Edit: I am becoming more and more convinced that Marvel is actually just stealing actual superheroes from alternate universes and passing them off as actors in ours.
Quite a few martial arts action stars have backgrounds in dance, gymnastics, and acrobatics. Michelle Yeoh was a ballet dancer. Jackie Chan and Sammo Hung were enrolled in the same Peking Opera School. Zhang Ziyi studied at the Beijing Dance Academy.
+1
That_GuyI don't wanna be that guyRegistered Userregular
Quite a few martial arts action stars have backgrounds in dance, gymnastics, and acrobatics. Michelle Yeoh was a ballet dancer. Jackie Chan and Sammo Hung were enrolled in the same Peking Opera School. Zhang Ziyi studied at the Beijing Dance Academy.
I saw an interview with Jackie Chan a while back where he was talking about how similar fight and dance choreography were.
Quite a few martial arts action stars have backgrounds in dance, gymnastics, and acrobatics. Michelle Yeoh was a ballet dancer. Jackie Chan and Sammo Hung were enrolled in the same Peking Opera School. Zhang Ziyi studied at the Beijing Dance Academy.
I saw an interview with Jackie Chan a while back where he was talking about how similar fight and dance choreography were.
Especially with the style that Jackie, Sammo, and the third Musketeer Yuen Biao all employ. There's a cadence to their fights that's as tight as the best rhythm sections in bands. You don't always notice it's there, until it's not, and then it's lack sticks out like a sore thumb.
No matter where you go...there you are. ~ Buckaroo Banzai
Quite a few martial arts action stars have backgrounds in dance, gymnastics, and acrobatics. Michelle Yeoh was a ballet dancer. Jackie Chan and Sammo Hung were enrolled in the same Peking Opera School. Zhang Ziyi studied at the Beijing Dance Academy.
I saw an interview with Jackie Chan a while back where he was talking about how similar fight and dance choreography were.
Especially with the style that Jackie, Sammo, and the third Musketeer Yuen Biao all employ. There's a cadence to their fights that's as tight as the best rhythm sections in bands. You don't always notice it's there, until it's not, and then it's lack sticks out like a sore thumb.
FEIGE: Definitely not called that. When we announce the title I am not sure, but as I’ve probably said to you, it’s gotten completely blown out of proportion. It will just be a name and the reason to hold it back was to keep the attention on Infinity War. That backfired a little bit because now everyone thinks what’s the name of the next one gonna be? But it was really just to keep the focus [on Infinity War]. We did not want to call it Part One and Part Two. Although it will be quite evident that the films obviously connect, as all our films do, but this in particular connects very directly. And then we changed the Part One and Part Two, we said let’s just keep this Infinity War and we’ll talk about the next movie later. We had done things in the past that had taken attention off of whatever the film at hand is because we talked about this. For instance, Infinity War announcing before Ultron came out, and it worked out, it was fine, but it felt like let’s keep the attention on the film at hand.
I kind of wish they'd just gone with Infinity War Part One and Part Two.
+15
ShadowenSnores in the morningLoserdomRegistered Userregular
That would have given the game away to people who saw the movie without getting into the nitty-gritty--for lack of a better term, the "casual" MCU fans (which is to say most of them, as the number of people going to see comic-book movies is vastly more than the number of people still buying comic books). "Part 1 and Part 2? Oh, I guess this one's going to end on a cliffhanger." But a lot of reviews I've seen from fans, they were convinced the big final battle was going to end with Thanos defeated. So for it to end the way it did was a genuine shock. And if it had been called part 1, I don't think as many people would have thought that. Hell, even I kind of fell victim to the naming scheme, with Feige and others saying "we renamed it because it's not one story in two parts, it's two stories that are inter-related". I expected some shit at the end of the movie, but I didn't expect what we got.
That would have given the game away to people who saw the movie without getting into the nitty-gritty--for lack of a better term, the "casual" MCU fans (which is to say most of them, as the number of people going to see comic-book movies is vastly more than the number of people still buying comic books). "Part 1 and Part 2? Oh, I guess this one's going to end on a cliffhanger." But a lot of reviews I've seen from fans, they were convinced the big final battle was going to end with Thanos defeated. So for it to end the way it did was a genuine shock. And if it had been called part 1, I don't think as many people would have thought that. Hell, even I kind of fell victim to the naming scheme, with Feige and others saying "we renamed it because it's not one story in two parts, it's two stories that are inter-related". I expected some shit at the end of the movie, but I didn't expect what we got.
When they publicly announced that they weren’t part 1 and 2 anymore I kind of fell into this.
“They’re not gonna do the snap, then. But, I mean, they have to, it’s one of the most important and well known moments in comics, but I guess they can’t. They can’t. Big summer blockbusters don’t do things like that. They won’t. But, I mean, they kind of HAVE to...”
FEIGE: Definitely not called that. When we announce the title I am not sure, but as I’ve probably said to you, it’s gotten completely blown out of proportion. It will just be a name and the reason to hold it back was to keep the attention on Infinity War. That backfired a little bit because now everyone thinks what’s the name of the next one gonna be? But it was really just to keep the focus [on Infinity War]. We did not want to call it Part One and Part Two. Although it will be quite evident that the films obviously connect, as all our films do, but this in particular connects very directly. And then we changed the Part One and Part Two, we said let’s just keep this Infinity War and we’ll talk about the next movie later. We had done things in the past that had taken attention off of whatever the film at hand is because we talked about this. For instance, Infinity War announcing before Ultron came out, and it worked out, it was fine, but it felt like let’s keep the attention on the film at hand.
We'll assume it's not just PR speak like everything is and go with: Then they fucked up by changing it from part 2. No one cared until they said it wasn't named that!
+3
ShadowenSnores in the morningLoserdomRegistered Userregular
If one of the fan-theories/rumors about the plot, that being we're going to see alternate-universe/timeline versions of the Avengers, is true, then Infinity makes the most sense, even if it does feel a bit weird after Infinity War.
If one of the fan-theories/rumors about the plot, that being we're going to see alternate-universe/timeline versions of the Avengers, is true, then Infinity makes the most sense, even if it does feel a bit weird after Infinity War.
The smart money is on time travel, future and past. This was set up in The Wasp, and Ant-man - he's there, too.
+1
FencingsaxIt is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understandingGNU Terry PratchettRegistered Userregular
I am honestly curious how much Antman is in this thing.
+5
Inquisitor772 x Penny Arcade Fight Club ChampionA fixed point in space and timeRegistered Userregular
He was explicitly left behind, so it would suck if he wasn't in it all that much given they could've just dusted him along with the others.
If one of the fan-theories/rumors about the plot, that being we're going to see alternate-universe/timeline versions of the Avengers, is true, then Infinity makes the most sense, even if it does feel a bit weird after Infinity War.
The smart money is on time travel, future and past. This was set up in The Wasp, and Ant-man - he's there, too.
Is 100% in Avengers 4, with a major role apparently. There’s been production photos of him on set and some form of quantum time travel is part of the plot since the photos are of him during the battle of New York from Avengers 1.
Avengers: Title Wars
Battlenet ID: MildC#11186 - If I'm in the game, send me an invite at anytime and I'll play.
Posts
"Because Thanos is poor."
Perfect.
Edit: I am becoming more and more convinced that Marvel is actually just stealing actual superheroes from alternate universes and passing them off as actors in ours.
Battlenet ID: MildC#11186 - If I'm in the game, send me an invite at anytime and I'll play.
I saw an interview with Jackie Chan a while back where he was talking about how similar fight and dance choreography were.
Especially with the style that Jackie, Sammo, and the third Musketeer Yuen Biao all employ. There's a cadence to their fights that's as tight as the best rhythm sections in bands. You don't always notice it's there, until it's not, and then it's lack sticks out like a sore thumb.
~ Buckaroo Banzai
Obligatory.
I wonder if they'll wait for the first trailer to announce it?
PSN / Xbox / NNID: Fodder185
It'll be Infinity War 2 when someone realizes they have 2 days to go.
Nah they probably don't care.
FEIGE: Definitely not called that. When we announce the title I am not sure, but as I’ve probably said to you, it’s gotten completely blown out of proportion. It will just be a name and the reason to hold it back was to keep the attention on Infinity War. That backfired a little bit because now everyone thinks what’s the name of the next one gonna be? But it was really just to keep the focus [on Infinity War]. We did not want to call it Part One and Part Two. Although it will be quite evident that the films obviously connect, as all our films do, but this in particular connects very directly. And then we changed the Part One and Part Two, we said let’s just keep this Infinity War and we’ll talk about the next movie later. We had done things in the past that had taken attention off of whatever the film at hand is because we talked about this. For instance, Infinity War announcing before Ultron came out, and it worked out, it was fine, but it felt like let’s keep the attention on the film at hand.
When they publicly announced that they weren’t part 1 and 2 anymore I kind of fell into this.
“They’re not gonna do the snap, then. But, I mean, they have to, it’s one of the most important and well known moments in comics, but I guess they can’t. They can’t. Big summer blockbusters don’t do things like that. They won’t. But, I mean, they kind of HAVE to...”
twitch.tv/Taramoor
@TaramoorPlays
Taramoor on Youtube
It's not.
I'm just going to guess its going to be either Infinity or Secret War based on Marvel comic titles that could be used for a film title at this time.
We'll assume it's not just PR speak like everything is and go with: Then they fucked up by changing it from part 2. No one cared until they said it wasn't named that!
PSN / Xbox / NNID: Fodder185
The smart money is on time travel, future and past. This was set up in The Wasp, and Ant-man - he's there, too.
Infinities of future past.
He's there 100% of the time, he's just small so you can't see him.
where instead of being great mystery-adventures revolving around macguffins, it's a shit time travel story that opens roughly one plot hole per page
and the gengars who are guiding me" -- W.S. Merwin
Steam / Origin & Wii U: Heatwave111 / FC: 4227-1965-3206 / Battle.net: Heatwave#11356
He literally hasn't been in an Avengers movie.
Avengers: Title Wars
Battlenet ID: MildC#11186 - If I'm in the game, send me an invite at anytime and I'll play.