Split forum accounts

SzechuanosaurusSzechuanosaurus Registered User, ClubPA regular
Just to clarify how this works...

Do I now have two seperate PixelSumorai accounts, one here and one in the chat forums or are they still one account? THey appear to behave as seperate accounts - ie, seperate PM boxes, seperate login, seperate avatar/sig settings etc. so i presume they are seperate.

Does this then mean that new forumers creating accounts post-devolution have to create a new account seperately for each forum or do they just create one account that then automatically splits into these two demi-accounts?

Also, did anybody read Altered Carbon?

Szechuanosaurus on

Posts

  • BesigedBBesigedB Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2004
    There is an easy way to share sessions and accounts automatically but I think it's two seperate boards judging by the fact that I had to login again and importing was referred to.

    BesigedB on
    this is a small sig to not get in your way
  • Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver You don't have to attend every argument you are invited to. Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2004
    As of right now. . .

    When you register, you register for both forums. Each forum has it's own profile settings, so if you change one profile, it won't effect the other. This works the same way with bannings. Getting banned from OnTopic won't get you banned from Skelter.

    Munkus Beaver on
    Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
  • the wookthe wook Registered User regular
    edited August 2004
    As of right now. . .

    When you register, you register for both forums. Each forum has it's own profile settings, so if you change one profile, it won't effect the other. This works the same way with bannings. Getting banned from OnTopic won't get you banned from Skelter.

    I read that as 'won't get you banned from Skeletor', and immediately thought that would be a cool name for the forum.

    the wook on
  • DogDog Registered User, Administrator, Vanilla Staff admin
    edited August 2004
    That's silly. Why'd they set it up that way?

    Unknown User on
  • Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver You don't have to attend every argument you are invited to. Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2004
    That's silly. Why'd they set it up that way?

    So you can be banned from the forums seperatly.

    Munkus Beaver on
    Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
  • bone daddybone daddy Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2004
    That's silly. Why'd they set it up that way?

    Don't listen to munkus. It was to make you unhappy.

    bone daddy on
    Rogue helicopter?
    Ecoterrorism is actually the single largest terrorist threat at the moment. They don't usually kill people, but they blow up or set on fire very expensive things.
  • ÄlphämönkëyÄlphämönkëy Registered User regular
    edited August 2004
    We certainly know how to share information, the question now is, how much do we want to share. PMs? Sessions? User accounts? And if so, to what degree? Ramius, Deni, and I are talking it over, and once we decide we will code appropriately. And yes, we enjoy being able to ban separately, though that runs off of the PABB_banlist table, right now the separate accounts allows for separate jailings (which runs off the user table)

    Älphämönkëy on
  • DogDog Registered User, Administrator, Vanilla Staff admin
    edited August 2004
    bone daddy wrote:
    That's silly. Why'd they set it up that way?

    Don't listen to munkus. It was to make you unhappy.

    You make me unhappy, not munkus, or the forum coding.

    Unknown User on
  • A duck!A duck! Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited August 2004
    more leik splicock, m i rite?

    m i rite?

    A duck! on
  • Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver You don't have to attend every argument you are invited to. Philosophy: Stoicism. Politics: Democratic SocialistRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2004
    We certainly know how to share information, the question now is, how much do we want to share. PMs? Sessions? User accounts? And if so, to what degree? Ramius, Deni, and I are talking it over, and once we decide we will code appropriately. And yes, we enjoy being able to ban separately, though that runs off of the PABB_banlist table, right now the separate accounts allows for separate jailings (which runs off the user table)

    About that jailing thing. Seems there is an error with people banned before the schism. They are unfreeable by normal standards.

    Munkus Beaver on
    Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but dies in the process.
  • bone daddybone daddy Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2004
    bone daddy wrote:
    That's silly. Why'd they set it up that way?

    Don't listen to munkus. It was to make you unhappy.

    You make me unhappy, not munkus, or the forum coding.

    Well, they're not really separable things. I chaired the Committee on Arguing Small, Cosmetic Features into the Ground.

    bone daddy on
    Rogue helicopter?
    Ecoterrorism is actually the single largest terrorist threat at the moment. They don't usually kill people, but they blow up or set on fire very expensive things.
  • RamiusRamius Joined: July 19, 2000 Administrator, ClubPA admin
    edited August 2004
    We certainly know how to share information, the question now is, how much do we want to share. PMs? Sessions? User accounts? And if so, to what degree? Ramius, Deni, and I are talking it over, and once we decide we will code appropriately. And yes, we enjoy being able to ban separately, though that runs off of the PABB_banlist table, right now the separate accounts allows for separate jailings (which runs off the user table)

    About that jailing thing. Seems there is an error with people banned before the schism. They are unfreeable by normal standards.

    yeah, I'm aware of this but haven't fixed it yet. My schedule has been rather fucked up this week, and just 15 minutes ago I did a double-take at the calendar, I had no idea tomorrow was Friday already.

    Upsides for separate accounts and sessions include:
    - was accomplished with very little programming effort
    - separate jailing
    - separate deputy, mod , junior admin, and admin status
    - profiles are separate which fits in with the differing avatar and sig standards between the boards
    - separate banlists
    - separate sessions means your "unviewed posts indicators" are kept separately. You can visit one board or the other and not lose track of what you've seen or not seen on the one you didn't visit

    Downsides for separate accounts:
    - Need to login separately ( might I suggest auto-login? )
    - PM boxes are separate ( this one annoys me somewhat )
    - super-trolls or spammers have to be handled twice, once for each board. (I'm currently not annoyed enough by this to do something about it. Under sufficient pressure from the mods, I may write code for it)

    If there are more downsides, they have not yet made themselves apparent to me. And the very first upside (the one which involves my laziness) is a powerful force for the downsides to reckon with. :P

    Ramius on
    1zxt8dhasaon.png
  • ObbiObbi Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2004
    Ramius wrote:
    - PM boxes are separate ( this one annoys me somewhat )

    Obbi on
  • KungFuKungFu Registered User regular
    edited August 2004
    Seperate forums are just unecessary and making too much extra work for the admins. We have a split community now :'-(

    KungFu on
    Theft 4 Bread
  • PaladinPaladin Registered User regular
    edited August 2004
    KungFu wrote:
    Seperate forums are just unecessary and making too much extra work for the admins. We have a split community now :'-(
    YES Soon the SE and On topic forums will be a different species after countless generations of inbreeding! I can hardly wait!

    Paladin on
    Marty: The future, it's where you're going?
    Doc: That's right, twenty five years into the future. I've always dreamed on seeing the future, looking beyond my years, seeing the progress of mankind. I'll also be able to see who wins the next twenty-five world series.
  • SzechuanosaurusSzechuanosaurus Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2004
    I like having seperate PM boxes. I'm a PM hoarder anyway and low capacity always bugged me. At least now my PMs will be split more or less evenly between the two accounts.

    Szechuanosaurus on
  • matthias00matthias00 Registered User regular
    edited August 2004
    KungFu wrote:
    Seperate forums are just unecessary and making too much extra work for the admins. We have a split community now :'-(

    Well, this sure was the right thread to post that. Good work.

    Oh, wait, it wasn't.

    matthias00 on
  • SzechuanosaurusSzechuanosaurus Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2004
    You know, ninjas don't even 'do' kungfu.

    Szechuanosaurus on
  • jameswaferjameswafer Registered User regular
    edited August 2004
    You know, ninjas don't even 'do' kungfu.

    The are trained in ninjitsu.

    jameswafer on
  • The CatThe Cat Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2004
    I like having seperate PM boxes. I'm a PM hoarder anyway and low capacity always bugged me. At least now my PMs will be split more or less evenly between the two accounts.

    The extra PM space was pretty much the only good thing about this, I thought. I don't know why anyone's complaining.

    The Cat on
    tmsig.jpg
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited August 2004
    on seperate bannings.

    there DOES need to be a way to ban from both.



    a person should only be banned from one forum when they are primarily violating the rules and status quo of that forum.

    but, if they do something not tolerated in either, like post porn, make hate-crime type comments, etc. they should immediately be banned from both.

    it would be sad to see a troll do a buncha shit on one forum, get banned, then spedn the next half an hour doing the same thing on the other while the mods have to scramble to get on it.

    Deusfaux on
  • matthias00matthias00 Registered User regular
    edited August 2004
    Deusfaux wrote:
    on seperate bannings.

    there DOES need to be a way to ban from both.



    a person should only be banned from one forum when they are primarily violating the rules and status quo of that forum.

    but, if they do something not tolerated in either, like post porn, make hate-crime type comments, etc. they should immediately be banned from both.

    it would be sad to see a troll do a buncha shit on one forum, get banned, then spedn the next half an hour doing the same thing on the other while the mods have to scramble to get on it.

    ...Scramble?

    Mod bans the crapface, switches over to the other forum, opens up Mod CP, and bans him again. That is more around the time of a minute, 2 minutes max.

    So he could make 4 posts at the other forum before he was banned there too.

    matthias00 on
  • DeusfauxDeusfaux Registered User regular
    edited August 2004
    i was told a mod cannot mod himself across the 2 forums

    Deusfaux on
  • ObbiObbi Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited August 2004
    Deusfaux wrote:
    i was told a mod cannot mod himself across the 2 forums

    he can.

    Obbi on
  • BarcardiBarcardi All the Wizards Under A Rock: AfganistanRegistered User regular
    edited August 2004
    this reminds me, yesterday i switched my douchebag link to another link. i come back online today and its switched back. did someone switch it without me knowing or something? Or was it a default error?

    edit: NM

    Barcardi on
Sign In or Register to comment.