The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Any chemists here? ETOH alternative question.

XobyteXobyte Registered User regular
I work in an alcohol and drug treatment facility. A few weeks ago, a coworker of mine was discussing how he'd come across a chemical shorthand similar to ETOH. But where ETOH signifies ethanol alcohol meant for consumption, this abbreviation was used to signify alcohols not intended for consumption. Whether this specified methylated alcohols, or simply non-toxic yet non-consumables such as hand sanitizer/mouthwash was not clear.

I've spent some time on Google, but I'm having difficulty coming up with the proper search terms. I thought some actual chemists might know the answer.

Posts

  • mtsmts Dr. Robot King Registered User regular
    well ethanol is EtOH, as far as i know there is no shorthand for non-drinkable alcohol. there are shorthands for some of the other alcohols, MeOH, for methanol, but thats about it

    camo_sig.png
  • Jebus314Jebus314 Registered User regular
    Denatured alcohol has additives specifically added to make it not suitable for consumption.

    "The world is a mess, and I just need to rule it" - Dr Horrible
  • YoSoyTheWalrusYoSoyTheWalrus Registered User regular
    edited October 2013
    @Xobyte Perhaps you are thinking of ROH or R-OH. R denotes an unknown or variable group in chemistry. So ROH or R-OH is fairly commonly used to indicate a general or unknown type of alcohol, although not necessarily a non-ethanol. I assume you want to use this to write on patient charts faster or something?

    YoSoyTheWalrus on
    tumblr_mvlywyLVys1qigwg9o1_250.png
  • BurtletoyBurtletoy Registered User regular
    IPA for Isopropyl Alcohol?

  • Regina FongRegina Fong Allons-y, Alonso Registered User regular
    edited October 2013
    ^

    IPA might be it. I don't see why methanol or methanol-containing alcohols would be in a drug treatment facility, the stuff is really poisonous. But isopropyl alcohol has more everyday uses.

    Regina Fong on
  • AmarylAmaryl Registered User regular
    It could also just be pure alcohol; Where most of the water is removed, which makes it unsuitable for comsumption.

  • tinwhiskerstinwhiskers Registered User regular
    Amaryl wrote: »
    It could also just be pure alcohol; Where most of the water is removed, which makes it unsuitable for comsumption.

    Says Who?

    1347926083_Everclear_alcohol_content.jpg

    6ylyzxlir2dz.png
  • GdiguyGdiguy San Diego, CARegistered User regular
    Amaryl wrote: »
    It could also just be pure alcohol; Where most of the water is removed, which makes it unsuitable for comsumption.

    It's only bad because most pure-ish ethanol sold commercially has additional chemicals (methanol, butyl alcohol, toluene, etc) that are very very toxic in order to make them not drinkable.

    It's perfectly possible to buy pure, 95-100% ethanol (though 100% is much harder to make and thus more expensive than 95%), it's a bit harder to find for consumption use but we buy it all the time for research purposes (you use ethanol in lots of lab protocols, and we can't have that extra crap in it).

  • Jebus314Jebus314 Registered User regular
    Gdiguy wrote: »
    Amaryl wrote: »
    It could also just be pure alcohol; Where most of the water is removed, which makes it unsuitable for comsumption.

    It's only bad because most pure-ish ethanol sold commercially has additional chemicals (methanol, butyl alcohol, toluene, etc) that are very very toxic in order to make them not drinkable.

    It's perfectly possible to buy pure, 95-100% ethanol (though 100% is much harder to make and thus more expensive than 95%), it's a bit harder to find for consumption use but we buy it all the time for research purposes (you use ethanol in lots of lab protocols, and we can't have that extra crap in it).

    It's actually ridiculously cheap for research purposes because there's no sin tax. Like I sometimes buy 100% pure ethanol for like $15 dollars a gallon from sigma.

    "The world is a mess, and I just need to rule it" - Dr Horrible
  • AmarylAmaryl Registered User regular
    Even the picture linked above says you shouldn't be drinking it without mixing it.

    having Anhydrous Ethanol (>96%) Isn't something I would suggest ingesting pure. Although I do enjoy the visit customs gives me every-year to make sure I'm not violating my license.

  • TheCanManTheCanMan GT: Gasman122009 JerseyRegistered User regular
    edited October 2013
    Amaryl wrote: »
    Even the picture linked above says you shouldn't be drinking it without mixing it.

    having Anhydrous Ethanol (>96%) Isn't something I would suggest ingesting pure. Although I do enjoy the visit customs gives me every-year to make sure I'm not violating my license.

    That disclaimer is only there so they don't get sued for alcohol poisoning. There's nothing inherently more toxic in Everclear than in any other liquor. The only difference is the concentration makes it easier to overdose.

    TheCanMan on
  • KiplingKipling Registered User regular
    TheCanMan wrote: »
    Amaryl wrote: »
    Even the picture linked above says you shouldn't be drinking it without mixing it.

    having Anhydrous Ethanol (>96%) Isn't something I would suggest ingesting pure. Although I do enjoy the visit customs gives me every-year to make sure I'm not violating my license.

    That disclaimer is only there so they don't get sued for alcohol poisoning. There's nothing inherently more toxic in Everclear than in any other liquor. The only difference is the concentration makes it easier to overdose.

    Anhydrous ethanol has either methanol or isopropyl alochol as the trace 2-4%. For Everclear, that 5% is water.

    That is not a trivial difference.

    3DS Friends: 1693-1781-7023
  • GdiguyGdiguy San Diego, CARegistered User regular

    Kipling wrote: »
    TheCanMan wrote: »
    Amaryl wrote: »
    Even the picture linked above says you shouldn't be drinking it without mixing it.

    having Anhydrous Ethanol (>96%) Isn't something I would suggest ingesting pure. Although I do enjoy the visit customs gives me every-year to make sure I'm not violating my license.

    That disclaimer is only there so they don't get sued for alcohol poisoning. There's nothing inherently more toxic in Everclear than in any other liquor. The only difference is the concentration makes it easier to overdose.

    Anhydrous ethanol has either methanol or isopropyl alochol as the trace 2-4%. For Everclear, that 5% is water.

    That is not a trivial difference.

    For general public purchase, yes; however, that's not necessarily true - see http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sial/459836?lang=en&region=US

    Also @Jebus314, your prices from sigma are better than ours apparently (by a lot, 1L is ~$90) :)

  • XobyteXobyte Registered User regular
    edited October 2013
    ^

    IPA might be it. I don't see why methanol or methanol-containing alcohols would be in a drug treatment facility, the stuff is really poisonous. But isopropyl alcohol has more everyday uses.

    It's not that we have these substances in our facility. The question was more just to satisfy a curiosity, and if necessary provide more specificity on client charting when appropriate. We deal primarily, though not exclusively, with the homeless population. As such, it's extremely common to see people come in after consuming anything cheap or free or easy to steal. This includes mouthwash, hand sanitizer and cologne to cooking sherry and vanilla extract. I even had one client come in after consuming Lysol for the tiny bit of alcohol it contains.

    I doubt IPA is the shorthand my coworker was thinking of, due to it being extremely specific as to which type of alcohol. R-OH sounds like it may fit the bill though. I'll mention it to him next time we work together, and see if that's what he was remembering.

    Xobyte on
Sign In or Register to comment.