Theodore Flooseveltproud parent of eight beautiful girls and shalmelodorne (which is currently being ruled by a woman (awesome role model for my daughters)) #dornedadRegistered Userregular
i didn't pick gary oldman for best actor and in doing so have passed through this crucible with my soul unstained
+1
Goose!That's me, honeyShow me the way home, honeyRegistered Userregular
edited March 2018
Blake PM me your email address and whether you want 3 months of moviepass or a $30 gc to a movie place
Goose!That's me, honeyShow me the way home, honeyRegistered Userregular
Oh, cool, Moviepass has made it so that not only can you not buy gift subs (which I already knew), you also can't just buy the monthly rate! You have to buy the full year up front. Which was not the case when I first planned to use them as a prize. What a pain.
I haven't watched Shape of Water all the way through, but in the course of theater working, I walked in on the one scene where
the cat is being eaten and, despite having no context, I hold a fierce grudge against Mr. Fishman for doing that. Don't even care if the rest of the movie is the most wonderful amazing Best Picture of 2017, boo to killing and devouring pet cats.
I haven't watched Shape of Water all the way through, but in the course of theater working, I walked in on the one scene where
the cat is being eaten and, despite having no context, I hold a fierce grudge against Mr. Fishman for doing that. Don't even care if the rest of the movie is the most wonderful amazing Best Picture of 2017, boo to killing and devouring pet cats.
That scene cost the movie a lot of godwill from the girlfriend.
The retroactive worst part of the Oscars is Taraji P. Henson clarifying that her red carpet thing with Seacrest was meant as a "keep your chin up" gesture and that she "absolutely" supports him after the sexual harassment allegations.
It's pretty weird that people generally don't give a shit about depictions of violence towards cats but there are entire websites cataloguing dog violence so people can avoid those movies entirely.
It definitely left me feeling a little sour on shape of the water, and added some uncomfortable questions about the central relationship
PSN- AHermano
+1
JimothyNot in front of the foxhe's with the owlRegistered Userregular
It's pretty weird that people generally don't give a shit about depictions of violence towards cats but there are entire websites cataloguing dog violence so people can avoid those movies entirely.
It definitely left me feeling a little sour on shape of the water, and added some uncomfortable questions about the central relationship
Those websites catalog violence against any non-human animals, generally
Straightzi on
+3
3cl1ps3I will build a labyrinth to house the cheeseRegistered Userregular
It's pretty weird that people generally don't give a shit about depictions of violence towards cats but there are entire websites cataloguing dog violence so people can avoid those movies entirely.
It definitely left me feeling a little sour on shape of the water, and added some uncomfortable questions about the central relationship
I don't get that sense from mainstream media at all. I think the context in the film is entirely different than a human just hurting a cat.
The scene in Shape of Water was definitely rough but
It didn't make me question their relationship.
He clearly didn't realize the cat was a pet,
As that concept was probably entirely alien to him and I would imagine small animals=food out in the Amazon, but as soon as it became apparent that Richard Jenkins loved that animal the fish man was super apologetic and tried to make it up to him.
+5
Theodore Flooseveltproud parent of eight beautiful girls and shalmelodorne (which is currently being ruled by a woman (awesome role model for my daughters)) #dornedadRegistered Userregular
The scene in Shape of Water was definitely rough but
It didn't make me question their relationship.
He clearly didn't realize the cat was a pet,
As that concept was probably entirely alien to him and I would imagine small animals=food out in the Amazon, but as soon as it became apparent that Richard Jenkins loved that animal the fish man was super apologetic and tried to make it up to him.
yeah, I don't think it's "unable to know better" but instead "ignorant of why that wouldn't be acceptable"
It's pretty weird that people generally don't give a shit about depictions of violence towards cats but there are entire websites cataloguing dog violence so people can avoid those movies entirely.
It definitely left me feeling a little sour on shape of the water, and added some uncomfortable questions about the central relationship
Those websites catalog violence against any non-human animals, generally
Ah fair enough, I only ever see it mentioned regarding dogs, my mistake
It's pretty weird that people generally don't give a shit about depictions of violence towards cats but there are entire websites cataloguing dog violence so people can avoid those movies entirely.
It definitely left me feeling a little sour on shape of the water, and added some uncomfortable questions about the central relationship
the name for the website 'Does the Dog Die' was mostly chosen for alliteration purposes, and will accept submissions of pretty much any form of animal abuse. I'm pretty sure everything is user submitted though, so it may be missing some
It's pretty weird that people generally don't give a shit about depictions of violence towards cats but there are entire websites cataloguing dog violence so people can avoid those movies entirely.
It definitely left me feeling a little sour on shape of the water, and added some uncomfortable questions about the central relationship
I don't get that sense from mainstream media at all. I think the context in the film is entirely different than a human just hurting a cat.
I just don't agree, there's entire movies about dogs and how sad it is when they die, with cats it's almost a joke.
Do you think this scene plays the same if it's a dog? Would the characters weirdly laughing it off with a shrug have happened?
It's pretty weird that people generally don't give a shit about depictions of violence towards cats but there are entire websites cataloguing dog violence so people can avoid those movies entirely.
It definitely left me feeling a little sour on shape of the water, and added some uncomfortable questions about the central relationship
I don't get that sense from mainstream media at all. I think the context in the film is entirely different than a human just hurting a cat.
I just don't agree, there's entire movies about dogs and how sad it is when they die, with cats it's almost a joke.
Do you think this scene plays the same if it's a dog? Would the characters weirdly laughing it off with a shrug have happened?
I think that the way Richard Jenkins’s character reacted to other things in the film he absolutely would’ve reacted the same way.
The scene in Shape of Water was definitely rough but
It didn't make me question their relationship.
He clearly didn't realize the cat was a pet,
As that concept was probably entirely alien to him and I would imagine small animals=food out in the Amazon, but as soon as it became apparent that Richard Jenkins loved that animal the fish man was super apologetic and tried to make it up to him.
Hmm ok that's a fair point
I think generally the movie needed a greater display of intelligence, it didn't really act beyond what a smart primate could be taught to do, i think the movie ended up in a pretty murky area regarding consent
PSN- AHermano
+1
3cl1ps3I will build a labyrinth to house the cheeseRegistered Userregular
It's pretty weird that people generally don't give a shit about depictions of violence towards cats but there are entire websites cataloguing dog violence so people can avoid those movies entirely.
It definitely left me feeling a little sour on shape of the water, and added some uncomfortable questions about the central relationship
I don't get that sense from mainstream media at all. I think the context in the film is entirely different than a human just hurting a cat.
I just don't agree, there's entire movies about dogs and how sad it is when they die, with cats it's almost a joke.
Do you think this scene plays the same if it's a dog? Would the characters weirdly laughing it off with a shrug have happened?
I really can't think of a single instance in which a cat being genuinely hurt was played off for laughs. That scene itself wasn't even played off for laughs in Shape of Water, the later reactions to fishman's mistake were the only humor.
It's pretty weird that people generally don't give a shit about depictions of violence towards cats but there are entire websites cataloguing dog violence so people can avoid those movies entirely.
It definitely left me feeling a little sour on shape of the water, and added some uncomfortable questions about the central relationship
I don't get that sense from mainstream media at all. I think the context in the film is entirely different than a human just hurting a cat.
I just don't agree, there's entire movies about dogs and how sad it is when they die, with cats it's almost a joke.
Do you think this scene plays the same if it's a dog? Would the characters weirdly laughing it off with a shrug have happened?
I really can't think of a single instance in which a cat being genuinely hurt was played off for laughs. That scene itself wasn't even played off for laughs in Shape of Water, the later reactions to fishman's mistake were the only humor.
It's pretty weird that people generally don't give a shit about depictions of violence towards cats but there are entire websites cataloguing dog violence so people can avoid those movies entirely.
It definitely left me feeling a little sour on shape of the water, and added some uncomfortable questions about the central relationship
I don't get that sense from mainstream media at all. I think the context in the film is entirely different than a human just hurting a cat.
I just don't agree, there's entire movies about dogs and how sad it is when they die, with cats it's almost a joke.
Do you think this scene plays the same if it's a dog? Would the characters weirdly laughing it off with a shrug have happened?
I think that the way Richard Jenkins’s character reacted to other things in the film he absolutely would’ve reacted the same way.
Oh no I mean, how would audiences react seeing Jenkin's reaction if it was a dog?
PSN- AHermano
0
3cl1ps3I will build a labyrinth to house the cheeseRegistered Userregular
It's pretty weird that people generally don't give a shit about depictions of violence towards cats but there are entire websites cataloguing dog violence so people can avoid those movies entirely.
It definitely left me feeling a little sour on shape of the water, and added some uncomfortable questions about the central relationship
I don't get that sense from mainstream media at all. I think the context in the film is entirely different than a human just hurting a cat.
I just don't agree, there's entire movies about dogs and how sad it is when they die, with cats it's almost a joke.
Do you think this scene plays the same if it's a dog? Would the characters weirdly laughing it off with a shrug have happened?
I really can't think of a single instance in which a cat being genuinely hurt was played off for laughs. That scene itself wasn't even played off for laughs in Shape of Water, the later reactions to fishman's mistake were the only humor.
It's pretty weird that people generally don't give a shit about depictions of violence towards cats but there are entire websites cataloguing dog violence so people can avoid those movies entirely.
It definitely left me feeling a little sour on shape of the water, and added some uncomfortable questions about the central relationship
I don't get that sense from mainstream media at all. I think the context in the film is entirely different than a human just hurting a cat.
I just don't agree, there's entire movies about dogs and how sad it is when they die, with cats it's almost a joke.
Do you think this scene plays the same if it's a dog? Would the characters weirdly laughing it off with a shrug have happened?
I really can't think of a single instance in which a cat being genuinely hurt was played off for laughs. That scene itself wasn't even played off for laughs in Shape of Water, the later reactions to fishman's mistake were the only humor.
Christmas Vacation.
There's a comedy (can't remember the name) where one of the running "gags" is a cat getting abused horribly and repeatedly (for example, there's a scene where the cat overdoses on cocaine that's been left out.) At the end, the couple adopts the cat saying it has X number of lives left (where X equaled 9 - the number of "gags".)
Posts
if anybody needs to see a movie, it's him
Yes
Steam
When I scrolled past this with tired, just-woke-up eyes, I was wondering why Kojima was congratulating Darkest Hour
That scene cost the movie a lot of godwill from the girlfriend.
It definitely left me feeling a little sour on shape of the water, and added some uncomfortable questions about the central relationship
PSN- AHermano
Still doesn’t get old
Those websites catalog violence against any non-human animals, generally
I don't get that sense from mainstream media at all. I think the context in the film is entirely different than a human just hurting a cat.
He clearly didn't realize the cat was a pet,
As that concept was probably entirely alien to him and I would imagine small animals=food out in the Amazon, but as soon as it became apparent that Richard Jenkins loved that animal the fish man was super apologetic and tried to make it up to him.
yeah, I don't think it's "unable to know better" but instead "ignorant of why that wouldn't be acceptable"
Ah fair enough, I only ever see it mentioned regarding dogs, my mistake
PSN- AHermano
the name for the website 'Does the Dog Die' was mostly chosen for alliteration purposes, and will accept submissions of pretty much any form of animal abuse. I'm pretty sure everything is user submitted though, so it may be missing some
I just don't agree, there's entire movies about dogs and how sad it is when they die, with cats it's almost a joke.
Do you think this scene plays the same if it's a dog? Would the characters weirdly laughing it off with a shrug have happened?
PSN- AHermano
I think that the way Richard Jenkins’s character reacted to other things in the film he absolutely would’ve reacted the same way.
Hmm ok that's a fair point
PSN- AHermano
I really can't think of a single instance in which a cat being genuinely hurt was played off for laughs. That scene itself wasn't even played off for laughs in Shape of Water, the later reactions to fishman's mistake were the only humor.
Christmas Vacation.
Oh no I mean, how would audiences react seeing Jenkin's reaction if it was a dog?
PSN- AHermano
Never saw it. That's disappointing.
There's a comedy (can't remember the name) where one of the running "gags" is a cat getting abused horribly and repeatedly (for example, there's a scene where the cat overdoses on cocaine that's been left out.) At the end, the couple adopts the cat saying it has X number of lives left (where X equaled 9 - the number of "gags".)
Disappointed this isn’t FFX Wakka
It’s underwater and everything
They caught him today and got it back to her.
Steam
Where the fuck was powers boothe and Adam west in the memorial part of the show?
But hey, they managed to include a goddamn publicist.
Who was a member of the academy, which is what they are honoring.
I wonder if the "snubs" were because they weren't members? Not sure how to check.
http://deadline.com/2018/03/oscars-in-memoriam-snubs-adam-west-tobe-hooper-list-1202311599/
https://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/wishlist/1JI9WWSRW1YJI