Club PA 2.0 has arrived! If you'd like to access some extra PA content and help support the forums, check it out at patreon.com/ClubPA
The image size limit has been raised to 1mb! Anything larger than that should be linked to. This is a HARD limit, please do not abuse it.
Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

Look upon my [game design] ye Mighty, and despair!

123468

Posts

  • El FantasticoEl Fantastico Toronto, ONRegistered User regular
    Had a thought about a boardgame idea that's still only really in the conceptual stages in my head, but getting them down on a document so I don't lose the idea and I think it'd be something I'd like to bring up.

    What do you do when you want to get started on making a playable prototype for your game?

    My game requires a board (square grid "tiles" would be drawn over a map) and cards. Lots and lots of cards. And tokens to represent coins/currency and victory points.

    akyxa17p3s5g.png
    PSN: TheArcadeBear
    Steam: TheArcadeBear

  • The SauceThe Sauce Fleur de Alys Registered User regular
    Head to Gamecrafter. I've done all my prototyping through them.

    Triptycho: A card-and-dice tabletop indie RPG currently in development and playtesting
  • The SauceThe Sauce Fleur de Alys Registered User regular
    edited January 13
    I may have been a bit hasty with the previous post. If you're wanting to do prototyping at an earlier stage, you'll want simpler handmade parts, probably.

    A common thing there is to use index cards. You can use different size ones for cards and board tiles. A publisher told me they've played and signed games that were entirely on index cards when presented.

    If you want something that feels more like cards, grab some solid back card protectors (I used Dragon Shields) and put poker cards in them. Create a spreadsheet with boxes set up the size of poker cards and copy to as many pages as you need, inserting the card text into the boxes. Print and cut them out (I bought one of those office paper cutters to do pages at once, mostly straight) and insert them into the protectors on top of the power cards.

    You can reduce your workload and promote rapid change by printing blank cards and writing in pencil so you can erase. Or, buy low graphics poker cards, skip the suits, and just write directly on them.

    For organization, you can use different colors of protectors for different types of cards.

    For tokens, pick up some generic tabletop tokens. I like the plain colored glass-looking counters. If you need a bunch of them and it's confusing, either print some cheat sheets with keys / quick lookup or make your own. Make smaller boxes than for the cards, put a letter or simple symbol on them, and print on thick stock and cut out.

    You can also use other random objects, like coins, dice, or pieces from other games.

    Expect to change things every time you playtest for the first like dozen times. I changed a few key terms after my first test, which meant I had to redo a ton of printed cards. It took hours. Make the first versions as easy to edit in place as you can!

    The Sauce on
    Triptycho: A card-and-dice tabletop indie RPG currently in development and playtesting
    El FantasticoJustTee
  • El FantasticoEl Fantastico Toronto, ONRegistered User regular
    I wrote down a list of materials that will likely be required, at this for this first test phase of the game.

    I have a bunch of different coloured plastic beads I can supplement for tokens for now. Mostly I need about 100 different cards (to start, might bump up to 200 if I expand to 4 players) and "tiles" to lay down a map, similar to how maps are "generated" every time one plays a game like Survive! or Settlers of Catan.

    I foresee a Michael's run later today to get some card stock or construction paper to get those cards knocked out.

    akyxa17p3s5g.png
    PSN: TheArcadeBear
    Steam: TheArcadeBear

    Elvenshae
  • NipsNips Luxuriating in existential crisis.Registered User regular
    If you're looking for cheap playing cards, I just picked up four decks of these for a prototype I'm making:
    https://www.eaieducation.com/Product/530658/Blank_Playing_Cards_-_Single_Deck.aspx

    They're a little bit on the thin side, but the price is an easy sell (I bought four decks, with S&H it cost less than $14 total) and they work as advertised.

    JXUBxMxP0QndjQUEnTwTxOkfKmx8kWNvuc-FUtbSz_23_DAhGKe7W9spFKLXAtkpTBqM8Dt6kQrv-rS69Hi3FheL3fays2xTeVUvWR7g5UyLHnFA0frGk1BC12GYdOSRn9lbaJB-uH0htiLPJMrc9cSRsIgk5Dx7jg9K8rJVfG43lkeAWxTgcolNscW9KO2UZjKT8GMbYAFgFvu2TaMoLH8LBA5p2pm6VNYRsQK3QGjCsze1TOv2yIbCazmDwCHmjiQxNDf6LHP35msyiXo3CxuWs9Y8DQvJjvj10kWaspRNlWHKjS5w9Y0KLuIkhQKOxgaDziG290v4zBmTi-i7OfDz-foqIqKzC9wTbn9i_uU87GRitmrNAJdzRRsaTW5VQu_XX_5gCN8XCoNyu5RWWVGTsjJuyezz1_NpFa903Uj2TnFqnL1wJ-RZiFAAd2Bdut-G1pdQtdQihsq2dx_BjtmtGC3KZRyylO1t2c12dhfb0rStq4v8pg46ciOcdtT_1qm85IgUmGd7AmgLxCFPb0xnxWZvr26G-oXSqrQdjKA1zNIInSowiHcbUO2O8S5LRJVR6vQiEg0fbGXw4vqJYEn917tnzHMh8r0xom8BLKMvoFDelk6wbEeNq8w8Eyu2ouGjEMIvvJcb2az2AKQ1uE_7gdatfKG2QdvfdSBRSc35MQ=w498-h80-no
  • NipsNips Luxuriating in existential crisis.Registered User regular
    edited January 13
    (Whoops double post!)
    Nips wrote: »
    If you're looking for cheap playing cards, I just picked up four decks of these for a prototype I'm making:
    https://www.eaieducation.com/Product/530658/Blank_Playing_Cards_-_Single_Deck.aspx

    They're a little bit on the thin side, but the price is an easy sell (I bought four decks, with S&H it cost less than $14 total) and they work as advertised.

    I'll also heartily endorse the sleeves/cards/printed slips technique. Great for modularity and adjustments mid-design, but it's very time consuming.

    Nips on
    JXUBxMxP0QndjQUEnTwTxOkfKmx8kWNvuc-FUtbSz_23_DAhGKe7W9spFKLXAtkpTBqM8Dt6kQrv-rS69Hi3FheL3fays2xTeVUvWR7g5UyLHnFA0frGk1BC12GYdOSRn9lbaJB-uH0htiLPJMrc9cSRsIgk5Dx7jg9K8rJVfG43lkeAWxTgcolNscW9KO2UZjKT8GMbYAFgFvu2TaMoLH8LBA5p2pm6VNYRsQK3QGjCsze1TOv2yIbCazmDwCHmjiQxNDf6LHP35msyiXo3CxuWs9Y8DQvJjvj10kWaspRNlWHKjS5w9Y0KLuIkhQKOxgaDziG290v4zBmTi-i7OfDz-foqIqKzC9wTbn9i_uU87GRitmrNAJdzRRsaTW5VQu_XX_5gCN8XCoNyu5RWWVGTsjJuyezz1_NpFa903Uj2TnFqnL1wJ-RZiFAAd2Bdut-G1pdQtdQihsq2dx_BjtmtGC3KZRyylO1t2c12dhfb0rStq4v8pg46ciOcdtT_1qm85IgUmGd7AmgLxCFPb0xnxWZvr26G-oXSqrQdjKA1zNIInSowiHcbUO2O8S5LRJVR6vQiEg0fbGXw4vqJYEn917tnzHMh8r0xom8BLKMvoFDelk6wbEeNq8w8Eyu2ouGjEMIvvJcb2az2AKQ1uE_7gdatfKG2QdvfdSBRSc35MQ=w498-h80-no
    JustTee
  • El FantasticoEl Fantastico Toronto, ONRegistered User regular
    Last night, I hit up Michael's, got a couple of foam boards, some card stock, and some markers.

    I finished up my map tiles and player "base" tiles, for lack of a better term. The map will scale in size for up to 4 players. I now just need to colour each tile to represent a resource, similar to Catan, though unlike Catan, they won't be randomly assigned a number. Players will fight for control over specifically marked tiles and earn VP for each one they manage to maintain at the end of each player round.

    Most of the tiles will just be "road" tiles though - no fights to be had over those. They would just count as empty spaces to use up a move action en route to the more valuable tiles.

    akyxa17p3s5g.png
    PSN: TheArcadeBear
    Steam: TheArcadeBear

    Endless_Serpents
  • Endless_SerpentsEndless_Serpents Registered User regular
    edited January 21
    Eh, I’m pretty sure Neon Oblivion is just a passion piece at this point. One of those quaint indie roleplaying games no one will actually play, but I’m having to make it as it wishes to be made, you know? Which means it’s now a diceless narrative story game thingy!

    All the rules and character moves are just acting constraints really, but I’m enjoying making it, which is the point I guess.

    I’m fairly close to daring to show it off, too!

    Endless_Serpents on
  • MrBlarneyMrBlarney Registered User regular
    To add another option to Nips' suggestion for blank cards, I've had a fair amount of luck with these: 500 bridge-sized cards. Sure, they're not as wide as standard cards, but they're sturdier than index cards and handy for quick notes.

    4463rwiq7r47.png
    Nips
  • El FantasticoEl Fantastico Toronto, ONRegistered User regular
    Had to make some new "base" tiles, as using 6-sided hex tiles does not make a 4-player game easy to lay out a map for if you want the players to use north/east/south/west seating positions.

    Using a 5-4-5-4-5 layout however, means the players can take the "corners" of the grid and the map works for 4 players. For 3 players, the map would be laid out like a pyramid as 5-4-3-2-1, with each player taking a tip of the map. And 2 players would have a 1-2-3-2-1 map layout, which is perfect for a small game with constant skirmishes for the VP PoIs.

    akyxa17p3s5g.png
    PSN: TheArcadeBear
    Steam: TheArcadeBear

    Elvenshae
  • JustTeeJustTee Registered User regular
    Index Cards are great for things that will have symbols or text, or will be shuffled / handled often. Use a pencil, and get a good eraser that doesn't destroy paper. I'm partial to the pentel white block thing.

    Poker Cards are awesome for wet/dry erase markers, and good for things that need to be hidden during play. The Paper in a card sleeve with a Poker card inside is also a great tip if you get to the stage where printing cards en masse is a thing that you're doing.

    Initially though, try to break down each concept and part of your game into the *smallest chunk* possible. I saw you mentioned 200 cards for 4 player multi player - but don't prototype 200 different cards. Prototype what I call "The One Key Round" of the game. For your game, that might be anywhere in the beginning, middle, or end. But it's the moment of the game that sings the clearest. Make just enough cards to test *exactly that* stage, and nothing more. You don't need follow up rounds yet. You don't need lead in rounds. Just get that stage of the game working. Iterate until it's great. Expand outward from there.

    This also lets you firm up the fundamentals of the game, the key decisions needed, the key rules needed. With that done, you can start to iterate how some cards might deviate from or break the rules. And you can always mix and match techniques. So at a later stage in development, when you've printed up cards and sleeved things and gotten everything ready - don't be afraid to hand right balance/adjustment changes and throw them in the sleeve, or to add a new blank playing card, or slip of paper, or whatever.

    I think the most important lesson I learned from futzing around with my own board game is to not be tied to specific *things* in your game. Have a design vision and design goals, but specific mechanics, no matter how brilliant, need to be cut without mercy when they need to be cut.

    It's like DMing. Sometimes you have an epic plan for a dungeon that your players will never see. And that's fine - the work you put in crafting that dungeon isn't wasted. It's just material for a later session (or in this case, game).

    Diagnosed with AML on 6/1/12. Read about it: www.effleukemia.com
    Elvenshae
  • Anon the FelonAnon the Felon In bat country.Registered User regular
    Never be afraid to kill your darlings.

    NipsJustTee
  • El FantasticoEl Fantastico Toronto, ONRegistered User regular
    edited January 23
    JustTee wrote: »
    Initially though, try to break down each concept and part of your game into the *smallest chunk* possible. I saw you mentioned 200 cards for 4 player multi player - but don't prototype 200 different cards. Prototype what I call "The One Key Round" of the game. For your game, that might be anywhere in the beginning, middle, or end. But it's the moment of the game that sings the clearest. Make just enough cards to test *exactly that* stage, and nothing more. You don't need follow up rounds yet. You don't need lead in rounds. Just get that stage of the game working. Iterate until it's great. Expand outward from there.

    So I took this advice, and made enough cards for a 2-P game where the "round" can be played out a few different ways, a few different times.

    When players get into a battle over a point of interest on the map, it's going to use a card game system similar to Final Fantasy 8's Triple Triad, where you have the 3x3 grid to lay out cards, and the cards will have a stat ranging from 1 to 10 to represent each facing direction. If my number beats your adjacent number, I win your card, but you can always take back your card (or take mine) by laying a card next to it with a face that has a higher number.

    Most people have played Triple Triad, so we know the mechanics work, and the popularity for the game is there. Where we can deviate a bit from TT and add some flavor and depth is in what the cards (consider them like army units) can do besides just attacking number to number. Some cards will have some of TT's regional rules built in as a special effect, like a unit that doesn't need to win by 1+, but can just match (the Same rule) a 5 versus a 5 and win. Other units, once played, can let you rotate a card on the field so you can shift each number 90 degrees in any direction to try to attack with a different number.

    To that end, I had to make different cards to try out a few of these mechanics so the players weren't just fighting with the same 5 units every time to test the round. Each player controls a faction (humans, undead, elves, beastmen) so the units in each faction deck and their special abilities are thematically different, but that's going to take some advanced planning and thought as balancing powerful unique cards between each faction will definitely be a concern.

    El Fantastico on
    akyxa17p3s5g.png
    PSN: TheArcadeBear
    Steam: TheArcadeBear

    JustTee
  • JustTeeJustTee Registered User regular
    JustTee wrote: »
    Initially though, try to break down each concept and part of your game into the *smallest chunk* possible. I saw you mentioned 200 cards for 4 player multi player - but don't prototype 200 different cards. Prototype what I call "The One Key Round" of the game. For your game, that might be anywhere in the beginning, middle, or end. But it's the moment of the game that sings the clearest. Make just enough cards to test *exactly that* stage, and nothing more. You don't need follow up rounds yet. You don't need lead in rounds. Just get that stage of the game working. Iterate until it's great. Expand outward from there.

    So I took this advice, and made enough cards for a 2-P game where the "round" can be played out a few different ways, a few different times.

    When players get into a battle over a point of interest on the map, it's going to use a card game system similar to Final Fantasy 8's Triple Triad, where you have the 3x3 grid to lay out cards, and the cards will have a stat ranging from 1 to 10 to represent each facing direction. If my number beats your adjacent number, I win your card, but you can always take back your card (or take mine) by laying a card next to it with a face that has a higher number.

    Most people have played Triple Triad, so we know the mechanics work, and the popularity for the game is there. Where we can deviate a bit from TT and add some flavor and depth is in what the cards (consider them like army units) can do besides just attacking number to number. Some cards will have some of TT's regional rules built in as a special effect, like a unit that doesn't need to win by 1+, but can just match (the Same rule) a 5 versus a 5 and win. Other units, once played, can let you rotate a card on the field so you can shift each number 90 degrees in any direction to try to attack with a different number.

    To that end, I had to make different cards to try out a few of these mechanics so the players weren't just fighting with the same 5 units every time to test the round. Each player controls a faction (humans, undead, elves, beastmen) so the units in each faction deck and their special abilities are thematically different, but that's going to take some advanced planning and thought as balancing powerful unique cards between each faction will definitely be a concern.

    Yeah, there's no real right answer for the quantity of cards you need to model the key decisions. From the stand point of an independent person who has to manually make each card by hand, without any sort of budget or assistance, I think a big key is to do the minimum necessary work to test.

    Once you have the base stat line plotted, and the base round plotted, then you start adding rounds and decisions. But don't focus too much attention on balancing the power at this stage. Just start adding unique abilities and seeing how they change the decision space. Don't get too into the weeds on "should this add +1 or +1.5".

    A good balancing technique for this stage of early development is the simple maxim: "If it seems weak, double the effect. If it seems strong, halve the effect".

    Mostly right now you just want to see what kinds of effects add decisions and value, and not necessarily focus on long term winning strategies before you have the basic game play loop nailed down.

    I'll say it again in another way, just to stress this point:
    No amount of fore thought will make whatever game you end up with perfectly balanced. So, essentially, the more time you spend thinking ahead to the end state meta, the less time you spend iterating your design. That's bad.

    Balancing concerns should basically be the last thing on the slate, and it should be based on play testing feedback of the overall total game.

    Diagnosed with AML on 6/1/12. Read about it: www.effleukemia.com
    El FantasticoEndless_SerpentsThe Sauce
  • Endless_SerpentsEndless_Serpents Registered User regular
    Neon Oblivion works!

    It does not work well enough.

    But it is the first game I’ve ever even thought to commission art for, so that’s something.

    It’s a diceless Apocalypse World-ish game that’s all about gaining and spending credibility, avoiding taking heat and moving progressively closer to the centre of the club Neon Oblivion to do whatever it is you’re going to do with the Administrator.

    And pushing everyone else back/forcing them to take heat and lose cred.

    I could go full board game on it at this point, but it’s my thing and I says you have to act!



    Meanwhile the tiny devil that lives in my thumb says I really should also start work on “Love, Justice, Transformation”—a roleplaying game for if you want to be a magical girl or something.

    JustTeeThe Sauce
  • Endless_SerpentsEndless_Serpents Registered User regular
    @WACriminal

    How’s that X-Com-like game going?

  • WACriminalWACriminal Dying Is Easy, Young Man Living Is HarderRegistered User regular
    @WACriminal

    How’s that X-Com-like game going?

    It's buried somewhere under house-buying paperwork right now. It still exists, though, LOL.

    JustTee
  • Endless_SerpentsEndless_Serpents Registered User regular
    No worries, my own game is sidelined by life. Plus I’ve deleted it and started again a lot this week.

  • The SauceThe Sauce Fleur de Alys Registered User regular
    Latest thing to fix:

    Controlled condition lets the controller pick your Action (generally, an attack) and the target, as well as move you.

    It does not, however, allow the controller to pick your Strategy (think Move Action). So, no equipping new things, for instance.

    Dropping things is free and can be done any time, no stipulations.

    Players finally put this together tonight. Get Controlled? Drop your weapons and lol.

    Oops!

    Triptycho: A card-and-dice tabletop indie RPG currently in development and playtesting
  • El FantasticoEl Fantastico Toronto, ONRegistered User regular
    edited February 4
    Project: Tactical Card Fantasy had it's first quick playtest on the weekend, with someone who has never played Triple Triad before.

    We played a quickened version of a 2P game, basically enough rounds to cycle through 3 "fights" because that's all I made cards for.

    Quick Notes:
    - The 2P map is too small. Either I reduce how many moves each "commander meeple" is allowed to make, or I make it more strategic by allowing all commanders to move up to a total of allowed movement. Likely the latter.

    - Because of the small map, fights were too frequent. While the new player enjoyed the card battle mechanics (who doesn't love TT?) he felt some my cards were too powerful. This is not normally going to be an issue - I included 3 of the top tier cards with special abilities because I needed to test them, but in a full game, 10 rounds with 5 new cards being drawn per round means you won't always have a top tier card in your hand.

    - For consideration, expand the map so it is not a setup of 1-2-3-2-1 but 1-2-3-4-3-2-1. If I allow each "commander" to make their own moves, this larger map lets more moves happen, and fewer fights, but depending on the tile layout, could mean the players never engage unless they want to. Will need to test this to see if it adds anything.

    - One of the factions is Undead, but my tester thinks not every unit in the faction should be "undead". Example: Spiders and undead are like peanut butter and chocolate, but a spider is not technically undead. This means some of the special abilities some of the top tier units in the undead deck have won't have an effect on a few of their units. Will consider for balance...

    A friend will be coming by on Wednesday so I can test a 3-player game, which means I'll need to take some time tonight to design 15 new cards for a third faction to participate.

    El Fantastico on
    akyxa17p3s5g.png
    PSN: TheArcadeBear
    Steam: TheArcadeBear

    JustTee
  • Endless_SerpentsEndless_Serpents Registered User regular
    You’re making something like Triple Triad!? Awesome!

    Maybe change undead to “horror” or something that you can classify both a zombie and a spider as.

    JustTee
  • ToothyToothy Registered User regular
    They could be Infected/Infested, so they're not actually in control of their own actions and still alive. The spiders could literally be pulling the strings. Maybe have some of the more powerful things still be undead creatures with their own special rules as a rarity.

    Endless_SerpentsJustTee
  • El FantasticoEl Fantastico Toronto, ONRegistered User regular
    edited February 4
    I like your ideas. I'd need to test a bit to see if I like the idea of some of those cards that target "undead" should affect all the units in the deck, or just some/most.

    I'll give you some more context. I have an "Avatar of Darkness" unit, that when in play gives all other undead units +2 to facing stats. But, should that be all undead (whole faction) or all "undead" (cards listed as undead, like zombies, mummies, skeletons, but not spiders, or living necromancers?)

    El Fantastico on
    akyxa17p3s5g.png
    PSN: TheArcadeBear
    Steam: TheArcadeBear

  • ToothyToothy Registered User regular
    Decide what role you want it to be: a general buffer for your team, buffer of the rank and file, or a strong buffer - which I think should require hoops such as unit type or within a radius so there's counter play. I only barely remember the rules for TT, so this might not be helpful!

    I am curious to see what you've got in a write up, once you've iterated a bit. Faction designing/theming can always wait until after you get the basics down pat. Just make sure you keep all the mechanic ideas somewhere separate, and eventually you can mix and match them.

    The Sauce
  • The SauceThe Sauce Fleur de Alys Registered User regular
    Yeah, focusing on what makes the most sense for the flavor / context / setting / theme of your game is a total trap when you're still in the early to mid stages of mechanical design.

    You can rename, reflavor, or retheme anything to fit your mechanics. You can let your intended theme guide and inspire you (after all, the best games have an excellent marriage between the two), but don't let it dictate mechanics except in the most broad ways.

    Triptycho: A card-and-dice tabletop indie RPG currently in development and playtesting
    Endless_Serpents
  • Endless_SerpentsEndless_Serpents Registered User regular
    Alright universe, fine!

    I can’t seem to wrangle Neon Oblivion at the moment, so I think I’ll start something new to freshen me up. Not even with the plan to complete it, just look into concepts and mechanics. I’m thinking expressly not a roleplaying game...

    So is it time to doodle up an elaborate card game? We shall see!

  • Endless_SerpentsEndless_Serpents Registered User regular
    edited March 26
    I feel terribly neglectful being the host of this thread and having only ever finished one free roleplaying game, so let’s start this up again.

    First, how goes it The Sauce?

    Second, everyone else, what’s a game you daydream about? You don’t have to be actively making it, just spitball!

    Endless_Serpents on
  • IanatorIanator Delightfully mediocre! Registered User regular
    edited March 28
    I'm cobbling together a miniatures wargame as a little hobby. Basically a cross between Battletech Alpha Strike (progress and damage tracked on cards marked off with pencils or markers) and X-Wing (token management, pilot variants) as applied to Super Robot Wars.

    Fighting a bit with complexity, both in practical and subjective terms. SRW has a lot of stuff that is managed automatically on account of being a video game. Translating that to tabletop has been difficult with things like weapon stats, Spirit commands, transformation and combining, other unique passive or active abilites and Morale gain profiles being hard for me to fit on a stat card in a way I feel satisfied with.

    Also messing with an idea for an alternate force balance system where every unit you take requires you to give your opponent something to fight it with. For example, if I add the Wing Gundam to my army, I have to add a Tallgeese to my opponent's army. If they take Mazinger Z and Aphrodite A, I get a Garada K7 and a Doublas M2. There would still be some a points system for determining game size or balancing narrative play.

    Ianator on
    steam_sig.png
    Twitch | Steam
    Blizzard: Ianator#1479 / 3DS: Ianator - 1779 2336 5317 / FFXIV: Iana Ateliere (NA Sarg)
    Backlog Challenge List
    Nips
  • Endless_SerpentsEndless_Serpents Registered User regular
    That last concept is very interesting. Could it be simplified into a point system? I buy a 5 point robot, so your opponent gets 5 points.

    Or maybe units are worth “escalation”, like if you buy a big robot, now it’s all big robots for both players, no going back to little ones.


    Sounds cool though! Keep it up!

  • Anon the FelonAnon the Felon In bat country.Registered User regular
    edited March 29
    Yeah, I'm not sure I'd like my force even partially decided by my opponent.

    Definitely a tough one.

    Edit: maybe you give your opponent some sratagems that can be used during the game. You take 2 flying units, your opponent can use "darkened sky", for one turn they can't fly.

    Anon the Felon on
    JustTee
  • IanatorIanator Delightfully mediocre! Registered User regular
    There'll definitely still be a points system, both for building armies and for determining game size. It's just one "don't wanna think about it" pickup game option.

    steam_sig.png
    Twitch | Steam
    Blizzard: Ianator#1479 / 3DS: Ianator - 1779 2336 5317 / FFXIV: Iana Ateliere (NA Sarg)
    Backlog Challenge List
  • tosoraktosorak Registered User regular
    You might want to check out the game Stronghold on BGG. It's a 2 player castle seige - the attacker can spend time to build rams, seige towers, etc. But the more time they spend building, the more time the defender is then given to spend on defensive actions.

  • MNC DoverMNC Dover Game Designer/Stay-at-home Dad Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    Hey thread! I was discussing the game I'm working on in the boardgame thread, and @MrBlarney nudged me in this direction. It's still pretty early in the design phase, so things can still change (and have they ever).

    Basically, it's a card game that mixes elements of StarCraft and Hearthstone with a worker placement economy. On your turn, you can take the following actions (fully described in spoiler for space):
    • use workers to create more workers
    • construct buildings from a shared market source (think Dominion)
    • acquire and construct ships
    • acquire and play research cards
    • engage in combat with enemy ships

    Workers are used on your turn by placing them on your buildings and are returned to your worker pool at the start of your turn. Workers are also used as pilots for some of the ships. Usually these ships are more powerful and the addition of pilots is used to offset that power and provide a penalty when the ship is lost.

    Buildings are where you draw/construct your ships. At higher tech tiers, they also can have abilities to enhance your ships or manipulate the playfield. Each building can have up to two "add-on" buildings that provide enhancements to the building they are attached to. Some add-on buildings are exclusive to higher tier tech buildings.

    Research cards (currently called R&D cards) are spell-like effects you play on your turn. They are activated with workers, then discarded. They are a nice addition to shake up the linear aspects of combat and provide more avenues to victory. There is a small, 5-building tech tree dedicated solely to R&D cards that the players can choose to go down if they so choose. Naturally going down this tech tree means you'll be weaker on the ship/add-on side of things, so you'll need to choose your pathing wisely.

    Combat is basically Hearthstone combat. Ships have an attack and shield value (HP) and retain damage taken. Like Hearthstone, the attacker chooses defenders and combat resolves instantly with both ships attacking each other and applying their damage. There are currently no plans for interactions between players during combat since we are still looking to take the game digitally and want to have an asynchronous game mode to play on the fly, as seen in Ascension or Star Realms.

    While there's a lot more to say, that's basically the bones of the game. I've created all the cards and am working on moving my testing stuff from hand-written strips of paper (ugh) to sleeved cards w/digitally printed paper inserts. While UI design is no where near finished, this is what I'm thinking as a sort of baseline look:

    8gao5yyiv4pm.jpg
    (from left to right: ships, buildings, R&D)

    In the final designs, there will be color and shapes to identify the card types easier while in-hand. Most information is open, except what ships players have drawn. The backs of the cards will feature icons to indicate if the type of card. This should help with set-up and clean-up and doesn't hurt the flow of information all that much.

    And love to hear some feedback or suggestions moving forward. I'll also be more than glad to send pnp excel sheets to anyone interested in doing any testing. Already got a few people here interested, but the more eyes the better. I wanna make sure the game is balanced obviously, but also doesn't feel too clunky. Given that we've got three types of mechanics, I'm trying to streamline each as to not feel like a turn is weighted down in decisions. It feels like the game is in a good spot right now, but that might just be because of my familiarity with it.

    Anyways, thanks for reading my egregiously long post!

    Twitch Page
    Hearthstone: mncdover#1994
    Nintendo Network ID: MNC.Dover
    3DS: 1934-0659-5183
    Steam ID
    The SauceIanatorEndless_SerpentsMrBlarneyElvenshae
  • Endless_SerpentsEndless_Serpents Registered User regular
    edited March 31
    I’d have to see more to really grasp it, but I think it’d be neat if bigger ships needed more workers onboard, or even if putting more workers on just straight up made the ship better.

    Perhaps a ship always needs a pilot, but they can also house X amount of gunners for more damage, navigators to _____ and so on. These can all just be pulled from the regular worker pool, they just fulfil the role.

    If you run with that killing your opponent’s workers can be as important as simply attacking the ships.

    You can also run last ditch attempts to win by sending out near crew-less ships to power through.



    This isn’t a mechanics thing but I’ve always found it interesting that in 1588 the British navy beat the Spanish Armada using fewer, smaller ships with quicker turn rate and by choosing to fire at close range. There’s maybe something in that, even in a sci fi setting.

    Endless_Serpents on
    MNC Dover
  • MNC DoverMNC Dover Game Designer/Stay-at-home Dad Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    I’d have to see more to really grasp it, but I think it’d be neat if bigger ships needed more workers onboard, or even if putting more workers on just straight up made the ship better.

    Perhaps a ship always needs a pilot, but they can also house X amount of gunners for more damage, navigators to _____ and so on. These can all just be pulled from the regular worker pool, they just fulfil the role.

    If you run with that killing your opponent’s workers can be as important as simply attacking the ships.

    You can also run last ditch attempts to win by sending out near crew-less ships to power through.



    This isn’t a mechanics thing but I’ve always found it interesting that in 1588 the British navy beat the Spanish Armada using fewer, smaller ships with quicker turn rate and by choosing to fire at close range. There’s maybe something in that, even in a sci fi setting.

    I do have some heavy ships that require 2-3 workers. One ship lets you put X workers on it and draw that many cards. Pretty strong, although you’re sacrificing a lot of economic advantage over the long term.

    We used to have worker harassment and building destruction, but cut them in favor of pilots. Losing workers/buildings snowballed the game too much during testing.

    If anyone wants to see the (slightly out of date) rules and card lists, I can PM them to you.

    Twitch Page
    Hearthstone: mncdover#1994
    Nintendo Network ID: MNC.Dover
    3DS: 1934-0659-5183
    Steam ID
  • Endless_SerpentsEndless_Serpents Registered User regular
    Oo go on then!

    MNC Dover
  • MNC DoverMNC Dover Game Designer/Stay-at-home Dad Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    Cards are ready for printing! While I wait for them to get printed, I'll do a first-pass over the rules I whipped up. After that, it's sleeving, testing, adjusting, and more testing.

    Not only to I want to make sure the game is fairly balanced, but ya' know, actually fun to play. We'll see!

    Twitch Page
    Hearthstone: mncdover#1994
    Nintendo Network ID: MNC.Dover
    3DS: 1934-0659-5183
    Steam ID
    Anon the FelonIanatorThe Sauce
  • MNC DoverMNC Dover Game Designer/Stay-at-home Dad Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    OK, early version PnP cards and rules PDFs are ready to go! I'll be sending them in PMs to anyone who was interested.

    I'd love to get some feedback on what you think. First impressions, confusion, clarifications, etc. Anything constructive would be great!

    Twitch Page
    Hearthstone: mncdover#1994
    Nintendo Network ID: MNC.Dover
    3DS: 1934-0659-5183
    Steam ID
  • The SauceThe Sauce Fleur de Alys Registered User regular
    So I've been changing a LOT of stuff in my card & dice RPG recently. We had a pretty critical session tonight, and I think it went really well! I'll eventually write up a dissertation with photos and such.

    But I did find one massive error to correct.

    There's a new piece that features four "stat tracks" on it (which functionally replaces the giant list of conditions in the previous version). It works well, is easy to use, etc, but...

    They're basically number lines with 0 in the middle.

    The positive numbers go to the left, and the negative numbers go to the right. Exactly the opposite of a proper traditional number line.

    How did I miss that

    Triptycho: A card-and-dice tabletop indie RPG currently in development and playtesting
    Anon the FelonMNC DoverAuralynxNipsElvenshae
  • El FantasticoEl Fantastico Toronto, ONRegistered User regular
    I've been neglecting my own Tactical Card Fantasy game for a while. I do need to get back to it.

    A recent discussion in one of the threads here got in to talking about Final Fantasy II, which led to Final Fantasy Legends II, which then led to the discussion of the classes in the game such as Human, Monster, Mutant and Robot and how they were carried over to SaGa Frontier.

    Now I want to make a new boardgame based on that concept of character types, but modernize it a bit. Not sure if it'd be a co-op deck builder with a DM operating a different deck, like a dungeon crawl boardgame, or what. I'm just intrigued and kind of want to see what directions I can take the idea in.

    akyxa17p3s5g.png
    PSN: TheArcadeBear
    Steam: TheArcadeBear

Sign In or Register to comment.