I'm less interested in the stall-less toilet than I am in the fact that they appear to have installed urinals designed to work for a broad spectrum of genital configurations.
“I was quick when I came in here, I’m twice as quick now”
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
The trailer for the movie about P.T. Barnum is... hmm. On the one hand, it looks fun. On the other hand, I dunno how they're gonna do old-style circus-freak exploitation tastefully.
There's awful continental philosophy out there and also some really thought-provoking stuff
The more I integrate the work of D+G into my own theoretical frameworks the more I appreciate the kind of approach they develop in A Thousand Plateaus
I think, being slightly more serious for a moment, that I have an aversion to continental philosophy due to my perception of its effort-reward ratio
Every piece of continental philosophy that I've read (which admittedly isn't that many) starts from such a radically novel framework both theoretically and linguistically compared to pretty much any other philosophical or scientific discipline, and requires a huge investment of time; even in my undergrad philosophy lectures, my lecturers warned me that to properly understand Sartre I'd probably have to read Husserl and Heidegger's key works first, and so on, and so on
I have a lot of stuff to read anyways! Unless continental philosophy is going to expand my mind more so than work from any other discipline, I would receive considerably more benefit by focusing on work from those alternative fields
0
AegisFear My DanceOvershot Toronto, Landed in OttawaRegistered Userregular
There's awful continental philosophy out there and also some really thought-provoking stuff
The more I integrate the work of D+G into my own theoretical frameworks the more I appreciate the kind of approach they develop in A Thousand Plateaus
I think, being slightly more serious for a moment, that I have an aversion to continental philosophy due to my perception of its effort-reward ratio
Every piece of continental philosophy that I've read (which admittedly isn't that many) starts from such a radically novel framework both theoretically and linguistically compared to pretty much any other philosophical or scientific discipline, and requires a huge investment of time; even in my undergrad philosophy lectures, my lecturers warned me that to properly understand Sartre I'd probably have to read Husserl and Heidegger's key works first, and so on, and so on
I have a lot of stuff to read anyways! Unless continental philosophy is going to expand my mind more so than work from any other discipline, I would receive considerably more benefit by focusing on work from those alternative fields
I mean, I think that's a fair assessment of how a lot of the chains of continential philosophy operate. I appreciate D+G more because of their generally stalwart resistance to those chains, and a more general desire to eliminate every last trace of Hegelianism.
My thesis's whole deal is making a case for studying media outside the aborescent line and set pathways of subject/object, signifier/signified, so of course I'm going to view that field as being more valuable than others.
There's awful continental philosophy out there and also some really thought-provoking stuff
The more I integrate the work of D+G into my own theoretical frameworks the more I appreciate the kind of approach they develop in A Thousand Plateaus
I think, being slightly more serious for a moment, that I have an aversion to continental philosophy due to my perception of its effort-reward ratio
Every piece of continental philosophy that I've read (which admittedly isn't that many) starts from such a radically novel framework both theoretically and linguistically compared to pretty much any other philosophical or scientific discipline, and requires a huge investment of time; even in my undergrad philosophy lectures, my lecturers warned me that to properly understand Sartre I'd probably have to read Husserl and Heidegger's key works first, and so on, and so on
I have a lot of stuff to read anyways! Unless continental philosophy is going to expand my mind more so than work from any other discipline, I would receive considerably more benefit by focusing on work from those alternative fields
continental philosophy is insular to an extreme, but at the same time you can read analytical analysis of Derrida and Hegel and critical theory readings of Rawls.
As much as I believe in reading the original text, I think a lot of authors benefit from learning about what they are doing. Perhaps continental philosophers more than analytic philosophers.
0
JuliusCaptain of Serenityon my shipRegistered Userregular
no wait who am I kidding, y'all "english as a first language" speakers can't really understand it.
Posts
The more I integrate the work of D+G into my own theoretical frameworks the more I appreciate the kind of approach they develop in A Thousand Plateaus
1. Play a bideo gam
2. Watch a Steven
3. Read smut comics about sex-having criminals.
Check out my site, the Bismuth Heart | My Twitter
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
Too effeminate for me.
Check out my site, the Bismuth Heart | My Twitter
I mean knitdan
I think, being slightly more serious for a moment, that I have an aversion to continental philosophy due to my perception of its effort-reward ratio
Every piece of continental philosophy that I've read (which admittedly isn't that many) starts from such a radically novel framework both theoretically and linguistically compared to pretty much any other philosophical or scientific discipline, and requires a huge investment of time; even in my undergrad philosophy lectures, my lecturers warned me that to properly understand Sartre I'd probably have to read Husserl and Heidegger's key works first, and so on, and so on
I have a lot of stuff to read anyways! Unless continental philosophy is going to expand my mind more so than work from any other discipline, I would receive considerably more benefit by focusing on work from those alternative fields
Currently DMing: None
Characters
[5e] Dural Melairkyn - AC 18 | HP 40 | Melee +5/1d8+3 | Spell +4/DC 12
I am not a brave man, and the experience was nothing short of harrowing
I mean, I think that's a fair assessment of how a lot of the chains of continential philosophy operate. I appreciate D+G more because of their generally stalwart resistance to those chains, and a more general desire to eliminate every last trace of Hegelianism.
My thesis's whole deal is making a case for studying media outside the aborescent line and set pathways of subject/object, signifier/signified, so of course I'm going to view that field as being more valuable than others.
God damn it
marx
wittgenstein
end of list
Which I guess means they accomplished exactly what they intended.
continental philosophy is insular to an extreme, but at the same time you can read analytical analysis of Derrida and Hegel and critical theory readings of Rawls.
As much as I believe in reading the original text, I think a lot of authors benefit from learning about what they are doing. Perhaps continental philosophers more than analytic philosophers.
-Indiana Solo, runner of blades
grapple points
:winky:
lumbar cum gutters
literallyunbelievable hasn't updated since January. so either they got wise or it is impossible to keep up with the examples.
NNID: Hakkekage
I think, therefore I ... um ...
oh shit that marvin sample
Check out my site, the Bismuth Heart | My Twitter
Mmmm, Domino, mmmmm!!!
You joke but I read Nietzsche the other day and he just attacked Descartes for just supposing an "I" all up in here.
Which is fucking fair. The shit ends with "thinking is happening". Going to ""I" think" is an assumption.