The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

"Smart TV" Boxes (Any with 802.11AC?)

WezoinWezoin Registered User regular
I'm looking at getting my dad something along the lines of an Apple TV so he can access Netflix. We're in Canada so there's no Hulu or any of that stuff. Just Netflix.

I just upgraded his router to 802.11AC, and he is an HD nut. He is obsessed with picture quality. There's also quite a distance between the TV and router.
Does anyone have any recommendations for one of these types of boxes that will provide 802.11AC?

Posts

  • DhalphirDhalphir don't you open that trapdoor you're a fool if you dareRegistered User regular
    edited October 2014
    Is there any reason it has to be AC and not N? I can't imagine many residential internet connections challenge the capacity of N, and watching HD TV wouldn't even challenge G, let alone N.

    And I don't think there will be many devices like the Apple TV out there supporting AC - it was only approved in January of this year and there's just no reasonable expectation of seeing significant availability of it until next year's generation of devices.

    Dhalphir on
  • WezoinWezoin Registered User regular
    Just figured it'd be beneficial for speed of buffering, but I suppose n would be fine anyway

  • AiouaAioua Ora Occidens Ora OptimaRegistered User regular
    Wezoin wrote: »
    Just figured it'd be beneficial for speed of buffering, but I suppose n would be fine anyway

    If it's netflix, even on N wifi you're going to be limited by your ISP, not your internal network.
    You'd really only see improvements if you were hosting the content locally (say on a media server), but that sounds like it isn't the case.

    life's a game that you're bound to lose / like using a hammer to pound in screws
    fuck up once and you break your thumb / if you're happy at all then you're god damn dumb
    that's right we're on a fucked up cruise / God is dead but at least we have booze
    bad things happen, no one knows why / the sun burns out and everyone dies
  • MichaelLCMichaelLC In what furnace was thy brain? ChicagoRegistered User regular
    I like my Roku 3. The menus are simple and the remote headphone jack is cool.

  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    Aioua wrote: »
    Wezoin wrote: »
    Just figured it'd be beneficial for speed of buffering, but I suppose n would be fine anyway

    If it's netflix, even on N wifi you're going to be limited by your ISP, not your internal network.
    You'd really only see improvements if you were hosting the content locally (say on a media server), but that sounds like it isn't the case.

    In which case it'd probably be swank to run a cat6 to the location of the TV anyways. Cheaper to get a spool of cat6 (1000 ft) and some jacks and some raceways (if you don't like to put holes in your walls or don't have a crawl space) than it is to get an AC route actually, funnily enough.

    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • PinfeldorfPinfeldorf Yeah ZestRegistered User regular
    bowen wrote: »
    Aioua wrote: »
    Wezoin wrote: »
    Just figured it'd be beneficial for speed of buffering, but I suppose n would be fine anyway

    If it's netflix, even on N wifi you're going to be limited by your ISP, not your internal network.
    You'd really only see improvements if you were hosting the content locally (say on a media server), but that sounds like it isn't the case.

    In which case it'd probably be swank to run a cat6 to the location of the TV anyways. Cheaper to get a spool of cat6 (1000 ft) and some jacks and some raceways (if you don't like to put holes in your walls or don't have a crawl space) than it is to get an AC route actually, funnily enough.

    Not to derail or anything, but on the topic of running a bunch of cat6 through a house, would it be safe to use air conditioning ducts for this purpose? The shortest route through our house from the cable wall jack to my room is about 30' if we can go through the vents, but closer to 100' through doorways.

  • WezoinWezoin Registered User regular
    Pinfeldorf wrote: »
    bowen wrote: »
    Aioua wrote: »
    Wezoin wrote: »
    Just figured it'd be beneficial for speed of buffering, but I suppose n would be fine anyway

    If it's netflix, even on N wifi you're going to be limited by your ISP, not your internal network.
    You'd really only see improvements if you were hosting the content locally (say on a media server), but that sounds like it isn't the case.

    In which case it'd probably be swank to run a cat6 to the location of the TV anyways. Cheaper to get a spool of cat6 (1000 ft) and some jacks and some raceways (if you don't like to put holes in your walls or don't have a crawl space) than it is to get an AC route actually, funnily enough.

    Not to derail or anything, but on the topic of running a bunch of cat6 through a house, would it be safe to use air conditioning ducts for this purpose? The shortest route through our house from the cable wall jack to my room is about 30' if we can go through the vents, but closer to 100' through doorways.

    My ISP does this shit all the time when routing cables. It's safe just ugly as all hell.

  • ASimPersonASimPerson Cold... ... and hard.Registered User regular
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    It depends on your locale, you'll need plenum rated cable in most cases, which is a bit more expensive and a pain in the ass to work with (thicker and different type of jacket on the cable).

    I wouldn't run it through the duct, but drill a hole through the floor/ceiling as needed and use raceways to make it look less terrible. Going through a duct looks the worst imaginable. The best way is to tear up drywall and fish it through that way and then patch it, but that's a bit more expensive and a bit harder work (having to match paint and all that).

    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
Sign In or Register to comment.