The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
Please vote in the Forum Structure Poll. Polling will close at 2PM EST on January 21, 2025.
[Extra Credits] As channels grow older, their voices will change...
I searched the forum and found them mentioned a few times in other threads, but I didn't find a dedicated thread about the channel. So, what are your thoughts on the group and what they do? For me, I have disagreed with some of their opinions, but generally speaking, they've brought up interesting topics or at least points of view that I wouldn't have thought about otherwise.
KoopahTroopahThe koopas, the troopas.Philadelphia, PARegistered Userregular
I actually just unsubbed them because I stopped watching their videos. I think they make great content, I just got tired of watching it. Highly recommend their 'Games You Might Not Have Tried' Series though. I try to watch those still as most of their recommendations usually lead to games I love.
Their content is palatable mush for the most part but their continued defense of lootboxes was enough I don't find them worth watching anymore.
In my case, it was not so much their defense but how bad their arguments were, and their reaction to criticisms of said argument.
Which was basically, "no, you don't know what you want, and we can't help how people take what we say."
In other words, completely ignoring the actual substance of the criticism.
I find them quite enjoyable. They just have this streak of arrogance that they can't back up with knowledge that overtakes them sometimes. They're fun and valuable when they stay at the right depth and don't let their opinions outrun their facts.
0
HenroidMexican kicked from Immigration ThreadCentrism is Racism :3Registered Userregular
Extra Credits is pretty rad. It's kind of an extension of work that James does, which is like consultation-design-theory stuff.
Extra History is undeniably the best fucking thing ever and I adore it and everyone should watch it. I only became aware of it when they ran their anniversary episodes for D-Day last year, so there was a ton of watching back of content. Now it's a goddamn torture to wait week to week for the newest episode, although the past month or two they've been doing two episodes a week it seems. The best part is that they follow series up with their "Lies" episodes, which is fact checking themselves but also fact checking the audience does for them and acknowledging it. Some people say they shouldn't knowingly do things like use modern flags vs previous era flags, but the explanation is that it makes it easier to associate / pick up what's being laid down. And I agree with that explanation. "This place here? Long ago, this happened." The flag designs are extra information not quite vital to the nature of what's being taught (with as much brevity as possible).
I wanted to watch Extra Science more but my roomie stopped me from diving deep on my own. And then we've never gotten around to it. HARUMPH.
Their content is palatable mush for the most part but their continued defense of lootboxes was enough I don't find them worth watching anymore.
I mean, they weren't defending loot boxes - rather they were framing the corporate think behind loot boxes since said corporations weren't doing it. But there's an actual thread for that isn't there?
0
KadokenGiving Ends to my Friends and it Feels StupendousRegistered Userregular
I used to watch their stuff the moment it came out (same with Neebs Gaming)...but lately, I think I'm kind of burning out on youtube. I mean...I've got 30+ years of Doctor Who seasons to watch, and I'm only on season 2 from 1964! I still fire up the Extra History playlist every now and then because that series is simply amazing...but the actual Extra Credits videos have kind of fallen by the wayside.
Also, for the past few months, I had been watching their Twitch stream...but then they fired Will Overgard and I found out that it was mostly his commentary I was watching the streams for (and while I like Dan Jones fine enough, I'm not overly fond of his interactions with the chat...James, though...he tends to get too focused on the games being played (which is fine) and ignores chat interactions (which is also fine...but it does take something away from the Twitch experience that I like: community interaction)).
| Origin/R*SC: Ein7919 | Battle.net: Erlkonig#1448 | XBL: Lexicanum | Steam: Der Erlkönig (the umlaut is important) |
They did a month on loot box defense and then missed multiple weeks of the game series while mostly hitting targets on the History. I think since the Patreon money is for History, they have stopped treating their main/original series as important to them as it probably should be. I find the videos generally interesting considering their length, but they're often insubstantial.
And those loot box videos were god awful. Jim's counter videos clowned them.
+2
HerrCronIt that wickedly supports taxationRegistered Userregular
Extra credits are pretty great, especially given how many people have decided that they're dead to them forever for saying things they didn't want to hear.
Now Playing:
Celeste [Switch] - She'll be wrestling with inner demons when she comes...
Super Mario Wonder - Wowie Zowie!
They're ok, as long as you remember their possible biases as game industry insiders.
Their loot box videos were pretty horrible, but otherwise they tend to do reasonably entertaining stuff.
Extra sci fi is especially good.
Their content is palatable mush for the most part but their continued defense of lootboxes was enough I don't find them worth watching anymore.
Huh? I get not liking their gaming content but what wrong with their sci-fi and historical series?
Speaking for myself, they spent one month attacking a strawman and pretending that Skinner boxes are new and have not been studied extensively.
Essentially, if they are that dishonest, they are not informative.
Their content is palatable mush for the most part but their continued defense of lootboxes was enough I don't find them worth watching anymore.
Huh? I get not liking their gaming content but what wrong with their sci-fi and historical series?
Speaking for myself, they spent one month attacking a strawman and pretending that Skinner boxes are new and have not been studied extensively.
Essentially, if they are that dishonest, they are not informative.
Ehhh. . . Some times people can be good at one thing and awful at another. Neil Degrasse Tyson is a brilliant science educator who puts his foot in his mouth almost every time he tries to get etymological. As long as they’re not spreading hate, I treat them as a fun trivia show and a good place to start studying new historical event. Like I had never heard of the South Seas Bubble or the history behind “she sells seashells by the seashore” if not for them.
Their content is palatable mush for the most part but their continued defense of lootboxes was enough I don't find them worth watching anymore.
Huh? I get not liking their gaming content but what wrong with their sci-fi and historical series?
Speaking for myself, they spent one month attacking a strawman and pretending that Skinner boxes are new and have not been studied extensively.
Essentially, if they are that dishonest, they are not informative.
Ehhh. . . Some times people can be good at one thing and awful at another. Neil Degrasse Tyson is a brilliant science educator who puts his foot in his mouth almost every time he tries to get etymological. As long as they’re not spreading hate, I treat them as a fun trivia show and a good place to start studying new historical event. Like I had never heard of the South Seas Bubble or the history behind “she sells seashells by the seashore” if not for them.
Let me put it another way: they spent one month using shitty arguments to defend exploiting addicts, because the industry makes more money exploiting addicts than making games.
And while they were doing that, they kept insisting that people were objecting to the industry making money, not to the industry exploiting addicts.
If that's their relationship with truth, then the information content of their videos is zero. Might as well not watch them.
Their content is palatable mush for the most part but their continued defense of lootboxes was enough I don't find them worth watching anymore.
Huh? I get not liking their gaming content but what wrong with their sci-fi and historical series?
"Palatable mush" is not a sharp criticism. To me, most of the content I have seen is easy to digest but only kind of interesting. Thus "palatable mush."
EC is mostly good for a very middle school video time presentation of things, and they're quite good at that. They're not up to critical analysis. They're mostly artistic folks who like video games. I've never even seen any of them at the local game developer meetups.
Incenjucar on
0
HerrCronIt that wickedly supports taxationRegistered Userregular
Their content is palatable mush for the most part but their continued defense of lootboxes was enough I don't find them worth watching anymore.
Huh? I get not liking their gaming content but what wrong with their sci-fi and historical series?
Speaking for myself, they spent one month attacking a strawman and pretending that Skinner boxes are new and have not been studied extensively.
Essentially, if they are that dishonest, they are not informative.
Ehhh. . . Some times people can be good at one thing and awful at another. Neil Degrasse Tyson is a brilliant science educator who puts his foot in his mouth almost every time he tries to get etymological. As long as they’re not spreading hate, I treat them as a fun trivia show and a good place to start studying new historical event. Like I had never heard of the South Seas Bubble or the history behind “she sells seashells by the seashore” if not for them.
Let me put it another way: they spent one month using shitty arguments to defend exploiting addicts, because the industry makes more money exploiting addicts than making games.
And while they were doing that, they kept insisting that people were objecting to the industry making money, not to the industry exploiting addicts.
If that's their relationship with truth, then the information content of their videos is zero. Might as well not watch them.
Even if I agreed with you assessment of those videos, using that to extrapolate out that everything they have said, and will ever say, on any given topic has no value is sheer nonsense.
Now Playing:
Celeste [Switch] - She'll be wrestling with inner demons when she comes...
Super Mario Wonder - Wowie Zowie!
+7
HenroidMexican kicked from Immigration ThreadCentrism is Racism :3Registered Userregular
EC is mostly good for a very middle school video time presentation of things, and they're quite good at that. They're not up to critical analysis. They're mostly artistic folks who like video games. I've never even seen any of them at the local game developer meetups.
James apparently has a job of giving consultation speeches or something to that effect. I dunno where or who he has done this with, as far as developers and publishers go.
Still, breaking things down to be as understandable as possible for the layman / "casual" gamer has value. "Gamers" kinda get up their own ass collectively about understanding / knowing things about the industry and often use that shit to reinforce gatekeeper mentality.
Their content is palatable mush for the most part but their continued defense of lootboxes was enough I don't find them worth watching anymore.
Huh? I get not liking their gaming content but what wrong with their sci-fi and historical series?
Speaking for myself, they spent one month attacking a strawman and pretending that Skinner boxes are new and have not been studied extensively.
Essentially, if they are that dishonest, they are not informative.
Ehhh. . . Some times people can be good at one thing and awful at another. Neil Degrasse Tyson is a brilliant science educator who puts his foot in his mouth almost every time he tries to get etymological. As long as they’re not spreading hate, I treat them as a fun trivia show and a good place to start studying new historical event. Like I had never heard of the South Seas Bubble or the history behind “she sells seashells by the seashore” if not for them.
Let me put it another way: they spent one month using shitty arguments to defend exploiting addicts, because the industry makes more money exploiting addicts than making games.
And while they were doing that, they kept insisting that people were objecting to the industry making money, not to the industry exploiting addicts.
If that's their relationship with truth, then the information content of their videos is zero. Might as well not watch them.
Even if I agreed with you assessment of those videos, using that to extrapolate out that everything they have said, and will ever say, on any given topic has no value is sheer nonsense.
Liars are not trustworthy. I fail to see how that's nonsense. I guess it needs more study.
I feel like there are at least sixty threads on this forum for people to work out the disproportionate level of hatred they have for lootboxes, I don't see a pressing reason why this should be another one.
+7
HenroidMexican kicked from Immigration ThreadCentrism is Racism :3Registered Userregular
Hot damn, today's episode was really serious and not video game related.
If you ever want to get grade school kids into various eras of history, extra history is fantastic. It is fun to see them connect some of the threads of history, Otto von Bismarck to the sinking of the Bismarck.
"This ship was named after that guy. Did they have a plan?"
Funny, I just got done watching that video, then I came here and saw you posted it.
There does seem to be a consensus that the anti-homeless measures are bad, but I did notice a comment that said the anti-skateboard measures can be justified since skateboarding in public places is potentially harmful to others who use the space for its intended purpose.
0
HenroidMexican kicked from Immigration ThreadCentrism is Racism :3Registered Userregular
People have been hating on skateboarding for years. There was a video game documenting this, called Skate or Die.
Given that grinding on masonry is generally not required for using a skateboard for transportation... it's mostly just preventing damage and loitering.
I'm kind of surprised they didn't at least include a comment on how games use hostile design to shape user behavior.
Given that grinding on masonry is generally not required for using a skateboard for transportation... it's mostly just preventing damage and loitering.
I'm kind of surprised they didn't at least include a comment on how games use hostile design to shape user behavior.
Honestly, tying it back to something as trivial as games would have just diluted things.
Now Playing:
Celeste [Switch] - She'll be wrestling with inner demons when she comes...
Super Mario Wonder - Wowie Zowie!
EC's Loot Box videos didn't seem like they were defending them to me. Rather, it seemed more like they were resigned to their inevitability. I.E. The "Jaded Insider" view.
I also want to say that they were going to have one more video about loot boxes, but RL issues canned it, and instead they ended up talking about what was going to be in that video on their twitch page.
In any case, I can (almost) forgive them for anything they say in their main series if they still keep making awesome Extra History and Extra Sci-fi episodes.
Given that grinding on masonry is generally not required for using a skateboard for transportation... it's mostly just preventing damage and loitering.
I'm kind of surprised they didn't at least include a comment on how games use hostile design to shape user behavior.
Honestly, tying it back to something as trivial as games would have just diluted things.
Maybe. It's still worth addressing, even if the videos are not connected. Hostile design is pretty common in games that want to stop the player from making progress or
I certainly don't mind them taking advantage of their audience to spread good info. This was one of their better tangents. Others have been... less graceful.
0
HenroidMexican kicked from Immigration ThreadCentrism is Racism :3Registered Userregular
I'd rather content creators (oh god I hate that phrase) show an occasional moment of humanity. In this case, the EC crew saying "hey harming the poor instead of solving the problem of homelessness is bullshit" is preferable to "SO VIDEO GAMES."
HenroidMexican kicked from Immigration ThreadCentrism is Racism :3Registered Userregular
I'm actually really happy with the source on the Mali Empire (it being the one eye-witness account ever written), because said source was at least acknowledging the biases that existed with his view while also recognizing things that were going on. With recording history it is too easy to just slander the shit out of whatever you don't like even just a little. I'm impressed. Though I wonder how much of that was EC being generous with how they read things.
EC's Loot Box videos didn't seem like they were defending them to me. Rather, it seemed more like they were resigned to their inevitability. I.E. The "Jaded Insider" view.
I also want to say that they were going to have one more video about loot boxes, but RL issues canned it, and instead they ended up talking about what was going to be in that video on their twitch page.
In any case, I can (almost) forgive them for anything they say in their main series if they still keep making awesome Extra History and Extra Sci-fi episodes.
EC's Loot Box videos didn't seem like they were defending them to me. Rather, it seemed more like they were resigned to their inevitability. I.E. The "Jaded Insider" view.
I also want to say that they were going to have one more video about loot boxes, but RL issues canned it, and instead they ended up talking about what was going to be in that video on their twitch page.
In any case, I can (almost) forgive them for anything they say in their main series if they still keep making awesome Extra History and Extra Sci-fi episodes.
Posts
Twitch: KoopahTroopah - Steam: Koopah
3DS: 0473-8507-2652
Switch: SW-5185-4991-5118
PSN: AbEntropy
Which was basically, "no, you don't know what you want, and we can't help how people take what we say."
In other words, completely ignoring the actual substance of the criticism.
Extra History is undeniably the best fucking thing ever and I adore it and everyone should watch it. I only became aware of it when they ran their anniversary episodes for D-Day last year, so there was a ton of watching back of content. Now it's a goddamn torture to wait week to week for the newest episode, although the past month or two they've been doing two episodes a week it seems. The best part is that they follow series up with their "Lies" episodes, which is fact checking themselves but also fact checking the audience does for them and acknowledging it. Some people say they shouldn't knowingly do things like use modern flags vs previous era flags, but the explanation is that it makes it easier to associate / pick up what's being laid down. And I agree with that explanation. "This place here? Long ago, this happened." The flag designs are extra information not quite vital to the nature of what's being taught (with as much brevity as possible).
I wanted to watch Extra Science more but my roomie stopped me from diving deep on my own. And then we've never gotten around to it. HARUMPH. I mean, they weren't defending loot boxes - rather they were framing the corporate think behind loot boxes since said corporations weren't doing it. But there's an actual thread for that isn't there?
Also, for the past few months, I had been watching their Twitch stream...but then they fired Will Overgard and I found out that it was mostly his commentary I was watching the streams for (and while I like Dan Jones fine enough, I'm not overly fond of his interactions with the chat...James, though...he tends to get too focused on the games being played (which is fine) and ignores chat interactions (which is also fine...but it does take something away from the Twitch experience that I like: community interaction)).
Huh? I get not liking their gaming content but what wrong with their sci-fi and historical series?
And those loot box videos were god awful. Jim's counter videos clowned them.
Celeste [Switch] - She'll be wrestling with inner demons when she comes...
Super Mario Wonder - Wowie Zowie!
Their loot box videos were pretty horrible, but otherwise they tend to do reasonably entertaining stuff.
Extra sci fi is especially good.
Essentially, if they are that dishonest, they are not informative.
Ehhh. . . Some times people can be good at one thing and awful at another. Neil Degrasse Tyson is a brilliant science educator who puts his foot in his mouth almost every time he tries to get etymological. As long as they’re not spreading hate, I treat them as a fun trivia show and a good place to start studying new historical event. Like I had never heard of the South Seas Bubble or the history behind “she sells seashells by the seashore” if not for them.
Let me put it another way: they spent one month using shitty arguments to defend exploiting addicts, because the industry makes more money exploiting addicts than making games.
And while they were doing that, they kept insisting that people were objecting to the industry making money, not to the industry exploiting addicts.
If that's their relationship with truth, then the information content of their videos is zero. Might as well not watch them.
"Palatable mush" is not a sharp criticism. To me, most of the content I have seen is easy to digest but only kind of interesting. Thus "palatable mush."
Even if I agreed with you assessment of those videos, using that to extrapolate out that everything they have said, and will ever say, on any given topic has no value is sheer nonsense.
Celeste [Switch] - She'll be wrestling with inner demons when she comes...
Super Mario Wonder - Wowie Zowie!
Still, breaking things down to be as understandable as possible for the layman / "casual" gamer has value. "Gamers" kinda get up their own ass collectively about understanding / knowing things about the industry and often use that shit to reinforce gatekeeper mentality.
Liars are not trustworthy. I fail to see how that's nonsense. I guess it needs more study.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWZLB8CyPbM
"This ship was named after that guy. Did they have a plan?"
(Bismarck always has a plan)
Funny, I just got done watching that video, then I came here and saw you posted it.
There does seem to be a consensus that the anti-homeless measures are bad, but I did notice a comment that said the anti-skateboard measures can be justified since skateboarding in public places is potentially harmful to others who use the space for its intended purpose.
I'm kind of surprised they didn't at least include a comment on how games use hostile design to shape user behavior.
Honestly, tying it back to something as trivial as games would have just diluted things.
Celeste [Switch] - She'll be wrestling with inner demons when she comes...
Super Mario Wonder - Wowie Zowie!
I also want to say that they were going to have one more video about loot boxes, but RL issues canned it, and instead they ended up talking about what was going to be in that video on their twitch page.
In any case, I can (almost) forgive them for anything they say in their main series if they still keep making awesome Extra History and Extra Sci-fi episodes.
Maybe. It's still worth addressing, even if the videos are not connected. Hostile design is pretty common in games that want to stop the player from making progress or
I certainly don't mind them taking advantage of their audience to spread good info. This was one of their better tangents. Others have been... less graceful.
Edit: Link- https://youtube.com/watch?v=YPytwp5ll9g
Still this is a cool series.
Which is ridiculous, because in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fwdc3OSaU
They end it by literally saying Fight the Power, even if it seems impossible.
Lip service to a popular ideal is pretty easy to give, and is basically a reflex.
Which makes that book thing quite impressive in contrast.