The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
At the [Movies] with Debate & Discourse
JacobkoshGamble a stamp.I can show you how to be a real man!Moderatormod
I watched Half Nelson a couple of days ago. It was alright. I remember people saying how great Gosling was in it. He wasn't bad, but I wasn't exactly blown away.
0
ThomamelasOnly one man can kill this many Russians. Bring his guitar to me! Registered Userregular
Interesting to compare this with the other really famous latter-day John Wayne film True Grit. Both portray Wayne's character as jaded and cynical, but True Grit plays it mostly for laughs and this movie goes much darker, even using it to examine racism (in 1956!).
The movie doesn't do enough to make it feel like several years have gone by, and the conclusion, with the Comanche band just showing up practically at the doorstep again, is a bit too big of a coincidence to swallow comfortably.
Ethan isn't so much jaded and cynical but bitter and hate filled having very little of his humanity left. His whole quest is driven by a pair of hates. His racism is so extreme that he's going to kill his own niece because of her taint. And his much more personal hatred of Scar driven by his love of Martha and Scar's rape of her. Even at the end of the film, when he shows that he hasn't completely lost his humanity, the film makes clear that he can never rejoin society. He's left outside as the camera pulls back, the audience moving with the settlers representing civilization while he can not cross the threshold of the door to rejoin us.
Saw The World's End. Excellent from beginning to ... almost finish, every Edgar Wright movie is now a master's thesis on cheeky foreshadowing, visual storytelling, and efficient scriptwriting. I would go: 1) Hot Fuzz, 2) Scott Pilgrim, 3) World's End, and 4) Shaun of the Dead but the space between these ranks is very very small and they're quite high compared to most other movies out there. As far as the ending,
it's certainly a bit offputting. I don't mind that the World literally Ended, I just think King becoming a freedom fighter for Blanks is COMPLETELY out of nowhere and kind of unmotivated, hence uninspiring. It's also kind of super terrible that two out of the 5 were mulched and this doesn't really get dealt with in an appropriate fashion. It would have been nice if they were SET UP to be mulched, but they didn't actually manage it before they gave up on Earth completely.
So yeah, the ending certainly will bother a good amount of people, but saying that, it's certainly NOT a movie ruiner, like certain other endings I could think of.
I watched Pi the other day. It was really good and creepy. My only wish is that it was longer (although being that it was Aronofsky's first movie, I can understand that it's only 90ish minutes or whatever).
I watched Half Nelson a couple of days ago. It was alright. I remember people saying how great Gosling was in it. He wasn't bad, but I wasn't exactly blown away.
Half Nelson was good, but I just watched Lars and the Real Girl and am now crying.
A while ago I got the David Lean/Noel Coward Criterion pack. This weekend I watched Blithe Spirit for the first time and enjoyed it quite a bit. The film is dated especially in terms of its pacing, and it does have a tendency to repeat the same joke with slight variations a bit too often, but it's charming, witty and surprisingly biting. It's a slight movie, but it's the kind of movie that needs to be slight to work - it's a tart meringue, if there is such a thing.
I suspect that Margaret Rutherford was born as a 50-going-on-80 woman, though. She's a hoot, mind you.
"Nothing is gonna save us forever but a lot of things can save us today." - Night in the Woods
0
reVerseAttack and Dethrone GodRegistered Userregular
Saw Magic Magic. I'd heard it described as "realistic Evil Dead", which it more or less is. Bunch of kids vacationing in a faraway cabin, shit goes wrong. More in spoiler tags while trying to avoid actual story spoilers, but I feel just describing what "realistic Evil Dead" actually means is a sort of spoiler in and on itself.
Basically, the movie is this really harrowing take on mental health issues. The main character is Alicia, going on a vacation to South America with her friend Sarah and a bunch of her friends she's never met. Very early on something happens that forces Sarah to go back to college for two days, leaving Alicia alone with a bunch of strangers in a strange place. They're not terrible people but a little bit on the immature and rowdy side.
All this and a bunch of things that happen contribute to Alicia's mental health starting to deteriorate, and that's what the movie is all about. She's slowly slipping further and further into psychosis, but the people she's with don't really want to think about it beyond "she's a bit weird", despite her obviously getting less and less stable. It's only after she does something fairly drastic towards the end of the movie before the others start to contemplate getting her some help, but by then she's in full on mental breakdown mode and things end on a really depressing note.
It should be noted that despite being a "realistic Evil Dead", people don't get murdered in increasingle comic booky ways. The mental breakdown of Alicia is much more, uh, "mundane", which really contributes to the horror of the situation.
With these depressing realistic horror movies it's kind of difficult to recommend them because that basically amounts to "hey, go watch this movie and be bummed out for the rest of the day", but if that's your thing, Magic Magic is really well made one of those. Hell, I even remembered two of the characters' names. That usually doesn't happen with horror movies.
0
jungleroomxIt's never too many graves, it's always not enough shovelsRegistered Userregular
I read that as Magic Mike is a realistic horror movie.
+8
Mike Danger"Diane..."a place both wonderful and strangeRegistered Userregular
Saw Magic Magic. I'd heard it described as "realistic Evil Dead", which it more or less is. Bunch of kids vacationing in a faraway cabin, shit goes wrong. More in spoiler tags while trying to avoid actual story spoilers, but I feel just describing what "realistic Evil Dead" actually means is a sort of spoiler in and on itself.
Basically, the movie is this really harrowing take on mental health issues. The main character is Alicia, going on a vacation to South America with her friend Sarah and a bunch of her friends she's never met. Very early on something happens that forces Sarah to go back to college for two days, leaving Alicia alone with a bunch of strangers in a strange place. They're not terrible people but a little bit on the immature and rowdy side.
All this and a bunch of things that happen contribute to Alicia's mental health starting to deteriorate, and that's what the movie is all about. She's slowly slipping further and further into psychosis, but the people she's with don't really want to think about it beyond "she's a bit weird", despite her obviously getting less and less stable. It's only after she does something fairly drastic towards the end of the movie before the others start to contemplate getting her some help, but by then she's in full on mental breakdown mode and things end on a really depressing note.
It should be noted that despite being a "realistic Evil Dead", people don't get murdered in increasingle comic booky ways. The mental breakdown of Alicia is much more, uh, "mundane", which really contributes to the horror of the situation.
With these depressing realistic horror movies it's kind of difficult to recommend them because that basically amounts to "hey, go watch this movie and be bummed out for the rest of the day", but if that's your thing, Magic Magic is really well made one of those. Hell, I even remembered two of the characters' names. That usually doesn't happen with horror movies.
Where did you go to get your hands on this? It's my understanding it's not getting a theatrical release.
Saw Magic Magic. I'd heard it described as "realistic Evil Dead", which it more or less is. Bunch of kids vacationing in a faraway cabin, shit goes wrong. More in spoiler tags while trying to avoid actual story spoilers, but I feel just describing what "realistic Evil Dead" actually means is a sort of spoiler in and on itself.
Basically, the movie is this really harrowing take on mental health issues. The main character is Alicia, going on a vacation to South America with her friend Sarah and a bunch of her friends she's never met. Very early on something happens that forces Sarah to go back to college for two days, leaving Alicia alone with a bunch of strangers in a strange place. They're not terrible people but a little bit on the immature and rowdy side.
All this and a bunch of things that happen contribute to Alicia's mental health starting to deteriorate, and that's what the movie is all about. She's slowly slipping further and further into psychosis, but the people she's with don't really want to think about it beyond "she's a bit weird", despite her obviously getting less and less stable. It's only after she does something fairly drastic towards the end of the movie before the others start to contemplate getting her some help, but by then she's in full on mental breakdown mode and things end on a really depressing note.
It should be noted that despite being a "realistic Evil Dead", people don't get murdered in increasingle comic booky ways. The mental breakdown of Alicia is much more, uh, "mundane", which really contributes to the horror of the situation.
With these depressing realistic horror movies it's kind of difficult to recommend them because that basically amounts to "hey, go watch this movie and be bummed out for the rest of the day", but if that's your thing, Magic Magic is really well made one of those. Hell, I even remembered two of the characters' names. That usually doesn't happen with horror movies.
Where did you go to get your hands on this? It's my understanding it's not getting a theatrical release.
Rented it from the online rentery of the TV box that my ISP sent me.
0
TexiKenDammit!That fish really got me!Registered Userregular
(From the previous thread, courtesy of @jungleroomx)
Some guy on Cracked, a website I usually love reading, just said The Dark Knight Rises is the new low point for the Batman franchise.
I guess if you pretend 90% of the Batman material never happened.
I agree with the "MOAR CLIX"-type headline, but from what I remember of the Kilmer and Clooney movies... they may have been ill-timed, goofy, and had too much neon, but they didn't have plot holes you could fly a Batmobile through.
It's odd; I liked the actors in the recent trilogy, but the stories were not that great.
Sorce on
+1
JuliusCaptain of Serenityon my shipRegistered Userregular
(From the previous thread, courtesy of @jungleroomx)
Some guy on Cracked, a website I usually love reading, just said The Dark Knight Rises is the new low point for the Batman franchise.
I guess if you pretend 90% of the Batman material never happened.
I agree with the "MOAR CLIX"-type headline, but from what I remember of the Kilmer and Clooney movies... they may have been ill-timed, goofy, and had too much neon, but they didn't have plot holes you could fly a Batmobile through.
It's odd; I liked the actors in the recent trilogy, but the stories were not that great.
Hell, the Tim Burton ones are basically as goofy and silly as the others and the only reason to think they were any more serious is because there was no neon. It was silly comic-fun with nonsensical stuff happening all the damn time but at least it didn't pretend to be anything more.
0
surrealitychecklonely, but not unloveddreaming of faulty keys and latchesRegistered Userregular
edited September 2013
ok im watching gi joe retalation
i am fully prepared for my butt to be exploderated
edit: OMG I CAN SEE THE ROCK THIS FILM IS LOOKNG GOOD ALREADY
i am fully prepared for my butt to be exploderated
edit: OMG I CAN SEE THE ROCK THIS FILM IS LOOKNG GOOD ALREADY
Dwayne Johnson is not quite as effective as he used to be in tricking me into seeing bad movies. But he's still pretty good.
Caught 1408 on cable last week--it may be because I'm a total wuss when it comes to any kind of horror in films (though I don't find Alien scary), but I enjoyed it much more than I do most psychological horror stuff. Great back-and-forth between Cusack and Jackson ("It's an evil fucking room!"), and Cusack by himself was entertaining.
+1
surrealitychecklonely, but not unloveddreaming of faulty keys and latchesRegistered Userregular
omg its rza! playing a japanese master dude initiating people into "the gi joes"!
ok this shits legit, i give it a pass
0
surrealitychecklonely, but not unloveddreaming of faulty keys and latchesRegistered Userregular
the dudes bike fires machine guns then it fires rockets then it does a sick wheelie then it disassembles and all the bits of the bike are missiles too and EXPLOSIONS
Immediately after an early preview screening with fan Q&A, the first question Director Drew Goddard was asked was, "Will there be a sequel?" To which he responded, "Have you seen the ending to my movie?"
Thought it was a good response.
Switch Friend Code: SW-3944-9431-0318
PSN / Xbox / NNID: Fodder185
Considering how hard it was to get that movie out in the first place, I don't think they would do a sequel even if they wanted to.
I cannot fathom a way for them to make a sequel that did not completely undermine the entire point/statement made by the first.
I would be way more interested in seeing the same genre deconstruction and reconstruction aimed at other genres. Although how it could be done, or if for that matter, is another question entirely.
It was some decent action scenes, villains so monstrously and moronically EVIL that there was no possible way of them winning even if the hero did nothing (and he didn't actually do much), and a political message with all the subtly of a brick, yet without any actual teeth. Matt Damon being the only white person in all of LA aside, Jodie Foster and Sharlto Copley were the real disappointments. Foster's character was awful, and she didn't do anything to improve it, and Copley's character bounced wildly from charming bad guy crazy (mostly when he wasn't talking and just giving people the finger while he blew them up) to painful to have on screen (any time he tried to deliver some "crazy" monologue).
If this movie had been made 20 years ago then Paul Verhoeven would have directed it, and it would have been amazing.
(From the previous thread, courtesy of @jungleroomx)
Some guy on Cracked, a website I usually love reading, just said The Dark Knight Rises is the new low point for the Batman franchise.
I guess if you pretend 90% of the Batman material never happened.
I agree with the "MOAR CLIX"-type headline, but from what I remember of the Kilmer and Clooney movies... they may have been ill-timed, goofy, and had too much neon, but they didn't have plot holes you could fly a Batmobile through.
It's odd; I liked the actors in the recent trilogy, but the stories were not that great.
Hell, the Tim Burton ones are basically as goofy and silly as the others and the only reason to think they were any more serious is because there was no neon. It was silly comic-fun with nonsensical stuff happening all the damn time but at least it didn't pretend to be anything more.
I have to agree to that. When Batman and Robin dodge bullets in B&R its almost believable because the thugs are shooting at them with Neon light Tommy guns while wearing dayglo makeup. You already know seriousness is out the window and realism is a dot on the horizon.
When the Cops survive their open long distance charge long enough to engage Bane's thugs in hand to hand combat at the end of DKR its ridiculous, because they paint the thugs as realistic criminals with AK-47s. You can't turn realism on and off in a movie like DKR did and not leave the audience in the lurch. Decide which you want and stick with it. In DKR case lots of dead cops and Bane triumphant.
The sky was full of stars, every star an exploding ship. One of ours.
It was some decent action scenes, villains so monstrously and moronically EVIL that there was no possible way of them winning even if the hero did nothing (and he didn't actually do much), and a political message with all the subtly of a brick, yet without any actual teeth. Matt Damon being the only white person in all of LA aside, Jodie Foster and Sharlto Copley were the real disappointments. Foster's character was awful, and she didn't do anything to improve it, and Copley's character bounced wildly from charming bad guy crazy (mostly when he wasn't talking and just giving people the finger while he blew them up) to painful to have on screen (any time he tried to deliver some "crazy" monologue).
If this movie had been made 20 years ago then Paul Verhoeven would have directed it, and it would have been amazing.
The violence in "Elysium" did remind me of "Robocop".
(From the previous thread, courtesy of @jungleroomx)
Some guy on Cracked, a website I usually love reading, just said The Dark Knight Rises is the new low point for the Batman franchise.
I guess if you pretend 90% of the Batman material never happened.
I agree with the "MOAR CLIX"-type headline, but from what I remember of the Kilmer and Clooney movies... they may have been ill-timed, goofy, and had too much neon, but they didn't have plot holes you could fly a Batmobile through.
It's odd; I liked the actors in the recent trilogy, but the stories were not that great.
Hell, the Tim Burton ones are basically as goofy and silly as the others and the only reason to think they were any more serious is because there was no neon. It was silly comic-fun with nonsensical stuff happening all the damn time but at least it didn't pretend to be anything more.
I have to agree to that. When Batman and Robin dodge bullets in B&R its almost believable because the thugs are shooting at them with Neon light Tommy guns while wearing dayglo makeup. You already know seriousness is out the window and realism is a dot on the horizon.
When the Cops survive their open long distance charge long enough to engage Bane's thugs in hand to hand combat at the end of DKR its ridiculous, because they paint the thugs as realistic criminals with AK-47s. You can't turn realism on and off in a movie like DKR did and not leave the audience in the lurch. Decide which you want and stick with it. In DKR case lots of dead cops and Bane triumphant.
That scene in DKR could have been easily fixed if they just had Batman launch some smoke grenades and flashbangs into Bane's army. Adding a lot of smoke would have also helped to obscure how terribly choreographed the extras were.
I have been reminded of Outland by an article on the AV Club. It's an excellent, low key SF version of High Noon starring Sean Connery, but I can't remember the last time I saw it anywhere near TV.
It was some decent action scenes, villains so monstrously and moronically EVIL that there was no possible way of them winning even if the hero did nothing (and he didn't actually do much), and a political message with all the subtly of a brick, yet without any actual teeth. Matt Damon being the only white person in all of LA aside, Jodie Foster and Sharlto Copley were the real disappointments. Foster's character was awful, and she didn't do anything to improve it, and Copley's character bounced wildly from charming bad guy crazy (mostly when he wasn't talking and just giving people the finger while he blew them up) to painful to have on screen (any time he tried to deliver some "crazy" monologue).
If this movie had been made 20 years ago then Paul Verhoeven would have directed it, and it would have been amazing.
The violence in "Elysium" did remind me of "Robocop".
Watched some movies over the break with my wife, quick reviews of each:
Dredd - Definately worth a watch -
Low budget sci-fi film, that really made the most of it's limited budget. Acting talent could have been better (too many pauses in their speaking, don't Shatner it up so much!). As long as you go in expecting a low budget sci-fi action film, you'll have a great time. If you're expecting anything else, prepare to be disappointed.
This would be a great movie to MST3K or to watch like Evil Dead, making fun of it and getting laughs for a repeat.
Cloud Atlas - I'd take a pass -
So, this movie is supposed to be about about six stories happening through various parts of man's history, and how they all tie together. There are a lot of problems with this concent including, but not limited to:
1) It's difficult for most people to follow six different story lines simutaneously.
2) This is compounded by use of strong accents. This made it difficult to understand what was being said at all during parts of the movie.
3) They make very fast transitions between the time periods.
The stories are supposed to be interconnected, but they really felt disjointed. Rather than using subtle ideas, the director chose to have repeated phrases and the commet birthmark tie the narratives together. This made me feel like I was being bludgeoned to remember that the narratives were supposed to tie together.
Re-use of the same set of actors for almost every role grated on me as well. The makeup used to make the white male actors appear oriental harkens back to the days of blackface in the 60's and 70's. It just wasn't well executed.
Overall, I kept expecting some grand narrative to come out of these seperate stories, but I don't feel like one ever came together. It felt like Lost, teasing me with something more, but never delivering.
Safe - Strongly Recommended -
A super smart chinese girl is kidnapped from her family and sent to America to work for Chinese Gangs as a living computer. Statham, an ex-cop and now cage fighter, runs into her after failing to take a dive and getting in trouble with the Russian mafia. The russians want the girl, the Chinese want the girl, the dirty cops want the girl, but she ends up running into Statham. Badassness ensues.
If I was ever in a cinema or even a lounge watching Dredd and someone started doing that MST3K thing ten strong men would not be enough to keep me off them.
If I was ever in a cinema or even a lounge watching Dredd and someone started doing that MST3K thing ten strong men would not be enough to keep me off them.
I have enough respect for others not to do that in a theater. However, since it's on netflix and I have my own domicile, I should think I can get away with it.
If I was ever in a cinema or even a lounge watching Dredd and someone started doing that MST3K thing ten strong men would not be enough to keep me off them.
I have enough respect for others not to do that in a theater. However, since it's on netflix and I have my own domicile, I should think I can get away with it.
You'd think, but no.
If I ever wander past your house and hear you MST3K-ing a movie, I will break your shit off. Shit will be going down.
I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
(From the previous thread, courtesy of @jungleroomx)
Some guy on Cracked, a website I usually love reading, just said The Dark Knight Rises is the new low point for the Batman franchise.
I guess if you pretend 90% of the Batman material never happened.
I agree with the "MOAR CLIX"-type headline, but from what I remember of the Kilmer and Clooney movies... they may have been ill-timed, goofy, and had too much neon, but they didn't have plot holes you could fly a Batmobile through.
It's odd; I liked the actors in the recent trilogy, but the stories were not that great.
Hell, the Tim Burton ones are basically as goofy and silly as the others and the only reason to think they were any more serious is because there was no neon. It was silly comic-fun with nonsensical stuff happening all the damn time but at least it didn't pretend to be anything more.
I have to agree to that. When Batman and Robin dodge bullets in B&R its almost believable because the thugs are shooting at them with Neon light Tommy guns while wearing dayglo makeup. You already know seriousness is out the window and realism is a dot on the horizon.
When the Cops survive their open long distance charge long enough to engage Bane's thugs in hand to hand combat at the end of DKR its ridiculous, because they paint the thugs as realistic criminals with AK-47s. You can't turn realism on and off in a movie like DKR did and not leave the audience in the lurch. Decide which you want and stick with it. In DKR case lots of dead cops and Bane triumphant.
This is weird. You must have stumbled in here from an alternate universe in which Batman and Robin was not the most terrible thing ever. You should know that things are a little different in our universe, and that trying to defend B&R in any capacity will make you sound like a crazy person.
I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
It was some decent action scenes, villains so monstrously and moronically EVIL that there was no possible way of them winning even if the hero did nothing (and he didn't actually do much), and a political message with all the subtly of a brick, yet without any actual teeth. Matt Damon being the only white person in all of LA aside, Jodie Foster and Sharlto Copley were the real disappointments. Foster's character was awful, and she didn't do anything to improve it, and Copley's character bounced wildly from charming bad guy crazy (mostly when he wasn't talking and just giving people the finger while he blew them up) to painful to have on screen (any time he tried to deliver some "crazy" monologue).
If this movie had been made 20 years ago then Paul Verhoeven would have directed it, and it would have been amazing.
The violence in "Elysium" did remind me of "Robocop".
So basically Neill Blomkamp is Paul Verhoeven 2.0
I don't think it quite works. Blomkamp, from watching both his movies, has only the thinest veneer of a political message.
It feels like he's not even really trying to tell one, he's just using it as a backdrop to tell a sci-fi story with lots of explosions.
+1
L Ron HowardThe duckMinnesotaRegistered Userregular
It was some decent action scenes, villains so monstrously and moronically EVIL that there was no possible way of them winning even if the hero did nothing (and he didn't actually do much), and a political message with all the subtly of a brick, yet without any actual teeth. Matt Damon being the only white person in all of LA aside, Jodie Foster and Sharlto Copley were the real disappointments. Foster's character was awful, and she didn't do anything to improve it, and Copley's character bounced wildly from charming bad guy crazy (mostly when he wasn't talking and just giving people the finger while he blew them up) to painful to have on screen (any time he tried to deliver some "crazy" monologue).
If this movie had been made 20 years ago then Paul Verhoeven would have directed it, and it would have been amazing.
The violence in "Elysium" did remind me of "Robocop".
So basically Neill Blomkamp is Paul Verhoeven 2.0
I don't think it quite works. Blomkamp, from watching both his movies, has only the thinest veneer of a political message.
It feels like he's not even really trying to tell one, he's just using it as a backdrop to tell a sci-fi story with lots of explosions.
I probably don't fully understand Verhoeven's work, but I would say the same about it. Detroit rotting away, and being in almost complete anarchy, is such a perfect setting for a future (now current) story.
Verhoeven uses political commentary as a backdrop to his sci-fi stories. Whereas I think Blomkompf uses a sci-fi story to transmit his political messages.
Posts
I watched Half Nelson a couple of days ago. It was alright. I remember people saying how great Gosling was in it. He wasn't bad, but I wasn't exactly blown away.
Ethan isn't so much jaded and cynical but bitter and hate filled having very little of his humanity left. His whole quest is driven by a pair of hates. His racism is so extreme that he's going to kill his own niece because of her taint. And his much more personal hatred of Scar driven by his love of Martha and Scar's rape of her. Even at the end of the film, when he shows that he hasn't completely lost his humanity, the film makes clear that he can never rejoin society. He's left outside as the camera pulls back, the audience moving with the settlers representing civilization while he can not cross the threshold of the door to rejoin us.
I watched Pi the other day. It was really good and creepy. My only wish is that it was longer (although being that it was Aronofsky's first movie, I can understand that it's only 90ish minutes or whatever).
Gosliiiiing
I suspect that Margaret Rutherford was born as a 50-going-on-80 woman, though. She's a hoot, mind you.
"Nothing is gonna save us forever but a lot of things can save us today." - Night in the Woods
All this and a bunch of things that happen contribute to Alicia's mental health starting to deteriorate, and that's what the movie is all about. She's slowly slipping further and further into psychosis, but the people she's with don't really want to think about it beyond "she's a bit weird", despite her obviously getting less and less stable. It's only after she does something fairly drastic towards the end of the movie before the others start to contemplate getting her some help, but by then she's in full on mental breakdown mode and things end on a really depressing note.
It should be noted that despite being a "realistic Evil Dead", people don't get murdered in increasingle comic booky ways. The mental breakdown of Alicia is much more, uh, "mundane", which really contributes to the horror of the situation.
With these depressing realistic horror movies it's kind of difficult to recommend them because that basically amounts to "hey, go watch this movie and be bummed out for the rest of the day", but if that's your thing, Magic Magic is really well made one of those. Hell, I even remembered two of the characters' names. That usually doesn't happen with horror movies.
Where did you go to get your hands on this? It's my understanding it's not getting a theatrical release.
Rented it from the online rentery of the TV box that my ISP sent me.
The law says you cannot kill that virgin but I see a lot of lawbreakers up in this haunted house, alright alright alright.
I agree with the "MOAR CLIX"-type headline, but from what I remember of the Kilmer and Clooney movies... they may have been ill-timed, goofy, and had too much neon, but they didn't have plot holes you could fly a Batmobile through.
It's odd; I liked the actors in the recent trilogy, but the stories were not that great.
Hell, the Tim Burton ones are basically as goofy and silly as the others and the only reason to think they were any more serious is because there was no neon. It was silly comic-fun with nonsensical stuff happening all the damn time but at least it didn't pretend to be anything more.
i am fully prepared for my butt to be exploderated
edit: OMG I CAN SEE THE ROCK THIS FILM IS LOOKNG GOOD ALREADY
Dwayne Johnson is not quite as effective as he used to be in tricking me into seeing bad movies. But he's still pretty good.
Caught 1408 on cable last week--it may be because I'm a total wuss when it comes to any kind of horror in films (though I don't find Alien scary), but I enjoyed it much more than I do most psychological horror stuff. Great back-and-forth between Cusack and Jackson ("It's an evil fucking room!"), and Cusack by himself was entertaining.
ok this shits legit, i give it a pass
LOL
Thought it was a good response.
PSN / Xbox / NNID: Fodder185
I cannot fathom a way for them to make a sequel that did not completely undermine the entire point/statement made by the first.
I would be way more interested in seeing the same genre deconstruction and reconstruction aimed at other genres. Although how it could be done, or if for that matter, is another question entirely.
PSN:Furlion
It was some decent action scenes, villains so monstrously and moronically EVIL that there was no possible way of them winning even if the hero did nothing (and he didn't actually do much), and a political message with all the subtly of a brick, yet without any actual teeth. Matt Damon being the only white person in all of LA aside, Jodie Foster and Sharlto Copley were the real disappointments. Foster's character was awful, and she didn't do anything to improve it, and Copley's character bounced wildly from charming bad guy crazy (mostly when he wasn't talking and just giving people the finger while he blew them up) to painful to have on screen (any time he tried to deliver some "crazy" monologue).
If this movie had been made 20 years ago then Paul Verhoeven would have directed it, and it would have been amazing.
Anyone want to beta read a paranormal mystery novella? Here's your chance.
stream
I have to agree to that. When Batman and Robin dodge bullets in B&R its almost believable because the thugs are shooting at them with Neon light Tommy guns while wearing dayglo makeup. You already know seriousness is out the window and realism is a dot on the horizon.
When the Cops survive their open long distance charge long enough to engage Bane's thugs in hand to hand combat at the end of DKR its ridiculous, because they paint the thugs as realistic criminals with AK-47s. You can't turn realism on and off in a movie like DKR did and not leave the audience in the lurch. Decide which you want and stick with it. In DKR case lots of dead cops and Bane triumphant.
Big WTF moment, I was expecting a ploy by Batman but it wad just dumb.
The violence in "Elysium" did remind me of "Robocop".
That scene in DKR could have been easily fixed if they just had Batman launch some smoke grenades and flashbangs into Bane's army. Adding a lot of smoke would have also helped to obscure how terribly choreographed the extras were.
Choose Your Own Chat 1 Choose Your Own Chat 2 Choose Your Own Chat 3
At least, it is here in the states.
Netflix here has a much reduced library, and no way of searching it that I know of. But US folks should watch it.
Choose Your Own Chat 1 Choose Your Own Chat 2 Choose Your Own Chat 3
So basically Neill Blomkamp is Paul Verhoeven 2.0
Dredd - Definately worth a watch -
This would be a great movie to MST3K or to watch like Evil Dead, making fun of it and getting laughs for a repeat.
Cloud Atlas - I'd take a pass -
1) It's difficult for most people to follow six different story lines simutaneously.
2) This is compounded by use of strong accents. This made it difficult to understand what was being said at all during parts of the movie.
3) They make very fast transitions between the time periods.
The stories are supposed to be interconnected, but they really felt disjointed. Rather than using subtle ideas, the director chose to have repeated phrases and the commet birthmark tie the narratives together. This made me feel like I was being bludgeoned to remember that the narratives were supposed to tie together.
Re-use of the same set of actors for almost every role grated on me as well. The makeup used to make the white male actors appear oriental harkens back to the days of blackface in the 60's and 70's. It just wasn't well executed.
Overall, I kept expecting some grand narrative to come out of these seperate stories, but I don't feel like one ever came together. It felt like Lost, teasing me with something more, but never delivering.
Safe - Strongly Recommended -
Choose Your Own Chat 1 Choose Your Own Chat 2 Choose Your Own Chat 3
I have enough respect for others not to do that in a theater. However, since it's on netflix and I have my own domicile, I should think I can get away with it.
You'd think, but no.
If I ever wander past your house and hear you MST3K-ing a movie, I will break your shit off. Shit will be going down.
This is weird. You must have stumbled in here from an alternate universe in which Batman and Robin was not the most terrible thing ever. You should know that things are a little different in our universe, and that trying to defend B&R in any capacity will make you sound like a crazy person.
I don't think it quite works. Blomkamp, from watching both his movies, has only the thinest veneer of a political message.
It feels like he's not even really trying to tell one, he's just using it as a backdrop to tell a sci-fi story with lots of explosions.
I probably don't fully understand Verhoeven's work, but I would say the same about it. Detroit rotting away, and being in almost complete anarchy, is such a perfect setting for a future (now current) story.
Verhoeven uses political commentary as a backdrop to his sci-fi stories. Whereas I think Blomkompf uses a sci-fi story to transmit his political messages.