The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

A Thread for Talking About Voter Fraud and Voter ID

QuidQuid Definitely not a bananaRegistered User regular
Some people think voter fraud is a threat to elections in America and therefore voter ID should be mandatory. In their view, even if it disenfranchises people of a constitutionally guaranteed right, the net good will be worth it.

Other people disagree.

Here's a post stolen from @Mild Confusion with relevant numbers:
Between 2000 and 2012, there were roughly 145 million registered voters in this country. Since there were seven Federal elections in that time frame, we get to a grand total of 741,800,000 votes cast in that time frame. Feel free to check the math.

How many cases of voter fraud between 2000 and 2012? 2068. Total. Not per election. Total. If you do the math, for every vote, 0.00028% is fraudulent. You have a better chance of getting struck by lightning, while being eaten by a shark, inside a tornado, than finding voter fraud.

But I'm not done yet.

Cause that 2068 voter fraud cases? Almost 50% of those are fraudulent absentee ballots and registration fraud. A total of 77 were alleged with 33 being convicted of in person fraud. That is the only kind of fraud that voter ID presents! Now, for every vote, only 0.000004% is the type of voter fraud that can be prevented with an ID. Now the lightning sharknado flew into a volcano.

If you wanna parse the data yourself and prove me wrong, I welcome it. Here's the Republican National Lawyers Association's website that tracks all voter fraud.


---


Frankly I find the fear to be nonsense. It's extremely difficult and time consuming to commit voter fraud in a way that requires physically faking your identity at multiple poll stations.

«13456789

Posts

  • AstaerethAstaereth In the belly of the beastRegistered User regular
    Oh, hey, a thread about voter ID. And yet my proposal for a thread about measures to fight the recent wave of thefts committed by unicorns goes totally unheeded. This forum is biased!

    ACsTqqK.jpg
  • PhasenPhasen Hell WorldRegistered User regular
    Numerically it would require a conspiracy on the grandest of scales to tip any election of significance.

    psn: PhasenWeeple
  • DarkPrimusDarkPrimus Registered User regular
    Voter ID laws: Because you can't commit voter fraud if it's made impossible for you to be able to get to the polls and meet our requirements to cast a legitimate vote.

  • BYToadyBYToady Registered User regular
    DarkPrimus wrote: »
    Voter ID laws: Because to many black people learnt how ta read n' rite gud.

    Battletag BYToady#1454
  • This content has been removed.

  • Mild ConfusionMild Confusion Smash All Things Registered User regular
    Honestly, I think I'd be okay with Voter ID if it was easy to obtain. Like given for free when you register (which in my state is easy to do, as it should be) States that make it hard to register is a different topic), maybe even mailed to you.

    I'm not okay with the kinds of Voter ID laws being proposed. Their just meant as another bar to prevent certian groups from voting.

    While I agree with the idea that a free state issued ID would be nice. There is still the issue is that it costs a lot of money for the tax payers to solve a problem that doesn't exist. And if you count in the absurd amount of distance that some people have to travel in order to get their picture taken, it amounts to a poll tax.

    steam_sig.png

    Battlenet ID: MildC#11186 - If I'm in the game, send me an invite at anytime and I'll play.
  • The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    edited October 2014
    Honestly, I think I'd be okay with Voter ID if it was easy to obtain. Like given for free when you register (which in my state is easy to do, as it should be) States that make it hard to register is a different topic), maybe even mailed to you.

    I'm not okay with the kinds of Voter ID laws being proposed. Their just meant as another bar to prevent certian groups from voting.

    I'm more or less opposed to anything that puts a barrier to entry up in front of casting a ballot. People are already too reluctant or too busy to cast votes; we don't need to further discourage the practice, no matter how 'easy and convenient!' it actually us to get an ID. Even if the government really went the extra mile & spent all sorts of money shipping absolutely every eligible voter a government-approved photo ID, all that will have been accomplished is providing another excuse to not vote ("Oops forgot my ID. Oh well,"), extra complications / points of contention at the polling station & a legitimization of an illegitimate argument.

    If voter ID laws were passed and everyone got a voter ID card, do you think this would actually make the people lobbying for this change happy, or do you think they would just keep moving the goal posts to see how many more restrictions they can place on voting?

    The Ender on
    With Love and Courage
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    The Ender wrote: »
    Honestly, I think I'd be okay with Voter ID if it was easy to obtain. Like given for free when you register (which in my state is easy to do, as it should be) States that make it hard to register is a different topic), maybe even mailed to you.

    I'm not okay with the kinds of Voter ID laws being proposed. Their just meant as another bar to prevent certian groups from voting.

    I'm more or less opposed to anything that puts a barrier to entry up in front of casting a ballot. People are already too reluctant or too busy to cast votes; we don't need to further discourage the practice, no matter how 'easy and convenient!' it actually us to get an ID. Even if the government really went the extra mile & spent all sorts of money shipping absolutely every eligible voter a government-approved photo ID, all that will have been accomplished is providing another excuse to not vote ("Oops forgot my ID. Oh well,"), extra complications / points of contention at the polling station & a legitimization of an illegitimate argument.

    If voter ID laws were passed and everyone got a voter ID card, do you think this would actually make the people lobbying for this change happy, or do you think they would just keep moving the goal posts to see how many more restrictions they can place on voting?

    I would have roughly zero confidence that any given voter ID law wouldn't throw up bureaucratic roadblocks that disproportionately affect minorities.

    "Oh, you got married and now your birth certificate name doesn't match your driver's license name? No voter ID for you. No, really, this is just about fraud and has nothing to do with making it harder on women."

    "Oh, you don't have a birth certificate because you're an immigrant from a poor country? No voter ID for you. No, really, this is just about fraud and has nothing to do with making it harder on foreign-born citizens."

    "Oh, there's a minor misspelling on your voter ID because somebody didn't know the difference between Muhammad and Mohammad? Can't vote today. No, really, this is just about fraud and has nothing to do with making it harder on Muslims."

    "Oh, hello, Brad Wilson. Here's your ballot."

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • emnmnmeemnmnme Registered User regular
    http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Texas-voter-ID-law-blocked-by-federal-judge-5813271.php
    During closing arguments at the September trial over the law in Corpus Christi, the U.S. Justice Department pointed out that African American voters were four times more likely than Anglo voters to lack the types of identification required by the law. Hispanic voters, federal officials stated, were three times less likely than Anglos to possess such identification.

    I'd like to know why this is. Texas offers photo IDs at no cost. I haven't looked at the form to get a state-issued ID but they can't be more complicated than getting a passport.

  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    emnmnme wrote: »
    http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Texas-voter-ID-law-blocked-by-federal-judge-5813271.php
    During closing arguments at the September trial over the law in Corpus Christi, the U.S. Justice Department pointed out that African American voters were four times more likely than Anglo voters to lack the types of identification required by the law. Hispanic voters, federal officials stated, were three times less likely than Anglos to possess such identification.

    I'd like to know why this is. Texas offers photo IDs at no cost. I haven't looked at the form to get a state-issued ID but they can't be more complicated than getting a passport.

    As someone who lived in one of Texas' major cities it's likely because the public transit is terrible and goes nowhere near the DMV.

  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    emnmnme wrote: »
    http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Texas-voter-ID-law-blocked-by-federal-judge-5813271.php
    During closing arguments at the September trial over the law in Corpus Christi, the U.S. Justice Department pointed out that African American voters were four times more likely than Anglo voters to lack the types of identification required by the law. Hispanic voters, federal officials stated, were three times less likely than Anglos to possess such identification.

    I'd like to know why this is. Texas offers photo IDs at no cost. I haven't looked at the form to get a state-issued ID but they can't be more complicated than getting a passport.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2012/08/voter_id_laws_why_do_minorities_lack_id_to_show_at_the_polls_.html

    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Honestly, I think I'd be okay with Voter ID if it was easy to obtain. Like given for free when you register (which in my state is easy to do, as it should be) States that make it hard to register is a different topic), maybe even mailed to you.

    I'm not okay with the kinds of Voter ID laws being proposed. Their just meant as another bar to prevent certian groups from voting.

    I get why you might feel this way, but it's still wrong.

    There's no reason for Voter ID laws, regardless of how easy ID is to get. Because there's no problem it's solving.

    There's literally nothing for Voter ID laws to fix. Except, you know, an election in favour of a conservative candidate.

  • override367override367 ALL minions Registered User regular
    edited October 2014
    the hilarious thing in Wisconsin is that student IDs, even from state universities, wouldn't be acceptable, nor would out of state IDs, but your fishing/hunting license would be

    gonna take a shot in the dark that hunters and fishers tend to vote one way

    edit: The Wisconsin state govt has announced they're going to continue to find ways to implement voter ID THIS NOVEMBER despite the supreme court ruling

    Judge Posner on Voter ID:
    The panel is not troubled by the absence of evidence. It deems the supposed beneficial effect of photo ID requirements on public confidence in the electoral system "'a legislative fact' -- a proposition about the state of the world," and asserts that "on matters of legislative fact, courts accept the findings of legislatures and judges of the lower courts must accept findings by the Supreme Court." In so saying, the panel conjures up a fact-free cocoon in which to lodge the federal judiciary. As there is no evidence that voter-impersonation fraud is a problem, how can the fact that a legislature says it's a problem turn it into one? If the Wisconsin legislature says witches are a problem, shall Wisconsin courts be permitted to conduct witch trials?

    override367 on
  • This content has been removed.

  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    Honestly, I think I'd be okay with Voter ID if it was easy to obtain. Like given for free when you register (which in my state is easy to do, as it should be) States that make it hard to register is a different topic), maybe even mailed to you.

    I'm not okay with the kinds of Voter ID laws being proposed. Their just meant as another bar to prevent certain groups from voting.

    I'd rather have universal mail-in balloting. No disenfranchisement, and all of the accountability occurs by professional staff at a centralized location with the ability to ensure it follows best practices and the capability of running audits multiple times with proper oversight. Rather than relying on the discretionary responsibility of retirees volunteers toward the tail end of a 16 hour day.

  • JuliusJulius Captain of Serenity on my shipRegistered User regular
    Okay, I would have no moral objections to easy voter ids.

    But plenty of economic ones.

    And then there's the fact (like many of you mentioned) that it would be impossible to implement voter ids without them screwing over the poor and minorities.

    So I'm 100% against them.

    Yeah on principle there is nothing to object to. In fact here in the Netherlands you do actually have to provide ID when voting.


    But the particular ways US society works currently makes voter id a terrible idea. The US just does things differently and it means voter ID is stupid.

  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    Does the Netherlands have a universal ID?

    The US system is horribly patchwork and uneven. The only truly universal form of Photo ID is a passport and getting of those is a colossal pain in the ass than can take months

  • JuliusJulius Captain of Serenity on my shipRegistered User regular
    Does the Netherlands have a universal ID?

    The US system is horribly patchwork and uneven. The only truly universal form of Photo ID is a passport and getting of those is a colossal pain in the ass than can take months

    The Netherlands is so tiny that a non-universal ID wouldn't even make sense. A driver's license and national ID card are both valid everywhere and because you are required to provide ID for many reasons everyone has one or the other. You can get them, and a passport too, in a week. (Or two days if you really need it and don't mind paying extra.)


    Basically there is no comparing the two unless you're comparing "things that make requiring voter ID not a bad idea" and have The Netherlands checking all the items on the list and the US none.

  • BigWillieStylesBigWillieStyles Expert flipper of tables Inside my mind...Registered User regular
    the hilarious thing in Wisconsin is that student IDs, even from state universities, wouldn't be acceptable, nor would out of state IDs, but your fishing/hunting license would be
    Because a lot of student I.D.s do not list certain things a photo I.D. needs to be legit while fishing/hunting licenses do. It's not funny, you just don't realize what a student I.D. lacks.

    3DS Friend Code: 1006 - 0121 - 6969
    PM me with yours if you add me
  • VeeveeVeevee WisconsinRegistered User regular
    the hilarious thing in Wisconsin is that student IDs, even from state universities, wouldn't be acceptable, nor would out of state IDs, but your fishing/hunting license would be
    Because a lot of student I.D.s do not list certain things a photo I.D. needs to be legit while fishing/hunting licenses do. It's not funny, you just don't realize what a student I.D. lacks.

    You mean like a picture which is on the student id and not the fishing/hubting license?

  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    the hilarious thing in Wisconsin is that student IDs, even from state universities, wouldn't be acceptable, nor would out of state IDs, but your fishing/hunting license would be
    Because a lot of student I.D.s do not list certain things a photo I.D. needs to be legit while fishing/hunting licenses do. It's not funny, you just don't realize what a student I.D. lacks.

    In order to provide the role that photographic identification is purported to ensure, that you are indeed who you say you are, it would need their name and a photograph. I have never had a student id that did not provide my name and my picture on it.

  • The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    moniker wrote: »
    Honestly, I think I'd be okay with Voter ID if it was easy to obtain. Like given for free when you register (which in my state is easy to do, as it should be) States that make it hard to register is a different topic), maybe even mailed to you.

    I'm not okay with the kinds of Voter ID laws being proposed. Their just meant as another bar to prevent certain groups from voting.

    I'd rather have universal mail-in balloting. No disenfranchisement, and all of the accountability occurs by professional staff at a centralized location with the ability to ensure it follows best practices and the capability of running audits multiple times with proper oversight. Rather than relying on the discretionary responsibility of retirees volunteers toward the tail end of a 16 hour day.

    What about a system that sent you out a unique key - basically the equivalent of a Steam key - and allowed you to use it to vote by text / e-mail / functional government website (hahahahaha!)?


    I keep trying to napkin-up a way that SMS voting could work...

    With Love and Courage
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    The Ender wrote: »
    moniker wrote: »
    Honestly, I think I'd be okay with Voter ID if it was easy to obtain. Like given for free when you register (which in my state is easy to do, as it should be) States that make it hard to register is a different topic), maybe even mailed to you.

    I'm not okay with the kinds of Voter ID laws being proposed. Their just meant as another bar to prevent certain groups from voting.

    I'd rather have universal mail-in balloting. No disenfranchisement, and all of the accountability occurs by professional staff at a centralized location with the ability to ensure it follows best practices and the capability of running audits multiple times with proper oversight. Rather than relying on the discretionary responsibility of retirees volunteers toward the tail end of a 16 hour day.

    What about a system that sent you out a unique key - basically the equivalent of a Steam key - and allowed you to use it to vote by text / e-mail / functional government website (hahahahaha!)?


    I keep trying to napkin-up a way that SMS voting could work...

    I don't see how that would be better. Particularly since a lot of referendum questions are complicated and should be accompanied with informational pamphlets. Ones that could easily be shoved in the same envelope as the ballot. I mean, vote by mail can still be done wrong but it is a lot easier to do it right.

  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    Julius wrote: »
    Does the Netherlands have a universal ID?

    The US system is horribly patchwork and uneven. The only truly universal form of Photo ID is a passport and getting of those is a colossal pain in the ass than can take months

    The Netherlands is so tiny that a non-universal ID wouldn't even make sense. A driver's license and national ID card are both valid everywhere and because you are required to provide ID for many reasons everyone has one or the other. You can get them, and a passport too, in a week. (Or two days if you really need it and don't mind paying extra.)


    Basically there is no comparing the two unless you're comparing "things that make requiring voter ID not a bad idea" and have The Netherlands checking all the items on the list and the US none.

    Yeah our whole state system makes it all a giant mess. Like there's no guarantee you can even transfer your ID from one state to another it all depends if the states have an understanding with each other. As a result tons of people never even bother to transfer their license or whatever when they move.

  • VeeveeVeevee WisconsinRegistered User regular
    edited October 2014
    Julius wrote: »
    Does the Netherlands have a universal ID?

    The US system is horribly patchwork and uneven. The only truly universal form of Photo ID is a passport and getting of those is a colossal pain in the ass than can take months

    The Netherlands is so tiny that a non-universal ID wouldn't even make sense. A driver's license and national ID card are both valid everywhere and because you are required to provide ID for many reasons everyone has one or the other. You can get them, and a passport too, in a week. (Or two days if you really need it and don't mind paying extra.)


    Basically there is no comparing the two unless you're comparing "things that make requiring voter ID not a bad idea" and have The Netherlands checking all the items on the list and the US none.

    Yeah our whole state system makes it all a giant mess. Like there's no guarantee you can even transfer your ID from one state to another it all depends if the states have an understanding with each other. As a result tons of people never even bother to transfer their license or whatever when they move.

    For instance, Arizona licenses are valid for 25 years while Wisconsin's is 8. If I got a license and moved from Arizona a year later, why would I ever voluntarily get a new license in Wisconsin before the Arizona license expires? To pay 3 extra rounds of registration fees?

    Veevee on
  • edited October 2014
    This content has been removed.

  • The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    I'm more sympathetic than (presumably) most here to the whole "we don't accept college IDs" policy

    ...Why? Is there now not only a group of nefarious vote fraudsters out to steal the election, but an entire counterfeit ID apparatus for them to fall back on?

    With Love and Courage
  • override367override367 ALL minions Registered User regular
    edited October 2014
    the hilarious thing in Wisconsin is that student IDs, even from state universities, wouldn't be acceptable, nor would out of state IDs, but your fishing/hunting license would be
    Because a lot of student I.D.s do not list certain things a photo I.D. needs to be legit while fishing/hunting licenses do. It's not funny, you just don't realize what a student I.D. lacks.

    Why don't you educate me instead of telling me that I'm ignorant

    keeping in mind that a fishing license is a green card with black text and no security features or photo on it, providing exactly zero protection against voter fraud

    and my UW ID is a smart card so

    override367 on
  • edited October 2014
    This content has been removed.

  • BigWillieStylesBigWillieStyles Expert flipper of tables Inside my mind...Registered User regular
    edited October 2014
    Why don't you educate me instead of telling me that I'm ignorant

    keeping in mind that a fishing license is a green card with black text and no security features or photo on it, providing exactly zero protection against voter fraud

    and my UW ID is a smart card so
    Because college I.D.s tend to only have a photo and a name, while a fishing or hunting license includes name, address, height, weight, age, hair color, and eye color. Essentially, everything but a photo. Basically, it gives the descriptors that a photo would provide. I would also imagine a fake hunting or fishing license is a massive criminal act. There's probably also a more rigorous record-keeping and confirmation process for hunting and fishing licenses than student I.D.s.

    http://dnr.wi.gov/permits/csrsp/images/txnnbr.gif

    BigWillieStyles on
    3DS Friend Code: 1006 - 0121 - 6969
    PM me with yours if you add me
  • VeeveeVeevee WisconsinRegistered User regular
    2 out of 3 of these are not valid forms of ID for voting in Wisconsin

    c26u84be067k.gif

    rkph5r2pmufy.jpg

    879ay3cxtxji.jpg

    To verify that I am who I say I am, which of these 3 would you personally choose? Please note, you do not get any other documents to use to verify I am who I say I am.

  • This content has been removed.

  • BigWillieStylesBigWillieStyles Expert flipper of tables Inside my mind...Registered User regular
    Veevee wrote: »
    To verify that I am who I say I am, which of these 3 would you personally choose? Please note, you do not get any other documents to use to verify I am who I say I am.
    I'll trust the one that gives me the most information. That student I.D. only has a name and photo. No other identifying information whatsoever. That's why they're not accepted.

    And that bottom one is a many-years-ago expired license, so that's obviously not accepted.

    3DS Friend Code: 1006 - 0121 - 6969
    PM me with yours if you add me
  • GnizmoGnizmo Registered User regular
    Why don't you educate me instead of telling me that I'm ignorant

    keeping in mind that a fishing license is a green card with black text and no security features or photo on it, providing exactly zero protection against voter fraud

    and my UW ID is a smart card so
    Because college I.D.s tend to only have a photo and a name, while a fishing or hunting license includes name, address, height, weight, age, hair color, and eye color. Essentially, everything but a photo. Basically, it gives the descriptors that a photo would provide. I would also imagine a fake hunting or fishing license is a massive criminal act. There's probably also a more rigorous record-keeping and confirmation process for hunting and fishing licenses than student I.D.s.

    http://dnr.wi.gov/permits/csrsp/images/txnnbr.gif

    Yeah why doesn't an ID that has a picture of you include things like hair and eye color. That just makes it so unreliable for trying to see if it is the person in question. If only there was something else they could put on it that would make up for all that lost information. Some way to summarize a thousand words of description in one part of the ID. Damn shame.
    Veevee wrote: »
    2 out of 3 of these are not valid forms of ID for voting in Wisconsin

    c26u84be067k.gif

    rkph5r2pmufy.jpg

    879ay3cxtxji.jpg

    To verify that I am who I say I am, which of these 3 would you personally choose? Please note, you do not get any other documents to use to verify I am who I say I am.

    Is there something I am missing, or could most of those be faked with the right paper and a printer?

  • override367override367 ALL minions Registered User regular
    edited October 2014
    Veevee wrote: »
    To verify that I am who I say I am, which of these 3 would you personally choose? Please note, you do not get any other documents to use to verify I am who I say I am.
    I'll trust the one that gives me the most information. That student I.D. only has a name and photo. No other identifying information whatsoever. That's why they're not accepted.

    And that bottom one is a many-years-ago expired license, so that's obviously not accepted.

    but the information doesn't do anything to identify the holder as the person voting

    I think you've made it pretty clear you're unconcerned with voter fraud and are pretty in line with the state GOP, the main concern is democrats voting, which they don't approve of

    override367 on
  • override367override367 ALL minions Registered User regular
    edited October 2014
    mcdermott wrote: »
    The Ender wrote: »
    I'm more sympathetic than (presumably) most here to the whole "we don't accept college IDs" policy

    ...Why? Is there now not only a group of nefarious vote fraudsters out to steal the election, but an entire counterfeit ID apparatus for them to fall back on?

    I knew I should have prefaced that.

    I do not think voter ID laws are reasonable or necessary.

    However, if we accept for a moment that they are (and I'll remind you again that my position is that they are not), then I am more supportive that the norm on this forum for not allowing student ID as a valid ID.

    And yes, it's precisely because there are both far too many different forms to keep track of, and because the apparatus through which they are issued seems less secure. On the spectrum from Ralph's Card to U.S. Passport, I'm sorry but I put many student IDs down towards the lower end. You may have a few exceptions when it comes to major flagship state universities, but then I see no reason to privilege those students over the students of East Podunk Community College. We should be working harder to ensure that actual valid state IDs make their way into the hands of the citizenry, including poor and minority citizens, rather than accepting less legitimate credentials.

    Again, assuming such a voter ID law was necessary to begin with, which it is not.

    One final time, I do not support voter ID laws.

    EDIT: Also, override, I'd agree that accepting the fishing license is pants-on-head.

    the state has lots of control over public universities

    Why could the state not make any satisfactory changes to their IDs?

    It would be relatively trivial compared to the rest of the costs of implementation!

    override367 on
  • This content has been removed.

  • This content has been removed.

  • VeeveeVeevee WisconsinRegistered User regular
    Gnizmo wrote: »
    Is there something I am missing, or could most of those be faked with the right paper and a printer?

    The green ones are paper, so you are right there. The middle one is a plastic ID with a microhip built into it, so you'll need a little more than paper.
    mcdermott wrote: »
    To be clear, if that was addressed to me, I would accept none of the three.

    And you would then be arrested for not allowing a voter to vote if presented with Option 1 or 3 (and just for you willie, pretending that both are valid and this years license). Sorry, you lose the game of Voter ID in Wisconsin.

  • This content has been removed.

Sign In or Register to comment.