The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Mass Migration in the Americas: 1200 Central Americans on the march

LoisLaneLoisLane Registered User regular
edited April 2018 in Debate and/or Discourse
Buzzfeed is reporting a 1200 strong caravan is on the march through Mexico to the US. No one is stopping them. How will the Trump government react if they reach their destination? Has this happened before in the Americas? Do you think these mass migrations will grow ever more common as climate change worsens?
https://www.buzzfeed.com/adolfoflores/a-huge-caravan-of-central-americans-is-headed-for-the-us?utm_term=.ei1XKzZVM#.linYAmpk1

Further reporting:
WAPO:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/04/01/why-a-u-s-bound-caravan-of-central-american-migrants-is-getting-trumps-attention/?utm_term=.caf327a6aa21

Mother Jones: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/04/trump-and-trolls-target-caravan-of-migrant-families/

LoisLane on
«1

Posts

  • SmrtnikSmrtnik job boli zub Registered User regular
    This will end in tears

    steam_sig.png
  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    Phrasing

  • GoumindongGoumindong Registered User regular
    Probably intentional phrasing.

    wbBv3fj.png
  • SmrtnikSmrtnik job boli zub Registered User regular
    Yeah i can't see Trump handling this with anything reassembling grace.

    steam_sig.png
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    Trump couldn't handle something with grace if he was moving a sofa with the princess of Monaco.

    I think the best we can hope for is that he doesn't order ICE to literally open fire on these people.

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • LoisLaneLoisLane Registered User regular
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Trump couldn't handle something with grace if he was moving a sofa with the princess of Monaco.

    I think the best we can hope for is that he doesn't order ICE to literally open fire on these people.
    And if he does? Like, I’m trying to imagine the worst case scenario here. If a 1000 people bum rush the border, what exactly can ICE do?

  • NyysjanNyysjan FinlandRegistered User regular
    LoisLane wrote: »
    ElJeffe wrote: »
    Trump couldn't handle something with grace if he was moving a sofa with the princess of Monaco.

    I think the best we can hope for is that he doesn't order ICE to literally open fire on these people.
    And if he does? Like, I’m trying to imagine the worst case scenario here. If a 1000 people bum rush the border, what exactly can ICE do?

    Open fire?

  • GaddezGaddez Registered User regular
    Considering how hostile trump is to illegal immigration I wouldn't be surprised to see him trying to get landmines deployed across the border.

    I'm not even joking. This is a thing I can see him doing and legions of idiots cheering for installing subterranean munitions that will be causing problems for decades to come.

  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited April 2018
    What I imagine is the ideal solution here is to post agents along the wall, and tell them that if they set foot in the country, they will be taken into custody. And when they cross, do exactly that, peacefully and humanely and without any fucking guns or whacking sticks. And if one or two escape and flee into the country, let it the fuck go. The most important thing, both morally and politically, is that none of these folks get hurt.

    Once they're in custody, we can figure out what to do with them. We can't just let them in, obviously. But we absolutely have to be humane and peaceful about this.

    But that ain't happening. If they hit the border and try to come in, people will die. I do not trust Trump, ICE, or anyone else associated with this administration to not let people die.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • Mr KhanMr Khan Not Everyone WAHHHRegistered User regular
    This is getting a distinct rise out of Trump:

  • hawkboxhawkbox Registered User regular
    This is just the first wave of these displaced groups too. It's going to get worse as desertification moves north/southward.

  • SadgasmSadgasm Deluded doodler A cold placeRegistered User regular
    hawkbox wrote: »
    This is just the first wave of these displaced groups too. It's going to get worse as desertification moves north/southward.

    Yeah, it's like with the refugee situation in Europe, no one has actually offered any real solutions, it just seems to go back to conservatives and liberals yelling at eachother. Lets say you somehow manage to seal up the border, there's still a ton of refugees on the other side with nowhere to go. Just because they ignore the problem doesnt mean it goes away.

  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    edited April 2018
    Is there any reporting on this that isn't from kooks and racist nutters?

    I'm seeing like no google hits for this thing that I'm not deeply suspicious of.

    There's like one piece from buzzfeed and one from motherjones I really had to dig for and other then that it seems no major news agency is really looking into this thing.

    I feel like it's just gonna explode onto the US news scene at the very last second when the shit has already gone down.

    shryke on
  • KaputaKaputa Registered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    Is there any reporting on this that isn't from kooks and racist nutters?

    I'm seeing like no google hits for this thing that I'm not deeply suspicious of.

    There's like one piece from buzzfeed and one from motherjones I really had to dig for and other then that it seems no major news agency is really looking into this thing.

    I feel like it's just gonna explode onto the US news scene at the very last second when the shit has already gone down.
    Yeah, I got "Buzzfeed, Fox News (quoting Buzzfeed), Breitbart, Daily Mail" in my search and became skeptical.

    http://www.pueblosinfronteras.org/viacrucis.html

    Here's the website of an organization that appears to be organizing the caravan? Or at least involved with it in some way.

  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    edited April 2018
    A half a million people legally cross the border North every year. Is 1,200 people anything other than a slight blip up from a normal day? Like, basically if Christmas happened without warning.

    moniker on
  • SmrtnikSmrtnik job boli zub Registered User regular
    Yeah but they are usually traveling 1-2 or truckload at a time, not "small town" at a time.

    steam_sig.png
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    Assuming the reports are accurate, this is a large group of people demanding the US make a public decision on this. Either we let them go through - which ain't gonna happen - or we directly address the group when they hit the border. And if the latter, everyone will be watching.

    Trump is going to want to turn this into a statement.

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • silence1186silence1186 Character shields down! As a wingmanRegistered User regular
    Sadgasm wrote: »
    hawkbox wrote: »
    This is just the first wave of these displaced groups too. It's going to get worse as desertification moves north/southward.

    Yeah, it's like with the refugee situation in Europe, no one has actually offered any real solutions, it just seems to go back to conservatives and liberals yelling at eachother. Lets say you somehow manage to seal up the border, there's still a ton of refugees on the other side with nowhere to go. Just because they ignore the problem doesnt mean it goes away.

    I've even seen it argued the refugee crisis in Europe has its roots in global climate change, with a drought in Syria being the initial impetus for the chain of events that led to the civil war there.

    So as less and less land is arable, the people who live there will move to places that can support life, regardless of whether there's people already there.

  • JoeUserJoeUser Forum Santa Registered User regular
    Trump spent Easter weekend with Fox News people like Jeanine Pirro, Sean Hannity and Bill Shine, all of whom told him he was being soft on immigration.

    I don't anticipate this going well.

  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited April 2018
    This is making its way on to other news networks. NPR reported it this morning and Trump spent a few tweets ranting about it.

    Quid on
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    Smrtnik wrote: »
    Yeah but they are usually traveling 1-2 or truckload at a time, not "small town" at a time.
    The San Ysidro Port of Entry is the largest land border crossing between San Diego and Tijuana, and one of the busiest land border crossings in the world with 70,000 northbound vehicles and 20,000 northbound pedestrians crossing each day, in addition to southbound traffic

  • SmrtnikSmrtnik job boli zub Registered User regular
    Those vehicles and people are each on their own journey, not an organized group. And are going through a border crossing, not throgh the desert. Why is this hard?

    steam_sig.png
  • LoisLaneLoisLane Registered User regular
    edited April 2018
    moniker wrote: »
    Smrtnik wrote: »
    Yeah but they are usually traveling 1-2 or truckload at a time, not "small town" at a time.
    The San Ysidro Port of Entry is the largest land border crossing between San Diego and Tijuana, and one of the busiest land border crossings in the world with 70,000 northbound vehicles and 20,000 northbound pedestrians crossing each day, in addition to southbound traffic

    Are they all going at once in a single massive push? This is like comparing a flash flood to the usual rise of a river during a rainstorm. New York transports millions through its subway system but I bet you if suddenly a 1200 people bum rushed one station they would have problems.

    Edit:
    WAPO now reporting on it:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/04/01/why-a-u-s-bound-caravan-of-central-american-migrants-is-getting-trumps-attention/?utm_term=.caf327a6aa21

    Mother Jones too: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/04/trump-and-trolls-target-caravan-of-migrant-families/
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Phrasing
    What innuendo did I make?

    LoisLane on
  • hawkboxhawkbox Registered User regular
    The number in this is rather low so people freaking out about that are being silly, the long term implication is what people should be freaking out about.

  • tbloxhamtbloxham Registered User regular
    LoisLane wrote: »
    moniker wrote: »
    Smrtnik wrote: »
    Yeah but they are usually traveling 1-2 or truckload at a time, not "small town" at a time.
    The San Ysidro Port of Entry is the largest land border crossing between San Diego and Tijuana, and one of the busiest land border crossings in the world with 70,000 northbound vehicles and 20,000 northbound pedestrians crossing each day, in addition to southbound traffic

    Are they all going at once in a single massive push? This is like comparing a flash flood to the usual rise of a river during a rainstorm. New York transports millions through its subway system but I bet you if suddenly a 1200 people bum rushed one station they would have problems.

    Edit:
    WAPO now reporting on it:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/04/01/why-a-u-s-bound-caravan-of-central-american-migrants-is-getting-trumps-attention/?utm_term=.caf327a6aa21

    Mother Jones too: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/04/trump-and-trolls-target-caravan-of-migrant-families/
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Phrasing
    What innuendo did I make?

    Most reports I read have stated that the caravan is to get them safely across Southern Mexico and central america. Once they approach the border they plan to disperse and cross in small groups, which is perfectly normal behavior.

    The only difference here is that the caravan is more organized for the crossing of central America step, to try and combat the drug dealers and kidnappers there.

    There's no chance they just all march at the border together. That's an easy response for Trump. Just have 100 agents in place, warn them clearly not to enter and then arrest them all immediately.

    "That is cool" - Abraham Lincoln
  • durandal4532durandal4532 Registered User regular
    The coverage seems to indicate that this is pretty much the way that people attempt to travel to the border, going in a larger group in order to avoid violence. They mention that trains used to be a more common method but security got stepped up recently. It seems like 1200 is both kind of a lot of folks for this particular crossing and method, and also not nearly unique enough to warrant fear of a "flash flood".
    Marching in a large group is expected to blunt the efforts of criminal gangs and cartels known to isolate and later rob immigrants, many of whom bring large sums of money to make the long journey north through Mexico. The caravan organizers, Pueblos Sin Fronteras, or People Without Borders, appeared to have concluded that it is safer for these people to travel together.
    ...
    Members of the caravan said they would attempt to ride the trains, but in 2014, more guards and trains moving faster through stations made it more difficult for migrants to catch rides.

    Mostly it sounds like a predictable continuation of the ongoing humanitarian crisis that is causing people to flee Honduras. If the US were something better than it is, this might be an opportunity to offer refuge.

    We're all in this together
  • LoisLaneLoisLane Registered User regular
    hawkbox wrote: »
    The number in this is rather low so people freaking out about that are being silly, the long term implication is what people should be freaking out about.

    I thought we were freaking about both?
    tbloxham wrote: »
    LoisLane wrote: »
    moniker wrote: »
    Smrtnik wrote: »
    Yeah but they are usually traveling 1-2 or truckload at a time, not "small town" at a time.
    The San Ysidro Port of Entry is the largest land border crossing between San Diego and Tijuana, and one of the busiest land border crossings in the world with 70,000 northbound vehicles and 20,000 northbound pedestrians crossing each day, in addition to southbound traffic

    Are they all going at once in a single massive push? This is like comparing a flash flood to the usual rise of a river during a rainstorm. New York transports millions through its subway system but I bet you if suddenly a 1200 people bum rushed one station they would have problems.

    Edit:
    WAPO now reporting on it:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/04/01/why-a-u-s-bound-caravan-of-central-american-migrants-is-getting-trumps-attention/?utm_term=.caf327a6aa21

    Mother Jones too: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/04/trump-and-trolls-target-caravan-of-migrant-families/
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Phrasing
    What innuendo did I make?

    Most reports I read have stated that the caravan is to get them safely across Southern Mexico and central america. Once they approach the border they plan to disperse and cross in small groups, which is perfectly normal behavior.

    The only difference here is that the caravan is more organized for the crossing of central America step, to try and combat the drug dealers and kidnappers there.

    There's no chance they just all march at the border together. That's an easy response for Trump. Just have 100 agents in place, warn them clearly not to enter and then arrest them all immediately.

    100 agents are supposed to arrest more than 1000 people how?

  • EriktheVikingGamerEriktheVikingGamer Registered User regular
    edited April 2018
    nvrmind. You weren't the one who said that. :P

    EriktheVikingGamer on
    Steam - DailyFatigueBar
    FFXIV - Milliardo Beoulve/Sargatanas
  • hawkboxhawkbox Registered User regular
    LoisLane wrote: »
    hawkbox wrote: »
    The number in this is rather low so people freaking out about that are being silly, the long term implication is what people should be freaking out about.

    I thought we were freaking about both?
    tbloxham wrote: »
    LoisLane wrote: »
    moniker wrote: »
    Smrtnik wrote: »
    Yeah but they are usually traveling 1-2 or truckload at a time, not "small town" at a time.
    The San Ysidro Port of Entry is the largest land border crossing between San Diego and Tijuana, and one of the busiest land border crossings in the world with 70,000 northbound vehicles and 20,000 northbound pedestrians crossing each day, in addition to southbound traffic

    Are they all going at once in a single massive push? This is like comparing a flash flood to the usual rise of a river during a rainstorm. New York transports millions through its subway system but I bet you if suddenly a 1200 people bum rushed one station they would have problems.

    Edit:
    WAPO now reporting on it:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/04/01/why-a-u-s-bound-caravan-of-central-american-migrants-is-getting-trumps-attention/?utm_term=.caf327a6aa21

    Mother Jones too: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/04/trump-and-trolls-target-caravan-of-migrant-families/
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Phrasing
    What innuendo did I make?

    Most reports I read have stated that the caravan is to get them safely across Southern Mexico and central america. Once they approach the border they plan to disperse and cross in small groups, which is perfectly normal behavior.

    The only difference here is that the caravan is more organized for the crossing of central America step, to try and combat the drug dealers and kidnappers there.

    There's no chance they just all march at the border together. That's an easy response for Trump. Just have 100 agents in place, warn them clearly not to enter and then arrest them all immediately.

    100 agents are supposed to arrest more than 1000 people how?

    1200 people crossing the border into the US is a rounding error. What it means for human migration is what people should be paying attention too, and stabilizing the regions they're fleeing from would be the smart solution, but you guys elected a cheeto for president.

  • ForarForar #432 Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    LoisLane wrote: »
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Phrasing
    What innuendo did I make?

    Wasn't you, it was Smrtnik's 'this will end in tears'.

    Presumably 'Sax was referencing the Trail of Tears.

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
  • SiliconStewSiliconStew Registered User regular
    moniker wrote: »
    A half a million people legally cross the border North every year. Is 1,200 people anything other than a slight blip up from a normal day? Like, basically if Christmas happened without warning.

    From 2016 statistics, there are about 150,000 people permanently moving from Mexico to the US per year, though that includes both legal and illegal. 1200 is 0.8% of that yearly total or about 3 days worth of immigration from there.

    Just remember that half the people you meet are below average intelligence.
  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    edited April 2018
    hawkbox wrote: »
    LoisLane wrote: »
    hawkbox wrote: »
    The number in this is rather low so people freaking out about that are being silly, the long term implication is what people should be freaking out about.

    I thought we were freaking about both?
    tbloxham wrote: »
    LoisLane wrote: »
    moniker wrote: »
    Smrtnik wrote: »
    Yeah but they are usually traveling 1-2 or truckload at a time, not "small town" at a time.
    The San Ysidro Port of Entry is the largest land border crossing between San Diego and Tijuana, and one of the busiest land border crossings in the world with 70,000 northbound vehicles and 20,000 northbound pedestrians crossing each day, in addition to southbound traffic

    Are they all going at once in a single massive push? This is like comparing a flash flood to the usual rise of a river during a rainstorm. New York transports millions through its subway system but I bet you if suddenly a 1200 people bum rushed one station they would have problems.

    Edit:
    WAPO now reporting on it:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/04/01/why-a-u-s-bound-caravan-of-central-american-migrants-is-getting-trumps-attention/?utm_term=.caf327a6aa21

    Mother Jones too: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/04/trump-and-trolls-target-caravan-of-migrant-families/
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Phrasing
    What innuendo did I make?

    Most reports I read have stated that the caravan is to get them safely across Southern Mexico and central america. Once they approach the border they plan to disperse and cross in small groups, which is perfectly normal behavior.

    The only difference here is that the caravan is more organized for the crossing of central America step, to try and combat the drug dealers and kidnappers there.

    There's no chance they just all march at the border together. That's an easy response for Trump. Just have 100 agents in place, warn them clearly not to enter and then arrest them all immediately.

    100 agents are supposed to arrest more than 1000 people how?

    1200 people crossing the border into the US is a rounding error. What it means for human migration is what people should be paying attention too, and stabilizing the regions they're fleeing from would be the smart solution, but you guys elected a cheeto for president.

    That doesn't answer the question though and the US already has issues with what to do with all the people DHS detains for immigration violations.

    If they actually all just decided to cross the border at once that would be a huge clusterfuck since you would need to arrest them all at the same time.

    shryke on
  • LoisLaneLoisLane Registered User regular
    Forar wrote: »
    LoisLane wrote: »
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Phrasing
    What innuendo did I make?

    Wasn't you, it was Smrtnik's 'this will end in tears'.

    Presumably 'Sax was referencing the Trail of Tears.

    Thank you for explaining.
    The coverage seems to indicate that this is pretty much the way that people attempt to travel to the border, going in a larger group in order to avoid violence. They mention that trains used to be a more common method but security got stepped up recently. It seems like 1200 is both kind of a lot of folks for this particular crossing and method, and also not nearly unique enough to warrant fear of a "flash flood".
    Marching in a large group is expected to blunt the efforts of criminal gangs and cartels known to isolate and later rob immigrants, many of whom bring large sums of money to make the long journey north through Mexico. The caravan organizers, Pueblos Sin Fronteras, or People Without Borders, appeared to have concluded that it is safer for these people to travel together.
    ...
    Members of the caravan said they would attempt to ride the trains, but in 2014, more guards and trains moving faster through stations made it more difficult for migrants to catch rides.

    Mostly it sounds like a predictable continuation of the ongoing humanitarian crisis that is causing people to flee Honduras. If the US were something better than it is, this might be an opportunity to offer refuge.

    I haven’t seen coverage indicating this is normal. Everything I’ve read so far is that migrants travel in small groups but not in such a large organized fashion with an established hierarchy.

  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    shryke wrote: »
    hawkbox wrote: »
    LoisLane wrote: »
    hawkbox wrote: »
    The number in this is rather low so people freaking out about that are being silly, the long term implication is what people should be freaking out about.

    I thought we were freaking about both?
    tbloxham wrote: »
    LoisLane wrote: »
    moniker wrote: »
    Smrtnik wrote: »
    Yeah but they are usually traveling 1-2 or truckload at a time, not "small town" at a time.
    The San Ysidro Port of Entry is the largest land border crossing between San Diego and Tijuana, and one of the busiest land border crossings in the world with 70,000 northbound vehicles and 20,000 northbound pedestrians crossing each day, in addition to southbound traffic

    Are they all going at once in a single massive push? This is like comparing a flash flood to the usual rise of a river during a rainstorm. New York transports millions through its subway system but I bet you if suddenly a 1200 people bum rushed one station they would have problems.

    Edit:
    WAPO now reporting on it:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/04/01/why-a-u-s-bound-caravan-of-central-american-migrants-is-getting-trumps-attention/?utm_term=.caf327a6aa21

    Mother Jones too: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/04/trump-and-trolls-target-caravan-of-migrant-families/
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Phrasing
    What innuendo did I make?

    Most reports I read have stated that the caravan is to get them safely across Southern Mexico and central america. Once they approach the border they plan to disperse and cross in small groups, which is perfectly normal behavior.

    The only difference here is that the caravan is more organized for the crossing of central America step, to try and combat the drug dealers and kidnappers there.

    There's no chance they just all march at the border together. That's an easy response for Trump. Just have 100 agents in place, warn them clearly not to enter and then arrest them all immediately.

    100 agents are supposed to arrest more than 1000 people how?

    1200 people crossing the border into the US is a rounding error. What it means for human migration is what people should be paying attention too, and stabilizing the regions they're fleeing from would be the smart solution, but you guys elected a cheeto for president.

    That doesn't answer the question though and the US already has issues with what to do with all the people DHS detains for immigration violations.

    If they actually all just decided to cross the border at once that would be a huge clusterfuck since you would need to arrest them all at the same time.

    Most of these refugees have been voluntarily surrendering at the border.

  • tbloxhamtbloxham Registered User regular
    The coverage seems to indicate that this is pretty much the way that people attempt to travel to the border, going in a larger group in order to avoid violence. They mention that trains used to be a more common method but security got stepped up recently. It seems like 1200 is both kind of a lot of folks for this particular crossing and method, and also not nearly unique enough to warrant fear of a "flash flood".
    Marching in a large group is expected to blunt the efforts of criminal gangs and cartels known to isolate and later rob immigrants, many of whom bring large sums of money to make the long journey north through Mexico. The caravan organizers, Pueblos Sin Fronteras, or People Without Borders, appeared to have concluded that it is safer for these people to travel together.
    ...
    Members of the caravan said they would attempt to ride the trains, but in 2014, more guards and trains moving faster through stations made it more difficult for migrants to catch rides.

    Mostly it sounds like a predictable continuation of the ongoing humanitarian crisis that is causing people to flee Honduras. If the US were something better than it is, this might be an opportunity to offer refuge.

    Eh, I'd say the correct response would be to offer massive humanitarian aid, investment in schooling, a complete end to the drug war, and a huge commitment to combating climate change. "Just let em come in" is a stopgap solution which doesn't go far enough (as we see from the issues in Europe). The people coming in are for the most part overwhelmingly grateful, and contribute to their new communities, but they understandably tell people back home to come, and the people back home tell them how even more awful things are now. This just makes the crisis worse, as the refugees become the most capable and qualified from the home nation leaving it less and less capable of rebuilding.

    America can tolerate a huge number of new residents, we have a lot of space. But we need to actually work to help people not need to come here. And step one of that is removing drugs from the equation and removing the power from the drug cartels.

    "That is cool" - Abraham Lincoln
  • tbloxhamtbloxham Registered User regular
    LoisLane wrote: »
    hawkbox wrote: »
    The number in this is rather low so people freaking out about that are being silly, the long term implication is what people should be freaking out about.

    I thought we were freaking about both?
    tbloxham wrote: »
    LoisLane wrote: »
    moniker wrote: »
    Smrtnik wrote: »
    Yeah but they are usually traveling 1-2 or truckload at a time, not "small town" at a time.
    The San Ysidro Port of Entry is the largest land border crossing between San Diego and Tijuana, and one of the busiest land border crossings in the world with 70,000 northbound vehicles and 20,000 northbound pedestrians crossing each day, in addition to southbound traffic

    Are they all going at once in a single massive push? This is like comparing a flash flood to the usual rise of a river during a rainstorm. New York transports millions through its subway system but I bet you if suddenly a 1200 people bum rushed one station they would have problems.

    Edit:
    WAPO now reporting on it:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/04/01/why-a-u-s-bound-caravan-of-central-american-migrants-is-getting-trumps-attention/?utm_term=.caf327a6aa21

    Mother Jones too: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/04/trump-and-trolls-target-caravan-of-migrant-families/
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Phrasing
    What innuendo did I make?

    Most reports I read have stated that the caravan is to get them safely across Southern Mexico and central america. Once they approach the border they plan to disperse and cross in small groups, which is perfectly normal behavior.

    The only difference here is that the caravan is more organized for the crossing of central America step, to try and combat the drug dealers and kidnappers there.

    There's no chance they just all march at the border together. That's an easy response for Trump. Just have 100 agents in place, warn them clearly not to enter and then arrest them all immediately.

    100 agents are supposed to arrest more than 1000 people how?

    Easily? They do all the time in ratios like that. The people will be hungry and thirsty when they reach the border, and know that the US government isn't going to just torture them to death.

    "That is cool" - Abraham Lincoln
  • durandal4532durandal4532 Registered User regular
    tbloxham wrote: »
    The coverage seems to indicate that this is pretty much the way that people attempt to travel to the border, going in a larger group in order to avoid violence. They mention that trains used to be a more common method but security got stepped up recently. It seems like 1200 is both kind of a lot of folks for this particular crossing and method, and also not nearly unique enough to warrant fear of a "flash flood".
    Marching in a large group is expected to blunt the efforts of criminal gangs and cartels known to isolate and later rob immigrants, many of whom bring large sums of money to make the long journey north through Mexico. The caravan organizers, Pueblos Sin Fronteras, or People Without Borders, appeared to have concluded that it is safer for these people to travel together.
    ...
    Members of the caravan said they would attempt to ride the trains, but in 2014, more guards and trains moving faster through stations made it more difficult for migrants to catch rides.

    Mostly it sounds like a predictable continuation of the ongoing humanitarian crisis that is causing people to flee Honduras. If the US were something better than it is, this might be an opportunity to offer refuge.

    Eh, I'd say the correct response would be to offer massive humanitarian aid, investment in schooling, a complete end to the drug war, and a huge commitment to combating climate change. "Just let em come in" is a stopgap solution which doesn't go far enough (as we see from the issues in Europe). The people coming in are for the most part overwhelmingly grateful, and contribute to their new communities, but they understandably tell people back home to come, and the people back home tell them how even more awful things are now. This just makes the crisis worse, as the refugees become the most capable and qualified from the home nation leaving it less and less capable of rebuilding.

    America can tolerate a huge number of new residents, we have a lot of space. But we need to actually work to help people not need to come here. And step one of that is removing drugs from the equation and removing the power from the drug cartels.

    There are a lot of correct responses. I do not expect any of them from the US. Particularly not from the current government.

    I expect that part of the reason trump has seized on this particular group of refugees is that people can be convinced that their arriving in a relatively larger number at the same time makes them dangerous and therefore acceptable to abuse.

    We're all in this together
  • NyysjanNyysjan FinlandRegistered User regular
    tbloxham wrote: »
    LoisLane wrote: »
    hawkbox wrote: »
    The number in this is rather low so people freaking out about that are being silly, the long term implication is what people should be freaking out about.

    I thought we were freaking about both?
    tbloxham wrote: »
    LoisLane wrote: »
    moniker wrote: »
    Smrtnik wrote: »
    Yeah but they are usually traveling 1-2 or truckload at a time, not "small town" at a time.
    The San Ysidro Port of Entry is the largest land border crossing between San Diego and Tijuana, and one of the busiest land border crossings in the world with 70,000 northbound vehicles and 20,000 northbound pedestrians crossing each day, in addition to southbound traffic

    Are they all going at once in a single massive push? This is like comparing a flash flood to the usual rise of a river during a rainstorm. New York transports millions through its subway system but I bet you if suddenly a 1200 people bum rushed one station they would have problems.

    Edit:
    WAPO now reporting on it:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/04/01/why-a-u-s-bound-caravan-of-central-american-migrants-is-getting-trumps-attention/?utm_term=.caf327a6aa21

    Mother Jones too: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/04/trump-and-trolls-target-caravan-of-migrant-families/
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Phrasing
    What innuendo did I make?

    Most reports I read have stated that the caravan is to get them safely across Southern Mexico and central america. Once they approach the border they plan to disperse and cross in small groups, which is perfectly normal behavior.

    The only difference here is that the caravan is more organized for the crossing of central America step, to try and combat the drug dealers and kidnappers there.

    There's no chance they just all march at the border together. That's an easy response for Trump. Just have 100 agents in place, warn them clearly not to enter and then arrest them all immediately.

    100 agents are supposed to arrest more than 1000 people how?

    Easily? They do all the time in ratios like that. The people will be hungry and thirsty when they reach the border, and know that the US government isn't going to just torture them to death.

    eh...
    Well, probably, at least.

  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    LoisLane wrote: »
    moniker wrote: »
    Smrtnik wrote: »
    Yeah but they are usually traveling 1-2 or truckload at a time, not "small town" at a time.
    The San Ysidro Port of Entry is the largest land border crossing between San Diego and Tijuana, and one of the busiest land border crossings in the world with 70,000 northbound vehicles and 20,000 northbound pedestrians crossing each day, in addition to southbound traffic

    Are they all going at once in a single massive push? This is like comparing a flash flood to the usual rise of a river during a rainstorm. New York transports millions through its subway system but I bet you if suddenly a 1200 people bum rushed one station they would have problems.

    Maybe, for ~half an hour or so. Don't really want to track down MTA stats, but for he CTA red line subway, State/Lake: December 2014, Lake had an average of 20,482 weekday passenger entries. So a ~6% increase over a typical Tuesday. It is also directly under the Chicago Theater and so gets habitual crushes of people when concerts get out. A standard empty 5000 series 8 car train holds roughly 1k people when uncomfortably full, so it usually just takes a handful of regular ones to clear it. (Which is why I board at Monroe)


    I guess I just really don't see 1,200 people as some impossible eye popping number and do not understanding why other people are acting as though it is.

  • furbatfurbat Registered User regular
    edited April 2018
    hawkbox wrote: »
    1200 people crossing the border into the US is a rounding error. What it means for human migration is what people should be paying attention too, and stabilizing the regions they're fleeing from would be the smart solution, but you guys elected a cheeto for president.

    I don't think anyone in either party or on either side of the border is actually talking about us stabilizing the regions they're fleeing from. They don't want US involvement. The people here don't want to get involved. So, here we are....

    Hell, the word desertification has been used in this thread more times than the word cartel. We are not a serious people.

    furbat on
Sign In or Register to comment.