I just started watching this show a few weeks ago for the first time. I'm about halfway through the second season, I think.
I feel like I started at just about the right time.
Some shows need a quarter century to simmer.
It's sort of hard to overstate how influential twin peaks is/was, though. I mean, really. It showed that Lovecraft country could be the bizarre pine-covered American northwest. And how. Between this and Stephen King, horror of the 90s and 2000s has been its own strange, wonderful brand of things.
Would we have True Detective without it? Maybe, but.. no. No way.
+3
Element BrianPeanut Butter ShillRegistered Userregular
ok so probably the most relevant clip is this, foreshadowing the show coming back
that being said, pretty much the only way I'm going to watch this is if Dale Cooper is in fact Dale Cooper and not fucking Bob or i swear to god I'm turning that shit right off
The most exciting thing about this is that Lynch is going to be directing all 9 episodes (along with co-writing every episode with Mark Frost). Just to get Lynch back to directing again after so many years quiet is fantastic, regardless of it being Twin Peaks.
Like literally only a few weeks since I stumbled across the pilot on late night TV and stayed up too late watching it again because it is still the most mind blowing thing.
'Diane, I have in my hand a small box of chocolate bunnies.'
I am terrified that this can't live up to the expectations it needs to. But to find out what happened to Dale Cooper? To be able to introduce it to my daughters (currently 1 and 3 so maybe a few years away yet) without the qualifier that this fantastic experience will end on the worst unresolved cliff hanger you can imagine?
Should there be some sort of spoiler rules set for this thread? Are we just considering everything from the original series and Fire Walk With Me open, or should we tag stuff?
that being said, pretty much the only way I'm going to watch this is if Dale Cooper is in fact Dale Cooper and not fucking Bob or i swear to god I'm turning that shit right off
Barring any official announcement otherwise, I assume Kyle Maclachlan won't come within miles of this project.
His falling-out with David Lynch is legendary, and his absence from the Psych tribute episode was highly conspicuous.
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
0
Element BrianPeanut Butter ShillRegistered Userregular
Should there be some sort of spoiler rules set for this thread? Are we just considering everything from the original series and Fire Walk With Me open, or should we tag stuff?
I really hope there's no expectation to spoiler-tag a 25 year old TV show that has been released on VHS, DVD, Blu-Ray, and Netflix streaming.
But just in case there's any question, since we're still on the front page...
IF ANYBODY READING THIS HAS NOT SEEN TWIN PEAKS, GO WATCH TWIN PEAKS RIGHT FUCKING NOW.
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
that being said, pretty much the only way I'm going to watch this is if Dale Cooper is in fact Dale Cooper and not fucking Bob or i swear to god I'm turning that shit right off
Barring any official announcement otherwise, I assume Kyle Maclachlan won't come within miles of this project.
His falling-out with David Lynch is legendary, and his absence from the Psych tribute episode was highly conspicuous.
I just started watching this show a few weeks ago for the first time. I'm about halfway through the second season, I think.
I feel like I started at just about the right time.
Some shows need a quarter century to simmer.
It's sort of hard to overstate how influential twin peaks is/was, though. I mean, really. It showed that Lovecraft country could be the bizarre pine-covered American northwest. And how. Between this and Stephen King, horror of the 90s and 2000s has been its own strange, wonderful brand of things.
Would we have True Detective without it? Maybe, but.. no. No way.
I've definitely picked up on little vibrations that hint at its influence now and then, and I retroactively see more now, but considering I was about 1 when it was first airing I don't know how much I would have appreciated it.
I went into it knowing next to nothing, though, and couldn't help but think that the pilot was a wonderful trick played on people expecting nothing supernatural about it (like myself).
Also, don't worry about spoilers on my behalf, I already came across the fact that
BOB possesses Cooper or something nooooo not my beloved Cooper
and I'll probably just avoid this thread until I've finished the series.
that being said, pretty much the only way I'm going to watch this is if Dale Cooper is in fact Dale Cooper and not fucking Bob or i swear to god I'm turning that shit right off
Barring any official announcement otherwise, I assume Kyle Maclachlan won't come within miles of this project.
His falling-out with David Lynch is legendary, and his absence from the Psych tribute episode was highly conspicuous.
I just sort of worry that given the shark jumpy nature of season one, and the rather constant downward trend of the show that this will be less than true detective.
People keep mentioning True Detective. If I heart Twin Peaks with all my being, should I be seeking out True Detective for myself? The only other thing that has come close to giving me that TP vibe was Life On a Mars/Ashes to Ashes. And Deadly Premonition obviously.
People keep mentioning True Detective. If I heart Twin Peaks with all my being, should I be seeking out True Detective for myself? The only other thing that has come close to giving me that TP vibe was Life On a Mars/Ashes to Ashes. And Deadly Premonition obviously.
While it shares some themes, True Detective is a very different show stylistically and tonally. Absolutely do not expect it to be Twin Peaks 1.5.
However, it is an excellent show and yes you should seek it out.
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
People keep mentioning True Detective. If I heart Twin Peaks with all my being, should I be seeking out True Detective for myself? The only other thing that has come close to giving me that TP vibe was Life On a Mars/Ashes to Ashes. And Deadly Premonition obviously.
While it shares some themes, True Detective is a very different show stylistically and tonally. Absolutely do not expect it to be Twin Peaks 1.5.
However, it is an excellent show and yes you should seek it out.
They are both detective stories with weird fucked up plots and themes and amazing cinematography.
Other than that, and their quality, they are completely different.
Really excited for this. I'm glad to see the "I'll see you in 25 years" clip was posted, that's the first thing I thought of when I saw the announcement trailer.
The True Detective comparisons are way off. While season 1 of True Detective is fantastic, the only similarities to Twin Peaks I can think of are that occasionally there are trees, and it's rural at times.
Really excited for this. I'm glad to see the "I'll see you in 25 years" clip was posted, that's the first thing I thought of when I saw the announcement trailer.
The True Detective comparisons are way off. While season 1 of True Detective is fantastic, the only similarities to Twin Peaks I can think of are that occasionally there are trees, and it's rural at times.
Nobody's really comparing it to True Detective. The influences are thematic, not stylistic.
Another video game that draws from Twin Peaks, although obviously not to the extent of the fantastic DEADLY PREMONITIONS is Alan Wake. At least early in the game. I'm struggling to think of any others.
The elevator pitch is superficially the same. Fish-out-of-water detective comes to a small rural town, teams up with a local to investigate the murder of a young girl, brings his unusual methods and unusual philosophy on life with him. The murder has some bizarre, possibly supernatural implications. Meanwhile, secondary plotlines expose the seedy underbelly of small town life to the viewer.
There is no doubt in my mind that True Detective would not exist without Twin Peaks.
But otherwise they're diametrically opposed. True Detective strives for psychological and procedural verisimilitude; Twin Peaks has weirdness for the sake of weirdness. Every tiny detail in True Detective is deliberately placed. In Twin Peaks, David Lynch made things up on the fly and the main villain was added in after a filming accident. In Twin Peaks, you have Log Lady; in True Detective, craziness is never cute or endearing, it is always menacing at best or pathetic at worst.
And of course the main characters couldn't get much different. Cooper is endlessly optimistic, cheerful, and gentle. True Detective's Cohle is endlessly pessimistic, brooding, and misanthropic.
True Detective is intense, tightly-wound, and harrowing. It's also fucking amazing. Watch it.
Feral on
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
I am so fucking excited it is like my favourite band are getting back together and also coming to my house to play a concert and they wrote a song about me.
I can almost see Portlandia and Twin Peaks being in the same universe. And hey, the mayor of Portland could very well be Dale Cooper since nobody ever actually says his name...
Alan Wake has a lot of very specific references to Twin Peaks.
The show-within-a-show of Invitation to Love/Night Springs
Double R Diner/Oh Deer Diner
Great Northern Hotel/Cauldron Lake Lodge
Log Lady/Lamp Lady
Black Lodge/Dark Place
Sheriff Breaker is described as the "only girl in the bookhouse," a secret society like Twin Peaks' Bookhouse Boys
There's many others, too. That game wears its influence on its sleeve and I love it.
I think this is actually one of the reasons why I didn't like Alan Wake. It felt like a bad Dreamworks animated comedy, just without the laughs; it's all shallow references. Doing a handful of these, okay, or being more subtle about it - or, if you want to do something more challenging, actually try to live up to what you're referencing -, but Alan Wake just seemed to be playing an extended game of "Remember When?"
On more Twin Peaks, though... It could go horribly wrong. It could be something very different and therefore not meet our expectations. But I'm excited for the potential in this - and even bad Twin Peaks still had a lot going for it. For every scene of James Hurley being sad on his motorbike, there's Lynchian gold in them hills.
Thirith on
"Nothing is gonna save us forever but a lot of things can save us today." - Night in the Woods
Oh God if anyone could be excised entirely from TP to no detriment it would be James ruddy Hurley. His pointless and tedious solo side plot in series 2 was the worst.
I think I might dislike the Andy/Lucy storyline in S2 just as much. But yes, I wouldn't be unhappy if the new series revealed that James died on the way back to his home planet. Remember this gem?
♪♫Just you
and I
together
forever
in love♪♫
At least it's clear where James' surname comes from...
"Nothing is gonna save us forever but a lot of things can save us today." - Night in the Woods
Posts
Which is how Twin Peaks usually makes me, in hindsight.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=nNHsA4WIFvc
I feel like I started at just about the right time.
What.
What?
This isn't real right? My current gut rot is more than I thought it was and I'm in some kind of super Ebola fuelled fever delusion now right?
Some shows need a quarter century to simmer.
It's sort of hard to overstate how influential twin peaks is/was, though. I mean, really. It showed that Lovecraft country could be the bizarre pine-covered American northwest. And how. Between this and Stephen King, horror of the 90s and 2000s has been its own strange, wonderful brand of things.
Would we have True Detective without it? Maybe, but.. no. No way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BL57-9171pk
that being said, pretty much the only way I'm going to watch this is if Dale Cooper is in fact Dale Cooper and not fucking Bob or i swear to god I'm turning that shit right off
Arch,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_goGR39m2k
The most exciting thing about this is that Lynch is going to be directing all 9 episodes (along with co-writing every episode with Mark Frost). Just to get Lynch back to directing again after so many years quiet is fantastic, regardless of it being Twin Peaks.
'Diane, I have in my hand a small box of chocolate bunnies.'
I am terrified that this can't live up to the expectations it needs to. But to find out what happened to Dale Cooper? To be able to introduce it to my daughters (currently 1 and 3 so maybe a few years away yet) without the qualifier that this fantastic experience will end on the worst unresolved cliff hanger you can imagine?
Man.
Man.
Barring any official announcement otherwise, I assume Kyle Maclachlan won't come within miles of this project.
His falling-out with David Lynch is legendary, and his absence from the Psych tribute episode was highly conspicuous.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
Arch,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_goGR39m2k
I really hope there's no expectation to spoiler-tag a 25 year old TV show that has been released on VHS, DVD, Blu-Ray, and Netflix streaming.
But just in case there's any question, since we're still on the front page...
IF ANYBODY READING THIS HAS NOT SEEN TWIN PEAKS, GO WATCH TWIN PEAKS RIGHT FUCKING NOW.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
On the other hand, he did just tweet this:
I went into it knowing next to nothing, though, and couldn't help but think that the pilot was a wonderful trick played on people expecting nothing supernatural about it (like myself).
Also, don't worry about spoilers on my behalf, I already came across the fact that
oh shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
I'm so excited for this. I've been hoping for a new David Lynch film so much, and this is just the best news.
If you don't want to get the blu-ray or obtain the deleted scenes by other means, you can read synopses here:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/jacelacob/twin-peaks-the-missing-pieces-fire-walk-with-me#2sfe9hg
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
I just sort of worry that given the shark jumpy nature of season one, and the rather constant downward trend of the show that this will be less than true detective.
Yay increased possibilities of pleant surprises!
While it shares some themes, True Detective is a very different show stylistically and tonally. Absolutely do not expect it to be Twin Peaks 1.5.
However, it is an excellent show and yes you should seek it out.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
They are both detective stories with weird fucked up plots and themes and amazing cinematography.
Other than that, and their quality, they are completely different.
The True Detective comparisons are way off. While season 1 of True Detective is fantastic, the only similarities to Twin Peaks I can think of are that occasionally there are trees, and it's rural at times.
Twitter 3DS: 0860 - 3257 - 2516
Nobody's really comparing it to True Detective. The influences are thematic, not stylistic.
Another video game that draws from Twin Peaks, although obviously not to the extent of the fantastic DEADLY PREMONITIONS is Alan Wake. At least early in the game. I'm struggling to think of any others.
I am so there.
There's many others, too. That game wears its influence on its sleeve and I love it.
Twitter 3DS: 0860 - 3257 - 2516
The elevator pitch is superficially the same. Fish-out-of-water detective comes to a small rural town, teams up with a local to investigate the murder of a young girl, brings his unusual methods and unusual philosophy on life with him. The murder has some bizarre, possibly supernatural implications. Meanwhile, secondary plotlines expose the seedy underbelly of small town life to the viewer.
There is no doubt in my mind that True Detective would not exist without Twin Peaks.
But otherwise they're diametrically opposed. True Detective strives for psychological and procedural verisimilitude; Twin Peaks has weirdness for the sake of weirdness. Every tiny detail in True Detective is deliberately placed. In Twin Peaks, David Lynch made things up on the fly and the main villain was added in after a filming accident. In Twin Peaks, you have Log Lady; in True Detective, craziness is never cute or endearing, it is always menacing at best or pathetic at worst.
And of course the main characters couldn't get much different. Cooper is endlessly optimistic, cheerful, and gentle. True Detective's Cohle is endlessly pessimistic, brooding, and misanthropic.
True Detective is intense, tightly-wound, and harrowing. It's also fucking amazing. Watch it.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
Choose Your Own Chat 1 Choose Your Own Chat 2 Choose Your Own Chat 3
Twitter 3DS: 0860 - 3257 - 2516
I swear to god if David Lynch is messing with me my heart can't take it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhTuYKR-ejo
On more Twin Peaks, though... It could go horribly wrong. It could be something very different and therefore not meet our expectations. But I'm excited for the potential in this - and even bad Twin Peaks still had a lot going for it. For every scene of James Hurley being sad on his motorbike, there's Lynchian gold in them hills.
"Nothing is gonna save us forever but a lot of things can save us today." - Night in the Woods
♪♫Just you
and I
together
forever
in love♪♫
At least it's clear where James' surname comes from...
"Nothing is gonna save us forever but a lot of things can save us today." - Night in the Woods