The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
For those wondering why San Antonio was chosen for PAX South available convention space was probably a factor.
The total usable space at the Henry B. Gonzalez Convention Center in San Antonio is 841,000 square feet (78,100 m2), and that doesn't include the 2,300 seat theatre on site. The entire complex is 1.3 million square feet (120,700 m2).
Compare that to the available space at PAX Prime and PAX East:
Washington State Convention Center - 432,700 square feet (40,200 m2) + The Conference Center - 71,000 square feet (6,600 m2) + 2,500 seat theatre
Boston Convention and Exhibition Center - 1,126,100 square feet (104,600 m2), which does include the concert area
So PAX South space is much larger than that of PAX Prime but smaller than PAX East's space, even accounting for the theatre.
so this comes up a lot but the space at the bcec that you reported is only expo space. the actual interior space at the bcec is far more than that (over 1 mil sq ft, take a look at actual floorplans, not Wikipedia). anyhow, San Antonio should be fine.
so this comes up a lot but the space at the bcec that you reported is only expo space. the actual interior space at the bcec is far more than that (over 1 mil sq ft, take a look at actual floorplans, not Wikipedia). anyhow, San Antonio should be fine.
Thanks for the tip. I pulled floor plans for Prime and East and redid my numbers. So much for everything being bigger in Texas
Space is definitely a factor, but San Antonio is a good convention city in a lot of ways. Bigger than Austin, cheaper than Dallas, better weather than Houston, and definitely more to see and do than the latter two. It's much more visitor-friendly, tourism being one of the city's biggest industries, and the convention center is undergoing a major expansion so there will be a lot of additional space available.
I live in Dallas, and I like the DFW metroplex, and I'm glad they're having it somewhere like San Antonio which is much more tourism focused, as was already mentioned. There are so many restaurants along the riverwalk alone, and it makes getting around the downtown area a lot easier.
Space is definitely a factor, but San Antonio is a good convention city in a lot of ways. Bigger than Austin, cheaper than Dallas, better weather than Houston, and definitely more to see and do than the latter two. It's much more visitor-friendly, tourism being one of the city's biggest industries, and the convention center is undergoing a major expansion so there will be a lot of additional space available.
Let's be reasonable - San Antonio has the Alamo, and that's it. The Riverwalk is a dirty creek, and six flags - who cares? Dallas is bland, I agree with that. Houston has terrible traffic and the humidity is awful, but the food variety cannot be beat. Austin is the best city - its diverse, far more interesting places to visit/things to do, and the weather is generally the best in Texas.
0
ohkateyOwner of Bitch Team AlphaAustin, TXRegistered Userregular
Austin is a great city, but the convention center here is TINY and traffic is already worse here than any other Texas city (and ALMOST anywhere in the country, according to a bunch of recent studies apparently). There also aren't a lot of hotels downtown/near the convention center, to be honest. I say this with love, but Austin couldn't support a convention the size of PAX.
Austin is a great city, but the convention center here is TINY and traffic is already worse here than any other Texas city (and ALMOST anywhere in the country, according to a bunch of recent studies apparently). There also aren't a lot of hotels downtown/near the convention center, to be honest. I say this with love, but Austin couldn't support a convention the size of PAX.
I've lived in Houston and Austin, traveled to San Antonio and Dallas. There is nothing - NOTHING worse than Houston traffic. Austin has bad traffic, but its nothing compared to Houston. Dallas is actually not bad for a major city. San Antonio is a non factor.
Not trying to debate (as I'm not from Texas and don't have a horse in that race) but I have been doing some travel research for San Antonio and so far it is looking like a good spot for PAX.
I quickly found a dozen hotels within a 10 minute walk to the convention center, many within a 5 minute or less walk and many again are pretty big. I can only imagine the hotel room capacity around the convention center.
The convention center hosts other large conventions and has glowing reviews on Google and various travel sites. I haven't looked at food options yet, but there is a restaurant in the convention center, another in the hotel connected to the convention center, and the hotel's lounge becomes a sushi bar in the evenings. There's also a mall a 5-10 walk away which I assume has a food court and surrounding restaurants. Even the airport is only 8 miles away, though it looks like PAX is at the very end of the public bus route so it will feel a lot longer
As for things to do... I haven't looked at that yet but even with a Thursday arrival I wouldn't expect to have that much time to be a tourist. Surely there will be new pre and post-PAX events and traditions started and late parties, not to mention PAX itself.
For those wondering why San Antonio was chosen for PAX South available convention space was probably a factor.
The total usable space at the Henry B. Gonzalez Convention Center in San Antonio is 841,000 square feet (78,100 m2), and that doesn't include the 2,300 seat theatre on site. The entire complex is 1.3 million square feet (120,700 m2).
Compare that to the available space at PAX Prime and PAX East:
Washington State Convention Center - 432,700 square feet (40,200 m2) + The Conference Center - 71,000 square feet (6,600 m2) + 2,500 seat theatre
Boston Convention and Exhibition Center - 1,126,100 square feet (104,600 m2), which does include the concert area
So PAX South space is much larger than that of PAX Prime but smaller than PAX East's space, even accounting for the theatre.
Well, for one, your numbers are off. BCEC is bigger than that once you factor in all the available space - and your numbers ignore the fact that Prime consumes every ballroom, theatre, orchestra space, lobby, and outhouse in the entire Seattle downtown area. I'm not sure how much square footage that equates to, but I'd bet money it equates to more space than BCEC all said and told.
The question becomes, as in another thread, whether South will ever need even close to that much space given the odd time of year it's at, the largely underserviced airport in the city (even if you include AUS), etc.
I don't think that prime uses more space than East. I certainly could be wrong, but it would surprise me. Either way, it appears that South will have plenty of space at least for a couple of years. Enough to discover how much they will need, anyhow.
+3
SkeleVaderYour Friendly Dark Lord of DestructionRegistered Userregular
I don't think that prime uses more space than East. I certainly could be wrong, but it would surprise me. Either way, it appears that South will have plenty of space at least for a couple of years. Enough to discover how much they will need, anyhow.
I fully expect this to be similar to East. I think East started out with a short contract to test the waters, then once they realized the BCEC is perfect for pax they did the huge extension. If the San Antonio space isn't great after 2 years, they'll probably move it somewhere else for the 4th or 5th year. It looks like it will be a good spot though, with all the hotels nearby and in close proximity of the convention center. As East has shown, it's not /all/ about the surrounding area being great to make a good pax, and simply having close hotels will make things good.
I fully expect this to be similar to East. I think East started out with a short contract to test the waters, then once they realized the BCEC is perfect for pax they did the huge extension. If the San Antonio space isn't great after 2 years, they'll probably move it somewhere else for the 4th or 5th year. It looks like it will be a good spot though, with all the hotels nearby and in close proximity of the convention center. As East has shown, it's not /all/ about the surrounding area being great to make a good pax, and simply having close hotels will make things good.
I agree, but Downtown San Antonio is quite small and full of interesting things to explore.
I agree, but Downtown San Antonio is quite small and full of interesting things to explore.
This is true. The Alamo is half a mile from the convention center, the Riverwalk is across the street, and off the top of my head I can think of half a dozen outstanding bars and restaurants within walking distance.
I was super happy when they announced this...since I live in San Antonio. I just hope I don't miss the badge sales for this like I do every other PAX and end up having to buy them off ebay.
I was super happy when they announced this...since I live in San Antonio. I just hope I don't miss the badge sales for this like I do every other PAX and end up having to buy them off ebay.
Dibs on couch space!
0
DaNickaStudly NurdPeoples Republic Of Massachusetts, DunstableRegistered Userregular
I don't blame them since they had no way of knowing. MAGFest has consistently been the first half of january for as long as I've been going. Also, they apparently did their market research and found only a 5% crossover between pax east and pax prime, so apparently geography is a pretty heavy influence.
I could be wrong but tough to get bigger then BCEC anywhere in continental US in a dedicated convention center. After the new expansion they doing it is suppose to be the largest in the western hemisphere. As far as bigger being better in Texas, the best comment I heard was in Alaska.. If Texas is sick of being the second largest state, we can help them up, we could make 2 states out of Alaska, and then they would be third
If all of PAX can fit in the Henry Gonzalez center then I think SA fits PAX. As far as I know, 4 PAX Easts in BCEC and things still haven't been moved off site. So obviously Boston was the right choice. Prime, well things were moved out of the convention center starting around 08/09ish I believe. Seattle does not fit prime but since it is the PA hometown an exception can be made, plus I love visiting Seattle
I was super happy when they announced this...since I live in San Antonio. I just hope I don't miss the badge sales for this like I do every other PAX and end up having to buy them off ebay.
Dibs on couch space!
Sadly, that space was spoken for within moments of the tweet!
So it's my hometown, making me a bit biased, but San Antonio is an awesome city. I wish they had gotten the Alamodome but I suppose that was always a pipe dream The new H.B.G. is actually pretty awesome, I've walked it before for a couple of local conventions. The theater is quite large and unlike the BCEC, there are a ton of hotels in the area. I will say one thing to those thinking of coming in for this... our airport is kind of lame, plan on a taxi or arranging for a hotel shuttle to downtown, don't even try the buses or you'll be waiting FOREVER. That said, you won't be paying what you would for a hotel near the BCEC or near the WSCC, and everything in downtown is within walking distance. I'm a 20+ year resident, so feel free to poke me with questions
Posts
Thanks for the tip. I pulled floor plans for Prime and East and redid my numbers. So much for everything being bigger in Texas
Let's be reasonable - San Antonio has the Alamo, and that's it. The Riverwalk is a dirty creek, and six flags - who cares? Dallas is bland, I agree with that. Houston has terrible traffic and the humidity is awful, but the food variety cannot be beat. Austin is the best city - its diverse, far more interesting places to visit/things to do, and the weather is generally the best in Texas.
I've lived in Houston and Austin, traveled to San Antonio and Dallas. There is nothing - NOTHING worse than Houston traffic. Austin has bad traffic, but its nothing compared to Houston. Dallas is actually not bad for a major city. San Antonio is a non factor.
I quickly found a dozen hotels within a 10 minute walk to the convention center, many within a 5 minute or less walk and many again are pretty big. I can only imagine the hotel room capacity around the convention center.
The convention center hosts other large conventions and has glowing reviews on Google and various travel sites. I haven't looked at food options yet, but there is a restaurant in the convention center, another in the hotel connected to the convention center, and the hotel's lounge becomes a sushi bar in the evenings. There's also a mall a 5-10 walk away which I assume has a food court and surrounding restaurants. Even the airport is only 8 miles away, though it looks like PAX is at the very end of the public bus route so it will feel a lot longer
As for things to do... I haven't looked at that yet but even with a Thursday arrival I wouldn't expect to have that much time to be a tourist. Surely there will be new pre and post-PAX events and traditions started and late parties, not to mention PAX itself.
Texas Train Trip, anyone?
Well, for one, your numbers are off. BCEC is bigger than that once you factor in all the available space - and your numbers ignore the fact that Prime consumes every ballroom, theatre, orchestra space, lobby, and outhouse in the entire Seattle downtown area. I'm not sure how much square footage that equates to, but I'd bet money it equates to more space than BCEC all said and told.
The question becomes, as in another thread, whether South will ever need even close to that much space given the odd time of year it's at, the largely underserviced airport in the city (even if you include AUS), etc.
I made an estimation sheet awhile back to compare the sizes of WSCC, BCEC, & the OCC (since a few people were saying Portland was much bigger) and I just added the off site areas used in Prime 2013 to it.
The main Convention center areas I used an On screen estimating program to calculate the exact Square footage of available space based on the floor plans. The additional area for Prime I just added what square footage the hotel website said they had for the areas Pax used.
Even with being generous with the Paramount & Benaroya, Prime still falls well short of East.
I agree, but Downtown San Antonio is quite small and full of interesting things to explore.
This is true. The Alamo is half a mile from the convention center, the Riverwalk is across the street, and off the top of my head I can think of half a dozen outstanding bars and restaurants within walking distance.
Check out my YouTube Pinny Arcade Videos!
Dibs on couch space!
I don't blame them since they had no way of knowing. MAGFest has consistently been the first half of january for as long as I've been going. Also, they apparently did their market research and found only a 5% crossover between pax east and pax prime, so apparently geography is a pretty heavy influence.
Sadly, that space was spoken for within moments of the tweet!
Check out my YouTube Pinny Arcade Videos!