If you are a C++ developer please be aware that CMake is taking over the world .Visual Studio 15 now has experimental support for the new CMake IPC server ( https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.7/manual/cmake-server.7.html ). This is going to allow really nice integration between IDE's and CMake. Now IDE's can ask CMake what all the include directories for a target is, what defines the compile line will have etc. This should remove the CMake/IDE loop that developers currently have to do.
So it looks like I'm stuck on 0.14.7 forever then.
Now do research on changelogs, bring up the problem in an issue, see if you can repro on other tablet interfaces. Perhaps it is aa known bug, or a regression they arent aware of.
Could also try updating to 15.0.0, and iterating up each patch and minor release, seeing if there is a particular version of 15 that introduced it.
@Nogs I'm reasonably sure it's the 300ms delay on touches. Going to try and pull in the react-touch-event-plugin again and see. I've removed the animation for the tabs and there's definitely a delay from when I tap the screen and when it actually registers the click.
yeah, that feature's pretty nice. it doesn't usually get you all the way there but it saves a lot of effort if you just need to slurp in some JSON or XML
I think chances are pretty good that if you need the power of a full programming language in place of the traditional preprocessor, you're probably not using the right tool for the job. I agree with bowen that most examples where a full language for a preprocessor is necessary are contrived, and for those that aren't there is probably a better solution (like actualfact code generation tools, or a higher level language with C interop or a native code interface).
I think chances are pretty good that if you need the power of a full programming language in place of the traditional preprocessor, you're probably not using the right tool for the job. I agree with bowen that most examples where a full language for a preprocessor is necessary are contrived, and for those that aren't there is probably a better solution (like actualfact code generation tools, or a higher level language with C interop or a native code interface).
Yeah, the examples are pretty contrived. Loop unrolling at the preprocessor level? Congrats on making your code ugly and a pain to use by anyone else, all for the sake of early optimization.
It's that or templating type stuff, where I don't see the gains in the latter either.
So my work is going to have non-QA personnel (normal users of the software) come in after hours and "test" our software in a development environment. They will be giving them gift cards for every bug they find.
Are you shitting me? HIRE A QA PERSON YOU FUCKWITS!
urahonky on
+9
NogsCrap, crap, mega crap.Crap, crap, mega crap.Registered Userregular
So my work is going to have non-QA personnel (normal users of the software) come in after hours and "test" our software in a development environment. They will be giving them gift cards for every bug they find.
Are you shitting me? HIRE A QA PERSON YOU FUCKWITS!
Wtf....that makes literally no sense.
I mean, even the metric of reward doesnt make any sense. Reward for bug found? So many things wrong with that.
So my work is going to have non-QA personnel (normal users of the software) come in after hours and "test" our software in a development environment. They will be giving them gift cards for every bug they find.
Are you shitting me? HIRE A QA PERSON YOU FUCKWITS!
Wtf....that makes literally no sense.
I mean, even the metric of reward doesnt make any sense. Reward for bug found? So many things wrong with that.
Seriously it's the worst. On top of that, if we had a QA person, then I wouldn't get tickets that say "This thing wasn't working. Not sure why, can't replicate, please diagnose and fix. Top priority."
So now I have to spend hours trying to figure out what the fuck they were talking about and how to replicate.
Those normal users are going to turn features into bugs "yeah that's great, but that's not how it should work, so that's a bug and worth $10 in amazon gift cards"
not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
Posts
That answer has been upvoted more since the screencap was taken. It's 31 at the time of this post.
And when you're already using C, PHP syntax probably doesn't look terrible.
If you are a C++ developer please be aware that CMake is taking over the world
@Nogs I'm reasonably sure it's the 300ms delay on touches. Going to try and pull in the react-touch-event-plugin again and see. I've removed the animation for the tabs and there's definitely a delay from when I tap the screen and when it actually registers the click.
It was unmountOnExit on the tabs. I set that to true and it went back to being incredibly fast. Had nothing to do with touch delay.
PARKER, YOU'RE FIRED! <-- My comic book podcast! Satan look here!
For the Tabs component there's a new property called "unmountOnExit" which is default to false. I set it to true and now every tab clicks instantly.
Not sure if it's a bug in react-bootstraps code or not but I got it working at least.
I guess they're trying to do something that the preprocessor can't easily do. The idea is to run it through PHP -> CPP -> compiler
I'd like to see practical examples because something tells me this recommendation is garbage even though it's shit from a butt too.
The C preprocessor is just a crappy templating language, I doesn't have any semantic connection with C, it's just convention that it gets used.
I made a game, it has penguins in it. It's pay what you like on Gumroad.
Currently Ebaying Nothing at all but I might do in the future.
am I missing something or do I need to write an entire class just to put a DbSet into a dropdown list
come on Microsoft... I thought you unfucked your shit!
Not very familiar with ASP or Core
Yeah, the examples are pretty contrived. Loop unrolling at the preprocessor level? Congrats on making your code ugly and a pain to use by anyone else, all for the sake of early optimization.
It's that or templating type stuff, where I don't see the gains in the latter either.
Exactly. The "good" examples of how it could be used lead to worse code.
This doesn't even touch the nightmare it introduces with debugging, if you were using this extensively.
Are you shitting me? HIRE A QA PERSON YOU FUCKWITS!
Wtf....that makes literally no sense.
I mean, even the metric of reward doesnt make any sense. Reward for bug found? So many things wrong with that.
PARKER, YOU'RE FIRED! <-- My comic book podcast! Satan look here!
https://foo.bar/fizz.html
And I need to request data from
https://foo.bar:18888/json/query=n:1
Is that going to be clobbered by the stuff that prevents cross site requests with pure XmlHTTPRequest?
If you have a template where every parameter has a default value and you never override the defaults, are you really using a template?
std::string answer("Yes.");
The server identity is based on scheme/host/port, so it would be treated the same as https://bar.foo/json would.
Oh.
Bollocks.
I assume most REST APIs would allow CORS server side and thus if I enable CORS client side it should work or is that a dangerous assumption?
No reason to have this assumption unless it's explicitly offered as a service.
It's even better. There's a partial template specialization that's also not used.
This is the most robust API that no one ever uses.
Seriously it's the worst. On top of that, if we had a QA person, then I wouldn't get tickets that say "This thing wasn't working. Not sure why, can't replicate, please diagnose and fix. Top priority."
So now I have to spend hours trying to figure out what the fuck they were talking about and how to replicate.