you buying that heatsink which isn't compatible with Socket 775 procs?

    Honestly, if you're not overclocking the stock heatsink that comes with the E6600 is pretty good too.

    I'm not, I just linked to the wrong one. I'm buying one off of a forumer that he had on his E6600. And I do plan to overclock the E6600 by a 1GHz, all the reviews I read said that's possible. Plus that heatsink looks bitchin and with the open-side case, I'm all for that.

    Talonrazor on
    sig4.jpg
  • ThrymThrym Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    I don't have any actual numbers for frame rates, and I havn't played STALKER yet, but with the video card, cpu, and ram, I'm about to post I've never had frame rate trouble in any of the other games, and I played them at at least 1024x768 (if not higher) and max settings.

    http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16814161025

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820145527

    (I'm sorry I can't find Neweggs link for this at the moment, but here's the name) AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Windsor 2.0GHz Socket AM2 Dual Core Processor Model ADA4000CSBOX - Retail

    This post is in no way to be taken as religion, just to give you an idea that the stuff about quad cores and dual 8800s is a little overstated to say the least.

    Thrym on
Sign In or Register to comment.