Yeah, seems good. Currently the game seems a little too blatant, with not enough drawbacks for the people on the King's side to allow for much mindfuckery.
The issue is, the King's side is less hampered by what anyone says and more by a lack of resources. It's not possible to see everyone in the game, reliably or not, and that means the game always devolves into the King and his unseen good guy vs the one or two Templar aligned players who still could may be on the King's team. Then neither side can posit any real arguments as to why they're on the King's side, so simple accusations or even not posting becomes a great defense for the remaining Templars.
In the meantime, everyone who's been seen, Templar, Traitor or even Monk alike, becomes sidelined.
I don't think an Assassin role would help this game. What it does need though is some sort of building integrity record that people can point to in lieu of being seen. That way deception is a thing beyond 'I'm good'. And then the game can move from straight logic puzzle and guessing into social territory.
Posts
In the meantime, everyone who's been seen, Templar, Traitor or even Monk alike, becomes sidelined.
I don't think an Assassin role would help this game. What it does need though is some sort of building integrity record that people can point to in lieu of being seen. That way deception is a thing beyond 'I'm good'. And then the game can move from straight logic puzzle and guessing into social territory.