The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Choose Your Own [Conspiracy Theories]

DivideByZeroDivideByZero Social Justice BlackguardRegistered User regular
You are a member of the PENNY-ARCADE FORUMS. One day you are reading a THREAD about MANIACS when you come across an ARTICLE on ESQUIRE about what some of these MANIACS actually BELIEVE.
A Maniac wrote:
“The assumption is that the BLM is part of the federal government. But we need to check the facts on that one. The BLM doesn’t work for the government: they work for the United Nations. They might as well be wearing blue helmets. If we find out there’s money being exchanged between Harry Reid and the Chinese government, no one should be surprised.”

A self-trained lawyer tells me the same. He adds that Bar-certified lawyers, like the ones who prosecuted Bundy, have sworn loyalty to the British government, whose statutes encourage sex with clients. “That’s what they do with all their clients.”

Intrigued, you READ FURTHER and come across THIS GUY:

photo-614-3.jpg

who is very concerned about MICROCHIPS that the GOVERNMENT is FORCIBLY IMPLANTING in INFANTS at birth.

Intrigued, you GOOGLE THAT SHIT to learn the REAL DEAL.

WKle1iF.png?1

Sounds LEGIT. But what about the WEBSITE that guy so helpfully stenciled onto his CAR?

NgabSiy.png?1

OH SHIT Mind Control, that sounds serious! What else do they have to say?

What does ICLEI do?
Subverts our constitutional system
Sets the goals for greenhouse gas reduction
Directs your land use planning
Controls your transportation dollars
Pressures the community to comply

The true meaning of ICLEI: International Criminal Law Eliminating Independence

Find out how much your city paid for their Green House Gas (GHG) assessment to ICLEI
“Conspiracy theorists” may actually know some things that you do not. In fact, one recent study found that “conspiracy theorists” are actually more sane than the general population. So the next time you are tempted to dismiss someone as a “conspiracy theorist”, just remember that the one that is crazy might actually be you. The following are 16 popular conspiracy theories that turned out to be true… To the untrained eye most things appear to be mere coincidence…
COURTS are UNLAWFULL - Confirmation - our courts are debt collectors NOT COURTS for JUSTICE . . .

Some of us may already know about the following, but most do NOT:

All these courts are privately owned trading companies. The united States district courts are all owned...those are your article one courts. They're all owned by the united States attorney's executive offices out of Washington DC which is a privately owned corporation. They're article one legislative tribunals. They're not courts.

HOLY SHITBALLS! That is some HEAVY STUFF.

Would you like to know more? [Y/N]

>



This is a thread to discuss Conspiracy Theories, the People Who Love Them, and the One World Government Mind-Controlling Us All through Smart Meters, Chemtrails, HAARP, Lizard People, Wi-Fi, RFID, the Illuminati, Robots, Artificial Intelligence, the Federal Reserve, Nanotechnology, Vaccines, Russian Zombie Ray Guns, Agenda 21, MKULTRA, FEMA, GMO crops, brain implants, weather control, and of course TERMINATOR PARK RANGERS

Access%20(STC).jpg

First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKERS
«134567100

Posts

  • The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    My all time favorite / least favorite conspiracy theory is anything related to 'JFK shot by [X] instead of / as well as Oswald!', because so many people believe it. Even academic people who I respect believe that, at the very least, Oswald had an accomplice who fired from ahead of the motorcade. Even people from one of the official U.S. investigations - the Select Committee on Assassinations - chose to believe a conspiracy on the basis of highly dubious audio recordings than the incredibly solid evidence suggesting that Oswald fired every shot that can be accounted for & acted alone.

    It's something that's just not-crazy enough that people choose to switch off their skepticism and indulge the fantasy.


    With Love and Courage
  • RchanenRchanen Registered User regular
    The Ender wrote: »
    My all time favorite / least favorite conspiracy theory is anything related to 'JFK shot by [X] instead of / as well as Oswald!', because so many people believe it. Even academic people who I respect believe that, at the very least, Oswald had an accomplice who fired from ahead of the motorcade. Even people from one of the official U.S. investigations - the Select Committee on Assassinations - chose to believe a conspiracy on the basis of highly dubious audio recordings than the incredibly solid evidence suggesting that Oswald fired every shot that can be accounted for & acted alone.

    It's something that's just not-crazy enough that people choose to switch off their skepticism and indulge the fantasy.


    There is a quote I like about that: "Its because the crime and the criminal do not balance out. Take the holocaust. History's greatest crime and on the other hand you have the Nazi's who are history's greatest criminals. Then you the murder of a dashing, witty, intellectual war hero President by a man who was literally a complete failure." (I am definitely paraphrasing that quote)

  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    The Ender wrote: »
    My all time favorite / least favorite conspiracy theory is anything related to 'JFK shot by [X] instead of / as well as Oswald!', because so many people believe it. Even academic people who I respect believe that, at the very least, Oswald had an accomplice who fired from ahead of the motorcade. Even people from one of the official U.S. investigations - the Select Committee on Assassinations - chose to believe a conspiracy on the basis of highly dubious audio recordings than the incredibly solid evidence suggesting that Oswald fired every shot that can be accounted for & acted alone.

    It's something that's just not-crazy enough that people choose to switch off their skepticism and indulge the fantasy.

    I have incontrovertible photographic proof

    1491776_10152127692728235_3977235906485352263_n.jpg

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • ShivahnShivahn Unaware of her barrel shifter privilege Western coastal temptressRegistered User, Moderator mod
    "There are three microchip implants that were placed in 2004 while asleep in medical center."

    Poor 2004, what have they done to you : (

  • The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    Feral wrote: »
    The Ender wrote: »
    My all time favorite / least favorite conspiracy theory is anything related to 'JFK shot by [X] instead of / as well as Oswald!', because so many people believe it. Even academic people who I respect believe that, at the very least, Oswald had an accomplice who fired from ahead of the motorcade. Even people from one of the official U.S. investigations - the Select Committee on Assassinations - chose to believe a conspiracy on the basis of highly dubious audio recordings than the incredibly solid evidence suggesting that Oswald fired every shot that can be accounted for & acted alone.

    It's something that's just not-crazy enough that people choose to switch off their skepticism and indulge the fantasy.

    I have incontrovertible photographic proof

    1491776_10152127692728235_3977235906485352263_n.jpg

    Oh shit. Now I look like such a fool.

    Can anyone link me to instructions on how to make a proper tin foil ha-- err-- mind control shield?

    With Love and Courage
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited April 2014
    Rchanen wrote: »
    The Ender wrote: »
    My all time favorite / least favorite conspiracy theory is anything related to 'JFK shot by [X] instead of / as well as Oswald!', because so many people believe it. Even academic people who I respect believe that, at the very least, Oswald had an accomplice who fired from ahead of the motorcade. Even people from one of the official U.S. investigations - the Select Committee on Assassinations - chose to believe a conspiracy on the basis of highly dubious audio recordings than the incredibly solid evidence suggesting that Oswald fired every shot that can be accounted for & acted alone.

    It's something that's just not-crazy enough that people choose to switch off their skepticism and indulge the fantasy.


    There is a quote I like about that: "Its because the crime and the criminal do not balance out. Take the holocaust. History's greatest crime and on the other hand you have the Nazi's who are history's greatest criminals. Then you the murder of a dashing, witty, intellectual war hero President by a man who was literally a complete failure." (I am definitely paraphrasing that quote)

    I liked David Wong's take on that in John Dies At The End:
    Arnie looked like he had come here expecting answers and would now leave empty-handed. I had seen that look before, on the faces of tourists visiting the Texas Book Depository in Dallas where Lee Harvey Oswald took the shots at JFK. I took that tour and met some conspiracy buffs, all of us standing at the gunman’s window and looking down to the spot where the motorcade passed. It’s right there below the window, an easy shot at a slow-moving car. No mystery, just a kid and a rifle and a tragedy. They came looking for dark and terrible revelations and instead found out something even more dark and terrible: that their lives were trite and boring.

    edit: also, filmmaker S. G. Collins discusses the feasibility of faking the moon landings:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGXTF6bs1IU

    Daedalus on
  • Harry DresdenHarry Dresden Registered User regular
    Access%20(STC).jpg

    Get on this, James Cameron.

  • DivideByZeroDivideByZero Social Justice Blackguard Registered User regular
    edited April 2014
    My personal favorite is Morgellon's syndrome, because it's so recent and so typifies the type of person who goes balls-deep on conspiracy nonsense.

    tl;dr: People believe tiny worms/fibers/bugs are growing out of their skin, but doctors can find no evidence of this whatsoever. Post about it on the internet, and suddenly it's a nationwide phenomenon. The CDC conducts a study, determines there's no actual infection, and the patients actually suffer from delusional parasitosis. It immediately morphs into a government coverup because people need to believe that these invisible, undetectable parasites living under their skin are real and not a psychosomatic condition.

    edit: my favorite part:
    The article draws parallels to several mass media-spread mass delusions. An article in the journal Psychosomatics in 2009 similarly asserts that Morgellons is an Internet meme.

    It's a memetic disease.

    DivideByZero on
    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKERS
  • Harry DresdenHarry Dresden Registered User regular
    From what I've noticed with conspiracy theorists is quite a few don't stop at one. It isn't only that the Illuminati control the world - the lizardman are in there somewhere doing lizardy things, the New World Order is bumbling about, 9/11 was an inside job, aliens were responsible for the Malaysia flight 360 disappearance etc etc.

  • RiemannLivesRiemannLives Registered User regular
    I seem to recall reading that reports of people claiming that wind power turbines made them ill do not correlate at all with the locations of actual wind turbines. But they do correlate with areas where the news reported on people claiming wind turbines made them ill.

    Attacked by tweeeeeeees!
  • davidsdurionsdavidsdurions Your Trusty Meatshield Panhandle NebraskaRegistered User regular
    This all makes for entertaining "History" Channel programming.

  • The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    Whomever came up with the term 'Sheeple' has never actually had to work with sheep before.


    Those Goddamn bastards don't give a fuck what you tell them to do.

    With Love and Courage
  • SurfpossumSurfpossum A nonentity trying to preserve the anonymity he so richly deserves.Registered User regular
    A couple of links:

    This study does a lot of work. It shows that conspiracy theorists will believe contradictory ideas as long as both suggest that there is a conspiracy.

    This article brings up what is, to me, the most important aspect of a conspiracy theory: generally, the way information that goes against the conspiracy is accounted for is by expanding the conspiracy to include the source of the contradictory information. This very quickly leads to conspiracy theorists (whether they realize it or not) believing that hundreds of thousands of people are all "in" on something, and, more importantly, it makes them incredibly comfortable discarding huge amounts of information on the basis that none of it can be trusted.

    And for one of my personal favorites, the Umbrella Man. It just so perfectly encapsulates how conspiracy theorists can't fathom the complexity of the world we live in and assume that everything must somehow be connected in the specific way that's in their heads.

  • DivideByZeroDivideByZero Social Justice Blackguard Registered User regular
    The Ender wrote: »
    Whomever came up with the term 'Sheeple' has never actually had to work with sheep before.


    Those Goddamn bastards don't give a fuck what you tell them to do.

    That's why we made these

    pem_herding.jpg

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKERS
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited April 2014
    A small but fairly convincing one that I heard from somebody:

    In the 70s during the Cold War, the CIA leaked fake "classified documents" to various conspiracy theory groups about a captured extraterrestrial spacecraft at Area 51. This would pollute the non-classified sources of information on the base with a bunch of nonsense about aliens, making it harder for the Soviets to determine what they were actually doing there (developing the SR-71 and A-12 reconnaissance planes). This is also allegedly why the "leaked classified documents" stopped coming after the base was transferred from the CIA to the USAF in 1979.

    I'm not entirely sure that I buy it, because a whole bunch of other OXCART-related stuff has been declassified recently (it's at the 40-year mark now) and nothing even hinted at it. If it is true, it didn't really work, R. A. Belyakov's memoirs indicate that Mikoyan was aware of the A-12 back in 1970, very early in the MiG-25's development.

    Daedalus on
  • RchanenRchanen Registered User regular
    The Ender wrote: »
    Whomever came up with the term 'Sheeple' has never actually had to work with sheep before.


    Those Goddamn bastards don't give a fuck what you tell them to do.

    That's why we made these

    pem_herding.jpg

    You mean that's why the new world order made those. So that we would follow our cute overlords into submission, with the only question being "Who wants a tummy wub?"

  • HuuHuu Registered User regular
    From what I've noticed with conspiracy theorists is quite a few don't stop at one. It isn't only that the Illuminati control the world - the lizardman are in there somewhere doing lizardy things, the New World Order is bumbling about, 9/11 was an inside job, aliens were responsible for the Malaysia flight 360 disappearance etc etc.

    This is pretty logical though: once someone takes the mental step to believe that (for example) the world is really run by a secret cabal of jews then its a pretty small step to also believe that 9/11 was an inside job. Its the inital step that is the big one.

    Also, lots of conspiracy nuts believe they're smarter than all us sheeple, so the more 'secrets' they know about/believe the smarter they think they are.

  • ButtcleftButtcleft Registered User regular
    edited April 2014
    I just read the op, and many of its links, and am struggling to keep hold of my will to live.

    Buttcleft on
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    I seem to recall reading that reports of people claiming that wind power turbines made them ill do not correlate at all with the locations of actual wind turbines. But they do correlate with areas where the news reported on people claiming wind turbines made them ill.

    Yes. And not only that, this effect has been used in an actual conspiracy...

    http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/05/09/480747/memo-group-create-fake-grassroots-wind-subversion-campaign-appear-as-a-groundswell
    In February, a group of anti-wind activists gathered in Washington, DC. Their goal: establish a coordinated, nation-wide program of “wind warriors” who could be dispatched to fight the industry anywhere, anytime.
    The organization would combine efforts and create “what should appear as a ‘groundswell’ among grass roots” to counter legislation supporting wind energy on the federal, state and local levels.
    The leader of the group was John Droz, Jr, a long-time wind opponent and a senior fellow at the ultra-conservative American Tradition Institute. ATI calls itself an “environmental” think tank. The organization, known best for suing climate scientist Michael Mann, is devoted to spreading doubt about climate change, opposing state-level renewable energy targets, and stripping away environmental regulations.

    Meanwhile, in Massachusetts,

    http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/article/2014/01/28/wind-turbines/
    Indeed, some conservative activists with ties to the fossil-fuel industry have recognized the benefits of allying themselves with groups like Wind Wise. In 2010, a self-described “backwoods scientist” and prominent climate-change skeptic from North Carolina named John Droz Jr. spoke at a lecture series in West Barnstable organized by Wind Wise’s Cape Cod affiliate. He also gave a talk in Falmouth in 2012 at the invitation of Wind Wise volunteers there. Droz, as it happened, was then a senior fellow at the American Tradition Institute (now called the Energy & Environment Legal Institute), a think tank funded in part by the oil billionaires Charles and David Koch, where he argued tirelessly that turbines are inefficient and a waste of money. In February 2012, Droz hosted a group of “wind warriors” at a two-day meeting in Washington to plan a national public relations campaign against wind energy.

    And another group:

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Industrial_Wind_Action_Group
    The Industrial Wind Action Group proclaims that it is "dedicated to providing information on industrial wind energy to enable communities and government officials to make informed decisions."
    While the homepage of its website implies it is neutral on whether wind power is a good idea or not, elsewhere on its website it is more explicit that it opposes windpower. The group was formed, it states, "to counteract the misleading information promulgated by the wind energy industry and various environmental groups. Support for this effort comes from a large and diversified group of environmentalists, energy experts, and ordinary citizens." [1] However, no specific individuals or organizations are listed anywhere on the website.
    The website was registered on May 31, 2006 by the Parkerhill Technology Group LLC of 286 Parker Hill Road, Lyman, New Hampshire. [2] Parkerhill Technology Group are also listed as the address for contributions to be sent to. [3] The group provides no office address, contact names or contact numbers on its website, only a page to sent an email to the group. [4]
    Parkerhill Technology Group was founded by Jonathan S. Linowes, a self-proclaimed Tea Party activist and climate change denier.[5]
    According to the Wisconsin Gazette, the group "routinely quotes as 'experts' affiliates of various front groups supported by Koch Industries, Charles Koch and the Koch family.

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • DedwrekkaDedwrekka Metal Hell adjacentRegistered User regular
    My personal favorite is Morgellon's syndrome, because it's so recent and so typifies the type of person who goes balls-deep on conspiracy nonsense.

    tl;dr: People believe tiny worms/fibers/bugs are growing out of their skin, but doctors can find no evidence of this whatsoever. Post about it on the internet, and suddenly it's a nationwide phenomenon. The CDC conducts a study, determines there's no actual infection, and the patients actually suffer from delusional parasitosis. It immediately morphs into a government coverup because people need to believe that these invisible, undetectable parasites living under their skin are real and not a psychosomatic condition.

    edit: my favorite part:
    The article draws parallels to several mass media-spread mass delusions. An article in the journal Psychosomatics in 2009 similarly asserts that Morgellons is an Internet meme.

    It's a memetic disease.

    But, in reality, you do have a bunch of eyelash mites! ...probably

  • MortiousMortious The Nightmare Begins Move to New ZealandRegistered User regular
    edited April 2014
    Ooh, I have my own conspiracy theory!

    Recently, the National party has been selling off some of its assests, mostly Power Plants, and they've been pushing for the Mom&Pop inverster thing with below market pricing and bonus shares if you keep them for more than a year.

    Now offically, this is part of their "privatisation is good" plan, and to give New Zealand residents investment opportunities other than property.

    However, most analysts agree that the share price will go up under a National Government, and drop under a Labour/Green Government! And the election is less than a year away, meaning New Zealanders will still have their shares to qualify for the bonus shares!!

    Therefore I propose that the National party is trying to turn honest, hardworking New Zealand residents into Capitalists so that they keep the National Party in power due to greedy self-interest.

    Edit: Wake up sheeple!

    Mortious on
    Move to New Zealand
    It’s not a very important country most of the time
    http://steamcommunity.com/id/mortious
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    Demodex mites are foul. Spoilered for "ew, that's living on my face?"
    They don't have anuses. Their waste product just builds up in their tails until they die. Then when they die the tail erupts and all of the waste product spills out.

    Furthermore, the waste product can cause skin inflammation in some people (and animals) so treating somebody for mites might induce a short-term aggravation of symptoms as the mite holocaust spills mite poop all over your skin.

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • DivideByZeroDivideByZero Social Justice Blackguard Registered User regular
    Is it racist to wonder if calling New Zealanders "sheeple" seems racist?

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKERS
  • RchanenRchanen Registered User regular
    Is it racist to wonder if calling New Zealanders "sheeple" seems racist?

    No. Calling them "Hobbits" is racist.

  • MortiousMortious The Nightmare Begins Move to New ZealandRegistered User regular
    Is it racist to wonder if calling New Zealanders "sheeple" seems racist?

    Sheep farming is Australian (also jokes about loving sheep, which is somehting they have in common with Wales, hence New South Wales)

    New Zealand is cows.

    Move to New Zealand
    It’s not a very important country most of the time
    http://steamcommunity.com/id/mortious
  • DivideByZeroDivideByZero Social Justice Blackguard Registered User regular
    That's what the Illuminati want you to believe.

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKERS
  • MortiousMortious The Nightmare Begins Move to New ZealandRegistered User regular
    Also, I'm pretty sure a couple of years ago, during an ANZUS meeting, the National Party members were secretly replaced by Republicans.

    Move to New Zealand
    It’s not a very important country most of the time
    http://steamcommunity.com/id/mortious
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    Hey, Mortious.

    Hey.

    Mortious.

    Is that *snicker*

    Is that a zed in your anus

    *tee hee*

    or are you just happy to see me?

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    Huu wrote: »
    From what I've noticed with conspiracy theorists is quite a few don't stop at one. It isn't only that the Illuminati control the world - the lizardman are in there somewhere doing lizardy things, the New World Order is bumbling about, 9/11 was an inside job, aliens were responsible for the Malaysia flight 360 disappearance etc etc.

    This is pretty logical though: once someone takes the mental step to believe that (for example) the world is really run by a secret cabal of jews then its a pretty small step to also believe that 9/11 was an inside job. Its the inital step that is the big one.

    Also, lots of conspiracy nuts believe they're smarter than all us sheeple, so the more 'secrets' they know about/believe the smarter they think they are.

    I've seen 'phases' of belief:

    Someone starts by believing in something that is nonsense, but not considered absolutely bonkers (includes no elements of fantasy like Lizard People or UFOs or time travel). Something like the JFK assassination or anti-vaxx crap or the 'sane' versions of the 9/11 conspiracy.

    Then they get reeled into the weirder stuff.

    Honestly, I swear to God, the breaking point for everyone is Chemtrails: either you go that far, read about Chemtrails and then say, "Fuck it. I'm done with this. Give me the 'official story' back, thanks," or you read about Chemtrails and your brain just flops right out of your head. "Oh SHIT! This WHOLE TIME! OF COURSE! WAKE UP SHEEPLE!"

    With Love and Courage
  • RchanenRchanen Registered User regular
    I have been reading Mike Mignola.

    Maybe I should look up and post some Hollow Earth stuff.

  • The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    ...Actually, now that i said that and thought about it for a minute while microwaving a hot dog:

    Chemtrails actually did kind of happen. Not in the way conspiracy theorists say it did, but:

    We put a lead compound in gasoline, had personal vehicles everywhere emitting concerning amounts of lead into the environment, and now if we look back at crime data, it looks like we may have been causing erratic / aggressive behavior on a large scale for the sake of an elite few people's profits.


    *eats hot dog*


    ...Baa-aaa?

    With Love and Courage
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    The Ender wrote: »
    ...Actually, now that i said that and thought about it for a minute while microwaving a hot dog:

    Chemtrails actually did kind of happen. Not in the way conspiracy theorists say it did, but:

    We put a lead compound in gasoline, had personal vehicles everywhere emitting concerning amounts of lead into the environment, and now if we look back at crime data, it looks like we may have been causing erratic / aggressive behavior on a large scale for the sake of an elite few people's profits.


    *eats hot dog*


    ...Baa-aaa?

    are we facebook friends?

    because this is literally the conversation I had today

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • DedwrekkaDedwrekka Metal Hell adjacentRegistered User regular
    Yay Cosmos?

  • The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    Dedwrekka wrote: »
    Yay Cosmos?

    It's kind of a shame that Cosmos didn't touch on the behavior change aspect.


    It's by no means conclusive, but it's kind of chilling to see how well crime rates map onto lead concentrations.

    With Love and Courage
  • enlightenedbumenlightenedbum Registered User regular
    The Ender wrote: »
    Whomever came up with the term 'Sheeple' has never actually had to work with sheep before.


    Those Goddamn bastards don't give a fuck what you tell them to do.

    The point is herd mentality, not that the sheep will follow whatever others tell them. They're following the other sheep.

    I mean, it's still a stupid insult, but at least understand why!

    The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
  • MuzzmuzzMuzzmuzz Registered User regular
    I was dissapointed that Cosmos, while mentioning Thomas Midgley Jr. was responsible for Leaded gas, they never touched on one of his other 'inventions'.


    CFC's.... you know, the stuff that nomnomnomed the Ozone layer? The man managed to invent not one, but two horrible things!

  • DivideByZeroDivideByZero Social Justice Blackguard Registered User regular
    Feral wrote: »
    The Ender wrote: »
    My all time favorite / least favorite conspiracy theory is anything related to 'JFK shot by [X] instead of / as well as Oswald!', because so many people believe it. Even academic people who I respect believe that, at the very least, Oswald had an accomplice who fired from ahead of the motorcade. Even people from one of the official U.S. investigations - the Select Committee on Assassinations - chose to believe a conspiracy on the basis of highly dubious audio recordings than the incredibly solid evidence suggesting that Oswald fired every shot that can be accounted for & acted alone.

    It's something that's just not-crazy enough that people choose to switch off their skepticism and indulge the fantasy.

    I have incontrovertible photographic proof

    1491776_10152127692728235_3977235906485352263_n.jpg

    Are you sure it wasn't a duck?

    "Quack, and to the left. Quack, and to the left."
    How did this take me so long to see?

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKERS
  • DedwrekkaDedwrekka Metal Hell adjacentRegistered User regular
    edited April 2014
    Muzzmuzz wrote: »
    I was dissapointed that Cosmos, while mentioning Thomas Midgley Jr. was responsible for Leaded gas, they never touched on one of his other 'inventions'.


    CFC's.... you know, the stuff that nomnomnomed the Ozone layer? The man managed to invent not one, but two horrible things!

    They're also in your air conditioning (Freon), and a lot of aerosols.
    CFCs are arguably more useful than "knock stopping".

    Dedwrekka on
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    Was it mentioned on Cosmos? Cool.

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    Luckily, effective regulations have minimized the environmental harm from both of those pollutants.

    Suck it, minarchists!

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
This discussion has been closed.