Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

It's actually a new [Tech Thread]

1262729313253

Posts

  • Al_watAl_wat Registered User regular
    jgeis wrote: »
    Xeddicus wrote: »
    And that's just one issue. Like most things people are the problem.

    Will they run someone down to avoid an accident? That alone will keep it tied up for decades.

    As autonomous car technology advances, I think this scenario becomes less and less of a consideration. There are a number of accidents that happen because people overcorrect or make the wrong decision under pressure when avoiding a different potential accident. An autonomous car has a data-driven view of the situation and should be able to make the most correct decision possible in the moment, applying the right amount of throttle/brakes/steering input to avoid any potential accident. You shouldn't have autonomous cars overreacting or making obviously incorrect decisions based on the data coming into their sensors.

    sensors can malfunction. Computers can incorrectly interpret sensor information. Conditions are sometimes outside the range of proper sensor operation. These things happen.

    Thinking about perfect, ideal conditions is one thing (not saying you are guilty of this). I'm curious as to how an autonomous car would perform in say, a blizzard with GPS malfunctioning. Can't see the lines on the road. Can't use GPS to map its position. A human would use reference points to keep in position. What happens in freezing rain? Assume some of the sensors get plugged up. Does the car know? Or does it just act on faulty data?

    These autonomous cars better be pretty damn robust. To compare it to a human mind - a large proportion of our brain's processing is devoted to making sense of the data and having an accurate view of the world with imperfect data.

    PSN: AWATTT66| XBox Live: AWATTT66| Steam: AL-WAT| Battle.Net: ALWATTS #1320
    Origin: aiwatt
    pimento
  • UrielUriel Registered User regular
    Man if self driving cars become almost mandatory in the next 5 to 10 years in going to be pretty pissed that I bothered learning to drive at all.

    I spent like 180 bucks on lessons and got my license two years ago. Hell I have 4 years on my car loan still. Technology sucks sometimes.

  • Al_watAl_wat Registered User regular
    Uriel wrote: »
    Man if self driving cars become almost mandatory in the next 5 to 10 years in going to be pretty pissed that I bothered learning to drive at all.

    I spent like 180 bucks on lessons and got my license two years ago. Hell I have 4 years on my car loan still. Technology sucks sometimes.

    I have a pretty good feeling that no matter what happens with self driving cars, knowing how to drive yourself will always be a vital skill.

    PSN: AWATTT66| XBox Live: AWATTT66| Steam: AL-WAT| Battle.Net: ALWATTS #1320
    Origin: aiwatt
    pimentoEmporiumKwoaruOghulkBahamutZEROgodmodeNaphtalimcpSlacker71Joolander
  • webguy20webguy20 Registered User regular
    Uriel wrote: »
    Man if self driving cars become almost mandatory in the next 5 to 10 years in going to be pretty pissed that I bothered learning to drive at all.

    I spent like 180 bucks on lessons and got my license two years ago. Hell I have 4 years on my car loan still. Technology sucks sometimes.

    Nah our infrastructure is way too shitty for any kind of mandatory switch, and there are too many cars on the road. There will be a time when the majority of cars are auto drive and the old school person operated cars will eventually all break down beyond repair.

    I could see in 20-30 years though city centers becoming purely the realm of the self driving car though, but not a nation wide mandate.

    Steam ID: Webguy20
    Origin ID: Discgolfer27
    Untappd ID: Discgolfer1981
    schussSlacker71
  • BroloBrolo Broseidon Lord of the BroceanRegistered User regular
    Al_wat wrote: »
    Uriel wrote: »
    Man if self driving cars become almost mandatory in the next 5 to 10 years in going to be pretty pissed that I bothered learning to drive at all.

    I spent like 180 bucks on lessons and got my license two years ago. Hell I have 4 years on my car loan still. Technology sucks sometimes.

    I have a pretty good feeling that no matter what happens with self driving cars, knowing how to drive yourself will always be a vital skill.

    at least for the next ~40 years

    godmodeNaphtaliSlacker71
  • UrielUriel Registered User regular
    Ah yeah possibly.

    I want to learn manual transmission for shits and giggles.

    Much like owning vinyl records. Driving myself will be like a weird hipster thing.

    Oh really though the more important thing to me is electric cars and a more sustainable power system that doesn't destroy the environment. Fuck this self driving car garbage.

  • BroloBrolo Broseidon Lord of the BroceanRegistered User regular
    Uriel wrote: »
    Ah yeah possibly.

    I want to learn manual transmission for shits and giggles.

    Much like owning vinyl records. Driving myself will be like a weird hipster thing.

    Oh really though the more important thing to me is electric cars and a more sustainable power system that doesn't destroy the environment. Fuck this self driving car garbage.

    self driving cars are great for people with disabilities or who otherwise aren't mobile

    as well as generally being safer for both drivers and pedestrians

    CyvrosgodmodeDarmakSlacker71
  • Al_watAl_wat Registered User regular
    the thing really holding up electric cars is batteries

    and I mean, electricity grids and charging as well, but that is more of an infrastructure problem than a technological development problem like batteries

    PSN: AWATTT66| XBox Live: AWATTT66| Steam: AL-WAT| Battle.Net: ALWATTS #1320
    Origin: aiwatt
    Naphtali
  • UrielUriel Registered User regular
    Brolo wrote: »
    Uriel wrote: »
    Ah yeah possibly.

    I want to learn manual transmission for shits and giggles.

    Much like owning vinyl records. Driving myself will be like a weird hipster thing.

    Oh really though the more important thing to me is electric cars and a more sustainable power system that doesn't destroy the environment. Fuck this self driving car garbage.

    self driving cars are great for people with disabilities or who otherwise aren't mobile

    as well as generally being safer for both drivers and pedestrians

    You raise a very good point.

    I think good public transit can help too but in smaller cities like where I live that just isn't practical for lots of reasons and will always leave something to be desired when it comes to getting around freely on your own schedule.

  • VeldrinVeldrin Sham bam bamina Registered User regular
    Referring to driving manual as a "hipster" thing is just the most bizarre freakin' thing to me.

    Cyvroschrishallett83KadithBouwsTJoolander
  • UrielUriel Registered User regular
    Veldrin wrote: »
    Referring to driving manual as a "hipster" thing is just the most bizarre freakin' thing to me.

    I didn't mean it seriously. It just seems like something that'll end up happening.

  • VeldrinVeldrin Sham bam bamina Registered User regular
    Uriel wrote: »
    Veldrin wrote: »
    Referring to driving manual as a "hipster" thing is just the most bizarre freakin' thing to me.

    I didn't mean it seriously. It just seems like something that'll end up happening.

    Ohh ok, phew.

    I was really having a moment of panicked introspection there.

    CyvrosJoolander
  • OghulkOghulk Be Humble Sit DownRegistered User regular
    I feel like knowing how to drive a car is a really vital self-preservation type of skills in the event of wide-scale infrastructure collapse.

    天上龙肉,地上驴肉
  • jgeisjgeis Registered User regular
    Al_wat wrote: »
    jgeis wrote: »
    Xeddicus wrote: »
    And that's just one issue. Like most things people are the problem.

    Will they run someone down to avoid an accident? That alone will keep it tied up for decades.

    As autonomous car technology advances, I think this scenario becomes less and less of a consideration. There are a number of accidents that happen because people overcorrect or make the wrong decision under pressure when avoiding a different potential accident. An autonomous car has a data-driven view of the situation and should be able to make the most correct decision possible in the moment, applying the right amount of throttle/brakes/steering input to avoid any potential accident. You shouldn't have autonomous cars overreacting or making obviously incorrect decisions based on the data coming into their sensors.

    sensors can malfunction. Computers can incorrectly interpret sensor information. Conditions are sometimes outside the range of proper sensor operation. These things happen.

    Thinking about perfect, ideal conditions is one thing (not saying you are guilty of this). I'm curious as to how an autonomous car would perform in say, a blizzard with GPS malfunctioning. Can't see the lines on the road. Can't use GPS to map its position. A human would use reference points to keep in position. What happens in freezing rain? Assume some of the sensors get plugged up. Does the car know? Or does it just act on faulty data?

    These autonomous cars better be pretty damn robust. To compare it to a human mind - a large proportion of our brain's processing is devoted to making sense of the data and having an accurate view of the world with imperfect data.

    Oh for sure, I don't think that self-driving cars are anywhere near ready for prime time at this point. They're getting better every week, but I wouldn't expect to see a self-driving car in which the public feels confident it won't make some stupid mistake that kills them for at least another decade. A lot of the issues you mentioned are giving autonomous cars problems right now, although there are arguably redundancies built into the sensor suite to reduce the effects on any one sensor having a fault. For example, if the car can't see the lines at a given moment, I would think that it could default to using LIDAR and object detection to simply keep a safe distance from objects around the car until proper lane identification can be made.

    It's possible that there will be some situations (like a blizzard) where the human driver will have to take over for the autonomous system no matter what, that's just the limitations of technology coming into play.

    I don't think we'll get to the point where a human passenger doesn't need to pay at least some attention until the vast majority of cars on the road are autonomous and using some standardized communication method to share their location/sensory data.

    3DS Friend Code: 2320-6460-9072
    MWO Username: g starwind
    Secret Satans Wishlist
  • Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver Krypton, the noblest element. The gas of kings! Kings!Registered User, ClubPA regular
    Brolo wrote: »
    Uriel wrote: »
    Ah yeah possibly.

    I want to learn manual transmission for shits and giggles.

    Much like owning vinyl records. Driving myself will be like a weird hipster thing.

    Oh really though the more important thing to me is electric cars and a more sustainable power system that doesn't destroy the environment. Fuck this self driving car garbage.

    self driving cars are great for people with disabilities or who otherwise aren't mobile

    as well as generally being safer for both drivers and pedestrians

    There's also the little thing where having universal automated cars dramatically decreases the amount of traffic jams and such.

    Steam name: munkus_beaver
    WiiU: munkusbeaver and Nintendo ID (3DS thinger): 0619-4510-9772
    Blizzard thing: munkus#1952
    Humor can be dissected, as a frog can, but it dies in the process.
    Twitter for health updates: https://twitter.com/MunkusBeaver
    Please give to the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America: http://www.ccfa.org/
  • pimentopimento New Donk CityRegistered User regular
    Veldrin wrote: »
    Uriel wrote: »
    Veldrin wrote: »
    Referring to driving manual as a "hipster" thing is just the most bizarre freakin' thing to me.

    I didn't mean it seriously. It just seems like something that'll end up happening.

    Ohh ok, phew.

    I was really having a moment of panicked introspection there.

    You won't be a hipster with a manual until you have a vintage Alfa Romeo, leather driving gloves and a flat cap.

    .. I mean not even then. Yea.

    It's better to light a candle than to curse the darkness.
    CyvrosVeldrinjgeis
  • CyvrosCyvros Registered User regular
    pimento wrote: »
    Veldrin wrote: »
    Uriel wrote: »
    Veldrin wrote: »
    Referring to driving manual as a "hipster" thing is just the most bizarre freakin' thing to me.

    I didn't mean it seriously. It just seems like something that'll end up happening.

    Ohh ok, phew.

    I was really having a moment of panicked introspection there.

    You won't be a hipster with a manual until you have a vintage Alfa Romeo, leather driving gloves and a flat cap.

    .. I mean not even then. Yea.

    Believable.

    Cy turned out to be much better in person.
  • CyvrosCyvros Registered User regular
    Cross-post from the LGBT thread because it's too good not to.



    This looks really cool. Paid full-time international internships aimed at groups traditionally under-represented in tech, explicitly including trans and gender diverse people. Applications for the next round close 30 March. More info here.

    Cy turned out to be much better in person.
    chrishallett83godmode
  • chrishallett83chrishallett83 Hi! Registered User regular
    pimento wrote: »
    Veldrin wrote: »
    Uriel wrote: »
    Veldrin wrote: »
    Referring to driving manual as a "hipster" thing is just the most bizarre freakin' thing to me.

    I didn't mean it seriously. It just seems like something that'll end up happening.

    Ohh ok, phew.

    I was really having a moment of panicked introspection there.

    You won't be a hipster with a manual until you have a vintage Alfa Romeo, leather driving gloves and a flat cap.

    .. I mean not even then. Yea.

    Speaking of which, are you taking the Alfa to the European classic car show at El Caballo on the first weekend of April?

    terriblepostsigpic.jpg
  • chrishallett83chrishallett83 Hi! Registered User regular
    Al_wat wrote: »
    jgeis wrote: »
    Xeddicus wrote: »
    And that's just one issue. Like most things people are the problem.

    Will they run someone down to avoid an accident? That alone will keep it tied up for decades.

    As autonomous car technology advances, I think this scenario becomes less and less of a consideration. There are a number of accidents that happen because people overcorrect or make the wrong decision under pressure when avoiding a different potential accident. An autonomous car has a data-driven view of the situation and should be able to make the most correct decision possible in the moment, applying the right amount of throttle/brakes/steering input to avoid any potential accident. You shouldn't have autonomous cars overreacting or making obviously incorrect decisions based on the data coming into their sensors.

    sensors can malfunction. Computers can incorrectly interpret sensor information. Conditions are sometimes outside the range of proper sensor operation. These things happen.

    Thinking about perfect, ideal conditions is one thing (not saying you are guilty of this). I'm curious as to how an autonomous car would perform in say, a blizzard with GPS malfunctioning. Can't see the lines on the road. Can't use GPS to map its position. A human would use reference points to keep in position. What happens in freezing rain? Assume some of the sensors get plugged up. Does the car know? Or does it just act on faulty data?

    These autonomous cars better be pretty damn robust. To compare it to a human mind - a large proportion of our brain's processing is devoted to making sense of the data and having an accurate view of the world with imperfect data.

    Passenger airliners have been self-flying for the last few decades with extremely few incidents caused by the autopilot systems themselves. System redundancy is a thing. Also, vehicles can tell you when something is wrong, what is wrong, and in some cases even probable causes for the fault. My car from 2008 already tells me exactly which part is not working at any particular time via "fault codes" and an indicator light on the dashboard.

    terriblepostsigpic.jpg
  • pimentopimento New Donk CityRegistered User regular
    pimento wrote: »
    Veldrin wrote: »
    Uriel wrote: »
    Veldrin wrote: »
    Referring to driving manual as a "hipster" thing is just the most bizarre freakin' thing to me.

    I didn't mean it seriously. It just seems like something that'll end up happening.

    Ohh ok, phew.

    I was really having a moment of panicked introspection there.

    You won't be a hipster with a manual until you have a vintage Alfa Romeo, leather driving gloves and a flat cap.

    .. I mean not even then. Yea.

    Speaking of which, are you taking the Alfa to the European classic car show at El Caballo on the first weekend of April?

    Never heard of it, let's give it a google.
    ...and staring the ABBASALUTELEY tribute show.

    No.

    It's better to light a candle than to curse the darkness.
    jgeischrishallett83CyvrosVeldringodmodeBouwsTJoolander
  • Munkus BeaverMunkus Beaver Krypton, the noblest element. The gas of kings! Kings!Registered User, ClubPA regular
    Al_wat wrote: »
    jgeis wrote: »
    Xeddicus wrote: »
    And that's just one issue. Like most things people are the problem.

    Will they run someone down to avoid an accident? That alone will keep it tied up for decades.

    As autonomous car technology advances, I think this scenario becomes less and less of a consideration. There are a number of accidents that happen because people overcorrect or make the wrong decision under pressure when avoiding a different potential accident. An autonomous car has a data-driven view of the situation and should be able to make the most correct decision possible in the moment, applying the right amount of throttle/brakes/steering input to avoid any potential accident. You shouldn't have autonomous cars overreacting or making obviously incorrect decisions based on the data coming into their sensors.

    sensors can malfunction. Computers can incorrectly interpret sensor information. Conditions are sometimes outside the range of proper sensor operation. These things happen.

    Thinking about perfect, ideal conditions is one thing (not saying you are guilty of this). I'm curious as to how an autonomous car would perform in say, a blizzard with GPS malfunctioning. Can't see the lines on the road. Can't use GPS to map its position. A human would use reference points to keep in position. What happens in freezing rain? Assume some of the sensors get plugged up. Does the car know? Or does it just act on faulty data?

    These autonomous cars better be pretty damn robust. To compare it to a human mind - a large proportion of our brain's processing is devoted to making sense of the data and having an accurate view of the world with imperfect data.

    Passenger airliners have been self-flying for the last few decades with extremely few incidents caused by the autopilot systems themselves. System redundancy is a thing. Also, vehicles can tell you when something is wrong, what is wrong, and in some cases even probable causes for the fault. My car from 2008 already tells me exactly which part is not working at any particular time via "fault codes" and an indicator light on the dashboard.

    They notably still have pilots at the controls for emergencies (and poor weather) and just landing the planes.

    And those pilots have a ton of experience too.

    Steam name: munkus_beaver
    WiiU: munkusbeaver and Nintendo ID (3DS thinger): 0619-4510-9772
    Blizzard thing: munkus#1952
    Humor can be dissected, as a frog can, but it dies in the process.
    Twitter for health updates: https://twitter.com/MunkusBeaver
    Please give to the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America: http://www.ccfa.org/
    godmode
  • chrishallett83chrishallett83 Hi! Registered User regular
    Al_wat wrote: »
    jgeis wrote: »
    Xeddicus wrote: »
    And that's just one issue. Like most things people are the problem.

    Will they run someone down to avoid an accident? That alone will keep it tied up for decades.

    As autonomous car technology advances, I think this scenario becomes less and less of a consideration. There are a number of accidents that happen because people overcorrect or make the wrong decision under pressure when avoiding a different potential accident. An autonomous car has a data-driven view of the situation and should be able to make the most correct decision possible in the moment, applying the right amount of throttle/brakes/steering input to avoid any potential accident. You shouldn't have autonomous cars overreacting or making obviously incorrect decisions based on the data coming into their sensors.

    sensors can malfunction. Computers can incorrectly interpret sensor information. Conditions are sometimes outside the range of proper sensor operation. These things happen.

    Thinking about perfect, ideal conditions is one thing (not saying you are guilty of this). I'm curious as to how an autonomous car would perform in say, a blizzard with GPS malfunctioning. Can't see the lines on the road. Can't use GPS to map its position. A human would use reference points to keep in position. What happens in freezing rain? Assume some of the sensors get plugged up. Does the car know? Or does it just act on faulty data?

    These autonomous cars better be pretty damn robust. To compare it to a human mind - a large proportion of our brain's processing is devoted to making sense of the data and having an accurate view of the world with imperfect data.

    Passenger airliners have been self-flying for the last few decades with extremely few incidents caused by the autopilot systems themselves. System redundancy is a thing. Also, vehicles can tell you when something is wrong, what is wrong, and in some cases even probable causes for the fault. My car from 2008 already tells me exactly which part is not working at any particular time via "fault codes" and an indicator light on the dashboard.

    They notably still have pilots at the controls for emergencies (and poor weather) and just landing the planes.

    And those pilots have a ton of experience too.

    "with extremely few incidents caused by the autopilot systems themselves" there are still pilots in cockpits solely because legislation says there has to be. It is well within reach of current tech to build an aircraft that can land in bad weather far better than any human pilot possibly could, but in the case of inclement weather pilots still have to have hands on throttle and stick because legislation hasn't moved on from the 1970s.

    terriblepostsigpic.jpg
  • Al_watAl_wat Registered User regular
    Al_wat wrote: »
    jgeis wrote: »
    Xeddicus wrote: »
    And that's just one issue. Like most things people are the problem.

    Will they run someone down to avoid an accident? That alone will keep it tied up for decades.

    As autonomous car technology advances, I think this scenario becomes less and less of a consideration. There are a number of accidents that happen because people overcorrect or make the wrong decision under pressure when avoiding a different potential accident. An autonomous car has a data-driven view of the situation and should be able to make the most correct decision possible in the moment, applying the right amount of throttle/brakes/steering input to avoid any potential accident. You shouldn't have autonomous cars overreacting or making obviously incorrect decisions based on the data coming into their sensors.

    sensors can malfunction. Computers can incorrectly interpret sensor information. Conditions are sometimes outside the range of proper sensor operation. These things happen.

    Thinking about perfect, ideal conditions is one thing (not saying you are guilty of this). I'm curious as to how an autonomous car would perform in say, a blizzard with GPS malfunctioning. Can't see the lines on the road. Can't use GPS to map its position. A human would use reference points to keep in position. What happens in freezing rain? Assume some of the sensors get plugged up. Does the car know? Or does it just act on faulty data?

    These autonomous cars better be pretty damn robust. To compare it to a human mind - a large proportion of our brain's processing is devoted to making sense of the data and having an accurate view of the world with imperfect data.

    Passenger airliners have been self-flying for the last few decades with extremely few incidents caused by the autopilot systems themselves. System redundancy is a thing. Also, vehicles can tell you when something is wrong, what is wrong, and in some cases even probable causes for the fault. My car from 2008 already tells me exactly which part is not working at any particular time via "fault codes" and an indicator light on the dashboard.

    You're not wrong but I feel like cars will actually have to deal with more complicated scenarios than planes. Traffic and people make things way more complicated. There is more potential for error.

    But that is why planes have had auto pilot for years, and cars are supposed to be years off.

    PSN: AWATTT66| XBox Live: AWATTT66| Steam: AL-WAT| Battle.Net: ALWATTS #1320
    Origin: aiwatt
    CyvrosTossrock
  • godmodegodmode Nooo-ooo-ooo... That ain't dancin', SallyRegistered User regular
    But again, driving is far less complicated than planes, and computerized cars would have no problem accounting for traffic and people, especially once cars could theoretically be networked together to share positioning data, there would be far fewer traffic incidents. Running red lights and stop lights wouldn't be a problem, poor merging because the driver didn't see the oncoming car, rear-ending because the driver was jerking it or reading the newspaper or their phone or whatever, all these things would virtually disappear with a computer taking the wheel.
    So far the only fatal automated car collision was because the computerized car's sensors didn't see a truck, due to the side of the truck reflecting afternoon light directly into the sensors. This would also disappear if cars shared positional data, because then the automated car wouldn't have had to rely on visual cues to stop.

  • XeddicusXeddicus Registered User regular
    edited March 13
    And if you WANT to hit something?

    The problems for these things are legion. The obvious answer is an override, but just like requiring someone at the wheel (or for there to be a wheel) that defeats the purpose of the exercise.

    Xeddicus on
    "For no one - no one in this world can you trust. Not men. Not women. Not beasts...this you can trust."
  • godmodegodmode Nooo-ooo-ooo... That ain't dancin', SallyRegistered User regular
    Wait, are you arguing that automated cars are going to band together and overthrow humans?

  • pimentopimento New Donk CityRegistered User regular
    The problems for autocars are front loaded, for sure. The first ones will have to deal with 99.9% of the traffic not being autocars, or networked, or talking to them at all. As we get into the future, there'll be more and more autocars, so more and more data coming in that way. Gotta wonder if cities will designate lanes for autocars to make it easier for them, and to incentivise their adoption.

    It's better to light a candle than to curse the darkness.
    chrishallett83kime
  • BroloBrolo Broseidon Lord of the BroceanRegistered User regular
    Xeddicus wrote: »
    And if you WANT to hit something?

    The problems for these things are legion. The obvious answer is an override, but just like requiring someone at the wheel (or for there to be a wheel) that defeats the purpose of the exercise.

    i'm trying to think of things you'd want to hit while you're in a car

  • OghulkOghulk Be Humble Sit DownRegistered User regular
    Intel is buying Mobileye for $15 billion.

    天上龙肉,地上驴肉
  • BroloBrolo Broseidon Lord of the BroceanRegistered User regular
    edited March 13
    either way dump your outdated driverless cars

    archaic trash fit only to be forgotten

    the real future is



    http://www.designboom.com/technology/airbus-pop-up-drone-car-designboom-03-08-2017/

    Brolo on
    Peen
  • JedocJedoc That citation you've neededRegistered User regular
    Yes, yes. We all loved Reboot.

    cannon.jpg
  • JasconiusJasconius sword criminal Illinois???Registered User regular
    i think we're missing the true point of that video

    airbus is going to buy us all-white carpet and furniture so that the pointlessly transparent LCD screens are actually legible

    PeenOghulkSlacker71
  • SnowbearSnowbear Registered User regular
    Comparing peoples' fear of Automated Cars to Automatic Elevators
    http://www.npr.org/2015/07/31/427990392/remembering-when-driverless-elevators-drew-skepticism

    8EVmPzM.jpg
    chrishallett83JedocgodmodeOghulkkimeSlacker71Joolander
  • PeenPeen Registered User regular
    It's pretty well documented that people are terrible at driving. Driving is at best frustrating and at worst completely lethal and that's under ideal non-intoxicated circumstances. Why would we not want to hand that off to a computer immediately so we can focus on what really matters, i.e. browsing the web and watching Netflix? It's baffling.

    Yes a lot of people will need new jobs, yes, that is A reason but I have to think it's one we can solve.

    SirToastykimeschussSlacker71
  • GrobianGrobian What's on sale? Pliers!Registered User regular
    I am convinced that driverless cars will be good enough in very few years and I think they will be hindered by legislation for decades. I'm not convinced I'll see actual driverless cars (so without someone at the controls at all times) in my lifetime because of this.

    Also they don't solve any real problems imo and I'd rather have public money spent on better public transport than any incentives for them. (obviously, after we have good public transport everywhere we should then make it driverless)

    IBHz8.png1dUCx.png
  • chrishallett83chrishallett83 Hi! Registered User regular
    Driverless cars are good enough now. Legislating them is the problem, but that can't take more than a decade or two.

    terriblepostsigpic.jpg
  • furlionfurlion Riskbreaker Lea MondeRegistered User regular
    I am mostly concerned with the cost of them compared to traditional cars. It seems like one more way to stratify the rich and poor.

    sig.gif Gamertag: KL Retribution
    PSN:Furlion
  • JedocJedoc That citation you've neededRegistered User regular
    edited March 13
    furlion wrote: »
    I am mostly concerned with the cost of them compared to traditional cars. It seems like one more way to stratify the rich and poor.

    Not for long. Automotive innovations tend to trickle down pretty quickly as the economy of scale kicks in. The luxury feature of 2005 is the standard feature of today. Especially in a system like automated cars, where the more there are on the road the better they all perform.

    Jedoc on
    cannon.jpg
    pimento
  • godmodegodmode Nooo-ooo-ooo... That ain't dancin', SallyRegistered User regular
    edited March 13
    I imagine it would give rise to fleets of driverless taxis instead, allowing for lower-cost transportation, which will be a bajillion dollar industry someday.

    godmode on
    PeenCyvrosSlacker71
Sign In or Register to comment.