The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Red vs Blue: [Republican Primary] Edition

12467101

Posts

  • zakkielzakkiel Registered User regular
    edited November 2015
    milski wrote: »
    Xaquin wrote: »
    The whole reason they have used it is as a bargaining chip against Obama. A republican president should eliminate that activity.

    The problem with all of this is it hinges on a sane Republican Party.

    So who's it going to be? The guy that wants to make Mexico pay for a wall on its border or the guy that says Joseph built the pyramids to store grain?

    You'll pardon me if I don't particularly have so much faith that that party won't tank the globe because of ?reasons?

    This idea of the Republican Party as cartoon villains is ridiculous and needs to stop bein repeated like it is a fact here. The Republican Party has made very irresponsible use of the debt ceiling and spending bill votes as a way to try and win substantive debates in the last few years, but they have not done anything with the intent of causing problems. They are pushing for what they think is right and you just disagree with them. I disagree with them too on most of these things. But they will not just destroy the world to destroy the world or some such nonsense. In fact, they lost the standoffs over the debt ceiling and passed it anyway, because they did not want to cause the global economy to collapse. I honestly think that the most likely scenario if a republican wins the whitehouse is lower taxes, defunding of many entitlement programs and federal government agencies like the EPA, and the continued passage of spending bills and the debt ceiling. They will absolutely keep the government running, it will just be a government that does less.

    They literally let the government shut down and proponents of ignoring the debt ceiling with no regard for the consequences are doing incredibly well nationally. They had to beg a man to take up one of the most powerful positions on the planet, and he only agreed to do so under conditions they nearly immediately violated. Chris Christie's biggest sin was not defrauding the taxpayers out of millions (billions?), but hugging the sitting president.

    There is definitely a portion of the Republican party that is rational and seeks to govern knowledgeably and effectively. However, pretending they have not been captured by a fanatical portion of their base is to deny reality, and since the Republican party is captured by the crazy people, there's not much reason to distinguish the factions.

    Further, the more terrifying thing about the fanatical portion of the representatives is that you may be right: They have not done anything with the intent of causing problems! They simply do not give a single fuck. They don't care what the consequences of making the debt ceiling a bargaining chip are. They don't care that spending millions of dollars on screening for welfare benefits prevents maybe a few hundred dollars in illegitimate payments. They don't care that the IRS isn't the cause of taxes, or that it actually prevents a lot of "loophole" abuse they pay lip service to. They don't even care about destroying the careers of politicians within their own party in order to have a scapegoat!

    Nothing you listed there is the act of a crazy person. I think the brinksmanship with the debt ceiling and budget is very irresponsible, but they made a calculated bet on it. They never did anything that caused an actual negative effect. They oppose Obama very strongly and hate it when people are cordial to him, but that is just tribalism, not insanity. They oppose welfare existing not at all and care a lot about the moral element of state funded drug use, so their position their is totally consistent. They oppose taxes and defunding the IRS is easier than changing the tax laws. They are pursuing an agenda you disagree with, but that is not crazy. You just disagree.

    The government shutdown definitely caused a "negative effect" or two. That said, debating whether the Republican party is sane is like debating whether religion is good: a hopeless quagmire of poorly defined terms in which the various parties will shout their tribalism at each other forever.

    But I would like to point out that Ben Carson and Donald Trump together not only have an absolute majority of Republican primary voters but most of those voters list the other guy as their number two choice. In other words, what I thought would never happen is now looking like a really good possibility: one of those two will be the Republican nominee. For president. Of these here United States.

    Not that that means Republicans are crazy, or anything.

    zakkiel on
    Account not recoverable. So long.
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    Hey guys.

    This is not the place to discuss whether the GOP are literal cartoon villains or just figurative cartoon villains.

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • Wraith260Wraith260 Happiest Goomba! Registered User regular
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Hey guys.

    This is not the place to discuss whether the GOP are literal cartoon villains or just figurative cartoon villains.

    yeah, that kinda thing needs to be discussed at an actual GOP debate!

  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    Kasich, you know...the 'rational one', has apparently proposed a new government department of propaganda devoted to spreading our 'judeo-christian values' in order to combat You Know Who.

    V...
    Voldemort...?

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • Santa ClaustrophobiaSanta Claustrophobia Ho Ho Ho Disconnecting from Xbox LIVERegistered User regular
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Kasich, you know...the 'rational one', has apparently proposed a new government department of propaganda devoted to spreading our 'judeo-christian values' in order to combat You Know Who.

    V...
    Voldemort...?

    Probably.






    Whatever you do now, though, don't go outside.

    You're muckin' with a G!

    Do not engage the Watermelons.
  • Captain MarcusCaptain Marcus now arrives the hour of actionRegistered User regular
    So you acknowledge this and you're a Republican why?
    We weren't evil before Reagan and his cadre of traitorous, tree-destroying minions. Plus, peak derp is a myth. Someone's got to vote against the teapers in the primaries.

  • enlightenedbumenlightenedbum Registered User regular
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Kasich, you know...the 'rational one', has apparently proposed a new government department of propaganda devoted to spreading our 'judeo-christian values' in order to combat You Know Who.

    V...
    Voldemort...?

    I think the genuine answer is Karl Marx or the Prophet Muhammed.

    And I'm not kidding.

    The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
  • KanaKana Registered User regular
    via kevin drum
    “Nobody has been able to sit down with him and have him get one iota of intelligent information about the Middle East,” Duane R. Clarridge, a top adviser to Mr. Carson on terrorism and national security, said in an interview....After Mr. Carson struggled on “Fox News Sunday” to say whom he would call first to form a coalition against the Islamic State, Mr. Clarridge called [Armstrong] Williams, the candidate’s top adviser, in frustration. “We need to have a conference call once a week where his guys roll out the subjects they think will be out there, and we can make him smart,” Mr. Clarridge said he told Mr. Williams.

    Mr. Williams, one of Mr. Carson’s closest friends, who does not have an official role in the campaign, also lamented the Fox News interview. “He’s been briefed on it so many times,” he said. “I guess he just froze.”
    The Carson campaign recommended Clarridge as a source and provided the Times with his phone number. But now they're throwing him under the bus. "Mr. Clarridge has incomplete knowledge of the daily, not weekly briefings, that Dr. Carson receives on important national security matters," the campaign said in a statement. "For The New York Times to take advantage of an elderly gentleman and use him as their foil in this story is an affront to good journalistic practices."

    A trap is for fish: when you've got the fish, you can forget the trap. A snare is for rabbits: when you've got the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words.
  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    We get it, Carson. Everything is a conspiracy. They're all out to get you. We know.

  • Harry DresdenHarry Dresden Registered User regular
    edited November 2015
    Xaquin wrote: »
    The whole reason they have used it is as a bargaining chip against Obama. A republican president should eliminate that activity.

    The problem with all of this is it hinges on a sane Republican Party.

    So who's it going to be? The guy that wants to make Mexico pay for a wall on its border or the guy that says Joseph built the pyramids to store grain?

    You'll pardon me if I don't particularly have so much faith that that party won't tank the globe because of ?reasons?

    This idea of the Republican Party as cartoon villains is ridiculous and needs to stop bein repeated like it is a fact here. The Republican Party has made very irresponsible use of the debt ceiling and spending bill votes as a way to try and win substantive debates in the last few years, but they have not done anything with the intent of causing problems. They are pushing for what they think is right and you just disagree with them. I disagree with them too on most of these things. But they will not just destroy the world to destroy the world or some such nonsense. In fact, they lost the standoffs over the debt ceiling and passed it anyway, because they did not want to cause the global economy to collapse. I honestly think that the most likely scenario if a republican wins the whitehouse is lower taxes, defunding of many entitlement programs and federal government agencies like the EPA, and the continued passage of spending bills and the debt ceiling. They will absolutely keep the government running, it will just be a government that does less.

    The "sane" Republicans, aka the moderates, are not as moderate or sane as they bill themselves as. W.'s administration was a shining example of how crazy and extreme they were. Imagine my surprise when today the biggest extremist faction, the Tea Party, makes them look like saints. I think you need to take a closer look at least at the current Republican party, specifically the Tea Party faction. The people you represent in the GOP, the moderates, have been losing ground for years and ironically it's the own fault for creating this monster via talk radio/Fox News as gullible fools to manipulate to vote for them. Moderates like you are becoming extinct, Boehner's retiring was another step in that direction, and your boy Trump is leading that charge. I suggest you pay closer attention to news about the GOP, because you don't seem that knowledgable about what's going in that party.

    edit: The moderates in this race are Jeb!, Rubio (?), Cruz (?) and Kasich and right now they're losing to the extremists like Trump and Carson. If this is a continuing trend the GOP should just give up on the presidential race because those guys are not winning the general.

    Harry Dresden on
  • AstaerethAstaereth In the belly of the beastRegistered User regular
    zakkiel wrote: »

    But I would like to point out that Ben Carson and Donald Trump together not only have an absolute majority of Republican primary voters but most of those voters list the other guy as their number two choice. In other words, what I thought would never happen is now looking like a really good possibility: one of those two will be the Republican nominee. For president. Of these here United States.

    Things are really heating up

    in this contest between a crazy person who says awful things and an awful person who says crazy things

    which one will be guaranteed 45% of the vote in the general, I wonder

    ACsTqqK.jpg
  • Mr KhanMr Khan Not Everyone WAHHHRegistered User regular
    Astaereth wrote: »
    zakkiel wrote: »

    But I would like to point out that Ben Carson and Donald Trump together not only have an absolute majority of Republican primary voters but most of those voters list the other guy as their number two choice. In other words, what I thought would never happen is now looking like a really good possibility: one of those two will be the Republican nominee. For president. Of these here United States.

    Things are really heating up

    in this contest between a crazy person who says awful things and an awful person who says crazy things

    which one will be guaranteed 45% of the vote in the general, I wonder

    I don't know that the popular vote would swing quite that far in their favor. If the crazypants was deep enough, more moderates could pull the lever for Hillary or just stay home.

    Which wouldn't change the electoral map all that much, i'm just thinking we would see a map more like 2008 if it gets bad enough, with NC, IN, and MO going blue and Georgia on the brink again.

  • notdroidnotdroid Registered User regular
    So in a continuation of the GOP's tradition to alienate every population groups, the GOP's latest being horrible human beings anti-refugee streak is alienating evangelical christians.

    http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/refugees-christians-215991
    Faith-based groups, who play a key role in resettling refugees to the United States, say they are dismayed by the wave of anti-refugee fervor set off by the Paris terrorist attacks and are urging supporters to contact elected officials on behalf of victims of the Syrian civil war.

    Evangelical Christians, as well as Christians more broadly, are a core group in the Republican electoral base and are among the most passionate advocates for aiding refugees.
    Story Continued Below

    A push by Republican presidential candidates to ban Syrian refugees "does not reflect what we've been hearing from our constituencies, which are evangelical churches across the country," said Jenny Yang, vice president for advocacy at World Relief, an evangelical organization that helps resettle refugees. "Most of the people have been saying we want to continue to work with refugees, that what happened in Paris ... doesn’t reflect who refugees are."

  • Phoenix-DPhoenix-D Registered User regular
    huh, that I wouldn't have expected. Good on them for once.

  • ArbitraryDescriptorArbitraryDescriptor Registered User regular
    Phoenix-D wrote: »
    huh, that I wouldn't have expected. Good on them for once.

    Indeed. I was waiting for the caveat that we should accept christian refugees, but it never came!
    Some Republican candidates have suggested that only Syrians who are Christian be allowed on U.S. soil, something President Barack Obama has blasted as shameful. Yang said many evangelical Christians would also oppose such a religious test,
    especially because many are eager to share their faith with new arrivals
    .

    Should have just stopped there, Yang. I'll still take it though.

  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Kasich, you know...the 'rational one', has apparently proposed a new government department of propaganda devoted to spreading our 'judeo-christian values' in order to combat You Know Who.

    V...
    Voldemort...?

    I think the genuine answer is Karl Marx or the Prophet Muhammed.

    And I'm not kidding.

    I would honestly prefer one of the candidates coming out with a for real literal anti-magic policy than what they are doing now.

  • Wraith260Wraith260 Happiest Goomba! Registered User regular
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Kasich, you know...the 'rational one', has apparently proposed a new government department of propaganda devoted to spreading our 'judeo-christian values' in order to combat You Know Who.

    V...
    Voldemort...?

    I think the genuine answer is Karl Marx or the Prophet Muhammed.

    And I'm not kidding.

    I would honestly prefer one of the candidates coming out with a for real literal anti-magic policy than what they are doing now.

    Am sure Honest Ben Carson will announce just such a policy any day now.

  • DarkPrimusDarkPrimus Registered User regular
    Wraith260 wrote: »
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Kasich, you know...the 'rational one', has apparently proposed a new government department of propaganda devoted to spreading our 'judeo-christian values' in order to combat You Know Who.

    V...
    Voldemort...?

    I think the genuine answer is Karl Marx or the Prophet Muhammed.

    And I'm not kidding.

    I would honestly prefer one of the candidates coming out with a for real literal anti-magic policy than what they are doing now.

    Am sure Honest Ben Carson will announce just such a policy any day now.

    Ben Carson's been working an anti-magic taskforce in secret for decades.

    I mean, haven't had any magic attacks on US soil, now have we?

  • notdroidnotdroid Registered User regular
    edited November 2015
    DarkPrimus wrote: »
    Wraith260 wrote: »
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Kasich, you know...the 'rational one', has apparently proposed a new government department of propaganda devoted to spreading our 'judeo-christian values' in order to combat You Know Who.

    V...
    Voldemort...?

    I think the genuine answer is Karl Marx or the Prophet Muhammed.

    And I'm not kidding.

    I would honestly prefer one of the candidates coming out with a for real literal anti-magic policy than what they are doing now.

    Am sure Honest Ben Carson will announce just such a policy any day now.

    Ben Carson's been working an anti-magic taskforce in secret for decades.

    I mean, haven't had any magic attacks on US soil, now have we?

    I can't trust Ben Carson to protect America from magic. His "anti big-government" attitude makes it so that he'll never approve the creation of a government repository to gather & store mandatory phylacteries for all magic users as should rightfully be done.

    EDIT: When it comes to protecting us from evil wizards and sorcerers, there's only one candidate I trust to get the job done.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxJyPsmEask

    notdroid on
  • Knight_Knight_ Dead Dead Dead Registered User regular
    This universe where blow a hole in the world tax plans are a "moderate" position scare me on a level I cannot even fathom.

    aeNqQM9.jpg
  • TryCatcherTryCatcher Registered User regular
    Trump talks about picking Ted Cruz as VP:
    Donald Trump on Tuesday named Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) when asked about his possible running mate in 2016.

    “Ted Cruz is now agreeing with me 100 percent,” he said when asked about his vice presidential pick, according to Lifezette.

    “Well, I like him,” Trump told radio host Laura Ingraham during her broadcast. "He’s backed everything I’ve said.”
    Unlike most of the Republican presidential hopefuls, Cruz has mostly refrained from attacking Trump, even appearing alongside him at a rally in September against the Iran nuclear deal.

    The pair has also struck similar tones on topics such as border security and illegal immigration.

    Still, Trump suggested late Monday that he will turn on Cruz if he becomes a threat to his front-runner status.

    “If he catches on, I guess we’ll have to go to war,” he told host Joe Kernen on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”

    That pretty much lets him pick up the Freedom Caucus vote without commiting to their positions, in particular their foreign policy. The pro-Trump base isn't excited for more dumb wars, but sure loved watching Cruz "putting the liberal media on their place".

  • TryCatcherTryCatcher Registered User regular
    On non-Trump news, Rand can say what he wants since he isn't going to win:
    Until the Republican Party looks like the rest of America — black, white, rich, poor, with earrings, without earrings, with tattoos, and without tattoos, working class folks in our party thinking what we're offering is the best for working class people — until that happens, we're not going to win again," Paul said in an interview aired Wednesday on "The Hard Line" with Ed Berliner.

  • notdroidnotdroid Registered User regular
    http://www.theonion.com/article/gop-warns-refugees-likely-be-driven-terrorism-way--51861

    The Onion nails it again.
    GOP Warns Refugees Likely To Be Driven To Terrorism By Way America Would Treat Them

    CHARLESTON, SC—Declaring that opening the nation’s doors to displaced Syrians posed a major security threat, GOP leaders warned Tuesday that any refugees who resettled in the U.S. would most likely be driven to terrorism by the way America treats them. “We absolutely cannot provide a safe haven to these Syrians due to the very real threat that the abusive and hateful conduct of Americans will push the refugees toward radicalization and recruitment by extremist militant groups,” said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), echoing the sentiments of numerous other presidential candidates and state governors who have argued that Syrian asylum seekers would in all probability embrace a radical jihadist worldview after constantly enduring anti-Muslim hate speech, racial epithets, and threats of violence and persecution by both the American people and government officials. “The moment we let these Syrians in, I promise that our most ruthless and cruel tendencies will take over, and we won’t relent until these refugees feel like they have no choice but to plan and execute a terror attack right inside our borders. It’s better to be safe than sorry in this situation.” Cruz claimed that the country did not face the same threat from Syria’s Christian refugees, stressing his confidence that only a small percentage of U.S. citizens would regard them as Muslim extremists.

  • GatorGator An alligator in Scotland Registered User regular
    Me sad about Jindal :(

  • EncEnc A Fool with Compassion Pronouns: He, Him, HisRegistered User regular
    notdroid wrote: »
    http://www.theonion.com/article/gop-warns-refugees-likely-be-driven-terrorism-way--51861

    The Onion nails it again.
    GOP Warns Refugees Likely To Be Driven To Terrorism By Way America Would Treat Them

    CHARLESTON, SC—Declaring that opening the nation’s doors to displaced Syrians posed a major security threat, GOP leaders warned Tuesday that any refugees who resettled in the U.S. would most likely be driven to terrorism by the way America treats them. “We absolutely cannot provide a safe haven to these Syrians due to the very real threat that the abusive and hateful conduct of Americans will push the refugees toward radicalization and recruitment by extremist militant groups,” said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), echoing the sentiments of numerous other presidential candidates and state governors who have argued that Syrian asylum seekers would in all probability embrace a radical jihadist worldview after constantly enduring anti-Muslim hate speech, racial epithets, and threats of violence and persecution by both the American people and government officials. “The moment we let these Syrians in, I promise that our most ruthless and cruel tendencies will take over, and we won’t relent until these refugees feel like they have no choice but to plan and execute a terror attack right inside our borders. It’s better to be safe than sorry in this situation.” Cruz claimed that the country did not face the same threat from Syria’s Christian refugees, stressing his confidence that only a small percentage of U.S. citizens would regard them as Muslim extremists.

    It's a sad world in which I can't tell what is satire anymore by the content, only by the provider.

  • NarbusNarbus Registered User regular
    Enc wrote: »
    notdroid wrote: »
    http://www.theonion.com/article/gop-warns-refugees-likely-be-driven-terrorism-way--51861

    The Onion nails it again.
    GOP Warns Refugees Likely To Be Driven To Terrorism By Way America Would Treat Them

    CHARLESTON, SC—Declaring that opening the nation’s doors to displaced Syrians posed a major security threat, GOP leaders warned Tuesday that any refugees who resettled in the U.S. would most likely be driven to terrorism by the way America treats them. “We absolutely cannot provide a safe haven to these Syrians due to the very real threat that the abusive and hateful conduct of Americans will push the refugees toward radicalization and recruitment by extremist militant groups,” said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), echoing the sentiments of numerous other presidential candidates and state governors who have argued that Syrian asylum seekers would in all probability embrace a radical jihadist worldview after constantly enduring anti-Muslim hate speech, racial epithets, and threats of violence and persecution by both the American people and government officials. “The moment we let these Syrians in, I promise that our most ruthless and cruel tendencies will take over, and we won’t relent until these refugees feel like they have no choice but to plan and execute a terror attack right inside our borders. It’s better to be safe than sorry in this situation.” Cruz claimed that the country did not face the same threat from Syria’s Christian refugees, stressing his confidence that only a small percentage of U.S. citizens would regard them as Muslim extremists.

    It's a sad world in which I can't tell what is satire anymore by the content, only by the provider.

    Good satire is supposed to give you that "wait, is this real?" moment. I mean, there were people who took "A Modest Proposal" seriously.

  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
  • EncEnc A Fool with Compassion Pronouns: He, Him, HisRegistered User regular
    Narbus wrote: »
    Enc wrote: »
    notdroid wrote: »
    http://www.theonion.com/article/gop-warns-refugees-likely-be-driven-terrorism-way--51861

    The Onion nails it again.
    GOP Warns Refugees Likely To Be Driven To Terrorism By Way America Would Treat Them

    CHARLESTON, SC—Declaring that opening the nation’s doors to displaced Syrians posed a major security threat, GOP leaders warned Tuesday that any refugees who resettled in the U.S. would most likely be driven to terrorism by the way America treats them. “We absolutely cannot provide a safe haven to these Syrians due to the very real threat that the abusive and hateful conduct of Americans will push the refugees toward radicalization and recruitment by extremist militant groups,” said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), echoing the sentiments of numerous other presidential candidates and state governors who have argued that Syrian asylum seekers would in all probability embrace a radical jihadist worldview after constantly enduring anti-Muslim hate speech, racial epithets, and threats of violence and persecution by both the American people and government officials. “The moment we let these Syrians in, I promise that our most ruthless and cruel tendencies will take over, and we won’t relent until these refugees feel like they have no choice but to plan and execute a terror attack right inside our borders. It’s better to be safe than sorry in this situation.” Cruz claimed that the country did not face the same threat from Syria’s Christian refugees, stressing his confidence that only a small percentage of U.S. citizens would regard them as Muslim extremists.

    It's a sad world in which I can't tell what is satire anymore by the content, only by the provider.

    Good satire is supposed to give you that "wait, is this real?" moment. I mean, there were people who took "A Modest Proposal" seriously.

    Yeah, but the Onion has always been over the top. The world has changed to make the Onion seem plausible, not the Onion becoming more subtle.

  • wazillawazilla Having a late dinner Registered User regular
    Maybe we've been blaming the wrong people all along

    It's the Onion that has shifted the Overton window

    Psn:wazukki
  • CorehealerCorehealer The Apothecary The softer edge of the universe.Registered User regular
    Atomika wrote: »

    That is adorable. And of course has nothing to do with how he was a rounding error for the entire race thus far or how even his kids couldn't fathom why he would run.

    488W936.png
  • DivideByZeroDivideByZero Social Justice Blackguard Registered User regular
    wazilla wrote: »
    Maybe we've been blaming the wrong people all along

    It's the Onion that has shifted the Overton window

    Poeverton Window

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKERS
  • enlightenedbumenlightenedbum Registered User regular
    qlfboelzsdgy73bkdejr.jpg

    This map is from the Carson campaign. The color code is based on which states' Governors want to deny Syrian refugees.

    But check out the northeast.

    The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    How do you even screw that up like that?

    Are we sure Ben Carson's campaign staff isn't just trolling him?

    Are pokemon speeches next?

    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    Corehealer wrote: »
    Atomika wrote: »

    That is adorable. And of course has nothing to do with how he was a rounding error for the entire race thus far or how even his kids couldn't fathom why he would run.

    I don't know. Getting 0.3% of the vote sounds just about right this season if you're pandering to intellectuals

  • enlightenedbumenlightenedbum Registered User regular
    Atomika wrote: »
    Corehealer wrote: »
    Atomika wrote: »

    That is adorable. And of course has nothing to do with how he was a rounding error for the entire race thus far or how even his kids couldn't fathom why he would run.

    I don't know. Getting 0.3% of the vote sounds just about right this season if you're pandering to intellectuals

    Find an intellectual who supported Jindal. I'll wait. Until the heat death of the universe.

    The idea that your vote is a moral statement about you or who you vote for is some backwards ass libertarian nonsense. Your vote is about society. Vote to protect the vulnerable.
  • EncEnc A Fool with Compassion Pronouns: He, Him, HisRegistered User regular
    qlfboelzsdgy73bkdejr.jpg

    This map is from the Carson campaign. The color code is based on which states' Governors want to deny Syrian refugees.

    But check out the northeast.

    Man, all those folks up in the Green Mountains just got some ocean front views. WOO HOO

  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    I am trying to figure out how that map works. Like, at a glance I thought it was just low res reproduction, and the border disappeared, but nope.

  • DunderDunder Registered User regular
    edited November 2015
    I mean Jindal is not entirely wrong though. Any candidate who focused on policies this primary has been relegated to sub 5% support throughout. The republican primary is the clownshow run by children. If you want to listen to adults talking policy you pretty much need to focus on the democratic primary.

    "Focusing too much on policy" was not the reason why Jindal's campaign failed though.

    Dunder on
  • EncEnc A Fool with Compassion Pronouns: He, Him, HisRegistered User regular
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    I am trying to figure out how that map works. Like, at a glance I thought it was just low res reproduction, and the border disappeared, but nope.

    ~puts on P'shop glasses~

    It appears that they took a normal US map and used a basic fill tool to color the states with a really high tolerance, which ate away the border pixels of the more complicated borders. Then they deliberately edited the New England Area (for reasons unknown). Then, to make things more confusing, they lowered the fill to allow some of the background to show through.

  • GatorGator An alligator in Scotland Registered User regular
    Atomika wrote: »
    Corehealer wrote: »
    Atomika wrote: »

    That is adorable. And of course has nothing to do with how he was a rounding error for the entire race thus far or how even his kids couldn't fathom why he would run.

    I don't know. Getting 0.3% of the vote sounds just about right this season if you're pandering to intellectuals

    Find someone who supported Jindal. I'll wait. Until the heat death of the universe.

This discussion has been closed.